Telestroke’s Role Through the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

The Advantageous Impact of Telestroke: Global Insights and Implications for Africa: A Scoping Review of Literature

Introduction: Stroke is a leading global contributor to mortality and disability. Low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected and account for 87% of stroke-related disabilities and 70% of stroke-related fatalities. The challenges of stroke care accessibility in Africa are compounded by financial constraints, geographical barriers, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure, necessitating the adoption of innovative models such as telestroke. Telestroke is a critical component of modern stroke care systems. Telestroke enables real-time remote assessments, optimizes patient triage and hospital transfers, improves the efficiency of thrombolysis administration, and enhances poststroke management by mitigating logistical and mobility-related challenges. This demonstrates telestroke's potential to expand access to specialized stroke care, improve functional outcomes, and address critical gaps in stroke management within underserved regions such as Africa. This paper assesses the advantageous impact of telestroke on stroke management, with the aim of drawing global insights for Africa. Methodology: This scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across ProQuest, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2017 to 2023. This ensured the inclusion of the most recent advancements in telestroke research. Results: The initial literature search retrieved 881 articles, of which 143 duplicates (16.2%) and 58 non-English studies (6.6%) were removed, followed by the exclusion of 451 nonpeer-reviewed publications (51.2%) and 128 articles (14.5%) unrelated to the study area, leaving 101 studies (11.5%) for full-text review. After further screening, 70 studies were excluded for not aligning with the study's title, objectives, or key search terms. This resulted in 31 studies (3.5%) being included in the final analysis, with 21 studies originating from outside Africa. The limited availability of high-indexed, peer-reviewed African telestroke studies highlighted a research gap, impacting the generalizability of findings. Conclusion: Telestroke has demonstrated significant benefits in stroke management, including improved functional outcomes, reduced onset-to-treatment time, enhanced diagnostic accuracy, and increased healthcare accessibility, particularly in medically underserved regions. However, its implementation in Africa faces challenges related to ethical concerns, technological infrastructure, regulatory inconsistencies, financial sustainability, and limited clinician buy-in. This necessitates strategic interventions such as standardized regulatory frameworks, network expansion, sustainable financing, capacity-building, and the integration of cost-effective imaging technologies to enhance stroke care delivery across the continent.

Stroke as a career option for neurologists

Stroke is one of the most common acute neurological disorders and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Evidence-based treatments over the last two decades have driven a revolution in the clinical management and design of stroke services. We need a highly skilled, multidisciplinary workforce that includes neurologists as core members to deliver modern stroke care. In the UK, the dedicated subspecialty training programme for stroke medicine has recently been integrated into the neurology curriculum. All neurologists will be trained to contribute to each aspect of the stroke care pathway. We discuss how training in stroke medicine is evolving for neurologists and the opportunities and challenges around practising stroke medicine in the UK and beyond.

Self-Reported Patient and Provider Satisfaction With Neurology Telemedicine Visits After Rapid Telemedicine Implementation in an Urban Academic Center: Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Many clinics and health systems implemented telemedicine appointment services out of necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate patient and general provider satisfaction with neurology telemedicine implementation at an urban academic medical center.

METHODS

Patients who had completed 1 or more teleneurology visits from April 1 to December 31, 2020, were asked to complete a survey regarding their demographic information and satisfaction with teleneurology visits. Providers of all specialties within the same hospital system were given a different survey to gather their experiences of providing telemedicine care.

RESULTS

Of the estimated 1500 patients who had completed a teleneurology visit within the given timeframe, 117 (7.8%) consented to complete the survey. Of these 117 respondents, most appointments were regarding epilepsy (n=59, 50.4%), followed by multiple sclerosis (n=33, 28.2%) and neuroimmunology (n=7, 6%). Overall, 74.4% (n=87) of patients rated their experience as 8 out of 10 or higher, with 10 being the highest satisfaction. Furthermore, 75.2% (n=88) of patients reported missing an appointment in the previous year due to transportation issues and thought telemedicine was more convenient instead. A significant relationship between racial or ethnic group and comfort sharing private information was found (P<.001), with 52% (26/50) of Black patients reporting that an office visit is better, compared to 25% (14/52) of non-Black patients. The provider survey gathered 40 responses, with 75% (n=30) of providers agreeing that virtual visits are a valuable tool for patient care and 80% (n=32) reporting few to no technical issues. The majority of provider respondents were physicians on faculty or staff (n=21, 52%), followed by residents or fellows (n=15, 38%) and nurse practitioners or physician assistants (n=4, 10%). Of the specialties represented, 15 (38%) of the providers were in neurology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found adequate satisfaction among patients and providers regarding telemedicine implementation and its utility for patient care in a diverse urban population. Additionally, while access to technology and technology literacy are barriers to telemedical care, a substantial majority of patients who responded to the survey had access to devices (101/117, 86.3%) and were able to connect with few to no technological difficulties (84/117, 71.8%). One area identified by patients in need of improvement was comfortability in communicating via telemedicine with their providers. Furthermore, while providers agreed that telemedicine is a useful tool for patient care, it limits their ability to perform physical exams. More research and quality studies are needed to further appreciate and support the expansion of telemedical care into underserved and rural populations, especially in the area of subspecialty neurological care.

