Review of Clinical Registries of Psoriatic Arthritis: Lessons Learned? Value for the Future?

Mortality in psoriatic arthritis: Risk, causes of death, predictors for death

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Mortality studies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have provided inconsistent results. This study aimed to: 1) Estimate trends in mortality rates among PsA patients over calendar time; 2) Evaluate cause-specific mortality rates in patients with PsA compared to the general population; 3) Identify predictors for mortality in PsA.

METHODS

The study was carried out at the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Clinic where patients are followed prospectively according to a standard protocol at 6- to 12- month intervals. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated overall, by age, and by sex with reference to the Ontario population. Causes of death were recorded by ICD9 and ICD10 codes and cause-specific SMRs were computed. Cox regression models were used to identify predictors for mortality among PsA patients.

RESULTS

Among 1490 patients followed over 15062.8 patient-years, 225 (15%) confirmed deaths were recorded (111 females, 114 males). The overall SMR was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.81-1.05), the sex-specific SMRs were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.89-1.30) for females and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-0.97) for males. The age-specific SMRs were 3.36 (95% CI: 1.61-6.18), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.68-1.34), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-1.06) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66-1.11) for 20-39, 40-59, 60-79 and above 80 years of age, respectively. Major causes of death included malignant neoplasms (n=61; SMR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.72-1.28), acute myocardial infarction (n=32; SMR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.58), and pneumonia (n=14; SMR=2.46, 95% CI: 1.27-4.31). Factors found to be associated with increased mortality include elevated acute phase reactants, presence of comorbidities such as heart disease and cancer, and lower education level.

CONCLUSION

Young patients with PsA are at increased mortality risk. Better control of comorbidities may reduce this risk.

Comorbidity in psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Comorbid conditions are common and impact outcomes in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but less data are available for psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

AIMS

To describe baseline demographics and prevalence of comorbidities in participants with PsA in an Australian cohort using data from the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) and to compare the prevalence of comorbidities in ARAD participants with PsA with those with RA.

METHODS

ARAD is a voluntary national registry for inflammatory arthritis. Data, including demographic details, medication use, history of comorbid medical illnesses and patient-reported outcomes, all self-reported, were extracted from questionnaires completed at the time of database enrolment for participants with PsA and RA. Demographic information and prevalence of comorbidities were summarised using descriptive statistics. Prevalence of comorbidities in PsA and RA were compared using logistic regression, adjusting for age, gender, disease duration, education, employment and prednisone use.

RESULTS

There were 490 participants with PsA, 59.2% female, mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 50.4 (21.1) years and disease duration 16.4 (9.7) years, and 57.8% reported having two or more comorbidities. Hypertension (38.2%) and depression (35.9%) were the most common. Compared with RA, participants with PsA had greater odds of depression (adjusted OR (95% CI): 2.1 (1.7-2.6)), hypertension (1.7 (1.4-2.1)), hyperlipidaemia (2.0 (1.6-2.5)), diabetes (2.2 (1.6-3.0)) and a history of ischaemic heart disease (2.0 (1.3-2.9)).

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of comorbidity were found in ARAD participants with PsA. The prevalence of depression, cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities were higher in PsA than RA participants in our Australian cohort.

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriatic arthritis: can we make better use of patient data registries?

The primary aim of this study is to explore the extent to which registry data may fulfill the evidence requirements of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies evaluating biologic therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), where trial data are lacking or insufficient. In addition, the paper aims to identify how future data collection in PsA registries might be better tailored to inform CEA research. A review of the literature was performed to identify existing registries containing PsA patients. Where possible, information was extracted on the design and characteristics of the registries. The registries were then appraised according to a set of criteria that was formulated based on the methods currently used to model PsA in the CEA literature. A review of the literature identified 21 potentially relevant registries from around the world containing patients with PsA. There was substantial variation regarding the extent to which the registries, as a whole, were useful for the purposes of CEA studies. There were also notable disparities found in terms of the accessibility of the registries to researchers. The critical review conducted in this study showed that all of the registries identified are potentially useful, at least in some degree, for the purposes of informing CEA studies in PsA. However, no individual registry on its own was found to meet all of the evidence requirements when considering how the disease has been modeled previously.

Systematic literature review of domains assessed in psoriatic arthritis to inform the update of the psoriatic arthritis core domain set

The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify domains and outcome measures used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) studies in the past 5 years, and to compare the measurement of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2006 PsA Core Domain Set in studies published in 2010–2015 vs those published in 2006–2010. We performed a systematic literature search in two databases, PubMed and Embase, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PsA. We also identified PsA longitudinal observational studies (LOS). Three patient research partners provided input into study conception, and data collection and interpretation. We identified 41 studies representing 22 unique RCTs, 27 LOS and 12 registries. Across all studies, we identified 24 domains and 169 outcome measures. In addition to the PsA Core Domain Set (6 domains), the following domains were also assessed in more than 30% of RCTs: acute phase reactants, dactylitis, enthesitis, fatigue and work productivity. We identified a range of 1–15 outcome measures per domain with a mean (SD) of 7 (4.7) per domain. The complete PsA Core Domain Set was assessed in 59% of RCTs in 2010–2015 compared to 23.5% RCTs in 2006–2010. There has been increased measurement of the PsA Core Domain Set in RCTs and LOS in the past 5 years. Numerous additional outcomes were also measured. The PsA Core Domain Set needs an update to standardise PsA outcome assessments. This SLR will inform the development of an updated PsA Core Domain Set with patient research partner input.

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated.

