1
|
Schifano N, Capogrosso P, Cakir OO, Dehò F, Garaffa G. Surgical tips in difficult penile prosthetic surgery: a narrative review. Int J Impot Res 2023; 35:690-698. [PMID: 36261536 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Penile prosthesis implantation continues to represent a reliable solution to address erectile dysfunction when oral medications fail, are not tolerated or are contraindicated, and most typically is associated with excellent satisfaction rates and durable results. Despite the dramatic improvements in the prostheses' design, in the surgical instruments and techniques over the years, certain categories of patients still pose a significant surgical challenge. The aim of the current review is to provide a quick and useful practical guidance based on our expertise in the identification and management of the difficult penile prosthesis implantation cases. A narrative review design was here preferred to fulfil our purpose. The search strategy included a range of terms, e.g. penile prosthesis, corporal fibrosis, infection, ischaemic priapism, Peyronie's disease, radical prostatectomy, pelvic surgery. Extensive corporal fibrosis after explantation of an infected device or after prolonged ischaemic priapism may represent the most difficult situations to deal with in penile prosthesis implantation surgery. Penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease and in those who previously underwent radical prostatectomy also presents with an increased risk of complications. Experienced surgeons need to be able to recognise promptly and manage urethral perforation, cylinder crossover, tunical perforation and erosion, as these complications are more common when dealing with difficult penile prosthesis implantation cases. Applying penile lengthening techniques and principles can be useful in selected cases to ensure better postoperative satisfaction rates, especially in those patients who have experienced a more significant degree of loss of length preoperatively. High-volume-implanting surgeons should always be involved in complex cases to minimise the risk of complications. A thorough preoperative counselling can set realistic patients' expectations in this context, further contributing to postoperative satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Schifano
- Department of Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Capogrosso
- ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Onur Omer Cakir
- Department of Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Federico Dehò
- ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haas S, Mikkelsen AH, Kronborg CJS, Oggesen BT, Møller PF, Fassov J, Frederiksen NA, Krogsgaard M, Graugaard-Jensen C, Ventzel L, Christensen P, Emmertsen KJ. Management of treatment-related sequelae following colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:458-488. [PMID: 35969031 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal cancer survivors are one of the most rapidly growing groups of patients living with and beyond cancer. In a national multidisciplinary setting, we have examined the extent of late treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors and present the scientific evidence for management of these conditions in this patient category with the aim of facilitating identification and treatment. METHOD A systematic search for existing guidelines and relevant studies was performed across 16 and 4 databases, respectively, from inception to 2021. This yielded 13 guidelines and 886 abstracts, of which 188 were included in the finalized guideline (231 included for full text review). Secondarily, bibliographies were cross-referenced and 53 additional articles were included. RESULTS Symptoms have been divided into overall categories including psychosocial, bowel-related, urinary, sexual (male and female), pain/neuropathy and fatigue symptoms or complaints that are examined individually. Merging and grading of data resulted in 22 recommendations and 42 management strategies across categories. Recommendations are of a more general character, whereas management strategies provide more practical advice suited for initiation on site before referral to specialized units. CONCLUSION Treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors are common and attention needs to be focused on identifying patients with unmet treatment needs and the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Haas
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Pia F Møller
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lise Ventzel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doherty W, Bridge P. A Systematic Review of the Role of Penile Rehabilitation in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019; 50:171-178. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
4
|
Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Stiller A, Zajdlewicz L, Nielsen L, Wittman D, Oliffe JL, Ralph N, Dunn J. Five-year outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of a couples-based intervention for men with localised prostate cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 28:775-783. [PMID: 30716188 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosexual morbidity is common after prostate cancer treatment, however, long-term prospective research is limited. We report 5-year outcomes from a couples-based intervention in dyads with men treated for localised prostate cancer with surgery. METHODS A randomised controlled trial was conducted involving 189 heterosexual couples, where the man received a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The trial groups were peer support vs. nurse counselling versus usual care. Primary outcomes were sexual adjustment, unmet