1
|
Salloch S, Eriksen A. What Are Humans Doing in the Loop? Co-Reasoning and Practical Judgment When Using Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38767971 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2353800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Within the ethical debate on Machine Learning-driven decision support systems (ML_CDSS), notions such as "human in the loop" or "meaningful human control" are often cited as being necessary for ethical legitimacy. In addition, ethical principles usually serve as the major point of reference in ethical guidance documents, stating that conflicts between principles need to be weighed and balanced against each other. Starting from a neo-Kantian viewpoint inspired by Onora O'Neill, this article makes a concrete suggestion of how to interpret the role of the "human in the loop" and to overcome the perspective of rivaling ethical principles in the evaluation of AI in health care. We argue that patients should be perceived as "fellow workers" and epistemic partners in the interpretation of ML_CDSS outputs. We further highlight that a meaningful process of integrating (rather than weighing and balancing) ethical principles is most appropriate in the evaluation of medical AI.
Collapse
|
2
|
Naughton M, Salmon PM, Compton HR, McLean S. Challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence implementation within sports science and sports medicine teams. Front Sports Act Living 2024; 6:1332427. [PMID: 38832311 PMCID: PMC11144926 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1332427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The rapid progress in the development of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, represents a step-wise change in human's interactions with technology as part of a broader complex, sociotechnical system. Based on historical parallels to the present moment, such changes are likely to bring forth structural shifts to the nature of work, where near and future technologies will occupy key roles as workers or assistants in sports science and sports medicine multidisciplinary teams (MDTs). This envisioned future may bring enormous benefits, as well as a raft of potential challenges. These challenges include the potential to remove many human roles and allocate them to semi- or fully-autonomous AI. Removing such roles and tasks from humans will make many current jobs and careers untenable, leaving a set of difficult and unrewarding tasks for the humans that remain. Paradoxically, replacing humans with technology increases system complexity and makes them more prone to failure. The automation and AI boom also brings substantial opportunities. Among them are automated sentiment analysis and Digital Twin technologies which may reveal novel insights into athlete health and wellbeing and team tactical patterns, respectively. However, without due consideration of the interactions between humans and technology in the broader system of sport, adverse impacts are likely to be felt. Human and AI teamwork may require new ways of thinking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Naughton
- School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul M. Salmon
- Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
| | - Heidi R. Compton
- School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia
| | - Scott McLean
- Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu M, Islam MM, Poly TN, Lin MC. Application of AI in Sepsis: Citation Network Analysis and Evidence Synthesis. Interact J Med Res 2024; 13:e54490. [PMID: 38621231 PMCID: PMC11058558 DOI: 10.2196/54490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered considerable attention in the context of sepsis research, particularly in personalized diagnosis and treatment. Conducting a bibliometric analysis of existing publications can offer a broad overview of the field and identify current research trends and future research directions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to leverage bibliometric data to provide a comprehensive overview of the application of AI in sepsis. METHODS We conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection database to identify relevant articles published in English until August 31, 2023. A predefined search strategy was used, evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts as needed. We used the Bibliometrix and VOSviewer tools to visualize networks showcasing the co-occurrence of authors, research institutions, countries, citations, and keywords. RESULTS A total of 259 relevant articles published between 2014 and 2023 (until August) were identified. Over the past decade, the annual publication count has consistently risen. Leading journals in this domain include Critical Care Medicine (17/259, 6.6%), Frontiers in Medicine (17/259, 6.6%), and Scientific Reports (11/259, 4.2%). The United States (103/259, 39.8%), China (83/259, 32%), United Kingdom (14/259, 5.4%), and Taiwan (12/259, 4.6%) emerged as the most prolific countries in terms of publications. Notable institutions in this field include the University of California System, Emory University, and Harvard University. The key researchers working in this area include Ritankar Das, Chris Barton, and Rishikesan Kamaleswaran. Although the initial period witnessed a relatively low number of articles focused on AI applications for sepsis, there has been a significant surge in research within this area in recent years (2014-2023). CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into AI-related research conducted in the field of sepsis, aiding health care policy makers and researchers in understanding the potential of AI and formulating effective research plans. Such analysis serves as a valuable resource for determining the advantages, sustainability, scope, and potential impact of AI models in sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MeiJung Wu
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Md Mohaimenul Islam
- Department of Outcomes and Translational Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Tahmina Nasrin Poly
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chin Lin
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Anazi S, Al-Omari A, Alanazi S, Marar A, Asad M, Alawaji F, Alwateid S. Artificial intelligence in respiratory care: Current scenario and future perspective. Ann Thorac Med 2024; 19:117-130. [PMID: 38766378 PMCID: PMC11100474 DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_192_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This narrative review aims to explore the current state and future perspective of artificial intelligence (AI) in respiratory care. The objective is to provide insights into the potential impact of AI in this field. METHODS A comprehensive analysis of relevant literature and research studies was conducted to examine the applications of AI in respiratory care and identify areas of advancement. The analysis included studies on remote monitoring, early detection, smart ventilation systems, and collaborative decision-making. RESULTS The obtained results highlight the transformative potential of AI in respiratory care. AI algorithms have shown promising capabilities in enabling tailored treatment plans based on patient-specific data. Remote monitoring using AI-powered devices allows for real-time feedback to health-care providers, enhancing patient care. AI algorithms have also demonstrated the ability to detect respiratory conditions at an early stage, leading to timely interventions and improved outcomes. Moreover, AI can optimize mechanical ventilation through continuous monitoring, enhancing patient comfort and reducing complications. Collaborative AI systems have the potential to augment the expertise of health-care professionals, leading to more accurate diagnoses and effective treatment strategies. CONCLUSION By improving diagnosis, AI has the potential to revolutionize respiratory care, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While challenges and ethical considerations remain, the transformative impact of AI in this domain cannot be overstated. By leveraging the advancements and insights from this narrative review, health-care professionals and researchers can continue to harness the power of AI to improve patient outcomes and enhance respiratory care practices. IMPROVEMENTS Based on the findings, future research should focus on refining AI algorithms to enhance their accuracy, reliability, and interpretability. In addition, attention should be given to addressing ethical considerations, ensuring data privacy, and establishing regulatory frameworks to govern the responsible implementation of AI in respiratory care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Al-Anazi
