1
|
Lee H, Thakker S, Pineault K, Wysock J, Tan WP. Salvage Cryoablation for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radiation-A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2717. [PMID: 39123445 PMCID: PMC11312114 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment options for prostate cancer typically entail active surveillance, surgery, radiation, or a combination of the above. Disease recurrence remains a concern, with a wide range of recurrence rates having been reported in the literature. In the setting of recurrence, the salvage treatment options include salvage prostatectomy, salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), salvage brachytherapy, and salvage cryoablation. In this review, we analyze the currently available data related to salvage cryoablation for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deivasigamani S, Kotamarti S, Rastinehad AR, Salas RS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Lepor H, Pinto P, Ahmed HU, Gill I, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Wysock J, Feller JF, Crouzet S, Kumar M P, Seguier D, Adams ES, Michael Z, Abreu A, Jack Tay K, Ward JF, Shinohara K, Katz AE, Villers A, Chin JL, Stricker PD, Baco E, Macek P, Ahmad AE, Chiu PKF, Crawford ED, Rogers CG, Futterer JJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Robertson CN, Hadaschik B, Marra G, Valerio M, Chong KT, Kasivisvanathan V, Tan WP, Lomas D, Walz J, Guimaraes GC, Mertziotis NI, Becher E, Finelli A, Kasraeian A, Lebastchi AH, Vora A, Rosen MA, Bakir B, Arcot R, Yee S, Netsch C, Meng X, de Reijke TM, Tan YG, Regusci S, Benjamin TGR, Olivares R, Noureldin M, Bianco FJ, Sivaraman A, Kim FJ, Given RW, Dason S, Sheetz TJ, Shoji S, Schulman A, Royce P, Shah TT, Scionti S, Salomon G, Laguna P, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Aminsharifi A, Cathelineau X, Gontero P, Stabile A, Grummet J, Ledbetter L, Graton M, Stephen Jones J, Polascik TJ. Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement. Eur Urol 2023; 84:547-560. [PMID: 37419773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whole-gland ablation is a feasible and effective minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previous systematic reviews supported evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but oncological outcomes were inconclusive owing to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world data on the mid- to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with clinically localized PCa, and to provide expert recommendations and commentary on these findings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications through February 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. As endpoints, baseline clinical characteristics, and oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. To estimate the pooled prevalence of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes, and to quantify and explain the heterogeneity, random-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-nine studies were identified, including 14 on cryoablation and 15 on HIFU with a median follow-up of 72 mo. Most of the studies were retrospective (n = 23), with IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study) stage 2b (n = 20) being most common. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival rates at 10 yr were 58%, 96%, 63%, 71-79%, and 84%, respectively. Erectile function was preserved in 37% of cases, and overall pad-free continence was achieved in 96% of cases, with a 1-yr rate of 97.4-98.8%. The rates of stricture, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, rectourethral fistula, and sepsis were observed to be 11%, 9.5%, 8%, 0.7%, and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term real-world data, and the safety profiles of cryoablation and HIFU are sound to support and be offered as primary treatment for appropriate patients with localized PCa. When compared with other existing treatment modalities for PCa, these ablative therapies provide nearly equivalent intermediate- to long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes, as well as excellent pad-free continence rates in the primary setting. This real-world clinical evidence provides long-term oncological and functional outcomes that enhance shared decision-making when balancing risks and expected outcomes that reflect patient preferences and values. PATIENT SUMMARY Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound are minimally invasive treatments available to selectively treat localized prostate cancer, considering their nearly comparable intermediate- to long term cancer control and preservation of urinary continence to other radical treatments in the primary setting. However, a well-informed decision should be made based on one's values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinath Kotamarti
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Eric S Adams
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Michael
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eduard Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Department of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter K F Chiu
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cary N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Service of Urology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Lomas
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Department of Urology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohit Arcot
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Samuel Yee
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Swiss International Prostate Centelenor, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ruben Olivares
