The Role of Urodynamics in Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence

Patient- and Procedure-specific Risk Factors for Urinary Incontinence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is a common complication following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), with incidence rates of 4-31%. This study examines associations between patient- and surgery-specific risk factors and PPI.

METHODS

We analysed data from 13 754 men who underwent RALP between 2017 and 2021, registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) questions were completed by 37% at 3 mo and 47% after 12 mo, including questions on pad use. PPI was defined as the use of more than one pad (primary) and any pad use (secondary). Poisson regression assessed the associations between PPI and factors such as age, comorbidity, prostate volume, nerve-sparing procedures, and surgical details.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

At 12 mo, 17% (1086/6413) reported the use of more than one pad and 49% (3113/6413) reported any pad use. Significant risk factors for incontinence in a multivariable analysis (more than one pad) included age ≥75 versus <65 yr (p < 0.001; relative risk [RR] 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-2.48), urethral division with margin from the apex versus maximal urethra length (p < 0.001; RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.57-2.43), non-nerve-sparing procedures (p < 0.001; RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.432.03), and prostate volume ≥90 versus <30 ml (p = 0.018; RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.07-2.01). Limitations included missing data on surgical variables and a relatively low ePROM response rate.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Older age, large prostate size, and non-nerve-sparing surgery increase the risk of PPI, underscoring the importance of shared decision-making in treatment planning. However, these factors explain only a part of PPI.

Sleep Quality and Urinary Incontinence in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Data Analytics Approach with the ASCAPE Dataset

BACKGROUND

The ASCAPE project aims to improve the health-related quality of life of cancer patients using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions. The current study employs a comprehensive dataset to evaluate sleep and urinary incontinence, thus enabling the development of personalized interventions.

METHODS

This study focuses on prostate cancer patients eligible for curative treatment with surgery. Forty-two participants were enrolled following their diagnosis and were followed up at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgical treatment. The data collection process involved a combination of standardized questionnaires and wearable devices, providing a holistic view of patients' QoL and health outcomes. The dataset is systematically organized and stored in a centralized database, with advanced statistical and AI techniques being employed to reveal correlations, patterns, and predictive markers that can ultimately lead to implementing personalized intervention strategies, ultimately enhancing patient QoL outcomes.

RESULTS

The correlation analysis between sleep quality and urinary symptoms post-surgery revealed a moderate positive correlation between baseline insomnia and baseline urinary symptoms (r = 0.407, p = 0.011), a positive correlation between baseline insomnia and urinary symptoms at 3 months (r = 0.321, p = 0.049), and significant correlations between insomnia at 12 months and urinary symptoms at 3 months (r = 0.396, p = 0.014) and at 6 months (r = 0.384, p = 0.017). Furthermore, modeling the relationship between baseline insomnia and baseline urinary symptoms showed that baseline insomnia is significantly associated with baseline urinary symptoms (coef = 0.222, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

The investigation of sleep quality and urinary incontinence via data analysis through the ASCAPE project suggests that better sleep quality could improve urinary disorders.

ProACT™ (Uromedica, Plymouth, USA) balloons for male urinary incontinence: A fourteen-year-old cohort

BACKGROUND

Male urinary incontinence is attributed to SUI consecutive to benign prostate hypertrophy surgery, trauma, neurological diseases, or injury. Medical devices are developed to treat male urinary incontinence among them proACT® balloons. This technique was chosen in our center to achieve continence. Our study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of proACT® balloons implanted in our center by measuring the rate of efficacy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective and single centre study. A single expert surgeon performed all surgeries. Seventy-one balloons were implanted in 57 male patients between 2007 and 2020. Primary endpoint was the efficacy time lapse of the balloons after surgery. The analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Factors, which could affect the efficacy of the balloons, were analysed using a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 45 balloons successfully cured stress urinary incontinence among the 57 men implanted resulting in a 63.38% success rate. Twenty-six balloons failed to treat stress urinary incontinence and were retrieved out of the 71 implanted. Ten balloons failed to treat urinary stress incontinence without organic cause, 6 balloons deflated, 5 balloons migrated out of the initial implantation site, 2 eroded, and 3 ended up infected. Fifty percent of the balloons were successful for a median time of 95 months. Univariate analysis did not reveal any predictive factor of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed 50% success rate at 95 months follow-up, therefore allowing a life expectancy of 7.9 years for the balloons. This safe mini-invasive technique ensured stress urinary incontinence in men.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complication after prostate surgery. Acupuncture treatment (AT) has been proposed as an alternative therapy for this condition. The purpose of this protocol aims to outline a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AT in patients with postprostate surgery UI.

