Blood Pressure Reduction in Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure

Blood pressure and heart failure: focused on treatment

Heart failure (HF) remains a significant global health burden, and hypertension is known to be the primary contributor to its development. Although aggressive hypertension treatment can prevent heart changes in at-risk patients, determining the optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in cases diagnosed with HF is challenging owing to insufficient evidence. Notably, hypertension is more strongly associated with HF with preserved ejection fraction than with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients with acute hypertensive HF exhibit sudden symptoms of acute HF, especially those manifested with severely high BP; however, no specific vasodilator therapy has proven beneficial for this type of acute HF. Since the majority of medications used to treat HF contribute to lowering BP, and BP remains one of the most important hemodynamic markers, targeted BP management is very concerned in treatment strategies. However, no concrete guidelines exist, prompting a trend towards optimizing therapies to within tolerable ranges, rather than setting explicit BP goals. This review discusses the connection between BP and HF, explores its pathophysiology through clinical studies, and addresses its clinical significance and treatment targets.

Clinical Review of Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure

Although acute heart failure (AHF) is a common disease associated with significant symptoms, morbidity and mortality, the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with hypertensive acute heart failure (H-AHF) still remain a challenge in modern medicine. Despite great progress in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, this disease is still accompanied by a high rate of both in-hospital (from 3.8% to 11%) and one-year (from 20% to 36%) mortality. Considering the high rate of rehospitalization (22% to 30% in the first three months), the treatment of this disease represents a major financial blow to the health system of each country. This disease is characterized by heterogeneity in precipitating factors, clinical presentation, therapeutic modalities and prognosis. Since heart decompensation usually occurs quickly (within a few hours) in patients with H-AHF, establishing a rapid diagnosis is of vital importance. In addition to establishing the diagnosis of heart failure itself, it is necessary to see the underlying cause that led to it, especially if it is de novo heart failure. Given that hypertension is a precipitating factor of AHF and in up to 11% of AHF patients, strict control of arterial blood pressure is necessary until target values are reached in order to prevent the occurrence of H-AHF, which is still accompanied by a high rate of both early and long-term mortality.

Valvular Heart Disease Presenting as Sympathetic Crashing Acute Pulmonary Edema (SCAPE) Phenomenon: A Diagnostic and Management Paradigm

Sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary edema (SCAPE) is an acute decompensated heart failure due to sympathetic overflow. SCAPE is usually triggered by acute insults with an underlying substrate such as long-standing hypertension, chronic heart failure, and valvular heart disease. We present a case of SCAPE in a 91-year-old female due to underlying multivalvular heart disease. Because of severe acute presentation, SCAPE should be identified early, and management should be urgently done to decrease the need for invasive ventilation and prolonged hospitalization.

Early drop in systolic blood pressure is associated with poor diuretic response and prognosis in patients with acute heart failure

AIMS

Although an excessive drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) during acute heart failure (AHF) negatively impacts prognosis, the association between changes in SBP and the diuretic response (DR) is unclear. We aimed to clarify the association between an early drop in SBP and DR/prognosis in patients with AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a sub-analysis of the REALITY-AHF study, which registered patients with AHF admitted through emergency departments (EDs). An early SBP drop was defined as the difference between baseline SBP and the lowest value during the first 48 h of hospitalization. DR was defined as the urine output achieved per 40 mg of intravenous furosemide administered. SBP was measured on admission, at 90 min, and 6, 24, and 48 h after admission. Patients were divided into four groups according to their median SBP drop and DR: greater SBP drop/poor DR (n = 322), smaller SBP drop/poor DR (n = 409), greater SBP drop/good DR (n = 419), and smaller SBP drop/good DR (n = 314). The study included 1,464 patients. A greater SBP drop/poor DR was associated with higher baseline SBP and vasodilator use. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that a greater drop in SBP was associated with poorer DR following adjustment for potential covariates. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that a greater SBP drop/poor DR was independently associated with 1-year mortality. Both SBP and DR changes were independently associated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION

An early drop in SBP during the first 48 h of hospitalization was associated with poor DR and 1-year mortality in patients with AHF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/Unique identifier: UMIN000014105.

Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: External validation and clinical outcomes

Background

Non-invasive finger-cuff monitors measuring cardiac index and vascular tone (SVRI) classify emergency department (ED) patients with acute heart failure (AHF) into three otherwise-indistinguishable subgroups. Our goals were to validate these “hemodynamic profiles” in an external cohort and assess their association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

AHF patients (n = 257) from five EDs were prospectively enrolled in the validation cohort (VC). Cardiac index and SVRI were measured with a ClearSight finger-cuff monitor (formerly NexFin, Edwards Lifesciences) as in a previous study (derivation cohort, DC, n = 127). A control cohort (CC, n = 127) of ED patients with sepsis was drawn from the same study as the DC. K-means cluster analysis previously derived two-dimensional (cardiac index and SVRI) hemodynamic profiles in the DC and CC (k = 3 profiles each). The VC was subgrouped de novo into three analogous profiles by unsupervised K-means consensus clustering. PERMANOVA tested whether VC profiles 1–3 differed from profiles 1–3 in the DC and CC, by multivariate group composition of cardiac index and vascular tone.

Profiles in the VC were compared by a primary outcome of 90-day mortality and a 30-day ranked composite secondary outcome (death, mechanical cardiac support, intubation, new/emergent dialysis, coronary intervention/surgery) as time-to-event (survival analysis) and binary events (odds ratio, OR). Descriptive statistics were used to compare profiles by two validated risk scores for the primary outcome, and one validated score for the secondary outcome.

