Parkinson's Disease: Surgical Options

Differential Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation on Motor Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the differences in motor symptom change outcomes after bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in well-defined motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease (PD) to improve clinical decision making.

METHODS

We included 114 patients who had undergone STN-DBS and 65 patients who had undergone GPi-DBS. The patients were classified as having akinetic-rigid type (ART), tremor-dominant type (TDT), and mixed type (MT) using the preoperative Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) scores in the no-medication state. The outcome measures included the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores and subscore changes at the last follow-up after surgery. The outcomes were compared among the different motor subtypes and between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up (14.92 ± 8.35 months), the TDT patients had had a greater median overall motor improvement in the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores compared with the ART patients (62.90% vs. 46.67%; P < 0.001), regardless of the stimulation target. The ART patients showed greater improvement after STN-DBS than after GPi-DBS (54.44% vs. 37.21%; P < 0.001), with improvements in rigidity, akinesia, and posture and gait disorders accounting for the difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the different PD motor subtypes will have differential responses to STN-DBS and GPi-DBS, that TDT patients will experience greater improvement than ART patients, and that STN-DBS provides better effects for ART patients than does GPi-DBS. In addition, different motor symptoms among the different motor subtypes might respond differently to STN-DBS than to GPi-DBS. All these factors could reflect the heterogeneity of PD. Longer-term outcomes across the different motor subtypes and stimulation targets should be studied further.

Comparison of elderly and young patient populations treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: long-term outcomes with up to 7 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the procedure of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been used in PD patients younger than 70 years because of better perceived intra- and postoperative outcomes than in patients 70 years or older. However, previous studies with limited follow-up have demonstrated benefits associated with the treatment of elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes in elderly PD patients treated with DBS in comparison with a younger population.

METHODS

PD patients treated with DBS at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2014 were divided into 2 groups: 1) elderly patients, defined as having an age at surgery ≥ 70 years, and 2) young patients, defined as those < 70 years at surgery. Functional and medical treatment outcomes were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III), levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), number of daily doses, and number of anti-PD medications. Study outcomes were compared using univariate analyses, 1-sample paired t-tests, and 2-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were studied, of whom 24.5% were ≥ 70 years. The most common preoperative Hoehn and Yahr stages for both groups were 2 and 3. On average, elderly patients had more comorbidities at the time of surgery than their younger counterparts (1 vs 0, p = 0.0001) as well as a higher average LEDD (891 mg vs 665 mg, p = 0.008). Both groups experienced significant decreases in LEDD following surgery (elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0001; and young 108.6 mg, p = 0.0439), with a more significant decrease seen in elderly patients (young 108.6 mg vs elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0153). Elderly patients also experienced more significant reductions in daily doses (young 0.65 vs elderly 3.567, p = 0.0344). Both groups experienced significant improvements in motor function determined by reductions in UPDRS III scores (elderly 16.29 vs young 12.85, p < 0.0001); however, reductions in motor score between groups were not significant. Improvement in motor function was present for a mean follow-up of 3.383 years postsurgery for the young group and 3.51 years for the elderly group. The average follow-up was 40.6 months in the young group and 42.2 months in the elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found long-term improvements in motor function and medication requirements in both elderly and young PD patients treated with DBS. These outcomes suggest that DBS can be successfully used in PD patients ≥ 70 years. Further studies will expand on these findings.

Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: current status and future outlook

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative condition secondary to loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Surgical therapy serves as an adjunct when unwanted medication side effects become apparent or additional therapy is needed. Deep brain stimulation emerged into the forefront in the 1990s. Studies have demonstrated improvement in all of the cardinal parkinsonian signs with stimulation. Frameless and ‘mini-frame’ stereotactic systems, improved MRI for anatomic visualization, and intraoperative MRI-guided placement are a few of the surgical advances in deep brain stimulation. Other advances include rechargeable pulse generators, voltage- or current-based stimulation, and enhanced abilities to ‘steer’ stimulation. Work is ongoing investigating closed-loop ‘smart’ stimulation in which stimulation is predicated on neuronal feedback.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients 70 Years and Older with Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease in elderly patients that may be treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS is an accepted surgical treatment in PD patients <70 years that demonstrates marked improvement in disease symptomology. Patients ≥70 years historically have been excluded from DBS therapy. Our objective is to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with PD ≥70 years who underwent DBS at our center.

