1
|
Raza D, Mohiuddin F, Khan MH, Fawad M, Raza SM. Childhood gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comprehensive review of disease, diagnosis, and therapeutic management. World J Clin Pediatr 2025; 14:101175. [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i2.101175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 02/08/2025] [Indexed: 03/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects both adults and children, although the symptoms differ significantly between these groups. While adults typically experience heartburn and regurgitation, children may present with more subtle signs, such as failure to thrive, chronic cough, wheezing, and Sandifer syndrome. Diagnosing GERD in children necessitates a multifaceted approach due to the diverse symptomatology and challenges in communication. Clinical assessment serves as the cornerstone of diagnosis, supported by tools like pH monitoring, esophageal impedance testing, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Imaging studies, such as barium swallow, can also provide valuable insights into anatomical abnormalities and the extent of reflux. Treatment strategies for pediatric GERD include lifestyle adjustments, pharmacotherapy, and, in severe cases, surgical interventions. Lifestyle adjustments may involve changes in feeding patterns, positional therapy, and weight management. Pharmacological options range from acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists to surgical procedures like fundoplication for refractory cases. Personalized management is essential, considering the child’s age, symptom severity, and the presence of complications. This article aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of pediatric GERD by utilizing current research to enhance clinical approaches and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniyal Raza
- Department of Internal Medicine, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71103, United States
| | - Farhan Mohiuddin
- Department of Internal Medicine, LSU New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States
| | - Muhammad Haris Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71103, United States
| | - Maheen Fawad
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71103, United States
| | - Syed Musa Raza
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deaconess Clinic, Henderson, KY 42420, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uranga JA, Vera G, Abalo R. Cannabinoid pharmacology and therapy in gut disorders. Biochem Pharmacol 2018; 157:134-147. [PMID: 30076849 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Cannabis sp. and their products (marijuana, hashish…), in addition to their recreational, industrial and other uses, have a long history for their use as a remedy for symptoms related with gastrointestinal diseases. After many reports suggesting these beneficial effects, it was not surprising to discover that the gastrointestinal tract expresses endogenous cannabinoids, their receptors, and enzymes for their synthesis and degradation, comprising the so-called endocannabinoid system. This system participates in the control of tissue homeostasis and important intestinal functions like motor and sensory activity, nausea, emesis, the maintenance of the epithelial barrier integrity, and the correct cellular microenvironment. Thus, different cannabinoid-related pharmacological agents may be useful to treat the main digestive pathologies. To name a few examples, in irritable bowel syndrome they may normalize dysmotility and reduce pain, in inflammatory bowel disease they may decrease inflammation, and in colorectal cancer, apart from alleviating some symptoms, they may play a role in the regulation of the cell niche. This review summarizes the main recent findings on the role of cannabinoid receptors, their synthetic or natural ligands and their metabolizing enzymes in normal gastrointestinal function and in disorders including irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, colon cancer and gastrointestinal chemotherapy-induced adverse effects (nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Uranga
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; Unidad Asociada I+D+i al Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación, CIAL (CSIC), Spain; Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander-Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor (i+DOL), Spain
| | - G Vera
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; Unidad Asociada I+D+i al Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación, CIAL (CSIC), Spain; Unidad Asociada I+D+i al Instituto de Química Médica, IQM (CSIC), Spain; Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander-Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor (i+DOL), Spain
| | - R Abalo
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; Unidad Asociada I+D+i al Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación, CIAL (CSIC), Spain; Unidad Asociada I+D+i al Instituto de Química Médica, IQM (CSIC), Spain; Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander-Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor (i+DOL), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rouzade-Dominguez ML, Pezous N, David OJ, Tutuian R, Bruley des Varannes S, Tack J, Malfertheiner P, Allescher HD, Ufer M, Rühl A. The selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist mavoglurant (AFQ056) reduces the incidence of reflux episodes in dogs and patients with moderate to severe gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29. [PMID: 28337838 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) induced by gastric distension are modulated by the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) that influences the vagal reflex loop. We therefore aimed to examine the effects of the selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant (AFQ056) on the number of TLESRs in dogs and reflux episodes in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS In a dog model, the number of meal-induced TLESRs was determined after intravenous (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg kg-1 ) and oral (1, 3, and 10 mg kg-1 ) doses of mavoglurant with reference to vehicle. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study, the incidence of meal-induced reflux episodes was assessed by esophageal impedance monitoring after single, oral doses of mavoglurant (50 and 400 mg) or baclofen (40 mg) in 30 patients with moderate to severe GERD. KEY RESULTS In dogs, mavoglurant reduced the number of TLESRs after intravenous and oral administration. In patients with GERD, the incidence of postprandial reflux episodes was significantly lower at a dose of 400 mg mavoglurant (-37.5% ; 90% confidence interval [CI]: -57.8, -17.2), whereas there was no significant difference at 50 mg of mavoglurant compared to placebo. A significantly lower incidence of reflux episodes was also noted with the active comparator baclofen (-50.3%; 90% CI: -66.2, -34.3), thereby validating this study. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES These data suggest a potential clinical benefit of mGluR5 antagonists such as mavoglurant in patients with GERD, particularly in those with persisting symptoms despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N Pezous