sexual supportive care needs, masculine self-esteem, marital satisfaction, and utilisation of erectile aids at 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year follow-up. RESULTS The effects of the interventions varied across the primary outcomes. Partners in the peer group had higher sexual adjustment than those in the usual care and nurses group at 2 and 3 years (P = 0.002-0.035). Men in usual care had lower unmet sexual supportive care needs than men in the peer and nurse groups (P = 0.001; P = 0.01) at 3 years. Women in usual care had lower sexual supportive care needs than women in the peer group at 2 and 3 years (P = 0.038; P = 0.001). Men in the peer and nurse group utilised sexual aids more than men in usual care; at 5 years 54% of usual care men versus 87% of men in peer support and 80% of men in the nurse group. CONCLUSION Peer and nurse-administered psychosexual interventions have potential for increasing men's adherence to treatments for erectile dysfunction. Optimal effects may be achieved through an integrated approach applying these modes of support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne K Chambers
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.,Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer (ANZUP) Trials Group, Sydney, Australia.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Stefano Occhipinti
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Anna Stiller
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Leah Zajdlewicz
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lisa Nielsen
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - John L Oliffe
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nicholas Ralph
- Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer (ANZUP) Trials Group, Sydney, Australia.,Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clavell-Hernandez J, Ermeç B, Kadıoğlu A, Wang R. Perplexity of penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy. Turk J Urol 2019; 45:77-82. [PMID: 30875285 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.18488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy has significantly improved prostate cancer survival rates but continues to have a negative impact on the patient's erectile function (EF). In attempts to improve erectile dysfunction (ED), clinicians have incorporated different treatment modalities to restore EF. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect post-prostatectomy EF and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices, and interventions to promote the male sexual function. This article aims to summarize the available scientific research involving penile rehabilitation. Even though the current literature lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, penile rehabilitation has a positive impact at the molecular and cellular levels, and it is widely adopted in clinic practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bahadır Ermeç
- Department of Urology İstinye State Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ateş Kadıoğlu
- Department of Urology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Run Wang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center- McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Costa P, Cardoso JM, Louro H, Dias J, Costa L, Rodrigues R, Espiridião P, Maciel J, Ferraz L. Impact on sexual function of surgical treatment in rectal cancer. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 44:141-149. [PMID: 29219281 PMCID: PMC5815544 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of new surgical techniques and medical devices, like therapeutical multimodal approaches has allowed for better outcomes on patients with rectal cancer (RCa). Owing to that, an increased awareness and investment towards better outcomes regarding patients' sexual and urinary function has been recently observed. AIM Evaluate and characterize the sexual dysfunction of patients submitted to surgical treatment for RCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS An observational retrospective study including all male patients who underwent a surgical treatment for RCa between January 2011 December 2014 (n=43) was performed, complemented with an inquiry questionnaire to every patient about its sexual habits and level of function before and after surgery. DISCUSSION All patients were male, with an average of 64yo. (range 42-83yo.). The surgical procedure was a rectum anterior resection (RAR) in 22 patients (56%) and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) in 19(44%). Sixty three percent described their sexual life as important/very important. Sexual function worsening was observed in 76% (65% with complains on erectile function, and 27% on ejaculation). Fourteen patients (38%) didn't resume sexual activity after surgery. Increased age (p=0.007), surgery performed (APR) (p=0.03) and the presence of a stoma (p=0.03) were predictors of ED after surgery. A secondary analysis found that the type of surgery (APR) (p=0.04), lower third tumor's location (p=0.03) and presence of comorbidities (p=0.013) (namely, smokers and diabetic patients) were predictors of de novo ED after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the clear negative impact in sexual function of patients submitted to a surgical treatment for RCa. Since it is a valued feature for patients, it becomes essential to correctly evaluate/identify these cases in order to offer an adequate therapeutical option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Costa
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - João M. Cardoso
- Departmento de Cirurgia Geral, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Hugo Louro
- Departmento de Cirurgia Geral, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Jorge Dias