RESULTS

The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

Managing patients with psoriatic disease: the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. Up to 40 % of patients with psoriasis will go on to develop PsA, usually within 5-10 years of cutaneous disease onset. Both conditions share common pathogenic mechanisms involving genetic and environmental factors. Because psoriasis is typically present for years before PsA-related joint symptoms emerge, dermatologists are in a unique position to detect PsA earlier in the disease process through regular, routine screening of psoriasis patients. Distinguishing clinical features of PsA include co-occurrence of psoriatic skin lesions and nail dystrophy, as well as dactylitis and enthesitis. Patients with PsA are usually seronegative for rheumatoid factor, and radiographs may reveal unique features such as juxta-articular new bone formation and pencil-in-cup deformity. Early treatment of PsA with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has the potential to slow disease progression and maintain patient quality of life. Optimally, a single therapeutic agent will control both the skin and joint psoriatic symptoms. A number of traditional treatments used to manage psoriasis, such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, are also effective for PsA, but these agents are often inadequately effective, temporary in benefit and associated with significant safety concerns. Biologic anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, are effective for treating patients who have both psoriasis and PsA. However, a substantial number of patients may lose efficacy, have adverse effects or find intravenous or subcutaneous administration inconvenient. Emerging oral treatments, including phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, such as apremilast, and new biologics targeting interleukin-17, such as secukinumab, brodalumab and ixekizumab, have shown encouraging clinical results in the treatment of psoriasis and/or PsA. Active and regular collaboration of dermatologists with rheumatologists in managing patients who have psoriasis and PsA is likely to yield more optimal control of psoriatic dermal and joint symptoms, and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Quantifying harmful effects of psoriatic diseases on quality of life: Cardio-metabolic outcomes in psoriatic arthritis study (COMPASS)

OBJECTIVE

Up to 30% of patients with psoriasis suffer from concurrent psoriatic arthritis, and both the diseases have worse quality-of-life outcomes compared to the general population. There is limited literature comparing quality-of-life outcomes between these diseases. We seek to compare quality-of-life outcomes between both these groups.

METHODS

The current study is a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of 252 patients with psoriatic diseases, who were recruited from 2 tertiary-care centers. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic and validated quality-of-life data using short form-12 (SF 12), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the quality-of-life outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 107 (42.5%) psoriatic arthritis and 145 (57.5%) psoriasis patients in the cohort. The groups had comparable gender distribution and co-morbid diseases prevalence, but arthritis patients were older and received biologics/DMARDs more frequently than psoriasis patients. The physical indices (identified by HAQ and SF 12 PCS) were worse for psoriatic arthritis, whereas the mental/psychometric indices (identified by DLQI and SF 12 MCS) were comparable between both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite aggressive therapy, physical quality of life was worse in psoriatic arthritis patients compared to psoriasis patients. The mental quality-of-life indices were comparable in both the groups and were still below the population norm. These results suggest need for screening for psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis to reduce the burden of physical quality of life and screening for early signs of psychiatric illnesses in both these disease populations.

Outcomes Research in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Using Large Databases and Research Networks: A Report from the GRAPPA 2013 Annual Meeting

Advances in healthcare informatics have increased the ability to address real-world, clinically relevant questions using large databases. When examining data sources, researchers and clinicians need to consider data validity, potential sources of misclassification, whether the source is sufficiently powered to detect clinically relevant differences, ability to obtain longitudinal data, containment of patients within a database, and ability to obtain structured point-of-care data. Population-based databases create opportunities for characterizing natural history of psoriatic diseases, conducting comparative effectiveness research, determining comorbidities, and providing epidemiology-based rational approaches to mechanistic investigations. Herein, we discuss the major data sources for clinical research in psoriasis, including electronic medical records, research networks, disease registries, and others.

Prevalence and treatment patterns of psoriatic arthritis in the UK

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of PsA in The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a large population-based medical records database in the UK, to examine factors associated with prevalent PsA among patients with psoriasis and to describe the use of DMARDs in patients with PsA.

METHODS

Two cohorts were derived from THIN to examine the prevalence of PsA in a cross-sectional study among all patients aged 18-90 years and among a subcohort of 4900 psoriasis patients aged 45-65 years. Prescription codes were used to describe therapies after the diagnosis of PsA. Associations for prevalent PsA among psoriasis patients were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 4.8 million patients in THIN between the ages of 18 and 90 years, 9045 patients had at least one medical code for PsA, giving an overall prevalence of 0.19% (95% CI 0.19%, 0.19%). Of those patients, 45.9% with PsA have been prescribed DMARDs. Among the 4064 confirmed psoriasis patients, the prevalence of PsA was 8.6% (95% CI 7.7%, 9.5%). PsA was more prevalent among patients with severe psoriasis [odds ratio (OR) 3.34; 95% CI 2.40, 4.65], obesity (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.30, 2.41) and duration of psoriasis for ≥10 years (OR 7.42; 95% CI 3.86, 14.25) in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of PsA in THIN is consistent with previous population-based estimates. Limitations include a definition of PsA based on a diagnostic code rather than Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Given the large population of PsA patients, THIN is an important resource for the study of PsA.

How can psoriatic arthritis be diagnosed early?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that usually develops after the onset of cutaneous psoriasis. Early diagnosis of PsA may lead to less joint damage and better long-term outcomes. Identifying inflammatory arthritis in individuals with psoriasis is the key to early diagnosis of PsA. Screening strategies targeted at individuals with psoriasis, as well as family members of patients with PsA will result in early identification of PsA. This article describes the various strategies that could be employed to identify inflammatory arthritis in patients with psoriasis so that appropriate referral to a rheumatologist for early diagnosis of PsA may be made.