Treatment of the first episode of schizophrenia: an update on pharmacologic and psychological interventions

Help, I can't help: A qualitative study of psychiatric nurse's perspectives on their care for people who hear voices

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT?: There are no studies on the perceptions of psychiatric nurses on interventions they provided to people hearing voices while in an acute psychiatric unit in Ireland. There are three studies focussed on psychiatric nurses' experiences of caring for people that hear voices, two based in England and one based in Australia. Only two of these studies is focussed on nurses working in an acute psychiatric unit. WHAT IS THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This study used semi-structured interviews to explore perceptions of psychiatric nurses in the Republic of Ireland on interventions they provided people hearing voices while in an acute psychiatric unit. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Further quantitative and qualitative research into the nursing practice for people experiencing auditory hallucinations, in both in-patient and community settings. Follow up supports and supervision after the completion training programmes should be implemented, to ensure the transition of skills and knowledge to the clinical environment. Further investigation into whether or not psychiatric nurses are well prepared for the developments outlined in national polices. ABSTRACT: Aims and Objectives To explore the perspectives and experiences of Irish psychiatric nurses working in acute care in regard to their role in addressing hearing voices in the people in their care, with a view to gain insight in the nurses' personal experiences, interventions they provide, attitudes, knowledge, facilitating factors and challenges. Background Treatment of auditory hallucinations often takes place in acute psychiatric care. Traditionally treatment was focused on medication, but this is no longer the sole approach, with psychosocial interventions gaining ground. Psychiatric nurses have the potential to provide these interventions. As part of the changing emphasis of mental health care in Ireland towards more responsibilities for psychiatric nurses, there is a need to establish whether psychiatric nurses are prepared to take up these added responsibilities. Design A qualitative study, comprising of semi-structured interviews (n = 16). Results Four themes emerged through thematic analysis. These included (a) the importance of therapeutic relationships; (b) reservations about the emphasis on medication; (c) limitations to interventions; and (d) the lack of focus/structure of interventions. Conclusions The use of systematic psychosocial interventions for people who hear voices is not well supported in the acute psychiatric settings the psychiatric nurses in the study worked in.

Active psychosis and pro-inflammatory cytokines in first-episode of psychosis

Higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are consistently found in the serum of first episode psychosis (FEP) patients and this immune dysfunction could contribute to neural harm. On the other hand, lengthy periods of active psychosis during the early phases of the illness appear to be associated to worst functional outcome. We aim to explore the possible relationship between lengthy periods of active psychosis during early phases of the illness and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This is a prospective clinical study consisting of a 3-year clinical follow-up. We assessed the relation between the duration of active psychosis in patients with FEP and the serum levels of 21 cytokines at baseline and 3 months after initiating antipsychotic medication. We used the Human High Sensitivity T Cell Magnetic Bead Panel protocol from the Milliplex® Map Kit. The sample consisted of 59 patients with a FEP. The percentage of variation of the serum levels of the chemokine MIP-3α during the first 3 months of antipsychotic treatment and the score in negative psychotic symptoms 3 months after the initiation of antipsychotic medication, acted as predictors of the initial time to remission of positive psychotic symptoms. Our findings open the possibility to investigating the potential use of the variation in chemokine MIP-3α serum levels during the first months of antipsychotic treatment to identify a subtype of FEP patients that could benefit from an add-on treatment with immune modulators. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT02897167. DATE OF FIRST REGISTRATION: September 13, 2016. "Study of the Activation of Proinflammatory Pathways of Toll-like Receptors in Schizophrenia Patients (PAFIP_TLR)". https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02897167.

Duration of active psychosis during early phases of the illness and functional outcome: The PAFIP 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Longer duration of active psychosis (presence of positive psychotic symptoms) has been associated to worsening of functional and symptomatic outcome in patients with a first-episode of psychosis. There could be a "critical period" of increased brain vulnerability in the early phases of the illness when the effect of active psychosis would be exceptionally pernicious.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to explore the impact of lengthy periods of active psychosis during early phases of illness on long-term functional outcome.

METHODS

This is a prospective clinical study. We assessed the effect of the duration active psychosis in patients with a first-episode of nonaffective psychosis on long-term social functioning and functional recovery. The study consisted of a 3-year clinical follow-up and a functional evaluation performed after a 10-year period.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 169 patients with a first-episode of non-affective psychosis. The duration of active psychosis after treatment (DAT) during the 3-year clinical follow-up acted as predictor of social functioning at the 10-year functional evaluation (Wald: 10.705; p = .001), but not of functional recovery. The duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) did not act as a predictor of any of the two long-term measures of functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Active psychosis in early phases of the illness seems to be correlated to worst long-term functionality. In this study the duration of active psychosis after treatment (DAT) was a better predictor of long-term outcome than the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). Reducing DAT should be considered an important objective for early intervention programs.