- Lead Clincial Appliaction AzeerTrade (Lowenstein Medical Company), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Awad Al-Omari
- Department of Intensive Care, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Group Hospitals, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Safug Alanazi
- Intensivist, Al Hammadi Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aqeelah Marar
- Respiratory Care Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Asad
- Department of Emergency, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Group Hospitals, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fadi Alawaji
- Ar Rass General Hospital, Qassim Health Cluster, Senior Laboratory Specialist, Rass Region, Qassim City, Saudi Arabia
| | - Salman Alwateid
- Respiratory Care Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spence C, Shah OA, Cebula A, Tucker K, Sochart D, Kader D, Asopa V. Machine learning models to predict surgical case duration compared to current industry standards: scoping review. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad113. [PMID: 37931236 PMCID: PMC10630142 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical waiting lists have risen dramatically across the UK as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The effective use of operating theatres by optimal scheduling could help mitigate this, but this requires accurate case duration predictions. Current standards for predicting the duration of surgery are inaccurate. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential for greater accuracy in predicting surgical case duration. This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support that AI is more accurate than current industry standards at predicting surgical case duration, with a secondary aim of analysing whether the implementation of the models used produced efficiency savings. METHOD PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE libraries were searched through to July 2023 to identify appropriate articles. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and the Arksey and O'Malley framework were followed. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the reporting guidelines for surgical AI papers by Farrow et al. Algorithm performance was reported using evaluation metrics. RESULTS The search identified 2593 articles: 14 were suitable for inclusion and 13 reported on the accuracy of AI algorithms against industry standards, with seven demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in prediction accuracy (P < 0.05). The larger studies demonstrated the superiority of neural networks over other machine learning techniques. Efficiency savings were identified in a RCT. Significant methodological limitations were identified across most studies. CONCLUSION The studies suggest that machine learning and deep learning models are more accurate at predicting the duration of surgery; however, further research is required to determine the best way to implement this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Spence
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - Owais A Shah
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - Anna Cebula
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - Keith Tucker
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - David Sochart
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - Deiary Kader
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| | - Vipin Asopa
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Valente M, Bellini V, Del Rio P, Freyrie A, Bignami E. Artificial Intelligence Is the Future of Surgical Departments … Are We Ready? Angiology 2023; 74:397-398. [PMID: 35973828 DOI: 10.1177/00033197221121192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Valente
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, 478519University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Valentina Bellini
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, 478519University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Paolo Del Rio
- Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, 478519University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, 478519University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Elena Bignami
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, 478519University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Macri R, Roberts SL. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Care: A Values-Based Guide for Shared Decision Making. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2178-2186. [PMID: 36826129 PMCID: PMC9955933 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, including in the field of oncology, have the potential to advance diagnosis and treatment. The literature suggests that patient values should be considered in decision making when using AI in clinical care; however, there is a lack of practical guidance for clinicians on how to approach these conversations and incorporate patient values into clinical decision making. We provide a practical, values-based guide for clinicians to assist in critical reflection and the incorporation of patient values into shared decision making when deciding to use AI in clinical care. Values that are relevant to patients, identified in the literature, include trust, privacy and confidentiality, non-maleficence, safety, accountability, beneficence, autonomy, transparency, compassion, equity, justice, and fairness. The guide offers questions for clinicians to consider when adopting the potential use of AI in their practice; explores illness understanding between the patient and clinician; encourages open dialogue of patient values; reviews all clinically appropriate options; and makes a shared decision of what option best meets the patient's values. The guide can be used for diverse clinical applications of AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Macri
- Department of Bioethics, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
- Joint Centre for Bioethics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Shannon L. Roberts
- Project-Specific Bioethics Research Volunteer Student, Hennick Bridgepoint Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON M4M 2B5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gundersen T, Bærøe K. Ethical Algorithmic Advice: Some Reasons to Pause and Think Twice. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:26-28. [PMID: 35737486 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
|