Management of urinary tract infections associated with nephrolithiasis

Micropercutaneous nephrostomy for intervention in acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction with hydronephrosis and infection

To compare the efficacy and advantages of mini percutaneous nephrostomy (MPCN), micropercutaneous nephrostomy (MicroPCN), and retrograde ureteric stenting (RUS) in the treatment of acute upper urinary tract calculi (UUTC) obstruction with hydronephrosis and infection, and verify the safety and indications of clinical application of micropercutaneous nephrostomy. Clinical-epidemiological data of patients with acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction and infection treated in Ningbo No.2 hospital were retrospectively collected from May 2019 to May 2023. 64 patients (20 patients in MPCN group, 13 patients in MicroPCN group, and 31 patients in RUS group) were eligible for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no significant differences in peri-intervention temperature, multiple infection indicators and complications among the three groups. The nutritional status and peri-intervention coagulation function of patients in MicroPCN and RUS groups were poor, the CRP and proportion of using carbapenem advanced antibiotics were higher. The length of hospital stay and the length of hospital stay after the intervention in MPCN and MicroPCN groups were longer, the length and width of calculi were larger, and the degree of hydronephrosis was heavier. Patients in the MicroPCN group had the worst general condition, the lowest hemoglobin before intervention, the longest withdrawal time of vasoactive drugs. MPCN, MicroPCN, and RUS are safe and effective in relieving acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction complicated with infection. MicroPCN has more advantages for patients with critical illness or complex obstruction urinary lithiasis.

Ureteric stent associated spondylodiscitis

This case report describes a clinical presentation of spondylodiscitis, following an emergency ureteric stent placement for an infected and obstructed kidney in a woman in her late 70s who presented with right flank pain, raised inflammatory markers and an acute kidney injury. Non-contrast CT kidney, ureters and bladder (KUB) revealed a 9 mm obstructing stone and prompt decompression with a JJ stent was performed. Although the urine culture showed no growth at first, an extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli was found in a subsequent urine culture after discharge. Postoperatively, the patient described a novel, worsening lower back pain and had persistently elevated inflammatory markers. An MRI revealed spondylodiscitis of L5/S1, for which she was treated with a 6-week course of antibiotics, and she has made a good but slow recovery. This case shows the unusual finding of spondylodiscitis postureteric stent placement and clinicians should be aware of this rare complication.

Obstructing Ureteral Calculi and Presumed Infection: Impact of Antimicrobial Duration and Time From Decompression to Stone Treatment in Developing Urosepsis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the duration of antibiotic treatment and timing between urgent renal decompression and stone intervention impacts the risk of developing urosepsis following definitive stone treatment.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed with obstructive urolithiasis and underwent urgent decompression with a ureteral double J stent or percutaneous nephrostomy at our institution between 2012 and 2018 was performed. We narrowed our analysis to the subset of patients who had suspected infection and received definitive stone treatment at our institution. Demographic, infection and antimicrobial data, and initial admission to stone treatment characteristics were collected. Factors associated with developing urosepsis were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 872 patients who were treated with urgent renal decompression, of which 215 were analyzed that had suspected infection and also received definitive stone removal at our institution. Thirty-three had fevers, 64.2% had a positive urine culture, and 45.6% had urosepsis at the initial presentation. The median antibiotics duration post decompression was 13 days (IQR 8-18). The median duration from decompression to stone treatment was 17 days (IQR 12-27). Of all, 4.6% of the patients developed urosepsis post ureteroscopy and 5% post percutaneous nephrolithotomy. No factors were associated with developing urosepsis post stone treatment on logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

In patients requiring urgent decompression for obstructing urolithiasis and suspected infection, the time between decompression and stone treatment and the length of antibiotic exposure did not impact rates of postoperative urosepsis. This highlights the importance of maintaining high clinical suspicion for prolonged use of antibiotics, to prevent overtreatment and possible exacerbation of antibiotic resistance.