Current Data on and Clinical Insights into the Treatment of First Episode Nonaffective Psychosis: A Comprehensive Review

Implementing the most suitable treatment strategies and making appropriate clinical decisions about individuals with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is a complex and crucial task, with relevant impact in illness outcome. Treatment approaches in the early stages should go beyond choosing the right antipsychotic drug and should also address tractable factors influencing the risk of relapse. Effectiveness and likely metabolic and endocrine disturbances differ among second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and should guide the choice of the first-line treatment. Clinicians should be aware of the high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in schizophrenia patients, and therefore monitoring weight and metabolic changes across time is mandatory. Behavioral and counseling interventions might be partly effective in reducing weight gain and metabolic disturbances. Ziprasidone and aripiprazole have been described to be least commonly associated with weight gain or metabolic changes. In addition, some of the SGAs (risperidone, amisulpride, and paliperidone) have been associated with a significant increase of plasma prolactin levels. Overall, in cases of FEP, there should be a clear recommendation of using lower doses of the antipsychotic medication. If no or minimal clinical improvement is found after 2 weeks of treatment, such patients may benefit from a change or augmentation of treatment. Clinicians should provide accurate information to patients and relatives about the high risk of relapse if antipsychotics are discontinued, even if patients have been symptom free and functionally recovered on antipsychotic treatment for a lengthy period of time.

Treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis: a randomized comparison of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone over 1 year

RATIONALE

Discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment at early phases increases the risk of poor adherence to maintenance drug therapy. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of effectiveness may determine a good adherence to treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of aripiprazole, ziprasidone and quetiapine in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders at 1 year.

METHOD

From October 2005 to January 2011 a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred two first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (N = 78), ziprasidone (N = 62), or quetiapine (N = 62) and followed up for 1 year. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

The overall dropout rate at 1 year was 13.37 %. The treatment discontinuation rate differed significantly between treatment groups (aripiprazole = 43.6 %, ziprasidone = 66.1 % and quetiapine = 82.3 %) (χ 2 = 22.545; p < 0.001). Insufficient efficacy in the group of quetiapine is the most important reason for differences in discontinuation rates between agents (χ 2 = 19.436; p < 0.001). The mean time to all-cause discontinuation was significantly different between groups (LogRank = 30.732 p < 0.001). The profile of extrapyramidal symptoms varies between treatments. Patients on ziprasidone were more likely to be prescribed antidepressants.

CONCLUSIONS

First episode patients treated with quetiapine have a higher risk of treatment discontinuation at midterm due to insufficient efficacy. Establishing differences between SGAs may help clinicians on prescribing decision for treatment of individuals presenting with first-episode non-affective psychosis.

The relationship between clinical outcomes and quality of life in first-episode mania: a longitudinal analysis

OBJECTIVES

  Despite growing attention to the relationship between bipolar disorder (BD) and quality of life (QoL), there remains a lack of information about QoL in the early stages of BD, and about the course of QoL in people with BD over time. Here, we report on QoL and symptomatic outcomes over a 1.5-year period in a Canadian sample of first-episode mania patients.

METHODS

  Patients (n = 63) with DSM-IV-TR BD type I recovering from a recent episode of mania were recruited from a university-based hospital setting in Vancouver, BC, Canada and assessed at six monthly intervals for 18 months. In addition to symptomatic and cognitive assessments, two self-report QoL scales [the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)] were administered.

RESULTS

  Baseline QoL scores were high, with mean Q-LES-Q scores at 70% of the maximum possible score; QoL continued to show a trend towards improvement over time. Multiple hierarchical regressions were used to explore predictors of QoL over time, finding that: (i) length of illness and severity of depressive symptoms at baseline predicted Q-LES-Q scores at both baseline and six months; (ii) the number of previous depressive episodes and severity of depression at baseline and 12 months all predicted QoL at 12 months; and (iii) only severity of depressive symptoms at 12 months predicted QoL at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

  Our observation that QoL in patients who have recently experienced an episode of mania can be relatively preserved offers hope, both for healthcare providers and for those newly diagnosed. Further, that severity of depressive symptoms even in the early stages of the disease was the consistent predictor of QoL suggests that depressive symptoms need to be aggressively treated to improve QoL.