METHODS

We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, SinoMed and VIP database. Additionally, we will search two clinical trial registration platforms, namely the WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The search will include articles from the inception of these databases until 30 September 2023. The extracted data will then be imported into the Stata V.15.0 software. Two authors will independently review the literature, collect data and use the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence. Outcomes for RCTs will include at least one of the following: International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form, Individualised Care for People with long-term health conditions-Capability measure for Adults, Score of Frequency Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, 1- hour pad test, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, total efficiency and adverse event. We will use random or fixed effect models to analyse data according to heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity exists along with sufficient data, we will perform subgroup analyses to identify the source of heterogeneity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this study because the data we will extract are from published articles. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022382806.

Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery

BACKGROUND

Men may need to undergo prostate surgery to treat prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia. After these surgeries, men may experience urinary incontinence (UI). Conservative treatments such as pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), electrical stimulation and lifestyle changes can be undertaken to help manage the symptoms of UI.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearched journals and conference proceedings (searched 22 April 2022). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of adult men (aged 18 or over) with UI following prostate surgery for treating prostate cancer or LUTS/BPO. We excluded cross-over and cluster-RCTs. We investigated the following key comparisons: PFMT plus biofeedback versus no treatment; sham treatment or verbal/written instructions; combinations of conservative treatments versus no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instructions; and electrical or magnetic stimulation versus no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instructions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using a pre-piloted form and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of outcomes and comparisons included in the summary of findings tables. We used an adapted version of GRADE to assess certainty in results where there was no single effect measurement available.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25 studies including a total of 3079 participants. Twenty-three studies assessed men who had previously undergone radical prostatectomy or radical retropubic prostatectomy, while only one study assessed men who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate. One study did not report on previous surgery. Most studies were at high risk of bias for at least one domain. The certainty of evidence assessed using GRADE was mixed. PFMT plus biofeedback versus no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instructions Four studies reported on this comparison. PFMT plus biofeedback may result in greater subjective cure of incontinence from 6 to 12 months (1 study; n = 102; low-certainty evidence). However, men undertaking PFMT and biofeedback may be less likely to be objectively cured at from 6 to 12 months (2 studies; n = 269; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether undertaking PFMT and biofeedback has an effect on surface or skin-related adverse events (1 study; n = 205; very low-certainty evidence) or muscle-related adverse events (1 study; n = 205; very low-certainty evidence). Condition-specific quality of life, participant adherence to the intervention and general quality of life were not reported by any study for this comparison. Combinations of conservative treatments versus no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instructions Eleven studies assessed this comparison. Combinations of conservative treatments may lead to little difference in the number of men being subjectively cured or improved of incontinence between 6 and 12 months (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.19; 2 studies; n = 788; low-certainty evidence; in absolute terms: no treatment or sham arm: 307 per 1000 and intervention arm: 297 per 1000). Combinations of conservative treatments probably lead to little difference in condition-specific quality of life (MD -0.28, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.29; 2 studies; n = 788; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably little difference in general quality of life between 6 and 12 months (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02; 2 studies; n = 742; moderate-certainty evidence). There is little difference between combinations of conservative treatments and control in terms of objective cure or improvement of incontinence between 6 and 12 months (MD 0.18, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.60; 2 studies; n = 565; high-certainty evidence). However, it is uncertain whether participant adherence to the intervention between 6 and 12 months is increased for those undertaking combinations of conservative treatments (RR 2.08, 95% CI 0.78 to 5.56; 2 studies; n = 763; very low-certainty evidence; in absolute terms: no intervention or sham arm: 172 per 1000 and intervention arm: 358 per 1000). There is probably no difference between combinations and control in terms of the number of men experiencing surface or skin-related adverse events (2 studies; n = 853; moderate-certainty evidence), but it is uncertain whether combinations of treatments lead to more men experiencing muscle-related adverse events (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.31 to 27.41; 2 studies; n = 136; very low-certainty evidence; in absolute terms: 0 per 1000 for both arms). Electrical or magnetic stimulation versus no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instructions We did not identify any studies for this comparison that reported on our key outcomes of interest.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite a total of 25 trials, the value of conservative interventions for urinary incontinence following prostate surgery alone, or in combination, remains uncertain. Existing trials are typically small with methodological flaws. These issues are compounded by a lack of standardisation of the PFMT technique and marked variations in protocol concerning combinations of conservative treatments. Adverse events following conservative treatment are often poorly documented and incompletely described. Hence, there is a need for large, high-quality, adequately powered, randomised control trials with robust methodology to address this subject.