Choosing the best way for urinary decompression and developing a novel predictive model for septic shock using SOFA in these patients

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive factors for the development of sepsis/septic shock postdecompression of calculi-related ureteric obstruction using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and to compare clinical outcomes and odd risk ratios of patients developing sepsis/septic shock following the insertion of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus insertion of retrograde ureteral stenting (RUS).

METHODS

Clinico-epidemiological data of patients who underwent PCN and/or RUS in two institutions for calculi-related ureteric obstruction were retrospectively collected from January 2014 to December 2020.

RESULTS

537 patients (244 patients in PCN group, 293 patients in RUS group) from both institutions were eligible for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with PCN were generally older, had poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and larger obstructive ureteral calculi compared to patients with RUS. Patients with PCN had longer durations of fever, the persistence of elevated total white cell and creatinine, and longer hospitalization stays compared with patients who had undergone RUS. RUS up-front has more unsuccessful interventions compared with PCN. There were no significant differences in the change in SOFA score postintervention between the two interventions. In multivariate analysis, the higher temperature just prior to the intervention (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.039, p = 0.003) and Cardiovascular SOFA score of 1 (adjusted OR:4.037, p = 0.012) were significant independent prognostic factors for the development of septic shock postdecompression of ureteral obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that both interventions have similar overall risk of urosepsis, septic shock and mortality rate. Despite a marginally higher risk of failure, RUS should be considered in patients with lower procedural risk. Patients going for PCN should be counseled for a longer stay. Post-HDU/-ICU monitoring, inotrope support postdecompression should be considered for patients with elevated temperature within 1 h preintervention and cardiovascular SOFA score of 1.

Can Urinalysis and Past Medical History of Kidney Stones Predict Urine Antibiotic Resistance?

Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common infections encountered in the emergency department (ED) with an estimated 2–3 million annual visits. Commonly prescribed antibiotics for UTIs have shown growing rates of resistance. Previous studies lack direction on improving UTI treatment based on the labs available to the bedside clinician.

Methods

We sought to determine if antibiotic resistance in UTIs was related to demographics, urinalysis, and history of renal failure or kidney stones. We conducted an analysis of 892 women ≥18 years of age discharged from the ED with a UTI diagnosis. We assessed predictors of nitrofurantoin resistance, cefazolin resistance, ciprofloxacin resistance, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance using unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Antibiotic resistance was 13.6% for nitrofurantoin, 11.9% for cefazolin, 12.8% for ciprofloxacin, and 17.1% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In multivariable analysis, significant independent associations with an increased likelihood of resistance to nitrofurantoin were observed for less urine blood (OR [per 1 category increase of score] 0.81; P = 0.02); greater mucous (OR [per 1 category increase of score] 1.22; P = 0.02); less specific gravity urine (OR [per 1 category increase] 0.87; P = 0.04), and presence of any history of kidney stones (OR 3.24; P = 0.01). There were no significant predictors for cefazolin resistance (all P ≥0.06); age was the only significant predictor of ciprofloxacin resistance (OR per 10 year increase] 1.10, P = 0.05), and lower specific gravity urine was significantly associated with an increased risk of resistance to trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole (OR [per 1 category increase] 0.88, P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Women with any history of kidney stones may have bacteriuria resistant to nitrofurantoin, suggesting that providers might consider alternative antibiotic therapies in this scenario.

Ureteral stone with hydronephrosis and urolithiasis alone are risk factors for acute kidney injury in patients with urinary tract infection

To identify whether urolithiasis with or without hydronephrosis has an impact on acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). This study aimed to identify whether urolithiasis with or without hydronephrosis has an impact on AKI in patients with UTI. This retrospective study enrolled hospitalized UTI patients who underwent imaging in an acute care setting from January 2006 to April 2019. Of the 1113 participants enrolled, 191 (17.2%) had urolithiasis and 76 (6.8%) had ureteral stone complicated with hydronephrosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in UTI patients with urolithiasis, the presence of ureteral stone with concomitant hydronephrosis was an independent risk factor for AKI (odds ratio [OR] 2.299, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.112–4.755, P = 0.025). In addition, urolithiasis was associated with an increased risk for AKI (OR 2.451, 95% CI 1.369–4.389, P = 0.003) in UTI patients without hydronephrosis. The presence of ureteral stone with hydronephrosis increases the risk for AKI of UTI patients with urolithiasis, and urolithiasis remains a risk factor of AKI in UTI patients without hydronephrosis.