Course, outcomes, and psychosocial interventions for first-episode mania

OBJECTIVES

The course of bipolar disorder tends to worsen over time, highlighting the importance of early intervention. Despite the recognized need for adjunctive psychosocial treatments in first-episode mania, very few studies have evaluated psychological interventions for this period of significant risk. In this empirical review, we evaluate existing research on first-episode bipolar disorder, compare this body of research to parallel studies of first-episode schizophrenia, and identify strategies for future research.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases was conducted to identify studies of first-episode mania, as well as first-episode schizophrenia. Recovery and relapse rates were compared across studies.

RESULTS

In contrast to a number of studies of first-episode schizophrenia, the authors identified only seven independent programs assessing first-episode mania. Findings from these studies suggest that, while pharmacological treatment helps patients achieve recovery from acute episodes, it fails to bring patients to sustained remission. Early psychosocial intervention may be imperative in reducing residual symptoms, preventing recurrence of mood episodes, and improving psychosocial functioning. However, very few studies of psychosocial interventions for first-episode mania have been systematically studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of first-episode mania indicate a gap between syndromal/symptomatic and functional recovery. Novel psychosocial interventions for first-episode mania may help bridge this gap, but require controlled study.

Treatment Response in First-episode Schizophrenia

First episode schizophrenia (FES) patients tend to be more responsive to treatment. An adequate response has been associated with a favourable long-term course in FES patients. Yet, despite the generally very favourable response profile around one quarter of the patients shows persisting symptoms of psychosis. To improve the outcome and course of psychosis great effort has emerged in identifying biological and clinical variables associated with non-response in order to identify non-responders as early as possible and adopt specific treatment strategies improving illness outcome. Different antipsychotic treatment regimens have been evaluated in terms of their efficacy in reducing symptoms of FES with psychological interventions gaining increasing importance in the treatment concept of patients suffering from their first illness episode. Therefore, aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the response patterns, the most important predictors of response/non-response as well as on effective treatment interventions in FES patients.

Predicting relapse after a first episode of non-affective psychosis: a three-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Preventing relapse during the first years of illness has a critical impact on lifelong outcomes in schizophrenia. A better understanding and improvement in factors which influence relapse should diminish the risk of relapse and consequently improve the outcome of the illness.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with relapse after 3 years of a first episode in a sample of non-affective psychosis patients who are representative of clinical practice in an epidemiological catchment.

METHOD

We analyzed socio-demographic and clinical data from a cohort of patients who were treated in a specialized early intervention service and who were at risk of relapse during a 3-year follow-up. Univariate analyses, logistic regression and survival analyses were performed. The analyzed variables included gender, age at onset, duration of untreated psychosis, clinical severity at baseline, insight at baseline, premorbid functioning, substance use, family history of psychosis and adherence to medication.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients considered to be at risk for relapse, 91 (65%) individuals relapsed at least once over the three-year period. The relapse rates at 1 year and 2 years were 20.7% and 40.7%, respectively. Adherence to medication was the only significant predictor of relapse after a three-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-7.7; p < 0.001]. Comparison of the mean time of relapse between adherent and non-adherent patients also revealed statistically significant differences (933 and 568 days, respectively). 50% of patients will relapse despite being categorized as treatment adherents.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence to medication is the biggest predictive factor of relapse after a first episode of psychosis.

Relapse prevention and remission attainment in first-episode non-affective psychosis. A randomized, controlled 1-year follow-up comparison of haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine

The effectiveness of antipsychotics in preventing relapses and attaining symptomatic remission is a relevant topic of psychopharmacological research. The purpose of the present study was to compare the relapse and symptomatic remission rates during the first year of treatment between low doses of haloperidol and SGAs (olanzapine and risperidone) in drug-naïve first-episode non-affective psychosis individuals. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label study conducted from February 2001 to February 2006. Data for the present investigation were obtained from a large epidemiologic and 3-year longitudinal intervention program of first-episode psychosis (DSM-IV criteria) conducted at the University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. One hundred and seventy four patients were randomly assigned to haloperidol (N = 56), olanzapine (N = 55), or risperidone (N = 63) and followed up for 1 year. Primary effectiveness measures were the time up to relapse and rates of relapse and symptomatic remission. There were no significant differences in the relapse rate between treatments (11.1% haloperidol; 18.5% olanzapine, and 13.8% risperidone) (χ(2) = 1.230; p = 0.541) or in the time up to relapse (Log Rank χ(2) = 0.308; p = 0.857). The rates of relapse for adherent (11.2%) and non-adherent (26.9%) patients were significantly different (χ(2) = 4.215; df = 1; p = 0.040). The remission rate did not differ significantly between treatment groups (χ(2) = 2.760; p = 0.252) and adherence to medication did not seem to significantly influence remission rates. We conclude that haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone show a similar effectiveness in relapse prevention or in remission attainment during the first year of treatment.