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Fernando J Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Urologist Specialist Group, Miami Lakes, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Department of Urology, Maimonides Health Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Royce
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Graton
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He Z, Liu P, Zhang S, Yan J, Wang M, Cai Z, Wang J, Dong Y. A Freezing-Induced Turn-On Imaging Modality for Real-Time Monitoring of Cancer Cells in Cryosurgery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2019; 58:3834-3837. [PMID: 30600879 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201813239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Cryosurgery has attracted much attention for the treatment of tumors owing to its clear advantages. However, determining the volume of frozen tissues in real-time remains a challenge, which greatly lowers the therapeutic efficacy of cryosurgery and hinders its broad application for the treatment of cancers. Herein, we report a freezing-induced turn-on strategy for the selective real-time imaging of frozen cancer cells. As a type of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) fluorogen, TABD-Py molecules interact specifically with ice crystals and form aggregates at the ice/water interface. Consequently, bright fluorescent emission appears upon freezing. TABD-Py molecules are enriched mostly in the cancer cells and exhibit high biocompatibility as well as low cytotoxicity; therefore, a freezing-induced turn-on imaging modality for cryosurgery is developed, which will certainly maximize the therapeutic efficacy of cryosurgery in treating tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan He
- Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Pai Liu
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Shizhong Zhang
- Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Jie Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University, Third Hospital, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Mengni Wang
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Zhengxu Cai
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Jianjun Wang
- Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.,School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Yuping Dong
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He Z, Liu P, Zhang S, Yan J, Wang M, Cai Z, Wang J, Dong Y. A Freezing‐Induced Turn‐On Imaging Modality for Real‐Time Monitoring of Cancer Cells in Cryosurgery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/ange.201813239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan He
- Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
- School of Future TechnologyUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
| | - Pai Liu
- School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing Institute of Technology 5 South Zhongguancun Street Beijing 100081 China
| | - Shizhong Zhang
- Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
- School of Future TechnologyUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
| | - Jie Yan
- Center for Reproductive MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyPeking University Third Hospital Beijing 100081 China
| | - Mengni Wang
- School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing Institute of Technology 5 South Zhongguancun Street Beijing 100081 China
| | - Zhengxu Cai
- School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing Institute of Technology 5 South Zhongguancun Street Beijing 100081 China
| | - Jianjun Wang
- Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
- School of Future TechnologyUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China
| | - Yuping Dong
- School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing Institute of Technology 5 South Zhongguancun Street Beijing 100081 China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuan F, Zhao G, Panhwar F. Enhanced killing of HepG2 during cryosurgery with Fe 3O 4-nanoparticle improved intracellular ice formation and cell dehydration. Oncotarget 2017; 8:92561-92577. [PMID: 29190938 PMCID: PMC5696204 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cryosurgery is a minimally invasive treatment that utilize extreme low temperatures to destroy abnormal tissues. The clinical monitoring methods for cryosurgery are almost based on the visualization of the iceball. However, for a normal cryosurgery process, the effective killing region is always smaller than the iceball. As a result, the end of the cryosurgery process can only be judged by the surgeons according to their experience. The subjective judgement is one of the main reasons for poor estimation of tumor ablation, and it sparks high probability of recurrence and metastasis associate with cryosurgery. Being different from the previous optimization studies, we develop a novel approach with the aid of nanoparticles to enlarge the effective killing region of entire iceball, and thus it greatly decrease the difficulty of precise judgement of the cryosurgery only by applying the common clinical imaging methods. To verify this approach, both the experiments on a tissue-scale phantom with embedded living HepG2 cells in agarose and on a cell-scale cryo-microscopic freeze-thaw stage are performed. The results indicate that the introduction of the self-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles significantly improved cell killing in the cryosurgery and the range of killing is extended to the entire iceball. The potential mechanism is further revealed by the cryo-microscopic experiments, which verifies the presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles can significantly enhance the probability of intracellular ice formation and the cell dehydration during freezing hence it promote precise killing of the cells. These findings may further promote the widespread clinical application of modern cryosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuquan Yuan