Risk of Urolithiasis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study 1977-2018

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are suggested to be at increased risk of urolithiasis, but the magnitude of risk and the impact of medical and surgical treatment on this risk remain unknown. We therefore aimed to determine overall and treatment-related risk of urolithiasis in patients with IBD in a nationwide population-based cohort study.

METHODS

Using national registers, we identified all patients with IBD and all cases of urolithiasis in Denmark during 1977-2018. We obtained information on all IBD medications and surgical procedures during 1995-2018. IBD cases were matched 1:10 on age and sex to non-IBD individuals.

RESULTS

In total, 2,549 (3%) of 75,236 IBD patients and 11,258 (2%) of 767,403 non-IBD individuals developed urolithiasis, resulting in a 2-fold increased risk of urolithiasis (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.17-2.38) in patients with IBD. The patients were also at increased risk of repetitive urolithiasis events (RR, 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.15) and had increased risk of urolithiasis prior to IBD diagnosis (OR, 1.42; 95% CI: 1.34-1.50). After IBD diagnosis, risk of urolithiasis was associated with anti-TNF therapy and surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IBD had a 2-fold increased risk of urolithiasis after IBD diagnosis and a 42% increased risk prior to IBD diagnosis. Risk was increased in anti-TNF exposed patients, and after surgery, suggesting that IBD severity per se and surgery, with altered intestinal absorption, increase risk of urolithiasis. Since stone formation is associated with adverse outcomes including sepsis, subpopulations of IBD patients, especially those undergoing strong immunosuppression might benefit from additional urolithiasis screening.

Patients' poor performance status is an independent risk factor for urosepsis induced by kidney and ureteral stones

This study was aimed to identify the risk factors for urosepsis caused by kidney and ureteral stones. One hundred and nine patients who had kidney or ureteral stones and who were treated with trans-ureteral lithotripsy (TUL) at our institution from 2016 to 2020 were included. We investigated the risk factors for urosepsis caused by kidney or ureteral stones that occurred prior to TUL. Thirty patients (28%) had urosepsis prior to TUL. Patients were divided into a urosepsis group (n = 30, 28%) and a non-urosepsis group (n = 79, 72%). Patients' characteristics (gender, age, performance status [PS] score, presence of diabetes mellitus, and skeletal muscle mass), as well as their stone and urine characteristics (stone size, presence of obstructive ureteral stones, stone composition, and urine and stone cultures), were compared between the two groups. When compared to the non-urosepsis group, patients with urosepsis were more likely to be older (p < 0.001), female (p < 0.001), with lower skeletal muscle mass (p < 0.001) and with poor PSs (p < 0.001). For stone and urine characteristics, infection stones (p = 0.01), positive urine (p < 0.001) and stone culture (p = 0.007) were more often detected in patients with urosepsis. A multivariate analysis showed patients' poor PS to be an independent risk factor for urosepsis due to kidney and ureteral stones (OR = 15.7; 95% CI = 2.2-115, p = 0.007). Our study revealed that the most significant risk factor for urosepsis caused by kidney and ureteral stones was the patients' poor PS.

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stent for acute upper urinary tract obstruction with urosepsis

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the efficacy of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus retrograde ureteric stent (RUS) for acute upper urinary tract obstruction with urosepsis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a random study, comparing PCN to RUS, for the treatment of patients requiring emergency drainage due to acute upper urinary tract obstruction with urosepsis between January 2019 to March 2020. Data collected included patient characteristics, stone material, microbiological characteristics, and laboratory data. Statistical analysis was performed by the student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test or chi-squared test and Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

At first, a total of 75 patients were eligibly assessed for enrollment. Among them, 3 cases were excluded for declining to participate and 7 cases were failed treated with RUS. At last, 35 PCN (53.85%) and 30 RUS (46.15%) patients were analyzed. There were 24 (36.92%) men and 41 (63.08%) women. The median age was 65 years. Emergency decompression was achieved by PCN in 35 (53.85%) patients and by RUS in 30 (46.15%). Urine culture was positive in 32 (49.23%) patients, of which 17 (53.13%) had E. coli. Postoperative C-reactive protein value and normal temperature recovery time in the PCN group were significantly lower than in the RUS group(P < .05).

