The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep

TRPV1 is a risk factor for sleep disturbance in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a case control study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a chronic high-morbidity disease with a bidirectional relationship with sleep disturbance (SD) that may occur via the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 receptor (TRPV1) in the oesophageal mucosa. Yet the related mechanism was still unclear, the aim of this study is to investigate whether TRPV1 is associated with the presence of SD in GORD patients.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed. After the screening, A total of 88 subjects were assigned to GORD without sleep disturbance (GORD + NOSD, n = 28), GORD comorbid sleep disturbance (GORD + SD, n = 30) and matched healthy controls (n = 30). Mucosal tissue was obtained from the participants by digestive endoscopy, the levels of TRPV1 expressed in the oesophageal mucosa were detected via RT-qPCR and western blot in different groups, and the correlation between GORD and SD were also analysed.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnostic Questionnaire (GerdQ) scores was positively correlated with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores but negatively correlated with total sleep time (TST). We also found that the level of TRPV1 expressed in the oesophageal mucosa of GORD + SD was significantly higher than GORD + NOSD patients, and they were all higher than healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggested a closer link exists between GORD and sleep disturbance, and TRPV1 in oesophageal mucosa may be a crucial factor affecting sleep in GORD patients.

Diagnostic thresholds and optimal collection protocol of salivary pepsin for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is primarily diagnosed based on symptoms and response to a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Gold standard testing requires an invasive endoscopic procedure, often with ambulatory pH monitoring. Salivary pepsin is a potential noninvasive modality for GERD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess diagnostic performance of salivary pepsin thresholds for GERD and determine optimal collection protocol of saliva in an external validation cohort. Over 10 months, adults with symptoms of GERD undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with wireless pH-monitoring off PPI were enrolled. Saliva was self-collected by participants over 4 days across three different time points: fasting ante meridiem (AM), post-prandial, and bedtime (PM). Pepsin levels were calculated via Peptest. Pepsin variability and agreement were determined using linear mixed effects models and intraclass correlation. Validation of diagnostic threshold and performance characteristics were evaluated by receiver-operator curve analysis. Twenty participants enrolled in the study; 50% with physiologic acid exposure (acid exposure time < 4% no GERD) and 50% with elevated acid exposure (GERD). Mean pepsin concentrations were significantly lower in the AM (22.6 ± 25.2 ng/mL) compared to post-prandial (44.5 ± 36.7 ng/mL) and PM (55.4 ± 47.0 ng/mL). Agreement between pepsin concentrations across 3 days was substantial for AM samples (kappa 0.61), with lower agreement for post-prandial and PM samples. A single AM pepsin concentration of 25 ng/mL was 67% accurate for GERD with 56% sensitivity and 78% specificity. This validation study highlights fair accuracy and performance characteristics of a single fasting AM salivary pepsin concentration for the diagnosis of GERD.

Factors that Impact Day-to-Day Esophageal Acid Reflux Variability and Its Diagnostic Significance for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease affecting a significant number of adults both globally and in the USA. GERD is clinically diagnosed based on patient-reported symptoms, and the gold standard for diagnosis is ambulatory reflux monitoring, a tool particularly utilized in the common scenario of non-response to therapy or atypical features. Over the past 20 years, there has been a shift toward extending the duration of reflux monitoring, initially from 24 to 48 h and more recently to 96 h, primarily based on a demonstrated increase in diagnostic yield. Further, multiple studies demonstrate clinically relevant variability in day-to-day acid exposure levels in nearly 30% of ambulatory reflux monitoring studies. For these reasons, an ongoing clinical dilemma relates to the optimal activities patients should engage in during prolonged reflux monitoring. Thus, the aims of this review are to detail what is known about variability in daily acid exposure, discuss factors that are known to influence this day-to-day variability (i.e., sleep patterns, dietary/eating habits, stress, exercise, and medications), and finally provide suggestions for patient education and general GERD management to reduce variation in esophageal acid exposure levels.