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electronic Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electronic Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
- Anhui Provincial Engineering Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
| | - Fazil Panhwar
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electronic Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fakhrejahani F, Madan RA, Dahut WL. Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017; 18:26. [PMID: 28434181 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-017-0462-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor malignancy in men worldwide. Treatment with surgery and radiation can be curative in organ-confined disease. Unfortunately, about one third of men develop biochemically recurrent disease based only on rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the absence of visible disease on conventional imaging. For these patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer, there is no uniform guideline for subsequent management. Based on available data, it seems prudent that biochemical recurrent prostate cancer should initially be evaluated for salvage radiation or prostatectomy, with curative intent. In selected cases, high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy may be considered in patients that meet very narrow criteria as defined by non-randomized trials. If salvage options are not practical or unsuccessful, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard option for disease control. While some patients prefer ADT to manage the disease immediately, others defer treatment because of the associated toxicity. In the absence of definitive randomized data, patients may be followed using PSA doubling time as a trigger to initiate ADT. Based on retrospective data, a PSA doubling time of less than 3-6 months has been associated with near-term development of metastasis and thus could be used signal to initiate ADT. Once treatment is begun, patients and their providers can choose between an intermittent and continuous ADT strategy. The intermittent approach may limit side effects but in patients with metastatic disease studies could not exclude a 20% greater risk of death. In men with biochemical recurrence, large studies have shown that intermittent therapy is non-inferior to continuous therapy, thus making this a reasonable option. Since biochemically recurrent prostate cancer is defined by technological limitations of radiographic detection, as new imaging (i.e., PSMA) strategies are developed, it may alter how the disease is monitored and perhaps managed. Furthermore, patients have no symptoms related to their disease and thus many prefer options that minimize toxicity. For this reason, herbal agents and immunotherapy are under investigation as potential alternatives to ADT and its accompanying side effects. New therapeutic options combined with improved imaging to evaluate the disease may markedly change how biochemically recurrent prostate cancer is managed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Fakhrejahani
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1906, Bethesda, 20892, USA
| | - Ravi A Madan
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1906, Bethesda, 20892, USA
| | - William L Dahut
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1906, Bethesda, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ellis CL, Harik LR, Cohen C, Osunkoya AO. Biomarker, Molecular, and Technologic Advances in Urologic Pathology, Oncology, and Imaging. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:499-516. [PMID: 28157406 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0263-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Urologic pathology is evolving rapidly. Emerging trends include the expanded diagnostic utility of biomarkers and molecular testing, as well as adapting to the plethora of technical advances occurring in genitourinary oncology, surgical practice, and imaging. We illustrate those trends by highlighting our approach to the diagnostic workup of a few selected disease entities that pathologists may encounter, including newly recognized subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and prostate cancer, some of which harbor a distinctive chromosomal translocation, gene loss, or mutation. We illustrate applications of immunohistochemistry for differential diagnosis of needle core renal biopsies, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, and amyloidosis and cite encouraging results from early studies using targeted gene expression panels to predict recurrence after prostate cancer surgery. At our institution, pathologists are working closely with urologic surgeons and interventional radiologists to explore the use of intraoperative frozen sections for margins and nerve sparing during robotic prostatectomy, to pioneer minimally invasive videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy, and to refine image-guided needle core biopsies and cryotherapy of prostate cancer as well as blue-light/fluorescence cystoscopy. This collaborative, multidisciplinary approach enhances clinical management and research, and optimizes the care