Implementing Telestroke in the Inpatient Setting: Identifying Factors for Success

BACKGROUND

Inpatient telestroke programs have emerged as a solution to provide timely stroke care in underserved areas, but their successful implementation and factors influencing their effectiveness remain underexplored. This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the perspectives of inpatient clinicians located at spoke hospitals participating in a newly established inpatient telestroke program to identify implementation barriers and facilitators.

METHODS

This was a formative evaluation relying on semistructured qualitative interviews with 16 inpatient providers (physicians and nurse practitioners) at 5 spoke sites of a hub-and-spoke inpatient telestroke program. The Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework guided data analysis, focusing on the innovation, recipients, context, and facilitation aspects of implementation. Interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen themes were identified in the data and mapped to the Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Themes related to the innovation (the telestroke program) included easy access to stroke specialists, the benefits of limiting patient transfers, concerns about duplicating tests, and challenges of timing inpatient telestroke visits and notes to align with discharge workflow. Themes pertaining to recipients (care team members and patients) were communication gaps between teams, concern about the supervision of inpatient telestroke advanced practice providers and challenges with nurse empowerment. With regard to the context (hospital and system factors), providers highlighted familiarity with telehealth technologies as a facilitator to implementing inpatient telestroke, yet highlighted resource limitations in smaller facilities. Facilitation (program implementation) was recognized as crucial for education, standardization, and buy-in.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation is crucial to determining where programmatic changes may need to be made to ensure the success and sustainment of inpatient telestroke services.

Telehealth and Technology: New Directions in Cancer Care

ABSTRACT

Telehealth is a broad concept that refers to any delivery of health care in real time using technologies to connect people or information that are not in the same physical location. Until fairly recently, telehealth was more aspiration than reality. This situation changed radically due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to a near-overnight inability for patients to be seen for routine management of chronic health conditions, including those with cancer. The purpose of this brief narrative review is to outline some areas where emerging and future technology may allow for innovations with specific implications for people with a current or past diagnosis of cancer, including underserved and/or historically excluded populations. Specific topics of telehealth are broadly covered in other areas of the special issue.

Telerehabilitation service impact on physical function and adherence compared to face-to-face rehabilitation in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) appraise the available evidence of telerehabilitation program effects on functional outcomes, adherence, and patient satisfaction compared to face-to-face programs after stroke; and (2) provide direction for future outcome measure selection and development for clinical research purposes. TYPE: Systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

LITERATURE SURVEY

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Proquest Theses and Dissertations, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies published in English from 1964 to the end of April 2022.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 6450 studies were identified, 13 were included in the systematic review, and 10 with at least 3 reported similar outcomes were included the meta-analysis. Methodological quality of results was evaluated using the PEDro checklist.

SYNTHESIS

Telerehabilitation demonstrated equivalency in outcomes across several domains and was favored compared to conventional face to face alone or when paired with semisupervised physical therapy on Wolf Motor Function performance score (mean difference [MD] 1.69 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-3.17) and time score (MD 2.07 seconds, 95% CI -4.04 to -0.10, Q test = 30.27, p < .001, I2  = 93%), and Functional Mobility Assessment in the upper extremities (MD 3.32 points, 95% CI 0.90-5.74, Q test = 5.60, p = .23, I2  = 29% alone or when paired with semisupervised physical therapy). The Barthel Index participation measures of function demonstrated improvement (MD 4.18 points, 95% CI, 1.79-6.57, Q test = 3.56, p = .31, I2  = 16%). Over half of summarized study ratings were determined to be of good to excellent quality (PEDro score 6.6 ± 2.3 points). Adherence varied in available studies from 75%-100%. Satisfaction levels of telerehabilitation were highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Telerehabilitation can improve functional outcomes and promote therapy adherence after stroke. Therapy protocols and functional assessments need substantial refinement and standardization to improve interpretation and clinical outcomes.