Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Pain Control Paradigms: A Comparative Review of Anesthesia Techniques in Trigeminal Neuralgia Therapy

This review summarizes the intraoperative anesthesia protocols for radiofrequency thermal coagulation in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of two primary anesthesia approaches. The first approach involves the injection of local anesthetics, such as lidocaine, at the radiofrequency target, which can alleviate pain during the procedure but carries potential risks. The second approach discusses the efficacy of intravenous administration of propofol for pain control, highlighting the necessity for vigilant monitoring of vital signs during the procedure. This article aims to provide the latest evidence-based guidance for anesthesia protocol selection in clinical practice.

Ultrasound combined with DSA-guided pulsed radiofrequency for perineal herpes zoster pain management: clinical outcomes and complications

Background

Herpes zoster (HZ) in the perineal area is a rare disease. There are limited treatment options for this disease. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound combined with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for perineal herpes zoster-related pain.

Methods

Two hundred and twelve patients with perineal HZ were enrolled at the pain department. From January 1, 2018 to December 30, 2019, patients with HZ in the perineal area were treated with PRF under DSA guidance, and from January 1, 2020 to October 30, 2023, patients with HZ in the perineal area were treated with PRF under ultrasound combined with DSA guidance. The included patients were divided into two groups: DSA group and ultrasound + DSA group. The visual analog scale (VAS), central sensitization inventory (CSI), sleep quality scores (SQS), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) at baseline and after the PRF treatment were analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy.

Results

The mean VAS scores, CSI scores, SQS, and SF-36 scores were statistically significantly lower after treatment compared to baseline (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in VAS scores, CSI scores, SQS, and SF-36 scores between the DSA group and the ultrasound + DSA group (p > 0.05). The time it took from the start of the puncture to the successful puncture was significantly shorter in the ultrasound + DSA group compared to the DSA group (41.2 ± 21.2 vs. 48.1 ± 20.3, p = 0.035). The ultrasound + DSA group had a higher percentage of satisfaction with the procedure than the DSA group (90/99, 90.9% vs. 62/78, 79.5%, p = 0.030). A total of 27 postoperative complications occurred. The incidence of puncture site hematoma was significantly higher in the DSA group (10/78, 12.8%) than that in the ultrasound + DSA group (4/99, 4.0%) (p = 0.032).

Conclusion

PRF can reduce pain from HZ in the perineal region, alleviate central sensitization, enhance sleep quality, and improve overall quality of life. When PRF is performed under ultrasound guidance combined with DSA, it shortens the puncture time and reduces the risk of hematoma formation at the puncture site, making it the recommended method for clinical use.

A Comparison Between the Efficacy of Trigeminal Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary-Mandibular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and objective Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating disorder characterized by acute episodic attacks of pain that significantly impair patients' quality of life and overall functioning. Initial therapeutic strategies to treat this condition include pharmacological options, particularly carbamazepine. In cases with resistance to dose escalation and polypharmacy, interventional procedures may be warranted. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of trigeminal ganglion (TG) radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) and ultrasound (US)-guided maxillary/mandibular (max/mand) nerve pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treating TN, based on the findings at six months post-treatment. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of these interventions on drug consumption and interventional safety based on adverse events. Methods This prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at a single pain clinic. Forty-four patients were randomized into two groups. Group RFT received TG RFT at 60 °C, 65 °C, and 70 °C for 60 seconds each, whereas Group PRF received max/mand PRF for 240 seconds. Pain relief was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and intervention effectiveness on medication consumption was evaluated by using the Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III). The rates of intervention-related adverse events were also compared. Results Both RFT and PRF significantly alleviated pain at one and six months post-treatment compared to baseline (p<0.05). No statistical differences were found in the NRS and MQS III scores between the groups. At six months, 77.3% of RFT patients and 63.9% of PRF patients experienced at least 50% pain relief, with no statistically significant difference. Hypoesthesia occurred in two RFT patients, and masseter weakness was observed in one patient, while no adverse events were reported in the PRF group. Conclusions TG RFT and max/mand PRF are effective treatments for TN. US-guided max/mand PRF, which avoids RFT-associated complications and radiation exposure, may be the superior and preferable option. In this study, the potential space between the coronoid process and maxilla was used to access the maxillary nerve during the maxillary block and PRF procedures, in contrast to the classical approach through the mandibular notch. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to gain deeper insights into the topic.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve for the Treatment of Headache Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review

Background

Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit from nerve blocks with local anesthetic and steroids. However, the evidence supporting this practice is unclear.

Aims

This narrative systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of GON PRFN on headaches.

Methods

Databases were searched for studies, published up to February 1, 2024, investigating PRFN of GON for adults with headaches. Abstracts and posters were excluded. Primary outcome was change in headache intensity. Secondary outcomes included effect on monthly headache frequency (MHF), mental and physical health, mood, sleep, analgesic consumption, and side-effects. Two reviewers screened and extracted data.