of patients with urologic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Ellis, Harik, Cohen, and Osunkoya), Urology (Dr Osunkoya), and the Winship Cancer Institute (Dr Osunkoya), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Pathology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Osunkoya)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kongnyuy M, Halpern DM, Kosinski KE, Katz AE. Cryosurgery, an alternative treatment option for organ-confined prostate cancer: current beliefs and practice patterns of urologists. Int Urol Nephrol 2016; 49:43-48. [PMID: 27761695 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1440-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to evaluate the current beliefs and practice patterns of urologists in regard to use of cryosurgery for management of PCa. METHODS An anonymous 13-point survey was designed and sent out to members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO), Endourological Society (ES) and American College of Cryosurgery (ACC). Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were used to determine variables associated with the use of cryosurgery. RESULTS Of the 206 responses received [81 (39.2 %) SUO; 106 (51.5 %) ES; 19 (9.2 %) ACC], 83 (40.3 %) performed cryosurgery. The majority of respondents who utilize cryosurgery do so in unilateral (80.3 %) and bilateral (77.6 %) intermediate-risk PCa. Also, users of this technology indicated significant use in primary treatment (>72 %), salvage treatment (>83 %), in patients who prefer cryosurgery (89.9 %) have a life expectancy ≥10 years (65.8 %) and poor erections (74.7 %). The main reason for not utilizing cryosurgery was the lack of technical expertise (56.7 %). A urologist in a non-academic practice setting was 3.2 times more likely to perform cryosurgery compared to a urologist in an academic setting, p = 0.0001. CONCLUSION Cryosurgery is increasingly being accepted among urologists. However, the need for large-scale studies as well as randomized clinical trials to further delineate the benefits of cryosurgery and convince the non-users and institutions cannot be overemphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kongnyuy
- Department of Urology, Winthrop University Hospital, 1300 Franklin Ave, Mineola, Garden City, NY, 11530, USA.
| | - Daniel M Halpern
- Department of Urology, Winthrop University Hospital, 1300 Franklin Ave, Mineola, Garden City, NY, 11530, USA
| | - Kaitlin E Kosinski
- Department of Urology, Winthrop University Hospital, 1300 Franklin Ave, Mineola, Garden City, NY, 11530, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, Winthrop University Hospital, 1300 Franklin Ave, Mineola, Garden City, NY, 11530, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
An investigation of the effects from a urethral warming system on temperature distributions during cryoablation treatment of the prostate: A phantom study. Cryobiology 2014; 69:128-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2013] [Revised: 06/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
10
|
Zaorsky NG, Raj GV, Trabulsi EJ, Lin J, Den RB. The dilemma of a rising prostate-specific antigen level after local therapy: what are our options? Semin Oncol 2013; 40:322-36. [PMID: 23806497 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor diagnosed in men in the United States and Western Europe. Primary treatment with radiation or surgery is largely successful at controlling localized disease. However, a significant number (up to one third of men) may develop biochemical recurrence (BR), defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. A general presumption is that BR will lead to overt progression in patients over subsequent years. There are a number of factors that a physician must consider when counseling and recommending treatment to a patient with a rising PSA. These include the following (1) various PSA-based definitions of BR; (2) source of PSA (ie, local or distant disease, residual benign prostate); (3) available modalities to treat the disease with the least morbidity; and (4) timing of therapy. In this article we review the current and future factors that clinicians should consider in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Histologic findings on prostate needle core biopsies following cryotherapy as monotherapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2013; 44:867-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2012] [Revised: 08/12/2012] [Accepted: 08/15/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
12
|
Autran-Gomez AM, Scarpa RM, Chin J. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Cryotherapy as Salvage Treatment in Local Radio-Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Urol Int 2012; 89:373-9. [DOI: 10.1159/000339616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