The Medical Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

The medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to evolve. Our aim was to systematically assess the literature to provide an updated review of the evidence on lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapy for the management of GERD.

BACKGROUND

The cornerstones of GERD medical management consist of lifestyle modifications and pharmacologic agents. Most recently, evidence has emerged linking anti-reflux pharmacologic therapy to adverse events, such as kidney injury, metabolic bone disease, myocardial infarction, and even dementia, among others.

METHODS

A systematic search of the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed for articles on the medical management of GERD between inception and March 1, 2021.

CONCLUSION

Although pharmacological therapy has been associated with potential adverse events, further research is needed to determine if this association exists. For this reason, lifestyle modifications should be considered first-line, while pharmacologic therapy can be considered in patients in whom lifestyle modifications have proven to be ineffective in controlling their symptoms or cannot institute them. Naturally, extra-esophageal causes for GERD-like symptoms must be considered on suspected high-risk patients and excluded before considering treatment for GERD.

Sorting out the Relationship between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Sleep

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common conditions encountered by primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, foregut surgeons and otolaryngologists. While approximately 50% of patients experience nocturnal reflux symptoms, the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep is often overlooked. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current understanding of this relationship and its clinical implications. Recent studies pertaining to the association between GERD and sleep with focus on sleep disturbances, obstructive sleep apnea, extraesophageal manifestations of GERD and treatment are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a close relationship between GERD and sleep disturbances, but the nature of this relationship remains to be elucidated. Similarly, new data supports the association between GERD and obstructive sleep apnea, but whether this association is independent of confounding risk factors remains unresolved. Extraesophageal manifestations due to nocturnal GERD are primarily respiratory and can be explained by microaspiration and vagally-induced bronchospasm. Treatment of nocturnal GERD, both pharmacologically and surgically, improves sleep quality. Conversely, pharmacologic treatment of sleep disorders can improve nocturnal GERD symptoms. There is a bi-directional relationship between GERD and sleep. GERD is associated with various sleep disturbances. Sleep deficiency can exacerbate GERD. There is an association between extraesophageal manifestations and nocturnal GERD. Treatment directed towards GERD can improve sleep experience, and treatment directed to improve sleep can improve GERD symptoms.

[Food patterns in Russian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the results of pilot comparative study]

AIM

To evaluate nutritional patterns in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared to the control group without GERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of complex examination of patients referred to perform esophageal pH-impedance recording and who gave written informed consent to participate in the study served as a source data. All the participants underwent complex examination, including clinical data (presence of heartburn and acid regurgitation), symptom evaluation (GERD-Q questionnaire), esophagogastroscopy, esophageal pH-impedance recordings and food frequency questionnaire. Diagnosis of GERD was based on GERD-Q score 8, acid exposure time 6%, number of gastroesophageal refluxes 80/day by 24-hrs esophageal pH-impedance recordings. Nutritional patterns were assessed with the use of healthy eating pyramid principles.

RESULTS

Overall 165 patients were enrolled and the data of 150 of them (34 with confirmed GERD and 116 of the control group) were available for the final analysis. The patients of the both groups consumed lower compared to the recommended amounts of dairy and higher amounts of meat. Those with GERD consumed larger amounts of fruits (0.910.68 compared to the values of healthy eating pyramid vs 0.520.57 in the control group, p=0.001), and fats (0.690.55 vs 0.490.55, p=0.001). Compared to the controls, patients with GERD consumed lower amounts of vegetables (0.860.46 of the healthy eating pyramid vs 0.940.63 in the control group, р=0.004) and sugars confectionaries (0.380.39 vs 1.930.98, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Nutritional patterns of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease significantly differ compared to the control group. The obtained data may be used for diet modification in patients with arterial hypertension.

Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Sleep: An Important Relationship That Is Commonly Overlooked

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent, chronic medical condition that affects 13% of the adult population globally at least once a week. Sleep disturbances are frequently encountered in up to 25% of the GERD patients, likely due to nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux (GER). With advance in diagnostic techniques allowing for an improved understanding of involved physiological mechanisms of nocturnal reflux, there is growing evidence of a bidirectional relationship between GERD and sleep disturbances. Furthermore, nocturnal GER is associated with more complicated GERD. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and GERD also have been linked, but to what degree remains controversial. Treatment of nocturnal GER has been shown to improve both subjective and objective sleep measures. The therapeutic approach includes lifestyle modifications and medication individualization and optimization with proton-pump inhibitors serving as the mainstay of treatment. Antireflux surgery and newer endoscopic procedures have been demonstrated to control nocturnal GER.

Current Trends in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) characterized by heartburn and/or regurgitation symptoms is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders managed by gastroenterologists and primary care physicians. There has been an increase in GERD prevalence, particularly in North America and East Asia. Over the past three decades proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay of medical therapy for GERD. However, recently there has been an increasing awareness amongst physicians and patients regarding the side effects of the PPI class of drugs. In addition, there has been a marked decline in the utilization of surgical fundoplication as well as a rise in the development of nonmedical therapeutic modalities for GERD. This review focuses on different management strategies for GERD, optimal management of refractory GERD with special focus on available endoluminal therapies and the future directions.

The effect of antireflux treatment on the frequency of awakenings from sleep in patients with Gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Up to half of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients report having heartburn that awakens them from sleep during the night. Recumbent-awake and conscious awakenings from sleep during the night are commonly associated with acid reflux events. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of esomeprazole 40 mg once daily on nighttime acid reflux, frequency of conscious awakenings associated with acid reflux and the recumbent-awake period.

METHODS

Patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation at least three times a week were eligible for this study. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and were evaluated by demographic, Epworth Sleepiness scale, Berlin and GERD symptom checklist questionnaires. Subjects then underwent esophageal pH testing concomitantly with an actigraphy. All subjects were given esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 7 days and completed a daily symptom record diary. On day 7, subjects repeated the pH test with actigraphy.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty patients (mean age of 48.95 ± 18.69, age range 20-81 years) were enrolled. Esophageal acid exposure parameters, during recumbent-awake, recumbent-asleep, and conscious awakenings were significantly improved on last day of treatment as compared to baseline (p < 0.05). However, the frequency and duration of conscious awakenings and duration of recumbent-awake period did not improve as compared to baseline (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

While esomeprazole significantly reduced esophageal acid exposure during conscious awakenings and recumbent-awake and asleep periods, it did not decrease the number and duration of conscious awakening or duration of recumbent-awake period.

Naps are associated more commonly with gastroesophageal reflux, compared with nocturnal sleep

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acid reflux during nighttime sleep has been associated with more severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Napping is common, especially after lunch time, in many cultures. We aimed to compare reflux characteristics between nighttime sleep and naps in patients with GERD.

METHODS

We performed a study of 15 patients (mean age, 58.5 ± 18.4 y; 10 men) with heartburn and/or regurgitation at least 3 times/week for the past 3 months, who experienced a nap in addition to regular nighttime sleep. All were evaluated using the demographics and GERD Symptoms Checklist questionnaires. Patients underwent pH testing concomitantly with actigraphy when they were not receiving antireflux treatment; only patients with abnormal results from pH tests were included in the study. Raw data from actigraphy analyses were superimposed over those collected from pH monitoring, matched by time. Integrative software was used to determine recumbent-awake, recumbent-asleep, and naps alongside pH monitoring data.

