State-of-the-Art Imaging for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary perfusion by chest digital dynamic radiography: Comparison between breath-holding and deep-breathing acquisition

Purpose

Pulmonary perfusion is an important factor for gas exchange. Chest digital dynamic radiography (DDR) by the deep‐breathing protocol can evaluate pulmonary perfusion in healthy subjects. However, respiratory artifacts may affect DDR in patients with respiratory diseases. We examined the feasibility of a breath‐holding protocol and compared it with the deep‐breathing protocol to reduce respiratory artifacts.

Materials and methods

A total of 42 consecutive patients with respiratory diseases (32 males; age, 68.6 ± 12.3 yr), including 21 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, underwent chest DDR through the breath‐holding protocol and the deep‐breathing protocol. Imaging success rate and exposure to radiation were compared. The correlation rate of temporal changes in each pixel value between the lung fields and left cardiac ventricles was analyzed.

Results

Imaging success rate was higher with the breath‐holding protocol vs the deep‐breathing protocol (97% vs 69%, respectively; P < 0.0001). The entrance surface dose was lower with the breath‐holding protocol (1.09 ± 0.20 vs 1.81 ± 0.08 mGy, respectively; P < 0.0001). The correlation rate was higher with the breath‐holding protocol (right lung field, 41.7 ± 9.3%; left lung field, 44.2 ± 8.9% vs right lung field, 33.4 ± 6.6%; left lung field, 36.0 ± 7.1%, respectively; both lung fields, P < 0.0001). In the lower lung fields, the correlation rate was markedly different (right, 15.3% difference; left, 14.1% difference; both lung fields, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The breath‐holding protocol resulted in high imaging success rate among patients with respiratory diseases, yielding vivid images of pulmonary perfusion.

Identification of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of venous-phase dual-energy CT in comparison to pulmonary arteries CT angiography

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of venous-phase dual-energy computed tomography (VP-DECT) in the identification of PE compared with standard CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

METHODS

This prospective IRB-approved study included 61 consecutive oncology patients (35 females, 26 males, mean age 66.91 years) examined by CTPA and VP-DECT. DECT data were post-processed on a SyngoVia workstation to obtain monoenergetic images (MEI+). The diagnosis of PE was based on the presence of any vascular perfusion defects. DECT images were evaluated independently by two radiologists (8 and 16 years of experience). A consensus reading of CTPA images (two senior radiologists, 18 and 24 years of experience) represented the reference for diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy values of VP-DECT on a per-patient and per-lobe basis were assessed. Interobserver agreement was calculated using k-statistics. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty of 61 patients (49.18%) were diagnosed with PE by CTPA, with 57/366 lobes being involved (15.57%). The sensitivity and specificity of the per-patient analysis of VP-DECT images were 90.0% (27/30) and 100% (31/31) respectively, for both readers. As concerns the per-lobe analysis, the sensitivity ranged from 100% for the right lower lobe to 50% for the left upper lobe for reader 1, and from 100% for the left upper lobe to 69.23% for the lingula for reader 2. The interobserver agreement ranged from 0.8671 (patients' analysis) to 0.6419 (lobes' analysis).

CONCLUSION

VP-DECT could be considered an accurate imaging tool for diagnosing PE in a selected, high-prevalence population, compared with CTPA.

KEY POINTS

• With regard to the patients' analysis, venous-phase DECT sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pulmonary embolism were 90% and 100%, respectively, for both readers. • With regard to the lobes' analysis, the sensitivity ranged from 100 to 50%, for reader 1, and from 100 to 69.23%, for reader 2, respectively. • The sensitivity and specificity of lung perfusion maps obtained from venous DECT were 73.33% and 67.74% as concerns the patients' analysis and 71.92% and 75.72% as regards the lobes' analysis, respectively.

Detection of Pulmonary Embolism Based on Reduced Changes in Radiographic Lung Density During Cardiac Beating Using Dynamic Flat-panel Detector: An Animal-based Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the capacity of dynamic flat-panel detector imaging without the use of contrast media to detect pulmonary embolism (PE) based on temporal changes in radiographic lung density during cardiac beating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sequential chest radiographs of six pigs were acquired using a dynamic flat-panel detector system. A porcine model of PE was developed, and temporal changes in pixel values in the imaged lungs were analyzed during a whole cardiac cycle. Mean differences in temporal changes in pixel values between affected and unaffected lobes were assessed using the paired t test. To facilitate visual evaluation, temporal changes in pixel values were depicted using a colorimetric scale and were compared to the findings of contrast-enhanced images.

RESULTS

Affected lobes exhibited a mean reduction of 49.6% in temporal changes in pixel values compared to unaffected lobes within the same animals, and a mean reduction of 41.3% compared to that before vessel blockage in the same lobe. All unaffected lobes exhibited significantly-increased changes in pixel values after vessel blockage (p < 0.01). In all PE models, there were color-deficient areas with shapes and locations that matched well with the perfusion defects confirmed in the corresponding contrast-enhanced images.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic chest radiography enables the detection of perfusion defects in the lobe unit based on temporal changes in image density, even without the use of contrast media. Quantification and visualization techniques provide a better understanding of the circulation-induced changes depicted in dynamic chest radiographs.