Impact of Urinary Incontinence on the Quality of Life After Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

Introduction

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is one of the standard treatments for localized prostate cancer. Evaluating the severity of postoperative urinary incontinence is primordial to guiding the treatment choice, and it still lacks standardization, hence the value of assessing the quality of life.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study between January 2014 and December 2018 in the Urology Department of La Rabta Hospital, involving 30 patients followed for localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy for at least one year. Our work aimed to study urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy and to evaluate the quality of life of patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer by three validated questionnaires: The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the International Continence Society (ICS) scores.

Results

The preoperative IPSS score ranged from 5-22, averaging 11.13. After the surgery, it ranged between four and 23, with an average of 14.13. This increase was significant, with p = 0.001. The average preoperative ICIQ-SF score was 10.03, and the mean postoperative score was 14.23. The first question dealing with the frequency of episodes of urinary leakage has not demonstrated variation after surgery. In the second question, which deals with the amount of urine loss, we found a significant increase in this parameter with p=0.003. In the third question inherent to perceived discomfort, operated patients reported significant deterioration with p <0.001.

We observed an increase in patients with urinary stress incontinence and enuresis on the ICS score after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Wearing protection or padding was required in 23.3% of patients.

Conclusion

IPSS, ICIQ-SF, and ICS scores are helpful to perform before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. It helps to study urinary incontinence better, propose to each patient with postoperative complications the appropriate treatment option, and improve the quality of the urinary status.

Influence of ATOMS implant on the voiding phase of patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in voiding phase, especially urethral resistance after post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) treatment with the Adjustable TransObturator Male System (ATOMS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A longitudinal prospective study was performed on 45 men treated with ATOMS for PPI, with the intention to evaluate the changes produced by the implant on the voiding phase. Patients with preoperative urodynamic study were offered postoperative urodynamic evaluation, and both studies were compared. The following urodynamic date were evaluated: maximum voiding detrusor pressure, detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate, maximum flow rate (Qmax), voiding volume, post-void residue, bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI), urethral resistance factor (URA), and bladder contractility index (BCI). The statistical analysis used were the mean comparison test for dependent groups (Student's t test) for parametric variables and the Wilcoxon test for non-parametric variables. The signification level was set at 95% bilateral.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (82.2%) used zero pads/day at the time of urodynamic postoperative evaluation and pad-test evolved from 592 ± 289 ml baseline to 25 ± 40 ml (p = 0.0001). Significant differences were observed in Qmax (15 ± 8.3 before and 11 ± 8.3 after surgery; p = 0.008), voiding volume (282 ± 130.7 before and 184 ± 99.92 after surgery). BOOI (-12 ± 23.9 before and -2 ± 21.4 after surgery; p = 0.025) and BCI (93 ± 46.4 before and 76 ± 46.0 after surgery; p = 0.044). In no case did we observe postoperative bladder outlet obstruction, according to URA parameter below 29 cm H₂ O in all cases. There was not a significant variation either in post-void urinary residual volume (15 ± 47.4 before and 14 ± 24.2 after surgery, p = 0.867).