CONCLUSION

PCN had a better outcome than RUS in emergency drainage with urosepsis, especially for patients with severe inflammation and fever.

Early Stone Manipulation in Urinary Tract Infection Associated with Obstructing Nephrolithiasis

A urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis secondary to an obstructing stone are one of the few true urological emergencies. The accepted management of infected ureteral stones includes emergent decompression of the collecting system as well as antibiotic therapy. Despite this, no consensus guidelines clarify the optimal time to undergo definitive stone management following decompression. Historically, our institution has performed ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (URS-LL) treatment at least 1 to 2 weeks after decompression to allow for clinical improvement and completion of an antibiotic course. In this case series, we retrospectively review four cases in which patients had a documented UTI secondary to an obstructive ureteral stone. The patients underwent urgent decompression and, based on labs and clinical improvement, were subsequently treated with URS-LL. The presented patients received URS-LL within 5 days of decompression and antibiotics. The patients had no sepsis related postoperative complications from the accelerated course of treatment, resulting in discharge within 2 days following URS-LL. We provide a detailed examination of each patient presentation to describe our institution's experience with treating infected kidney stones within days of urgent decompression in order to question the previous standard of treating an infected kidney stone with a more delayed intervention.

Comparison between non-septic and septic cases in stone-related obstructive acute pyelonephritis and risk factors for septic shock: A multi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study assessed risk factors for septic shock in patients with obstructive acute pyelonephritis (APN) associated with upper urinary tract calculi in a multi-center retrospective study.

METHODS

We studied 143 patients admitted to 4 hospitals in Japan with obstructive APN associated with upper urinary tract calculi. Data on gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, neurological disease or malignant disease, laboratory data (white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP)), drainage, and bacterial strains including Escherichia coli in the non-septic and septic groups were collected. Risk factors for septic shock were analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

RESULTS

There were a total of 107 non-septic cases (74.8%) and 36 septic cases (25.2%). The commonest strains of urinary tract infection-causative bacteria were E. coli in the non-septic group (23 cases, 21.5%) and septic group (13 cases, 36.1%) (p > 0.05). Emergency drainage was administered in 74.8% of the non-septic group and 97.2% of the septic group (p > 0.05). Meropenem was most often used as the initial treatment in the non-septic group (20 cases, 18.7%) and septic group (22 cases, 61.1%) (p < 0.0001). Risk factors for septic shock in multivariate analyses were diabetic mellitus (odds ratio (OR) = 3.591, p = 0.0098) and CRP ≥ 10 (OR = 1.057, p = 0.0119) as significant independent factors in this multicenter study.

CONCLUSIONS

APN is a common infectious disease, especially in the cases with urinary tract obstruction where patients easily acquire bacteremia or sepsis. Stone-associated obstructed APN can cause fatal septic shock in cases with diabetes and CRP ≥ 10. Further prospective studies will be undertaken to draw definitive conclusions.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases that commonly occur in communities. Although several international guidelines for the management of UTIs have been available, clinical characteristics, etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns may differ from country to country. This work represents an update of the 2011 Korean guideline for UTIs. The current guideline was developed by the update and adaptation method. This clinical practice guideline provides recommendations for the diagnosis and management of UTIs, including asymptomatic bacteriuria, acute uncomplicated cystitis, acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, complicated pyelonephritis related to urinary tract obstruction, and acute bacterial prostatitis. This guideline targets community-acquired UTIs occurring among adult patients. Healthcare-associated UTIs, catheter-associated UTIs, and infections in immunocompromised patients were not included in this guideline.

Successful ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease leads to resolution of urinary tract infections: Prospective outcomes with a 12-month follow-up

Introduction

To investigate the resolution of urinary tract infection (UTI) with the successful treatment of kidney stone disease (KSD).

