Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO)

Conservative versus surgical therapy for idiopathic and secondary megacolon or megarectum in adults - a retrospective multicentre controlled study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic and secondary megacolon (MC) and megarectum (MR) in adults is associated with persistent bowel dilatation and reduced intestinal motility. Little is known about the optimal treatment of this rare disease. Therefore, we retrospectively analysed long-term data from these patients in 5 community and university hospitals, focusing on conservative versus surgical treatment.

METHODS

Patient records from 7/2004 to 9/2021 were screened for colorectal diseases with severe constipation and persistent megacolon ≥ 9.0 cm and/or megarectum ≥ 6.5 cm. Follow up-data was collected through telephone interviews and written surveys. ClinicalTrialsgov NCT04340856.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with idiopathic (n=10) and secondary (n=57) MC or MR were identified with only 20 of 67 patients (29.9%) correctly diagnosed. Mean/median age was 64/69 (range 18-93) years. Thirty-two patients were treated with laxative regimens, and 35 underwent surgery (colostomy: n=12, segmental resection, or hemicolectomy: n=10, (sub)total colectomy: n= 13) after conservative treatment attempts in 32/35 (91.4%). The mean/median follow-up was 4.2/2.7 (range 0.1-17.0) years. The readmission rate for MC-associated symptoms was significantly higher after conservative treatment than after surgical therapy at 12 (0.84 vs. 0.36 per patient, p=0.036), 24 (1.00 vs. 0.52, p=0.048) and 36 (1.13 vs. 0.58, p=0.047) months, as was the number of patients with persistent laxative dependence (28/32 (87.5%) vs. 19/33 (57.6%); p = 0.007). Therapy-associated adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification) were documented more often in surgically treated patients (11/35, 31.4%) (p=0.025).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment may be considered earlier if idiopathic or secondary MC or MR is correctly diagnosed, and conservative treatment has been attempted.

Idiopathic Slow Transit Constipation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Slow transit constipation (STC) has an estimated prevalence of 2-4% of the general population, and although it is the least prevalent of the chronic constipation phenotypes, it more commonly causes refractory symptoms and is associated with significant psychosocial stress, poor quality of life, and high healthcare costs. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management options in STC. STC occurs due to colonic dysmotility and is thought to be a neuromuscular disorder of the colon. Several pathophysiologic features have been observed in STC, including reduced contractions on manometry, delayed emptying on transit studies, reduced numbers of interstitial cells of Cajal on histology, and reduced amounts of excitatory neurotransmitters within myenteric plexuses. The underlying aetiology is uncertain, but autoimmune and hormonal mechanisms have been hypothesised. Diagnosing STC may be challenging, and there is substantial overlap with the other clinical constipation phenotypes. Prior to making a diagnosis of STC, other primary constipation phenotypes and secondary causes of constipation need to be ruled out. An assessment of colonic transit time is required for the diagnosis and can be performed by a number of different methods. There are several different management options for constipation, including lifestyle, dietary, pharmacologic, interventional, and surgical. The effectiveness of the available therapies in STC differs from that of the other constipation phenotypes, and prokinetics often make up the mainstay for those who fail standard laxatives. There are few available management options for patients with medically refractory STC, but patients may respond well to surgical intervention. STC is a common condition associated with a significant burden of disease. It can present a clinical challenge, but a structured approach to the diagnosis and management can be of great value to the clinician. There are many therapeutic options available, with some having more benefits than others.