CONCLUSIONS

The ATOMS implant induces a decrease of Qmax, voided volume, and bladder contractility and an increase of BOOI. However, our findings suggest that ATOMS device does not cause bladder outlet obstruction.

Management of Medium and Long Term Complications Following Prostate Cancer Treatment Resulting in Urinary Diversion - A Narrative Review

The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss and highlight recently published studies regarding the surgical management of patients suffering from prostate cancer treatment complications. Focus will be put on the recalcitrant and more complex cases which might lead to urinary diversion as a definite, last resort treatment. It is in the nature of every treatment, that complications will occur and be bothersome for both patients and physicians. A small percentage of patients following prostate cancer treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or other focal therapies) will suffer side effects and thus, will experience a loss of quality of life. These side effects can persist for months and even years. Often, conservative management strategies fail resulting in recalcitrant recurrences. Prostate cancer patients with "end-stage bladder," "devastated outlet," or a history of multiple failed interventions, are fortunately rare, but can be highly challenging for both patients and Urologists. In a state of multiple previous surgical procedures and an immense psychological strain for the patient, urinary diversion can offer a definite, last resort surgical solution for this small group of patients. Ideally, they should be transferred to centers with experience in this field and a careful patient selection is needed. As these cases are highly complex, a multidisciplinary approach is often necessary in order to guarantee an improvement of quality of life.

Urodynamic evaluation before and after to RARP to identify pre and intraoperative factors affecting postoperative continence

AIMS

To investigate factors contributing to pre and postoperative urethral function in male patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the urethral pressure profile (UPP).

METHODS

Study A A total of 313 patients who underwent RARP between April 2013 and March 2015 were prospectively investigated. UPP was performed preoperatively in all patients. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate predictive factors for low preoperative maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP). Study B To validate the predictive factors for low preoperative MUCP obtained in Study A, 755 patients who underwent RARP between May 2010 and October 2017 were retrospectively examined. Relationships between the time to pad-free status and the following factors were investigated: number of predictive factors, nerve-sparing surgery, and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) methods (barbed vs. nonbarbed suture).

RESULTS

Study A A total of 187 patients were enrolled. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, large prostate volume, low erectile function domain scores in International Index Erectile Function 15, and use of calcium channel blockers were significantly associated with low preoperative MUCP. Study B A total of 515 patients were included. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that the number of predictive factors and VUA method were significantly associated with the time to pad-free status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that older age, larger prostate volume, poor erectile function, and calcium channel blocker use could be predictive markers for recovery from postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.

How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of the currently available evidence relating to the prevention and management strategies of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive research was carried out on MEDLINE/PubMed database to identify pertinent studies concerning post-RP UI. The search strategy included these words: urinary continence; urinary continence recovery; urinary incontinence; radical prostatectomy; and prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Post-RP UI still represents a challenging issue for both urologic patients and clinicians. A complete preoperative assessment of the risk factors associated with post-RP UI aids both in counseling those patients with a higher estimated likelihood of postoperative UI and in identifying those who would probably benefit from preventive strategies in the preoperative and in the intraoperative settings. Over the last decades different surgical strategies based on either the "preservation" or the "reconstruction" of the anatomical elements responsible for urinary continence (UC) led to an overall improvement of postoperative functional outcomes. Finally, several therapeutic strategies should be evaluated for the postoperative UI management. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation represents the gold standard for treatment, notwithstanding its wide adoption is limited due to high costs and significant risk of surgical revision. In this context, male sling positioning seems the most promising strategy, in particular in mild and moderate post-RP UI.

CONCLUSIONS

To enhance the likelihood of obtaining an optimal UC recovery after RP, it is here strongly suggested to intervene throughout the overall clinical management process thus including the pre-, intra- and postoperative settings.