We reviewed the outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) and stone treatment for patients with positive urine culture or recurrent UTIs and evaluated whether the infection resolved with the clearance of their urinary stones.

Material and methods

Between March 2012 and July 2016, consecutive patients who underwent URS for stone disease with a history of recurrent UTIs or culture proven UTIs were identified from a prospective database. Data was recorded on stone free rate (SFR) and infection free rate (IFR) during the follow-up period at 3, 6 and 12-months.

Results

During the study period, 103 consecutive patients with stone disease and associated UTI underwent URS over a 52-month period (mean age: 60 years, Female: Male ratio of 2:1). The mean cumulative stone size was 16 mm (range: 3–107 mm) and a positive pre-operative urine culture was found in 81 (79%) patients. While the overall SFR was 96%, the total complication rate was 12.6% (n = 13) and these were all Clavien I/II complications.

At follow-up, the SFR and IFR was 96% and 88% at 3-months, and 82% and 71% at 12-months, respectively (p <0.001). While almost three-quarters of patients were stone and infection free at 12-months, the majority of those with stones recurrence also had recurrence of their UTI.

Conclusions

The majority of patients will remain infection free at the 12-month follow-up if they are stone free after their initial treatment. Stone recurrence, which is more likely in high-risk patients, is also linked to the recurrence of their UTI.

[Mortality predictive factors in patients with urinary sepsis associated to upper urinary tract calculi]

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics of patients with urinary sepsis associated to ureteral calculi admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and to identify predictors of mortality in the first 24 hours of admission.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study covering a 16-year period (2006-2011) was carried out.

SETTING

The combined clinical/surgical ICU of a secondary-level University hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted to the ICU due to obstructive urinary sepsis.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN VARIABLES

We analyzed general clinical and laboratory test and urological data. The diagnostic technique, affected side, decompression technique, isolated microorganism and antibiotic therapy used were also considered. The assessment of risk factors was performed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients admitted to the ICU were included in the study, with a mortality rate of 19.6%. The diagnosis was mainly established by ultrasound, and the most commonly used decompression technique was retrograde JJ stenting. Microorganisms were isolated in 48.6% of the patients. In total, 20.6% of the patients had bacteremia. Multivariate analysis found age, acute renal failure and the use of vasoactive drugs administered continuously for the first 24 hours of admission to be independently associated to mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, acute renal failure and the need for vasoactive drugs were associated to an increased risk of mortality in patients with urinary sepsis associated to upper urinary tract calculi.

Clinical factors associated with shock in bacteremic UTI

PURPOSE

Urinary tract infection (UTI) often causes bacteremia, resulting in shock. The purpose of this study is to investigate urological bacteremia and bacteremia shock cases and seek for the clinical factors associated with urological bacteremic shock.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive cases with bacteremia caused by UTI from the Department of Urology, Kobe University Hospital were studied. These cases were diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 and had full data available for analysis. We investigated the potential clinical factors associated with bacteremic shock (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg with UTI), including: (1) the number of basal general diseases (such as diabetes, malignancy, immune diseases, heart diseases, liver diseases, and kidney diseases), (2) causative bacteria, (3) antibiotics and therapeutic intervention, (4) gram-negative bacteria, (5) resistance to imipenem (which is often used in this infection), and (6) serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) at the time of diagnosis of bacteremic UTI.

RESULTS

A total of 81 causative bacteria were isolated: 42 cases were gram-negative and 39 were gram-positive bacteria. In detail, Escherichia coli was the most common, followed by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The comparison data revealed that urological bacteremic shock cases had significantly increased CRP (p < 0.001). Our univariate analyses showed indwelling urinary tract catheters (p = 0.02) as a significant clinical factor associated with urological bacteremic shock and multivariate analyses showed that the presence of indwelling urinary tract catheters before UTI was a significant clinical factor associated with urological bacteremic shock (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Indwelling urinary catheters before UTI and high CRP were clinical factors associated with urological bacteremic shock. This result should be considered during decision-making for UTI treatments in high risk cases or urological bacteremia cases.