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - O J David
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Tutuian
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - J Tack
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - H-D Allescher
- Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - M Ufer
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Rühl
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calik MW, Radulovacki M, Carley DW. A method of nodose ganglia injection in Sprague-Dawley rat. J Vis Exp 2014:e52233. [PMID: 25490160 DOI: 10.3791/52233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Afferent signaling via the vagus nerve transmits important general visceral information to the central nervous system from many diverse receptors located in the organs of the abdomen and thorax. The vagus nerve communicates information from stimuli such as heart rate, blood pressure, bronchopulmonary irritation, and gastrointestinal distension to the nucleus of solitary tract of the medulla. The cell bodies of the vagus nerve are located in the nodose and petrosal ganglia, of which the majority are located in the former. The nodose ganglia contain a wealth of receptors for amino acids, monoamines, neuropeptides, and other neurochemicals that can modify afferent vagus nerve activity. Modifying vagal afferents through systemic peripheral drug treatments targeted at the receptors on nodose ganglia has the potential of treating diseases such as sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or chronic cough. The protocol here describes a method of injection neurochemicals directly into the nodose ganglion. Injecting neurochemicals directly into the nodose ganglia allows study of effects solely on cell bodies that modulate afferent nerve activity, and prevents the complication of involving the central nervous system as seen in systemic neurochemical treatment. Using readily available and inexpensive equipment, intranodose ganglia injections are easily done in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Calik
- Center for Narcolepsy, Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois at Chicago; Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago;
| | - Miodrag Radulovacki
- Center for Narcolepsy, Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois at Chicago; Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago
| | - David W Carley
- Center for Narcolepsy, Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois at Chicago; Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lehmann A, Antonsson M, Aurell-Holmberg A, Blackshaw LA, Brändén L, Elebring T, Jensen J, Kärrberg L, Mattsson JP, Nilsson K, Oja SS, Saransaari P, von Unge S. Different in vitro and in vivo profiles of substituted 3-aminopropylphosphinate and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinate GABA(B) receptor agonists as inhibitors of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 165:1757-1772. [PMID: 21950457 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01682.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Gastro-oesophageal reflux is predominantly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) and GABA(B) receptor stimulation inhibits TLOSR. Lesogaberan produces fewer CNS side effects than baclofen, which has been attributed to its affinity for the GABA transporter (GAT), the action of which limits stimulation of central GABA(B) receptors. To understand the structure-activity relationship for analogues of lesogaberan (3-aminopropylphosphinic acids), and corresponding 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids, we have compared representatives of these classes in different in vitro and in vivo models. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH The compounds were characterized in terms of GABA(B) agonism in vitro. Binding to GATs and cellular uptake was done using rat brain membranes and slices respectively. TLOSR was measured in dogs, and CNS side effects were evaluated as hypothermia in mice and rats. KEY RESULTS 3-Aminopropylphosphinic acids inhibited TLOSR with a superior therapeutic index compared to 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids. This difference was most likely due to differential GAT-mediated uptake into brain cells of the former but not latter. In agreement, 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids were much more potent in producing hypothermia in rats even when administered i.c.v. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS An enhanced therapeutic window for 3-aminopropylphosphinic acids compared with 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids with respect to inhibition of TLOSR was observed and is probably mechanistically linked to neural cell uptake of the former but not latter group of compounds. These findings offer a platform for discovery of new GABA(B) receptor agonists for the treatment of reflux disease and other conditions where selective peripheral GABA(B) receptor agonism may afford therapeutic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lehmann
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - M Antonsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - A Aurell-Holmberg
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L A Blackshaw
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L Brändén
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - T Elebring
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - J Jensen
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L Kärrberg
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - J P Mattsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - K Nilsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - S S Oja
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - P Saransaari
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - S von Unge
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|