Results

The VC had median age 60 years (interquartile range {49–67}), and was 45% (n = 116) female. Multivariate profile composition by cardiac index and vascular tone differed significantly between VC profiles 1–3 and CC profiles 1–3 (p = 0.001, R² = 0.159). A difference was not detected between profiles in the VC vs. the DC (p = 0.59, R² = 0.016).

VC profile 3 had worse 90-day survival than profiles 1 or 2 (HR = 4.8, 95%CI 1.4–17.1). The ranked secondary outcome was more likely in profile 1 (OR = 10.0, 1.2–81.2) and profile 3 (12.8, 1.7–97.9) compared to profile 2. Diabetes prevalence and blood urea nitrogen were lower in the high-risk profile 3 (p<0.05). No significant differences between profiles were observed for other clinical variables or the 3 clinical risk scores.

Conclusions

Hemodynamic profiles in ED patients with AHF, by non-invasive finger-cuff monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone, were replicated de novo in an external cohort. Profiles showed significantly different risks of clinically-important adverse patient outcomes.

Bazedoxifene activates the angiotensin II-induced HUVEC hypertension model by targeting SIRT1

The shift in vascular function to vasoconstriction, pro-inflammatory state, oxidative stress and carbon monoxide deficiency may to endothelial dysfunction and injury, which is the key event in hypertension. Estrogen receptor modulators play a protective role in blood vessels. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of bazedoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and its potential underlying mechanism of action. The present study treated endothelial cells with different concentrations of bazedoxifene and determined cell viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 to screen for the optimal working concentration of bazedoxifene. Subsequently, an angiotensin II (AngII)-induced vascular endothelial cell model was established to observe the effect of bazedoxifene on AngII-induced endothelial cells. The concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected using NO and ROS kits, respectively. The protein expression of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), oxidative stress-related proteins and apoptosis-related proteins was detected using western blotting, and apoptosis was detected using a TUNEL assay. The results demonstrated that bazedoxifene promoted AngII-induced HUVEC viability, reduced the expression of stress-related proteins and inhibited apoptosis. Furthermore, bazedoxifene activated SIRT1 to promote the proliferation and inhibit the oxidative stress and apoptosis of AngII-induced HUVECs. These findings suggested that bazedoxifene could effectively promote AngII-induced HUVEC proliferation and inhibit cell apoptosis and oxidative stress. In addition, bazedoxifene protected HUVEC dysfunction induced by AngII by targeting the activation of SIRT1. In summary, bazedoxifene could improve the protective role against hypertension induced by AngII.

Right ventricular dysfunction in acute heart failure from emergency department to discharge: Predictors and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Among acute heart failure (AHF) inpatients, right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) predicts clinical outcomes independent of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Prior studies have not accounted for congestion severity, show conflicting findings on echocardiography (echo) timing, and excluded emergency department (ED) patients. We describe for the first time the epidemiology, predictors, and outcomes of RVD in AHF starting with earliest ED treatment.

METHODS

Point-of-care echo and 10-point lung ultrasound (LUS) were obtained in 84 prospectively enrolled AHF patients at two EDs, ≤1 h after first intravenous diuresis, vasodilator, and/or positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Echo and LUS were repeated at 24, 72, and 168 h, unless discharged sooner (n = 197 exams). RVD was defined as <17 mm tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), our primary measure. To identify correlates of RVD, a multivariable linear mixed model (LMM) of TAPSE through time was fit. Possible predictors were specified a priori and/or with p ≤ 0.1 difference between patients with/without RVD. Data were standardized and centered to facilitate comparison of relative strength of association between predictors of TAPSE. Survival curves for a 30-day death or AHF readmission primary outcome were assessed for RVD, LUS severity, and LVEF. A multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) for the outcome was used to adjust RVD for LVEF and LUS.

RESULTS

46% (n = 39) of patients at ED arrival showed RVD by TAPSE (median 18 mm, interquartile range 13-23). 18 variables with p ≤ 0.1 unadjusted difference with/without RVD, and 12 a priori predictors of RVD were included in the multivariable LMM model of TAPSE through time (R² = 0.76). Missed antihypertensive medication (within 7 days), ED PPV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease history, LVEF, LUS congestion severity, and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were the strongest multivariable predictors of RVD, respectively, and the only to reach statistical significance (p < 0.05). 30-day death or AHF readmission was associated with RVD at ED arrival (hazard ratio {HR} 3.31 {95%CI: 1.28-8.53}, p = 0.009), ED to discharge decrease in LUS (HR 0.11 {0.01-0.85}, p < 0.0001 for top quartile Δ), but not LVEF (quartile 2 vs. 1 HR 0.78 {0.22-2.68}, 3 vs. 1 HR 0.55 {0.16-1.92}, 4 vs. 1 HR 0.32 {0.09-1.22}, p = 0.30). The area under the receiver operating curve on GLMM for the primary outcome by TAPSE (p = 0.0012), ΔLUS (p = 0.0005), and LVEF (p = 0.8347) was 0.807.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, RVD was common in AHF, and predicted by congestion on LUS, LVEF, RVSP, and comorbidities from ED arrival through discharge. 30-day death or AHF-rehospitalization was associated with RVD at ED arrival and ΔLUS severity, but not LVEF.