METHODS

In our single-center study, we retrospectively assessed a prospective registry of patients with PD treated with DBS who were ≥70 years old at the time of their procedure. Univariate analyses and 1-sample paired t test were used to evaluate data. Motor scores were evaluated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III, and the effects on medication requirements were evaluated with levodopa equivalence daily doses (LEDD).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were followed for an average of 42.2 months post-DBS. The average ages at diagnosis and at the time of DBS surgery were 63.05 years and 72.45 years, respectively. Significant reductions in the average Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III score were observed (preoperative 31.8; postoperative 15.6; P < 0.0001). Significant reductions in the average LEDD (preoperative 891.94 mg; postoperative 559.6 mg; P = 0.0008) and medication doses per day (preoperative 11.54; postoperative 7.97; P = 0.0112) also were present.

CONCLUSION

DBS is effective in treating elderly patients with PD. Patients experienced improvement in motor function, LEDD, and medication doses per day after DBS. Our results suggest that DBS is an effective treatment modality in elderly patients with PD.

Considerations regarding the etiology and future treatment of autosomal recessive versus idiopathic Parkinson disease

OPINION STATEMENT

We postulate that the frequently encountered grouping of different Parkinson disease (PD) variants into a single pathogenetic concept-rather than differentiation into its molecular subtypes-has hindered progress toward curative interventions. Parkinsonism is a clinical syndrome that in rare cases can be explained by a single genetic event or by a single environmental cause, thereby leading to monogenic PD and secondary parkinsonism, respectively. Under the former category, mutations in both alleles of the Parkin-encoding PARK2 gene leads to young-onset, autosomal recessive PD, in which neurodegeneration is restricted to dopamine-producing cells of the brainstem. Under the latter category, exposure to one of several environmental factors with neuroanatomic selectivity can cause rapid-onset, secondary parkinsonism most likely irrespective of the patient's age and genetic makeup. Sandwiched between these two extreme and rare types, the most common variant is referred to as late-onset, idiopathic PD. In extension of a disease model first proposed by Braak et al., we consider idiopathic PD the result of an encounter between one or several environmental triggers and one or more susceptibility alleles. Importantly, this interaction produces a pre-motor syndrome followed by the typical PD phenotype over a period of decades. In our opinion, this pathophysiological process should thus be viewed as a "complex disease." As is true for many complex human disorders, successful intervention for the common PD variant will likely occur when genetic leads as well as environmental contributors are targeted in parallel. However, successful proof-of-concept studies could arrive sooner, namely for select PD variants that can be attributed to a single genetic event and that are neuropathologically restricted. Therefore, the authors decided to focus the second portion of their review on treatment considerations regarding autosomal recessive PD cases that are caused by Parkin deficiency. We briefly draw attention to aspects of existing pharmacological and surgical therapies as they relate to the PARK2-linked variant; thereafter, we comment on new research avenues that are aimed at future therapeutic interventions to eventually slow or arrest the progression of a first variant of PD.

Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations

OPINION STATEMENT

Many important advances for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) have been made over the past decade, and quality of life has improved for most patients. Nonetheless, motor fluctuations in the form of wearing off with the re-emergence of parkinsonian symptoms and hyperkinetic movements (dyskinesias) often arise as a complication of long-term dopaminergic therapy and can be disabling. Because treatment of motor fluctuations is difficult, clinicians should attempt to prevent them by using low doses of dopaminergic drugs in early PD, targeting functionally relevant symptoms. Instead of levodopa, dopamine agonists, amantadine, and rasagiline can be used with the aim of delaying the onset of motor fluctuations. Once motor fluctuations arise, off time can initially be addressed with more frequent dosing of levodopa. Later, adjunctive therapy with a dopamine agonist, COMT-inhibitor, or MAO-B inhibitor becomes necessary. For treatment of dyskinesias, reduction of the levodopa dose should be the first step. If this is not tolerated because of increased off time, then adjunctive therapy with levodopa-sparing agents should be attempted. The addition of amantadine (the only currently available antidyskinetic drug) is another useful strategy but is often only a temporary solution. Once medical attempts at treating motor fluctuations fail, deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be considered. Careful patient selection and skilled placement of DBS electrodes are important determinants of the surgical outcome.

Efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has, for the most part, replaced irreversible stereotactic coagulations in the surgical treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. This study was undertaken to evaluate the benefits of bilateral STN stimulation related to its potential risks and side effects.

METHOD

Twenty-nine consecutive Parkinsonian patients treated with STN-DBS were prospectively followed-up. Effects on Parkinsonian symptoms were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The evaluation was performed preoperatively and included postoperative follow-up evaluations at one and twelve months. All evaluations were made during the patient's best on-medication phase and postoperative follow-ups were conducted under both stimulator-on and stimulator-off conditions by a blinded neurologist. A neuropsychologist also evaluated the patients at every visit.

FINDINGS

Two patients were excluded from the analysis because of severe surgical complications and three for an infection demanding the removal of the stimulator material. Other complications and side effects were clearly milder and temporary. At twelve months after surgery dyskinesia scores in the UPDRS were 53% lower than preoperative values. The results of the UPDRS motor scores improved 31.4% and activities of daily living (ADL) scores increased 19% compared with the preoperative situation. Also, the daily levodopa dose was 22% lower. Neuropsychological changes were minor, except for some deterioration in verbal fluency.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Parkinsonian patients experienced significant and long lasting relief from their motor symptoms and an improvement in ADL functions due to DBS-STN therapy when evaluated at the best on-medication phase.

Chronic implantation of deep brain stimulation leads in animal models of neurological disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has routinely been used as a treatment option in Parkinson's disease (PD), tremor disorders and, more recently, dystonia. Here, we describe a method of implantation of DBS leads in the monkey model of PD. By adapting procedures used in human patients, we have devised implantation techniques that can be readily applied to any animal model in which stimulation of subcortical structures is desired. The procedure for implantation consists of microelectrode mapping of the target structure, DBS lead preparation and implantation, and verification of lead placement. The stimulation system described in this paper allows for simultaneous recording of neuronal activity (during stimulation) and observation of animal behavior without restriction of the subject's head or body. In addition, we detail techniques for stimulation and recording from distant structures (utilizing either a one or two chamber system) to facilitate examination of the effects of DBS on neural activity. Thus, the correlation of changes in neuronal activity with behavior during stimulation of subcortical structures can be accomplished. In addition, the use of leads in primates which are analogous in size to human devices allows for close reproduction of the effects of stimulation as observed in humans.

Long term motor complications of levodopa: clinical features, mechanisms, and management strategies

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, after an initial period of dramatic benefit, several limitations become apparent including, "dopa resistant" motor symptoms (postural abnormalities, freezing episodes, speech impairment), "dopa resistant" non-motor signs (autonomic dysfunction, mood and cognitive impairment, etc), and/or drug related side effects (especially psychosis, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias). Motor complications include fluctuations, dyskinesias, and dystonias. They can be very disabling and difficult to treat. Therefore, strategies should ideally be developed to prevent them. Though mechanisms underlying motor complications are only partially understood, recent work has revealed the importance of pulsatile stimulation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors and the disease severity. As a result of intermittent stimulation there occurs a cascade of changes in cell signalling leading to upregulation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of gamma-aminobutryric acid-ergic neurones. Modified preparations of levodopa (controlled release preparations, liquid levodopa), catecholamine-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, dopamine agonists, amantidine, and various neurosurgical approaches have been used in the prevention and/or treatment of motor complications. Current management of motor complications is less than satisfactory. With better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms, it is hoped that future therapeutic strategies will provide a safer and targeted treatment.