Medication non-adherence among liver transplant recipients

Incidence, epidemiology, and outcomes of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation in Australia

Acute allograft rejection is a well-known complication of liver transplantation (LT). The incidence, epidemiology, and outcomes of acute rejection have not been well described in Australia. We retrospectively studied consecutive adults who underwent deceased donor LT at a single center between 2010 and 2020. Donor and recipient data at the time of LT and recipient outcomes were collected from a prospective LT database. Liver biopsy reports were reviewed, and only a graft's first instance of biopsy-proven acute rejection was analyzed. During the study period, 796 liver transplants were performed in 770 patients. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 34.9% of transplants. There were no significant changes in the incidence of rejection over time (linear trend p =0.11). The median time to the first episode of rejection was 71 days after LT: 2.2% hyperacute, 50.4% early (≤90 d), and 47.5% late rejection (>90 d). Independent risk factors for rejection were younger recipient age at transplant (aHR 0.98 per year increase, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00, p =0.01), and ABO-incompatible grafts (aHR 2.55 vs. ABO-compatible, 95% CI: 1.27-5.09, p <0.01) while simultaneous multiorgan transplants were protective (aHR 0.21 vs. LT only, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58, p <0.01). Development of acute rejection (both early and late) was independently associated with significantly reduced graft (aHR 3.13, 95% CI: 2.21-4.42, p <0.001) and patient survival (aHR 3.42, 95% CI: 2.35-4.98, p <0.001). In this 11-year Australian study, acute LT rejection occurred in 35%, with independent risk factors of younger recipient age and ABO-incompatible transplant, while having a simultaneous multiorgan transplant was protective. Acute rejection was independently associated with reduced graft and patient survival after adjustment for other factors.

Risk Factors for Non-Adherence to Medication for Liver Transplant Patients: An Umbrella Review

Background/Objectives: Liver Transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation. Medication adherence on LT patients is key to avoiding graft failure, mortality, and important quality of life losses. The aim of this study is to identify risk-factors for non-adherence to treatment of liver transplant patients according to reliable published evidence. Methods: An umbrella review within the context of adherence to immunosuppressant medication of LT patients, was conducted. The review was performed in accordance with the principles of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 11 articles were finally included for the review. Non-adherence factors were identified and allocated using the WHO classification of factors for non-adherence. Each of these groups contains a subset of factors that have been shown to influence adherence to medication, directly or indirectly, according to literature findings. Conclusions: The results of the review indicate that sociodemographic factors, factors related to the patient, factors related to the treatment, condition-related and health system-related factors are good categories of predictors for both adherence and non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication in LT patients. This list of factors may help physicians in the treating and recognizing of patients with a potential risk of non-adherence and it could help in the designing of new tools to better understand non-adherence after LT and targeted interventions to promote adherence of LT patients.

Transplant recipient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of medication adherence monitoring technology: A mixed methods study

Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies-reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills-may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.

Conversion from twice-daily everolimus to once-daily sirolimus in long-term stable liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

After organ transplantation, strategies for simplifying the therapeutic regimen may improve adherence and prevent acute organ rejection and/or late graft loss. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion from everolimus (EVR) twice daily to sirolimus (SIR) once daily in a large cohort of liver transplantation (LT) patients.

METHODS

We included 108 LT patients with at least 12 months of post-transplant follow-up and no rejection episodes in the last year. Conversion was based on a 1:1 ratio (but eventually adapted to available formulations of SIR).

RESULTS

The median age at the time of conversion was 68.9 years (range: 26.1-83.6); 75.0% were men. The main indications for mTOR inhibitor use were renal failure (38.9%) and/or a history of malignancy (37.0%). Median conversion time after LT was 14.8 years (range: 2.3-31.5). The median dose of EVR and SIR (initially) was 1.50 mg/day (range: 0.5-4.5). The mean follow-up after conversion was 15.8±4.4 months. Median serum EVR/SIR trough levels before/after conversion were 3.85 ng/mL vs. 6.32 ng/mL (p < 0.05), i.e. a 1:1.64 ratio. At the end of follow-up after conversion, the median dose of SIR was 1.25 mg/day (range: 0.5-3.5), and the mean serum SIR trough level was 5.23 ng/mL; 9 patients (8.3%) had returned to EVR, because of side effects (mainly digestive), that resolved thereafter. No biopsy-proven acute rejection episode was observed. Finally, 87.1% of patients considered the conversion beneficial and the cost was reduced by 50.3%.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that conversion from once-daily EVR to once-daily SIR in stable LT patients is safe, but needs dose adaptations and careful monitoring.

Liver transplantation in Latin America: reality and challenges

Healthcare systems in Latin America are broadly heterogeneous, but all of them are burdened by a dramatic rise in liver disease. Some challenges that these countries face include an increase in patients requiring a transplant, insufficient rates of organ donation, delayed referral, and inequitable or suboptimal access to liver transplant programs and post-transplant care. This could be improved by expanding the donor pool through the implementation of education programs for citizens and referring physicians, as well as the inclusion of extended criteria donors, living donors and split liver transplantation. Addressing these shortcomings will require national shifts aimed at improving infrastructure, increasing awareness of organ donation, training medical personnel, and providing equitable access to care for all patients.