Many management options are available to patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an important role in initial staging of prostate cancer, but it also aids in tumor detection when there is clinical or biochemical suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment. The purpose of this review is to describe the normal appearances of the prostatic region after different kinds of treatment for prostate cancer and to discuss how these appearances differ from those of recurrent and residual disease. Several MR imaging techniques used in evaluating patients with prostate cancer are described, including conventional MR imaging sequences (mainly T1- and T2-weighted sequences), MR spectroscopic imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging. Clinical considerations, together with the different approaches for interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values in the posttreatment setting, are also presented. All forms of treatment alter the MR imaging features of the prostatic region to a greater or lesser extent, and it is important to be able to recognize expected posttreatment appearances and distinguish them from the features of recurrent or residual cancer to aid subsequent clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Radiology Academic Offices, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; 43:1089-94. [PMID: 21475948 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-9952-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2011] [Accepted: 03/22/2011] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present the early results of the use of third-generation cryotherapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2006 to December 2009, 102 patients underwent primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent a dual freeze-thaw cycle using third-generation cryotechnology with ultrathin 17-gauge cryoneedles. RESULTS The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for all patients at the last follow-up visit was less than 0.5 ng/ml in 94 patients (92.2%) and 0.5 ng/ml or more in 8 (7.8%). One patient (1.0%) had recurrent prostate cancer confirmed by prostate biopsy and was treated with salvage cryotherapy. Seven other patients (6.9%) had an elevated PSA level after cryotherapy despite negative posttreatment biopsies and a metastatic evaluation. Of 102 patients, 1 patient was incontinent preoperatively. Of the remaining 101 patients, 4 patients (4.0%) developed mild incontinence requiring 1 to 2 pads per day. Urethral sloughing occurred in 5 of the 102 patients (4.9%) and in 1 of these patients (1.0%) required transurethral resection of sloughing. The rates of erectile dysfunction were 64.1%. No urethral strictures, rectourethral fistulas, urinary retention, or chronic pelvic pain was reported. The median inpatient stay after cryoablation was 3.2 days. CONCLUSION Early results suggest that cryotherapy offers a safe and effective alternative for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Additional studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the sustained efficacy of this procedure.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee EW, Huang WC. Minimally invasive ablative therapies for definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer in the primary setting. Prostate Cancer 2010; 2011:394182. [PMID: 22110985 PMCID: PMC3216008 DOI: 10.1155/2011/394182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2010] [Accepted: 10/28/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, the patient with a new diagnosis of localized prostate cancer faces either radical therapy, in the form of surgery or radiation, or active surveillance. A growing subset of these men may not be willing to accept the psychological burden of active surveillance nor the side effects of extirpative or radiation therapy. Local ablative therapies including cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy have emerged as a means for minimally invasive definitive treatment. These treatments are well tolerated with decreased morbidity in association with improvements in technology; however, long-term oncologic efficacy remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene W. Lee
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, NY 10016, USA
| | - William C. Huang
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Management of prostate cancer recurrence after definitive radiation therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2010; 36:91-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2009] [Revised: 06/08/2009] [Accepted: 06/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- David Levy
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Levy DA, Pisters LL, Jones JS. Primary Cryoablation Nadir Prostate Specific Antigen and Biochemical Failure. J Urol 2009; 182:931-7. [PMID: 19616226 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Levy
- Department of Regional Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Louis L. Pisters
- Department of Urology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - J. Stephen Jones
- Department of Regional Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Babaian RJ, Donnelly B, Bahn D, Baust JG, Dineen M, Ellis D, Katz A, Pisters L, Rukstalis D, Shinohara K, Thrasher JB. Best Practice Statement on Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2008; 180:1993-2004. [PMID: 18817934 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bryan Donnelly
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - Duke Bahn
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - John G. Baust
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - Martin Dineen
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - David Ellis
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - Aaron Katz
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | - Louis Pisters