Results

Twenty-two papers (2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 11 cohort, and 9 case reports/series) including 608 patients were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, headache diagnosis, PRF target and settings, and image-guidance was noted. PRFN settings varied (38-42°C, 40-60 V, and 150-400 Ohms). Studies demonstrated PRFN to provide significant analgesia and reduction of MHF in chronic migraine (CM) from 3 to 6 months; and significant pain relief for ON from six to ten months. Mild adverse effects were reported in 3.1% of cohort. A minority of studies reported on secondary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was low.

Conclusions

Low-quality evidence indicates an analgesic benefit from PRFN of GON for ON and CM, but its role for other headache types needs more investigation. Optimal PRFN target and settings remain unclear. High-quality RCTs are required to further explore the role of this intervention. PROSPERO ID CRD42022363234.

Neuronavigation-guided Percutaneous Rhizotomies to Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Neuronavigation improves intraoperative visualization of the cranial structures, which is valuable in percutaneous surgical treatments for patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who are refractory to pharmacotherapy or reluctant to receive open surgery. The objective of this review was to evaluate the available neuronavigation-guided percutaneous surgical treatment modalities with cannulation of foramen ovale to TN, and their relative benefits and limitations.

METHODS

This review was conducted based on the PRISMA statement. An initial search was performed on electronic databases, followed by manual and reference searches. Study and patient characteristics, rhizotomy procedure and neuronavigation details, and treatment outcomes (initial pain relief and pain recurrence within 2 y, success rate of forman ovale cannulation, and complications) were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed with a quality assessment based on the ROBINS-I tools.

RESULTS

Ten studies (491 operations, 403 participants) were analyzed. Three percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy modalities identified were radiofrequency thermocoagulation rhizotomy (RFTR), percutaneous balloon compression, and glycerol rhizotomy. Intraoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging fusion-based RFTR had the highest initial pain relief rate of 97.0%. The success rate of foramen ovale cannulation ranged from 92.3% to 100% under neuronavigation. Facial hypoesthesia and masticatory muscle weakness were the most reported complications.

DISCUSSION

Neuronavigation-guided percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomies showed possible superior pain relief outcomes to that of conventional rhizotomies in TN, with the benefits of radiation reduction and lower complication development rates. The limitations of neuronavigation remain its high cost and limited availability. Higher-quality prospective studies and randomized clinical trials of neuronavigation-guided percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy were lacking.

The long-term outcome of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve in trigeminal neuralgia

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve has been used for trigeminal neuralgia. However, the long-term outcomes of radiofrequency thermocoagulation have not been established. To evaluate the long-term efficacy of RFTC of peripheral branches in patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a comprehensive medical center in China. Patients who underwent radiofrequency thermocoagulation of peripheral branches for refractory trigeminal neuralgia from May 2014 to March 2021 were included for analysis. A total of 84 patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia underwent 105 procedures. BNI I-II which represents treatment success was achieved in 76/84 (90%) patients and 93/105 (89%) procedures. During follow-up, BNI I and II were maintained in 64/76 (84%), 40/73 (55%), 20/67 (30%), 17/65 (26%), 12/61 (20%), and 8/58 (14%) of patients at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years, after the first procedure, respectively. For all the 105 procedures, BNI I and II were maintained in 68/93 (73%), 41/89(46%), 22/82(27%), 15/79 (19%), 8/74 (11%), and 3/72 (4%) at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years, respectively. There is no significant difference between the first and repeat thermocoagulation in terms of immediate (90% vs. 81%, P=0.140) and long-term efficacies (24 months vs.18 months, P=0.266). Radiofrequency thermocoagulation resulted in better long-term outcomes in patients with typical purely paroxysmal pain (24 months vs. 11 months, P=0.033). Radiofrequency ablation of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve might be a safe and effective method in the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

The Role of Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Narrative Review

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain condition that affects the trigeminal nerve, the largest of the cranial nerves. It is characterized by severe, sudden, and recurrent facial pain, often triggered by light touch or a breeze. Treatment options for TN include medication, nerve blocks, and surgery, but radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a promising alternative. RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that uses heat energy to destroy the small portion of the trigeminal nerve responsible for the pain. The procedure is performed under local anesthesia and can be done as an outpatient procedure. RFA has been shown to provide long-term pain relief for TN patients with a low complication rate. However, RFA is not suitable for all TN patients and may not be effective for those with multiple pain sites. Despite these limitations, RFA is a valuable option for TN patients who are not responding to other treatments. Furthermore, RFA is a good alternative for a patient unsuitable for surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term effectiveness of RFA and identify the best candidates for the procedure.