RESULTS

The mean duration of nocturnal sleep time and nap time were 446.0 ± 100.7 minutes and 61.9 ± 51.8 minutes, respectively. The mean number of reflux events per hour was significantly greater during nap than nocturnal sleep time (40.1 ± 69.9/h vs 3.5 ± 4.2/h; P < .05). The mean duration of reflux events was longer during nap than nocturnal sleep time (1.9 ± 2.8 min vs 1.5 ± 2.7 min). The percentage of time spent at a pH less than 4 was significantly greater during naptime than nocturnal sleep time (36.2% ± 38.8% vs 8.9% ± 11.6%; P < .05). Arousals from naps were rare, compared with nocturnal sleep (mean, 0.7 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 2.9; P < .05). Patients also experienced more acid reflux associated with symptoms during nap than nocturnal sleep (mean, 8.08% vs 0.45%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We associated naps with significantly greater numbers of, and duration of, esophageal acid exposure and symptoms, compared with nocturnal sleep. Naps therefore might have important effects on disease severity.

Night-time symptoms and their impact on sleep in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitors: a qualitative patient interview study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists about night-time symptoms that are generated directly from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. This information is needed to select an appropriate instrument in studies in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this qualitative interview study was to gain understanding of the night-time symptoms of patients with GERD who had a partial response to PPIs. The specific aims were (i) to evaluate whether GERD symptoms experienced during the night differ from those occurring during the day; and (ii) to understand the impact of night-time symptoms on sleep and next-day functioning.

METHODS

Four US sites participated in this study of patients with GERD who, despite PPI therapy for at least 4 weeks, still experienced both daytime and night-time heartburn and/or regurgitation. Non-responders to PPIs were excluded. Patient statements were coded and grouped by concept.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The predominant and most troublesome symptoms during both the day and night were heartburn and regurgitation. At night-time only, expressions describing regurgitation were more frequent than those describing heartburn (62 vs. 26 %). During the daytime only, expressions describing regurgitation and heartburn occurred with similar frequency (21 vs. 27 %). Patients experienced greater severity of heartburn and regurgitation at night than during the day, and the difference was more pronounced for regurgitation. Patients focused on symptom frequency during the day but on symptom severity at night. Of expressions about the impact of night-time GERD symptoms, 46 % described impact on sleep and 41 % described compensatory behaviors when woken up by symptoms. Next-day impacts of night-time symptoms predominantly included changes in diet (53 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial responders to PPI therapy experience similar GERD symptoms at night and during the day. However, regurgitation is more predominant at night than during the day, and at night patients focus more on symptom severity than symptom frequency.

Impaired sleep quality in Crohn's disease depends on disease activity

BACKGROUND

Little is known concerning the relationship of disease activity and sleep disturbances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and specifically in patients with Crohn's disease.

AIM

This study examined the prevalence of poor sleep quality in patients with active and inactive Crohn's disease compared with healthy controls.

METHODS

Participants included 108 patients with Crohn's disease attending the IBD clinic of a tertiary medical center in 2009-2010 and 36 healthy volunteers. All prospectively completed a demographic questionnaire and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI). Patients with Crohn's disease completed the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) and were divided into two groups accordingly: inactive disease (CDAI ≤150) and active disease (CDAI >150). Data on disease duration, medications, complications, and treatment were collected from the medical files.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients had inactive Crohn's disease and 37 had active disease. All three groups were similar in mean age, sex distribution, and body mass index. Mean duration of Crohn's disease was 10.22 ± 8.6 years; 40 patients (37 %) had ileal disease, 16 (15 %) colonic disease, and 56 (50 %) ileo-colonic disease. Patients with active disease had a significantly higher mean ± SD global score on the PSQI (8.6 ± 2.4; indicating poorer sleep quality) than patients with inactive disease (4.6 ± 1.9) or control subjects (5.1 ± 1.7) (p < 0.0001 for both), with no significant difference between the inactive-disease and control groups. The correlation between the CDAI and PSQI scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired sleep quality is associated with active Crohn's disease, but not inactive disease.