- American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Polascik TJ, Nosnik I, Mayes JM, Mouraviev V. Short-term cancer control after primary cryosurgical ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer using third-generation cryotechnology. Urology 2007; 70:117-21. [PMID: 17656220 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2006] [Revised: 02/15/2007] [Accepted: 03/07/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Percutaneous perineal cryoablation of the prostate is a promising technique in the treatment armamentarium for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. We report our initial experience using a transrectal ultrasound-guided, third-generation, argon/helium cryosurgical system. METHODS From January 2002 to July 2005, 50 men underwent primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. The median patient age was 68 years (range 50 to 83), and the median follow-up period was 18 months (range 3 to 43). According to the D'Amico risk stratification system, 36 patients (72%) had low-risk, 9 (18%) had intermediate-risk, and 5 (10%) had high-risk prostate cancer. All patients underwent a dual freeze-thaw cycle using third-generation cryotechnology with ultrathin 17-gauge cryoneedles. RESULTS The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for all patients at the last follow-up visit was less than 0.5 ng/mL in 45 patients (90%) and 0.5 ng/mL or more in 5 (10%). Two patients had persistent prostate cancer confirmed by prostate biopsy and were treated with salvage cryotherapy or external beam radiotherapy. Three other patients had an elevated PSA level after cryotherapy despite negative posttreatment biopsies and a metastatic evaluation. Of these 3 patients, 2 had their postcryotherapy PSA level normalize, and 1 patient, with intermediate-risk disease preoperatively, had a consistent increase in PSA up to 1.2 ng/mL. The overall survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS Cryoablation of the prostate is a feasible and safe treatment option in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. Additional studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the sustained efficacy of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Polascik
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Allen GW, Howard AR, Jarrard DF, Ritter MA. Management of prostate cancer recurrences after radiation therapy-brachytherapy as a salvage option. Cancer 2007; 110:1405-16. [PMID: 17685384 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Depending on initial prognostic factors, an estimated 10%-60% of men who undergo definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer may experience a biochemical recurrence. Even though hormonal therapy is standard for metastatic recurrences, no consensus exists on optimal salvage therapy for those recurrences thought confined to the prostate. Salvage treatment options for these local recurrences have historically been limited to salvage prostatectomy, hormonal therapy, or cryotherapy. Salvage prostate brachytherapy, however, uses a widely available technique and may provide another option for attaining disease control in patients with localized failures, although only about 110 cases have been reported in the literature. In this report, the authors have described their own series of salvage brachytherapy cases as well as presented a review of other such series reported in the literature. In addition, the authors included a comprehensive review of published experiences with surgery and cryotherapy as salvage options. It appears that salvage brachytherapy, when combined with careful patient selection, is at least as effective as other salvage options with comparable or potentially fewer treatment-related side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory W Allen
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PSA-only recurrence after definitive RP or RT for PCA is an increasingly com-mon scenario. The very definition of advanced prostate cancer is changing. Multimodal therapy improves cancer-specific outcomes especially in men with high-risk disease. After RP, a detectable serum PSA has been considered suggestive of PCA recurrence. After RT, the ASTRO definition of BCR has been widely used to define BCR. Both of these definitions of BCR are subject to dispute. The kinetics of a rising PSA (PSA doubling time) appears to be the best surrogate marker for disease risk, clinical progression, and ultimately cancer-specific death. Therapeutic options include salvage RT after primary RP or systemic HT through surgical/chemical castration, antiandrogens, or nontraditional HT. Re-cent studies suggest that early HT can provide modest survival benefits, but at both an economic cost and decreased quality of life. The diminished side effects of an oral antiandrogen are appealing, and may be as efficacious as castration therapies in low-volume disease. More clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatments, alone and in combination. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judd W Moul
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ward JF, Moul JW. Treating the Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 4:38-44. [PMID: 15992460 DOI: 10.3816/cgc.2005.n.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
As increasing numbers of men are living longer with prostate cancer, larger proportions will eventually present to our collective practices with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Such PSA relapses, conservatively estimated to affect approximately 50,000 men each year, have become the most common form of advanced prostate cancer. Salvage radiation therapy and salvage prostatectomy have important roles in our therapeutic armamentarium and should be valid options for young, healthy men. Counseling patients regarding expectations for cancer control and treatment morbidity has become better because of reports from larger series of patients who have had salvage radiation therapy and surgery. Some patients may not be appropriate candidates for salvage local therapies. A growing body of evidence suggests early hormonal therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) and could alter cancer-specific survival. This benefit seems to be greatest when hormonal therapy is initiated while PSA levels are low, before clinically measurable disease becomes apparent. However, there is a cost to be paid in side effects and health care dollars when androgen deprivation is administered over prolonged periods. The nonsteroidal antiandrogen agent bicalutamide could offer PFS equivalent to that seen with castration without the complications of androgen deprivation. Observational data seem to indicate that individuals at high risk could also receive benefit from therapy administered before PSA detection. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Ward
