Pericardial Effusion and Tamponade

Effects of pericardiocentesis on renal function and cardiac hemodynamics

BACKGROUND

Previous case studies have reported reversal of acute renal failure after pericardiocentesis in pericardial effusion. This study examines the effects of pericardiocentesis on preprocedural low cardiac output and acute renal dysfunction in patients with pericardial effusion.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 95 patients undergoing pericardiocentesis between 2015 and 2020. Pre- and post-procedure transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) were reviewed for evidence of cardiac tamponade, resolution of pericardial effusion, and for estimation of right atrial (RA) pressure and cardiac output. Laboratory values were compared at presentation and post-procedure. Patients on active renal replacement therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included for analysis (mean age 62.2 ± 17.8 years, 58% male). There was a significant increase in glomerular filtration rate pre- and post-procedure. Fifty-six patients (58.9%) had an improvement in glomerular filtration rate after pericardiocentesis (termed "responders"), and these patients had a lower pre-procedure glomerular filtration rate than "non-responders." There was a significant improvement in estimated cardiac output and right atrial pressure for patients in both groups. Patients who had an improvement in renal function had significantly lower pre-procedural diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial drainage may improve effusion-mediated acute renal dysfunction by reducing right atrial pressure and thus systemic venous congestion, and by increasing forward stroke volume and perfusion pressure.

Comparing Outcomes of CT-Guided Percutaneous Pericardial Drainage with Surgical Pericardial Window in Patients with Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare short-term outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous pericardial drainage (PPD) versus subxiphoid surgical pericardial window (PW) drainage and analyze the risk factors associated with their outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent either percutaneous drainage with drainage catheter placement or PW with surgical drain placement for symptomatic pericardial effusion between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2016 was performed after institutional review board approval (decision number 16-783). The primary objective was to test for associations between the short-term (≤30 days post procedure) complication and recurrence rates in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusions. The secondary objectives were to test for associations between short-term complications with changes in vital signs.

RESULTS

Of the 257 procedures included in the final analysis, 142 were in the percutaneous drainage group. Short-term complication rate was significantly greater (p < 0.001) in patients undergoing PW, 17% (19/114), as compared with PPD, 2% (3/142). The estimated odds of having complications in the PW cohort was 9 times greater than the percutaneous drainage cohort (OR = 9.3, 95% CI:  2.7-32.3). No significant difference was observed between whether or not a patient experienced a short-term recurrence and any of the explanatory variables (patient demographics, imaging, and vital signs).

CONCLUSION

CT-guided PPD is a safer alternative to surgical PW as it leads to fewer complications without a significant difference in recurrence rate of pericardial effusion.

Right Heart Failure With Recurrent Pericardial Effusion Mimicking Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis Several Years After Renal Transplantation

Pericardial disease is a rare complication after renal transplantation. We present a patient who developed high-output cardiac failure from a large arteriovenous (AV) fistula with recurrent pericardial effusion resulting in a constrictive hemodynamic pattern that was revealed during cardiac catheterization. Pericardiectomy was considered for recurrent effusive pericarditis, but per cardiac surgery recommendations, closure of the AV fistula dramatically cured the patient’s heart failure, and no recurrence of pericardial effusion was seen during follow-up almost a year later.

Malignant Müllerian Adenocarcinoma Manifesting With Cardiac Tamponade and Pleural Effusion

A 54-year-old woman with a past medical history of untreated stage IV Müllerian adenocarcinoma presented for dyspnea. She was found to have a large right-sided pleural effusion through basic radiology and clinically improved after a CT-guided therapeutic thoracocentesis. However, the patient rapidly deteriorated shortly afterward. A broader workup that included echocardiography revealed a large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. The patient underwent an emergent pericardiocentesis, which briefly improved hemodynamics, but her clinical status kept declining until she eventually expired. Subsequent cytology of the pleural and pericardial fluid revealed malignant cells of Müllerian origin.

Long-term Outcomes After Controlled Pericardial Drainage for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Cardiac tamponade with acute aortic dissection type A can cause fatal outcomes. We previously reported excellent outcomes using percutaneous pericardial drainage with controlled volumes of aspirated pericardial effusion (controlled pericardial drainage [CPD]) to stabilize patients with critical cardiac tamponade. This study evaluates the early and late outcomes using this approach.

METHODS

Between September 2003 and July 2018, 308 patients with acute aortic dissection type A were treated surgically, including 76 patients who presented with cardiac tamponade on hospital arrival. Forty-nine patients who did not respond to intravenous volume resuscitation underwent CPD in the emergency room, including 14 patients (28.6%) who presented with cardiopulmonary arrest. After CPD 39 patients (79.6%) were transferred to the operating room to undergo immediate aortic repair. The remaining 10 patients (20.4%) received medical treatment on arrival, followed by aortic repair within several days.

