What Is New in Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Surgery, TAVR, or Medical Therapy?

True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AIMS

The ESC/EACTS guidelines propose criteria that determine the likelihood of true-severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to investigate the impact of the guideline-based criteria of the likelihood of true-severe AS in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective TAVR registry, LFLG-AS patients with pEF were retrospectively categorized into high (criteria ≥6) and intermediate (criteria <6) likelihood of true-severe AS. Haemodynamic, functional, and clinical outcomes were compared with high-gradient AS patients with pEF. Among 632 eligible patients, 202 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for LFLG-AS. Significant haemodynamic improvement after TAVR was observed in LFLG-AS patients, irrespective of the likelihood. Although >70% of LFLG-AS patients had functional improvement, impaired functional status [New York Heart Association (NYHA III/IV)] persisted more frequently at 1 year in LFLG-AS than in high-gradient AS patients (7.8%), irrespective of the likelihood (high: 17.4%, P = 0.006; intermediate: 21.1%, P < 0.001). All-cause death at 1 year occurred in 6.6% of high-gradient AS patients, 10.9% of LFLG-AS patients with high likelihood [hazard ratio (HR)adj 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-3.02], and in 7.2% of those with intermediate likelihood (HRadj 0.92, 95% CI 0.39-2.18). Among the criteria, only the absence of aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 emerged as an independent predictor of treatment futility, a combined endpoint of all-cause death or NYHA III/IV at 1 year (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.14-6.25).

CONCLUSION

Patients with LFLG-AS with pEF had comparable survival but worse functional status at 1 year than high-gradient AS with pEF, irrespective of the likelihood of true-severe AS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.

In silico approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement inspection

Introduction: Increasing applications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to treat high- or medium-risk patients with aortic diseases have been proposed in recent years. Despite its increasing use, many influential factors are still to be understood. Furthermore, innovative applications of TAVR such as in bicuspid aortic valves or in low-risk patients are emerging in clinical use. Numerical analyses are increasingly used to reproduce clinical treatments. The future trends in this area are foreseen for in silico trials and personalized medicine. Areas covered: This review paper analyzes the recent years (Jan 2018 - Aug 2020) of in silico studies simulating the behavior of transcatheter aortic valves with emphasis on the addressed clinical question and the used modeling strategies. The manuscripts are firstly classified based on their clinical hypothesis. A second classification is based on the adopted modeling approach in terms of patient domain, device modeling, and inclusion or exclusion of the fluid domain. Expert opinion: The TAVR can be virtually performed in numerous vessel geometries and with different devices. This versatility allows a rapid evaluation of the feasibility of different implantation approaches for specific patients, and patient populations, resulting in faster and safer introduction or optimization of new treatments or devices.