Daily Pad Usage Versus the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form for Continence Assessment Following Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose

Continence assessment is an essential component of follow-up after radical prostatectomy (RP). Several methods exist to assess the severity of urinary incontinence (UI). Our study examined the relationship and degree of agreement between International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) scores and the number of pads used in a 24-hour period in the assessment of UI following RP.

Methods

Continence was prospectively assessed in 746 men from a Spanish urology clinic 12 months after RP using the ICIQ-SF and pad usage. The relationship between ICIQ-SF scores and pad usage was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test was used to determine whether the ICIQ-SF score and the component question scores increased with increasing pad usage. The Bonferroni-corrected pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which pairs of pad usage levels differed. The weighted kappa was used to evaluate the agreement between pad usage levels and ICIQ-SF questions.

Results

The continence rate was 82% using the “no pad usage” definition of continence versus 78% using the definition of an ICIQ-SF score of 0 (P<0.001). Strong positive correlations were observed between the number of pads and the ICIQ-SF total and component question scores (r_s>0.85, P<0.001). The ICIQ-SF total and component question scores increased significantly with increasing pad usage (P<0.001). The ICIQ-SF scores (P<0.018) for all pairs of pad usage levels (0, 1, 2, or 3 or more) differed significantly. The agreement between the ICIQ-SF leakage amount question and pad usage was very good (r_s=0.861, P<0.001).

Conclusions

At 12 months post-RP, 24-hour pad usage was closely correlated with ICIQ-SF, although the continence rate differed depending on the definition used. Higher levels of pad usage were associated with higher questionnaire scores, more leakage, and poor quality of life (interference with everyday life).

Patient-reported outcomes and urodynamic findings in men with persistent lower urinary tract symptoms following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

AIMS

To evaluate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and urodynamic findings in men seeking intervention for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a regional referral center for continence surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive men with post-RARP LUTS, who were referred for specialist evaluation and urodynamics between December 2012 and October 2017, were evaluated. Men were invited to complete the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Long Form (ICIQ-MLUTS) pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and 18 months post-RARP.

RESULTS

In total 64/860 (7.4%) men post-RARP were referred for specialist evaluation. There was a significant increase in total ICIQ-MLUTS and bother scores at 6, 12 and 18 months compared with the baseline in these men (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Urodynamics identified 41/64 (64%) had urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) only, 2/64 (3%) had detrusor overactivity (DO) only and 11/64 (17%) had a combination of USI and DO. Of those referred to a continence specialist 29/64 (45%) underwent a continence procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bothersome LUTS post-RARP have higher baseline ICIQ-MLUTs scores and significant worsening of total scores at all time points compared with the baseline. Routine use of PROMs may identify patients at risk of bothersome symptoms after RARP and prompt earlier referral for further management of their LUTS. Urodynamic evaluation revealed that the most common finding was pure stress incontinence but the range of urodynamic diagnoses highlights the need to perform urodynamics before making treatment decisions for men with LUTS post-RARP.

Management of Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Post-prostatectomy overactive bladder (OAB) is a common and challenging condition to manage. The aim of the present report was to review the recent evidences regarding OAB symptoms that develop in men after prostatectomy and how to manage them.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of OAB after radical prostatectomy may range from 15.2 to 37.8%. Recent studies have highlighted the role of the urethrogenic mechanism (facilitation of the urethrovesical reflex due to stress urinary incontinence (SUI)) in the genesis of post-prostatectomy OAB in a significant proportion of patients. Several other pathophysiological factors such as iatrogenic decentralization of the bladder, defunctionalized bladder due to severe SUI, detrusor underactivity, or bladder outlet obstruction might be involved. The evaluation should aim to identify the underlying mechanism to tailor the treatment, which could range from SUI surgery, to fixing a urethral stricture, improving bladder emptying or using the conventional spectrum of OAB therapies. There is a paucity of data for OAB therapies specific to post-prostatectomy patients, with the exception of solifenacin, tolterodine, and botulinum toxin. There is currently no data on how preoperative management or surgical technique may prevent post-prostatectomy OAB.