Patient randomised controlled trial of technology enabled strategies to promote treatment adherence in liver transplantation: rationale and design of the TEST trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for end-stage liver disease. However, post-transplant medication regimens are complex and non-adherence is common. Post-transplant medication non-adherence is associated with graft rejection, which can have long-term adverse consequences. Transplant centres are equipped with clinical staff that monitor patients post-transplant; however, digital health tools and proactive immunosuppression adherence monitoring has potential to improve outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a patient-randomised prospective clinical trial at three transplant centres in the Northeast, Midwest and South to investigate the effects of a remotely administered adherence programme compared with usual care. The programme monitors potential non-adherence largely levering text message prompts and phenotypes the nature of the non-adhere as cognitive, psychological, medical, social or economic. Additional reminders for medications, clinical appointments and routine self-management support are incorporated to promote adherence to the entire medical regimen. The primary study outcome is medication adherence via 24-hour recall; secondary outcomes include additional medication adherence (ASK-12 self-reported scale, regimen knowledge scales, tacrolimus values), quality of life, functional health status and clinical outcomes (eg, days hospitalised). Study implementation, acceptability, feasibility, costs and potential cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The University of Pennsylvania Review Board has approved the study as the single IRB of record (protocol # 849575, V.1.4). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to study funders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05260268.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Health Literacy and Compliance to Treatment in Organ Transplant Recipients

This study was conducted to determine the correlations between health literacy, transplant effects, and compliance to treatment in organ transplant recipients and to identify the factors influencing compliance to treatment. The participants (n = 130; males = 66.9%; mean age = 56.4 years) were organ transplant recipients visiting an organ transplantation center in Seoul, South Korea. The regression model explained 32% of the variance in participants' compliance to treatment. Among the health literacy variables, "Scale 3: Actively managing my health" (β = 0.38, p = 0.001) and "Scale 4: Social support for health" (β = 0.25, p = 0.019) had a significant effect on compliance to treatment. In this study, health literacy was identified as a key factor influencing compliance to treatment. Therefore, patients' health literacy should be assessed prior to transplantation to identify potential high-risk patients for treatment nonadherence. In addition, after transplantation surgery, patient-tailored interventions should be developed and provided for self-management that reflects the patient's health literacy level to ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Quality of life associated with immunosuppressant treatment adherence in liver transplant recipients: A cross-sectional study

Purpose: Transplanted organ survival after solid organ transplantation highly correlates with the adherence levels of the patients to their immunosuppressive drugs. On the other hand, one of the main goals of liver transplantation is to increase the overall quality of life (QOL) for the patient. This study is aimed to analyze the relationship between adherence and QOL in adult liver transplant recipients of the biggest liver transplant center in Asia. Methods: All of the included patients were older than 18 years and at least 6 months had passed from their liver transplantation. The adherence level was measured with BAASIS method and the QOL was assessed by SF-36 questionnaire in real-time interviews. The relationship between adherence and different aspects of QOL in addition to qualitative and quantitative influential factors on these two outcomes was calculated with statistical analysis. Results: Among the 122 included patients, 41% of the were categorized in the non-adherent group. The most important reasons for non-adherence in these patients included forgetfulness (62%), lack of medication (12%), financial problems for drug supply (9%), and side effects (2%). According to the results of the multivariate linear regression model, rejection was the only influential factor in the occurrence of non-adherence among patients (OR = 8.226 CI (1.404-48.196)). The overall mean QOL score of patients was reported 51.09 ± 21.86. The lowest is given to social functioning, while mental health has achieved the highest score. The mean QOL scores in different dimensions in patients with adherence were higher than non-adherents, which was only significant in mental health (p-value = 0.01). Additionally, in total scores related to Physical Composite Score (PSC) and Mental Composite Score (MCS), the mean MSC scores in adherent patients were significantly higher than non-adherent patients (p-value: 0.02). Although adherent patients have an overall greater QOL, the only meaningful effect on QOL total score was from income level. Conclusion: The overall QoL score has been in all parameters higher in the adherent group compared with non-adherent patients. The difference in QoL was most meaningfully significant in mental composite score among other parameters of QoL.

Adherence in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adequately managing a complex medical regimen is paramount to the success of organ transplants. When patients stray from their prescribed medical regimen posttransplant, graft rejection, and death can occur. Predictors of adherence have been studied for many years, and various factors have been identified as contributing to adequate or poor adherence. Both demographic and personal characteristics have been associated with adherence behavior. However, recent developments, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, increased use of mobile health interventions, and use of medical biomarkers have affected the way adherence is measured and applied.

RECENT FINDINGS

The COVID-19 pandemic affected patients' comfort with accessing outpatient care and created a wider use of telehealth services. Measurement of adherence through serum lab levels continues to be reviewed as a potential objective assessment of adherence. Psychosocial factors continue to be identified as major contributors to nonadherence.

SUMMARY

Adherence to antirejection medication, lab work, appointments, and exercise and dietary instructions remains critical to the health of the transplant patient. It is critical that providers involved in the selection process and posttransplant treatment of these patients remain well informed of potential new factors affecting adherence.