Association between sleep bruxism and gastroesophageal reflux disease

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Rhythmic masticatory muscle activity, including sleep bruxism (SB), can be induced in healthy individuals by experimental esophageal acidification, which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, no robust evidence supports the association between SB and GERD.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between SB and GERD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five individuals were eligible to participate in this observational transversal study at the Gastroenterology Service of the Clinical Hospital of Porto Alegre, Brazil. The participants were classified into 2 groups, those with and without GERD, according to the Montreal Criteria and pH-metry/endoscopy findings. The diagnosis of SB was not assessed in a sleep laboratory but was based on self-report plus clinical inspection, according to the minimal diagnostic criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The Lipp Stress Symptom Inventory was used to evaluate self-perceived stress. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with SB as dependent variable and GERD, sex, age, body mass index, and stress as predictors (α=.05; 90% power).

RESULTS

The study population included individuals with SB without GERD (13.3%) and individuals with SB with GERD (31.1%). In participants with GERD, the prevalence of SB was 73.7%. Only the variable GERD was significantly associated with SB (P=.017; odds ratio 6.58; 95% confidence interval 1.40-30.98), although adjusted for stress and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep bruxism is prevalent in GERD patients, and GERD is highly associated with SB.

Comparison of distribution of intraesophageal pH during nighttime recumbency among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Nighttime reflux has been demonstrated to be associated with a more aggressive presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it has remained unknown until now if the difference in nighttime reflux between the different GERD groups is related to the distribution of intraesophageal pH level or duration of acid exposure.

AIM

To compare distribution of intraesophageal pH during nighttime between patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) versus those with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).

METHODS

Patients with heartburn symptoms at least 3 times per week were included in this study. Patients were not receiving any antireflux treatment. All patients underwent an upper endoscopy to determine if esophageal inflammation was present or absent. Subsequently, patients underwent ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Only those with NERD and EE were included in this study. Nighttime period was defined as the time from the moment patients entered the bed to fall asleep and until they woke up the next morning. Distribution of intraesophageal pH during nighttime was generated using a special computer program that analyzed all registered pH measurements.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were found to have NERD and 31 EE. Time in bed was not different between the 2 groups. The mean number of acid reflux events, mean reflux time pH<4, and mean % total time pH<4 during nighttime were significantly lower in the NERD group as compared with the EE group (13.05±4.6, 19.7±7.09, 3.6±1.2% vs. 25.44±4.4, 29.3±7.97, 5.3±1.5%, respectively, all P<0.05). Symptom index for EE was 43.8% versus 21% for NERD, P<0.05. Overall, the distribution of intraesophageal pH during nighttime was similar between NERD and EE patients for all pH ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EE demonstrated a significantly higher nighttime esophageal acid exposure as compared with NERD, but the overall distribution of the acid exposure was similar between the 2 groups. This suggests that duration rather than intensity of nighttime intraesophageal acid exposure accounts for the difference between EE and NERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and tooth erosion

The increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children and adults, and of “silent refluxers” in particular, increases the responsibility of dentists to be alert to this potentially severe condition when observing unexplained instances of tooth erosion. Although gastroesophageal reflux is a normal physiologic occurrence, excessive gastric and duodenal regurgitation combined with a decrease in normal protective mechanisms, including an adequate production of saliva, may result in many esophageal and extraesophageal adverse conditions. Sleep-related GERD is particularly insidious as the supine position enhances the proximal migration of gastric contents, and normal saliva production is much reduced. Gastric acid will displace saliva easily from tooth surfaces, and proteolytic pepsin will remove protective dental pellicle. Though increasing evidence of associations between GERD and tooth erosion has been shown in both animal and human studies, relatively few clinical studies have been carried out under controlled trial conditions. Suspicion of an endogenous source of acid being associated with observed tooth erosion requires medical referral and management of the patient as the primary method for its prevention and control.

Conscious awakenings are commonly associated with Acid reflux events in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

More than half of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) report heartburn that awakens them from sleep. We aimed to determine the frequency of conscious awakenings associated with acid reflux events during sleep and their relationship with symptoms in patients with GERD compared with normal subjects.