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Raquel Rodrigues
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Paulo Espiridião
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Jorge Maciel
- Departmento de Cirurgia Geral, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Luís Ferraz
- Departmento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Topical alprostadil (Vitaros ©) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urologia 2017; 85:55-59. [PMID: 28967058 DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the treatment with topical alprostadil (Vitaros©) in post-robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) rehabilitation therapy of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS Seventy-four patients were enrolled and underwent non-nerve-sparing RARP. INCLUSION CRITERIA age <75, preoperatively International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) >16, erection hardness score (EHS) ⩾2, weekly sexual intercourse ⩾1, affirmative answers to Sexual Encounter Profile Question (SEP-Q) 2 and SEP-Q3, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ⩽5, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ⩽1, no moderate/severe cardiovascular disease. RESULTS Vitaros was administered ⩾2 twice a week. At month 6, the IIEF-5 decreased from 20.5 preoperative to 18.1 post-treatment. EHS score decreased from a mean of 3.3 to a mean of 3.0. The quality of life score decreased from an average of 5.1 to 2.3. Weekly sexual intercourse decreased from an average of 2.1 to 1.7. Six patients dropped out; 89.7% patients showed a positive SEP-Q2 and 77.8% a positive SEP-Q3. All patients responded positively to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)-1 and 97% to GAQ-2. Of all 68 analyzed patients, 13 (17.6%) switched to intracavernous injection therapy. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, Vitaros may become a viable alternative to common injective therapies in well-selected patients after RARP.
Collapse
|
8
|
Clavell-Hernández J, Wang R. The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:2-11. [PMID: 28217445 PMCID: PMC5313301 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.08.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function (EF) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function before and after any insult to the penile erectile physiologic axis. There currently is a limited amount of clinical trials that assess treatments with the goal of recovering post-prostatectomy EF. The goal of this article is to assess a contemporary series of trials that study penile rehabilitation. Although the current evidence lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, advancements in research and technology forecast a promising future in penile rehabilitation management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Clavell-Hernández
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Run Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA;; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature. Asian J Androl 2016; 17:916-22; discussion 921. [PMID: 25851656 PMCID: PMC4814961 DOI: 10.4103/1008-682x.150838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) are highly effective in improving prostate cancer survival. However, both have a detrimental effect on erectile function (EF). Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that cause erectile dysfunction (ED) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function. For the past decade, many researchers have pursued to define effective treatment modalities to improve ED after prostate cancer treatment. Despite the understanding of the mechanisms and well-established rationale for postprostate treatment penile rehabilitation, there is still no consensus regarding effective rehabilitation programs. This article reviews a contemporary series of trials that assess penile rehabilitation and explore treatment modalities that might play a role in the future. Published data and trials related to penile rehabilitation after RP and RT were reviewed and presented. Although recent trials have shown that most therapies are well-tolerated and aid in some degree on EF recovery, we currently do not have tangible evidence to recommend an irrefutable penile rehabilitation algorithm. However, advancements in research and technology will ultimately create and refine management options for penile rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Run Wang
- Division of Urology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Department of Urology, Houston, Texas; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Many therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) after prostate cancer treatment improve erectile firmness, yet, most couples stop using aids within 1-2 years. Patients and partners who expect immediate and complete success with their first ED treatment can be demoralized when they experience treatment failure, which contributes to reticence to explore other ED aids. Comprehensive patient education should improve sustainability and satisfaction with ED treatments. Pre-emptive and realistic information should be provided to couples about the probability of recovering natural erections. Beginning intervention early and using a couple-based approach is ideal. Recommendations are provided about the timing of ED treatment, the order of aid introduction, and combination therapies. Renegotiation of sexual activity is an essential part of sexual adaptation. From the outset of therapy, couples should be encouraged to broaden their sexual repertoire, incorporate erection-independent sexual activities, and continue to be sexual despite ED and reduced libido.
