Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node detection in gynecologic malignancies of the lower genital tract

Sentinel node mapping using hysteroscopic injection of indocyanine green and laparoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer staging

Herein is presented a technique for minimally invasive sentinel node mapping. The patient had apparently early stage endometrial cancer. Sentinel node mapping was performed using a hysteroscopic injection of indocyanine green followed by laparoscopic sentinel node detection via near-infrared fluorescence. This technique ensures delineation of lymphatic drainage from the tumor area, thus achieving accurate detection of sentinel nodes.

The development of priority cervical cancer trials: a Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup report

Since the late 1990s, when a spate of US studies reported the benefit of chemoradiation for cervical cancer, there has been a dearth of clinical trials in cervical cancer. This requires to be addressed with urgency because this disease is responsible for a quarter of a million deaths globally each year, mostly in developing countries, but therapeutic advances are required in all health care settings. The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) is a worldwide collaborative of leading national groups that develops and promotes multinational trials in gynecologic cancer. In recognition of the pressing need for action, the GCIG convened an international meeting with expert representations from most of the GCIG groups and selected large centers in low- and middle-income countries. The focus was to identify consensus on several concepts for clinical trials, which would be developed and promoted by the GCIG and launched with major international participation. The first half of the meeting was devoted to a resume of the current state of the knowledge and identifying the gaps most needing new evidence. The second half of the meeting was concerned with achieving consensus on the way forward. There were 2 principal outcomes. The first was a proposal to establish, under the umbrella of GCIG, a cervical cancer trials network of centers from countries currently outside GCIG (Eastern Europe, India, Thailand, Southern Africa, and South and Central America), which could increase international participation in trials, conducted within the principles of good clinical practice. The second was to identify the priorities for clinical trials. These included additional systemic therapy before or after chemoradiation; less radical surgery for small, early-stage tumors; the use of fewer fractions to improve cost-effectiveness of treatment in centers with limited resources; and chemotherapy to improve resectability of bulky tumors.

Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a less radical surgery; laparoscopic lymphadenectomy followed by a simple vaginal hysterectomy in sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative early cervical cancer patients. Treatment-associated morbidity and oncological outcome were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2000 to September 2007, 60 patients (50 squamous and 10 adenocarcinoma patients) in stages 3-IA1, 11-IA2 and 46-IB1 with median age of 44.6 years (range 33-64 years) were enrolled. Patients were selected based on favorable cervical tumors (IA1 with lymph-vascular space invasion [LVSI], IA2 and IB1 with tumor size less than 20 mm and less than half of stromal invasion). All patients underwent laparoscopic SLN identification using frozen section (FS). Negative SLN patients underwent complete pelvic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. FS positive patients underwent radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

The average number of sentinel nodes per side was 1.4 with detection rate per side of 95%. The average number of removed nodes was 23.2. Five patients (8.3%) were SLN positive. There were two false negative FS results (both were micrometastases in SLN). Median follow-up was 47 months (range 12-92). There were no recurrences in 55 SLN negative patients and in 5 SLN positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Lymphatic mapping and SLN identification improved safety in less radical surgery in early stage cervical cancer. This preliminary study showed that it is both feasible and safe to reduce the radicality of parametrial resection for small tumor volume in SLN negative patients. Results also indicated that treatment-associated morbidity is low.

Update on sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynecologic cancers

The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) holds the promise of more accurate staging of the primary tumor and fewer wound complications and lymphedema than associated with lymphadenectomy. Regional lymphadenectomy may no longer be a requirement in SLNB-negative patients if the SLN procedure is adequately validated in prospective clinical trials for gynecologic malignancies.

The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer

BACKGROUND

Over two-thirds of patients with endometrioid uterine cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program from 1988 to 2001 did not undergo a lymphadenectomy. These patients were compared to those who had a lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were employed.

RESULTS

Of 39,396 women (median age: 65 years) with endometrioid uterine cancers, 12,333 (31.3%) underwent surgical staging procedures including lymphadenectomy. The remainder did not receive a lymphadenectomy. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of stages I-IV women who underwent lymphadenectomy were 95.5%, 90.4%, 73.8%, and 53.3% compared to 96.6%, 82.2%, 63.1%, and 26.9% in those without lymphadenectomy (p>0.05 for stage I; p<0.001 for stages II-IV). In stage I patients, those who did not receive lymphadenectomy had a higher proportion of tumors with grade 1 histology and/or disease limited to the endometrium compared to those who underwent lymphadenectomy (54.8 % vs. 34.7%; p<0.001, grade 1 disease; 26.6% vs. 15.9%; p<0.001, no myometrial invasion). In patients with stage I grade 3 disease, those who underwent lymphadenectomy had a better 5-year DSS than those without lymphadenectomy (90% vs. 85%; p=0.0001); however, no benefit for lymphadenectomy was seen for patients with stage I grade 1 (p=0.26) and grade 2 (p=0.14) disease. On multivariable analysis, younger age, Caucasian race, early-stage disease, low grade histology, and lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors for improved disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved survival in stage I grade 3 and more advanced endometrioid uterine cancers.