3
|
Fröbert O, Götberg M, Erlinge D, Akhtar Z, Christiansen EH, MacIntyre CR, Oldroyd KG, Motovska Z, Erglis A, Moer R, Hlinomaz O, Jakobsen L, Engstrøm T, Jensen LO, Fallesen CO, Jensen SE, Angerås O, Calais F, Kåregren A, Lauermann J, Mokhtari A, Nilsson J, Persson J, Stalby P, Islam AKMM, Rahman A, Malik F, Choudhury S, Collier T, Pocock SJ, Pernow J. Clinical impact of influenza vaccination after ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - insights from the IAMI trial. Am Heart J 2023; 255:82-89. [PMID: 36279930 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination early after myocardial infarction (MI) improves prognosis but vaccine effectiveness may differ dependent on type of MI. METHODS A total of 2,571 participants were prospectively enrolled in the Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial and randomly assigned to receive in-hospital inactivated influenza vaccine or saline placebo. The trial was conducted at 30 centers in eight countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. Here we report vaccine effectiveness in the 2,467 participants with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 1,348) or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI, n = 1,119). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and NSTEMI/STEMI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment effects were evaluated with formal interaction testing to assess for effect modification. RESULTS Baseline risk was higher in participants with NSTEMI. In the NSTEMI group the primary endpoint occurred in 6.5% of participants assigned to influenza vaccine and 10.5% assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), compared to 4.1% assigned to influenza vaccine and 4.5% assigned to placebo in the STEMI group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.54-1.50, P = .237 for interaction). Similar findings were seen for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. The Kaplan-Meier risk difference in all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in participants with NSTEMI (NSTEMI: HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.80, STEMI: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.70, interaction P = .028). CONCLUSIONS The beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on adverse cardiovascular events may be enhanced in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Fröbert
- Örebro University, Faculty of Health, Department of Cardiology, Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.
| | - Matthias Götberg
- Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Scania, Sweden
| | - David Erlinge
- Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Scania, Sweden
| | - Zubair Akhtar
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh; The Kirby Institute, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Chandini R MacIntyre
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keith G Oldroyd
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom and West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Zuzana Motovska
- Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Bohemia, Czech Republic
| | - Andrejs Erglis
- Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Riga, Latvia
| | - Rasmus Moer
- LHL-sykehuset Gardermoen, Oslo, Ostiandet, Norway
| | - Ota Hlinomaz
- nternational clinical research center, St. Anne University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, South Moravian, Czech Republic
| | - Lars Jakobsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Thomas Engstrøm
- Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisette O Jensen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Svend E Jensen
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Kommune, Denmark
| | - Oskar Angerås
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden and Institute of Medicine, Department of molecular and clinical medicine, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Västergötland , Sweden
| | - Fredrik Calais
- Örebro University, Faculty of Health, Department of Cardiology, Örebro, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Amra Kåregren
- Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås, Västerås, Västmanland, Sweden
| | - Jörg Lauermann
- Department of Cardiology, Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring, Linköping University, Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden
| | - Arash Mokhtari
- Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Scania, Sweden
| | - Johan Nilsson
- Cardiology, Heart Centre, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umea, Västerbotten län, Sweden
| | - Jonas Persson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Södermanland and Uppland, Sweden
| | - Per Stalby
- Department of Cardiology, Karlstad Central Hospital, Karlstad, Värmland, Sweden
| | - Abu K M M Islam
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Afzalur Rahman
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Fazila Malik
- National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Sohel Choudhury
- National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Timothy Collier
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart J Pocock
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Pernow
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Successful treatment of cancer can be hampered by the attendant risk of cardiotoxicity, manifesting as cardiomyopathy, left ventricle systolic dysfunction and, in some cases, heart failure. This risk can be mitigated if the injury to the heart is detected before the onset to irreversible cardiac impairment. The gold standard for cardiac imaging in cardio-oncology is echocardiography. Despite improvements in the application of this modality, it is not typically sensitive to sub-clinical or early-stage dysfunction. We identify in this review some emerging tracers for detecting incipient cardiotoxicity by positron emission tomography (PET). RECENT FINDINGS Vectors labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides (e.g., carbon-11, fluorine-18, gallium-68) are now available to study cardiac function, metabolism, and tissue repair in preclinical models. Many of these probes are highly sensitive to early damage, thereby potentially addressing the limitations of current imaging approaches, and show promise in preliminary clinical evaluations. The overlapping pathophysiology between cardiotoxicity and heart failure significantly expands the number of imaging tools available to cardio-oncology. This is highlighted by the emergence of radiolabeled probes targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) for sensitive detection of dysregulated healing process that underpins adverse cardiac remodeling. The growth of PET scanner technology also creates an opportunity for a renaissance in metabolic imaging in cardio-oncology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M. Kelly
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences and Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, Belfer Research Building, Room BB-1604, 413 East 69th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
- Citigroup Biomedical Imaging Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - John W. Babich
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences and Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, Belfer Research Building, Room BB-1604, 413 East 69th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
- Citigroup Biomedical Imaging Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021 USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021 USA
| |
Collapse
|