METHODS

The study included 39 patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation at least 3 times each week and 9 healthy individuals as controls. Subjects underwent pH testing concomitantly with actigraphy. Novel software simultaneously integrated raw actigraphy and pH data matched by time to determine patients' conscious awakenings during sleep and their temporal relationship with acid reflux events and GERD-related symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 104 and 11 conscious awakenings were recorded in 89.7% of patients and 77.8% of normal controls, respectively. The mean number of conscious awakenings was significantly higher in the group with GERD compared with controls (3.0 ± 0.3 vs 1.8 ± 0.4, P < .05). Of the conscious awakenings, 51.9% (51/104) were associated with an acid reflux event in GERD patients and 0 in controls (P < .01). Only 16.3% of total conscious awakenings were symptomatic. In most of the conscious awakenings that were associated with an acid reflux event (85.6%), the awakening preceded the reflux event.

CONCLUSIONS

Acid reflux events occur primarily after an awakening episode. Conscious awakenings from sleep are common among patients with GERD and are frequently associated with acid reflux events. However, conscious awakenings associated with reflux events are seldom symptomatic.

Increased oesophageal acid exposure at the beginning of the recumbent period is primarily a recumbent-awake phenomenon

BACKGROUND

A significant increase in oesophageal acid exposure during early recumbent period has been demonstrated.

AIM

To determine if acid reflux during the early recumbent period occurs in the recumbent-asleep or recumbent-awake period using a novel integrative actigraphy and pH programme.

METHOD

Thirty-nine subjects with heartburn at least three times a week were included. Subjects underwent pH testing concomitantly with actigraphy. Simultaneously recorded actigraphy and pH data were incorporated using a novel integrative technique to determine sleep and awake periods. Characteristics of acid reflux were compared between the recumbent-awake and recumbent-asleep periods.

RESULTS

Seventeen (44.7%) subjects had acid reflux events during recumbent-awake period as compared to seven (18.4%) in the corresponding recumbent-asleep period (P = 0.046). The mean number of acid reflux events in recumbent-awake period was significantly higher than in the corresponding recumbent-asleep period (8.1 +/- 4.4 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.5, P < 0.001). In the recumbent-awake period, 38.4% of acid reflux events were associated with GERD-related symptoms as compared with 3.7% of acid reflux events during the corresponding recumbent-asleep period (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Increased acid reflux in the early recumbent period occurs primarily during the recumbent-awake and not during the recumbent-asleep period.

Effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on sleep

Recent studies have demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and sleep where night-time reflux leads to sleep deprivation and sleep deprivation per se can exacerbate GERD by enhancing perception of intra-esophageal stimuli. Presently, treatment has primarily focused on reducing night-time reflux and thus improving sleep quality. Future studies are needed to further explore the relationship between GERD and sleep and the potential of novel therapeutic options to interrupt the vicious cycle between GERD and sleep.

Riser's reflux--an eye-opening experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) commonly report waking up in the morning with a sour or bitter taste in their mouth. The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence and frequency of acid reflux events prior to and immediately after awakening from sleep in the morning between GORD patients and normal subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with heartburn at least three times a week and abnormal pH test and nine healthy controls were included. All subjects were evaluated by demographic and GORD Symptom Checklist questionnaires. Subjects underwent pH testing concomitantly with actigraphy. A novel technology that simultaneously integrates raw actigraphy and pH monitoring data was utilized to determine the presence, frequency, and characteristics of acid reflux events prior to (up to 1 h) and immediately after (10 and 20 min) awakening from sleep in the morning.

KEY RESULTS

Nineteen (48.7%) of the GORD patients had an acid reflux event within the first 20 min after awakening from sleep in the morning as compared to only seven (17.9%) during the hour prior to awakening. Within the first 10 and 20 min after awakening, patients had a total of 32 and 60 acid reflux events, respectively, as compared to 14 during the 1 h prior to awakening (P < 0.05). None of the healthy control patients demonstrated any reflux events during these three studied periods (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Riser's reflux is very common among GORD patients and possibly may explain reports of early-morning GORD symptoms.