Collapse
|
11
|
Aoun F, Peltier A, van Velthoven R. Penile rehabilitation after pelvic cancer surgery. ScientificWorldJournal 2015; 2015:876046. [PMID: 25785286 PMCID: PMC4345049 DOI: 10.1155/2015/876046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 01/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fouad Aoun
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roland van Velthoven
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aoun F, Peltier A, van Velthoven R. Penile Rehabilitation Strategies Among Prostate Cancer Survivors. Rev Urol 2015; 17:58-68. [PMID: 27222641 DOI: 10.3909/riu0652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in technical and surgical approaches, erectile dysfunction (ED) remains the most common complication among prostate cancer survivors, adversely impacting quality of life. This article analyzes the concept and rationale of ED rehabilitation programs in prostate cancer patients. Emphasis is placed on the pathophysiology of ED after diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer to understand the efficacy of rehabilitation programs in clinical practice. Available evidence shows that ED is a transient complication following prostate biopsy and cancer diagnosis, with no evidence to support rehabilitation programs in these patients. A small increase in ED and in the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors was reported in patients under active surveillance. Patients should be advised that active surveillance is unlikely to severely affect erectile function, but clinically significant changes in sexual function are possible. Focal therapy could be an intermediate option for patients demanding treatment/refusing active surveillance and invested in maintaining sexual activity. Unlike radical prostatectomy, there is no support for PDE5 inhibitor use to prevent ED after highly conformal external radiotherapy or low-dose rate brachytherapy. Despite progress in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for ED in prostate cancer patients, the success rates of rehabilitation programs remain low in clinical practice. Alternative strategies to prevent ED appear warranted, with attention toward neuromodulation, nerve grafting, nerve preservation, stem cell therapy, investigation of neuroprotective interventions, and further refinements of radiotherapy dosing and delivery methods.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Schover L, Nielsen L, Zajdlewicz L, Clutton S, Halford K, Gardiner RA, Dunn J. A randomised controlled trial of a couples-based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer and their female partners. Psychooncology 2014; 24:748-56. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.3726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Revised: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne K. Chambers
- School of Applied Psychology; Griffith University; Brisbane Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia; Sydney Australia
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Health and Wellness Institute; Edith Cowan University; Perth Australia
| | | | - Leslie Schover
- Department of Behavioral Science; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston USA
| | | | | | | | - Kim Halford
- School of Psychology; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - Robert A. Gardiner
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Department of Urology; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- School of Medicine; Griffith University; Brisbane Australia
- School of Social Science; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skolarus TA, Wolf AMD, Erb NL, Brooks DD, Rivers BM, Underwood W, Salner AL, Zelefsky MJ, Aragon-Ching JB, Slovin SF, Wittmann DA, Hoyt MA, Sinibaldi VJ, Chodak G, Pratt-Chapman ML, Cowens-Alvarado RL. American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64:225-49. [PMID: 24916760 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer survivors approach 2.8 million in number and represent 1 in 5 of all cancer survivors in the United States. While guidelines exist for timely treatment and surveillance for recurrent disease, there is limited availability of guidelines that facilitate the provision of posttreatment clinical follow-up care to address the myriad of long-term and late effects that survivors may face. Based on recommendations set forth by a National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center expert panel, the American Cancer Society developed clinical follow-up care guidelines to facilitate the provision of posttreatment care by primary care clinicians. These guidelines were developed using a combined approach of evidence synthesis and expert consensus. Existing guidelines for health promotion, surveillance, and screening for second primary cancers were referenced when available. To promote comprehensive follow-up care and optimal health and quality of life for the posttreatment survivor, the guidelines address health promotion, surveillance for prostate cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, long-term and late effects assessment and management, psychosocial issues, and care coordination among the oncology team, primary care clinicians, and nononcology specialists. A key challenge to the development of these guidelines was the limited availability of published evidence for management of prostate cancer survivors after treatment. Much of the evidence relies on studies with small sample sizes and retrospective analyses of facility-specific and population databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted A Skolarus
- Assistant Professor of Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Research Investigator, HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|