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ward JF, Moul JW. Biochemical recurrence after definitive prostate cancer therapy. Part II: Treatment strategies for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer*. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15:187-95. [PMID: 15815196 DOI: 10.1097/01.mou.0000165553.17534.e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Through the prostate-specific antigen era, the proportion of men less than 55 years old with newly diagnosed prostate cancer more than doubled to almost 15%. As increasing numbers of men are living longer with prostate cancer, larger proportions will eventually present to our collective practices with rising prostate-specific antigen levels. Such prostate-specific antigen relapses, conservatively estimated to affect approximately 50 000 men each year, have become the most common form of advanced prostate cancer in the current period. RECENT FINDINGS Increasing evidence suggests that early hormonal therapy improves progression-free survival and may alter the cancer-specific survival. However, there is a cost to pay in side-effects when androgen deprivation is administered over prolonged periods. The non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide may offer an equivalent progression-free survival to castration without the complications of androgen deprivation. Observational data seem to indicate that high-risk individuals (i.e. those with high-grade, high-stage disease or a prostate-specific antigen doubling time less than 12 months) may also receive benefit from early therapy. SUMMARY The definition of advanced prostate cancer has changed. Multimodal therapy improves cancer-specific outcomes especially in men with high-risk disease. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Ward
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ward JF, Moul JW. Rising prostate-specific antigen after primary prostate cancer therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 2:174-82. [PMID: 16474760 DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2004] [Accepted: 03/02/2005] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
An estimated 20-40% of men experience a biochemical recurrence within 10 years of definitive prostate cancer treatment. No single prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value is invariably associated with clinical metastasis or cancer-specific survival; PSA kinetics might prove to be a more important predictor of eventual progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival than absolute PSA level alone. With only one-third of patients progressing from biochemical recurrence to clinical disease, therapeutic morbidity should not outpace risk of disease progression. Salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy has widely variable long-term biochemical control rates (from 18 to 64% depending on the follow-up period). Early hormonal therapy delivered as castration or complete androgen blockade might delay clinical metastasis in patients with high-risk pathologic disease; however, the adverse effects and morbidity of long-term therapy must not be underestimated. Non-steroidal antiandrogens as monotherapy for early biochemical recurrence, particularly for younger men who wish to preserve their libido and sexual potency, have received considerable attention, but there are conflicting data on long-term outcomes. Because of their favorable adverse-effect profiles, non-traditional therapies that exert localized hormonal or cellular effects are receiving considerable attention for treatment of early, PSA-only recurrence. Data from animal models provide a rationale for the use of these therapies, but there is a lack of evidence to support prolongation of progression-free survival or cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Ward
- Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahmed S, Lindsey B, Davies J. Salvage cryosurgery for locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiotherapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004; 8:31-5. [PMID: 15583704 DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The popularity of radiotherapy as a minimally invasive treatment for prostate cancer is increasing. Despite advancements in radiation delivery, a number of patients will fail treatment. Salvage radical prostatectomy has been the main therapeutic option for locally recurrent radiation failure prostate cancer with curative intent. The operation is technically difficult to perform and associated with significant comorbidities. Salvage cryotherapy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative option. In this article, we review the role of cryotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer and compare its outcome with salvage radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ahmed
- The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XX, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Judd W Moul
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|