RESULTS

In 49 patients the mean systolic blood pressure before CPD was 64.4 ± 10.3 mm Hg. Blood pressure rose significantly in all patients after CPD. The total volume of aspirated pericardial effusion was 46.8 ± 56.2 mL, and 30 of 49 patients (61%) required only 30 mL or less of aspiration to improve their blood pressure. All patients underwent successful aortic repair. Early hospital mortality was 16%. However there was no mortality related to CPD. The mean follow-up period was 52.9 ± 54.3 months. The cumulative survival rate was 63.4% after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CPD for critical cardiac tamponade with acute type A aortic dissection produced satisfactory early and late outcomes.

Pericardial effusion with tamponade: bedside ultrasonography saves another life

In these video clinical images, the authors present the cause for an elderly gentleman’s shortness of breath. It was presumed to be an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a condition for which he was in the process of being evaluated. However, bedside ultrasonography revealed a large pericardial effusion with tamponade. This timely diagnosis resulted in the patient being taken expeditiously to the operating room and saving his life.

Impact of controlled pericardial drainage on critical cardiac tamponade with acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Cardiac tamponade is associated with fatal outcomes for patients with acute type A aortic dissection, and the presence of cardiac tamponade should prompt urgent aortic repair. However, treatment of the patient with critical cardiac tamponade who cannot survive until surgery remains unclear. We analyzed our experience of controlled pericardial drainage (CPD) managing critical cardiac tamponade.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between September 2003 and May 2011, 175 patients with acute type A aortic dissection were treated surgically, including 43 (24.6%) who presented with cardiac tamponade on arrival. Eighteen patients, who did not respond to intravenous volume resuscitation, underwent CPD in the emergency department. An 8F pigtail drainage catheter was inserted percutaneously, and drainage volume was controlled by means of several cycles of intermittent drainage to maintain blood pressure at ≈90 mm Hg. After CPD, all of the patients were transferred to the operating room, and immediate aortic repair was performed. Systolic blood pressure before CPD was 64.3 ± 8.2 mm Hg and elevated significantly in all of the cases after CPD. Systolic blood pressure after CPD was 94.8 ± 10.5 mm Hg, and increase in systolic pressure was 30.5 ± 11.7 mm Hg. Total volume of aspirated pericardial effusion was 40.1 ± 30.6 mL, and 10 patients required only ≤30-mL aspiration volume. All of the patients underwent aortic repair successfully. In-hospital mortality was 16.7%; however, there was no complications or mortality related to CPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative pericardial drainage with control of volume is a safe and effective procedure for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by critical cardiac tamponade. In our patient population, timely controlled pericardial drainage is warranted.

[Cardiac arrest following blunt chest injury. Emergency thoracotomy without ifs or buts?]

In German-speaking countries, most serious thoracic injuries are attributable to the impact of blunt force; they are the second most frequent result of injury after head injury in polytrauma patients with multiple injuries. Almost one in every three polytraumatized patients with significant chest injury develops acute lung failure, and one in every four, acute circulatory failure. The acute circulatory arrest following serious chest injury involves a high mortality rate, and in most cases it reflects a tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, or hemorrhagic shock resulting from injury to the heart or one of the large vessels close to it. Brisk drainage of tension pneumothorax and adequate volume restoration are therefore particularly important in resuscitation of multiply traumatized patients, as are rapid resuscitative thoracotomy to allow direct heart massage, drainage of pericardial tamponade, and control of hemorrhage. However the probability of survival described in the literature is very low for patients sustaining severe chest trauma with acute cardiac arrest. The case report presented here describes a female polytrauma patient who suffered an acute cardiac arrest following cardiac tamponade after admission in the emergency department and who survived without neurological deficits after an emergency thoracotomy. Selections from the topical literature can help the treating physician in the emergency department in making decisions on whether an emergency thoracotomy is indicated after a blunt chest injury and on the procedure itself.

Percutaneous treatment in patients presenting with malignant cardiac tamponade

The percutaneous treatment of pericardial effusion resulting in cardiac tamponade has undergone an evolution in recent years with the use of less invasive drainage techniques in selected cases. To determine optimal therapy modalities for oncology patients with malignant pericardial tamponade (MPT), the authors review their institutional experience with percutaneous needle puncture routes, means of imaging-guided drainage and percutaneous management of the pericardial fluid effusion (pericardial sclerosis and balloon pericardiotomy). Advantages and limits of the percutaneous techniques will be compared to the surgical treatment.