Surgical technique: Tibia cortical strut autograft interposition arthrodesis after distal radius resection

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Functional Outcomes of Centralization of the Ulna as a Method of Reconstruction Following Resection of Campanacci Grade 3 Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Radius

PURPOSE

Wrist reconstruction after distal radial tumor resection poses a challenge to the orthopedic oncologist. We evaluated the functional outcomes of centralization of the ulna with ulnocarpal arthrodesis as a method of reconstruction following resection of distal radius tumors, using impairment measures and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Evaluation of functional outcome was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 scoring system and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. We also determined hand grip strength on the affected side, time to radiologic union at the ulnocarpal junction and reduction in wrist circumference. Local complications and oncologic outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The study included 26 patients with Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Mean follow-up period in the study was 32.8 ± 12 months. Mean resection length was 10.3 ± 2.5 cm. Radiologic union at the ulnocarpal junction was achieved in 38.5%, 77% and 96% of the patients by 4, 5, and 6 months respectively. Mean hand grip strength was 74 ± 3.9% of the contralateral side whereas mean reduction in wrist circumference was 16.9 ± 6.4%. A good functional outcome with a mean the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score of 26 ± 1.4 and mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score of 10.5 ± 6.3 was observed. Fracture of the ulna, hardware loosening, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy were each noted in 1 patient, with an overall complication rate of 10.7% (3/28). No patient had nonunion, infection, or local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a simple and effective modality of reconstruction after resection of distal radial tumors. It provides good functional outcome and preservation of good hand grip strength, with low complication rates.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Reconstruction After En Bloc Resection of a Distal Radius Tumor. An Updated and Concise Review

The distal radius is rarely affected by either primary or metastatic bone cancers. The most frequent tumors of the distal radius are giant cell tumors, which are benign tumors with the propensity to invade. En bloc excision of giant cell tumors of the distal radius achieves a low recurrence rate but compromises the wrist joint, necessitates a significant reconstruction, and has functional consequences. Reconstruction after en bloc resection of a distal radius bone tumor is challenging. Furthermore, orthopedic oncologists disagree on treating such long bone anomalies most effectively. The present article summarizes the various biological and non-biological reconstruction techniques performed after en bloc resection of a distal radius tumor, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each reconstruction strategy, and summarizes several case studies and case reports.

Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Radius: A Review

Giant cell tumor of the distal radius presents a significant challenge in management due to high risk of recurrence and potential loss of function. Shared decision-making guides management, particularly for more advanced lesions. Intralesional curettage can optimize wrist function but at the cost of a higher recurrence risk. Wide resection decreases local recurrence but has higher complication rates regardless of reconstruction method. No functional difference exists between motion-preserving procedures and arthrodesis; therefore, patients should be clearly informed of the risks and benefits of each treatment option.

Outcomes of distal radial endoprostheses for tumour reconstruction: a single centre experience over 15 years

We report a retrospective study over a 15-year period, between 2005 and 2020, evaluating clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent reconstruction of the distal radius with an endoprosthetic replacement following excision of both malignant and aggressive benign bone tumours. Data was collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained electronic database, and prospectively via telephone patient consultation. Musculoskeletal Tumour Society and patient-rated wrist evaluation scores were assessed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Of nine implants, five were arthrodeses and four were arthroplasties. One patient required amputation within 6 months for proximal metastatic disease. At last follow-up, eight patients subjectively reported good function. Five patients returned to high functionally demanding jobs. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society and patient-rated wrist evaluation scores were 72% and 50/100, respectively. We conclude that distal radius endoprosthetic replacements offer acceptable functional outcomes and remain a viable option when biological reconstruction is not possible.Level of evidence: IV.

The role of VFG in wrist arthrodesis: Long term results in a series of 11 patients and literature review

BACKGROUND

Total wrist fusion (TWF) is indicated for longstanding degenerative, posttraumatic and/or post-oncological conditions to provide pain relief and wrist stability at partial expense of wrist motion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 11 consecutive patients who had completed TWF with Vascularized Fibula Graft (VFG) for massive distal radius defects were identified retrospectively from our center using inpatient records. We evaluated bone fusion times and long term functional outcomes following the procedure. Post-operative grip strength (GS) and prono-supination were objectively measured. The new Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to rate disability and symptoms; pre- and post- operative pain with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was assessed. A literature review of the present studies about TWF with VFG was performed, with the aim of comparing long-term functional results of the surgical techniques so far reported in the English literature.

RESULTS

Our experience with TWF using VFG appeared slightly better than that found in the literature. The procedure was successful in all the cases, achieving bone union in 4,8 months on average. Complication rate was 27,2%, no flap loss was recorded. There were no wrist instability, deformation or dislocation; mean pronation/supination (P/S) was 57,5°/61,2° Average grip strength resulted 59% of the contralateral side. Mean recorded levels of visual analog scale (VAS) for pain postoperatively were 2,32 ± 0,792, which improved significantly from the pre-operatively value of 7,90 ± 0,79. Mean overall satisfaction was good and all the patients comfortably returned to normal activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrist arthrodesis by means of VFG resulted to be an effective and reliable option in dealing with massive defects of distal radius with involvement of radio-carpal joint. Although the cohort analyzed is relatively small and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, the long term radiographs and the overall functional outcomes encourage to use the described surgical option over other techniques, such as prosthetic replacement and non-vascularized bone grafts.

Does a Modified Technique to Achieve Arthrodesis of the Wrist After Resection of the Distal Radius and Translocating the Ipsilateral Ulna as a Vascularized Graft to Reconstruct the Defect Improve Grip Strength and Outcomes Scores?

BACKGROUND

Ten years ago, we reported the results of a procedure in which we translocated the ipsilateral ulna as a vascularized autograft to reconstruct defects of the distal radius after tumor resection, with excellent functional results. At that time, wrist arthrodesis was achieved by aligning the translocated ulna with the scapholunate area of the carpus and usually the third metacarpal. This resulted in wrist narrowing. We then wondered if aligning the translocated ulna with the scaphoid and the second metacarpal would result in ulnar deviation and thereby improve grip strength. We believed lateralization would reduce the wrist narrowing that occurs with fusion to the third metacarpal and would make the cosmesis more acceptable. We also modified the incision to dororadial to make the scar less visible and thus improve the cosmesis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there an objective improvement in grip strength and functional scores (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] and Mayo wrist) when the translocated ulna is lateralized and the wrist is fused with the translocated ulna and aligned with the second metacarpal versus when the translocated ulna is aligned with the third metacarpal? (2) Did lateralization caused by the wrist fusion aligned with the second metacarpal minimize wrist narrowing as measured by the circumference compared with the fusion aligned with the third metacarpal?

METHODS

From 2010 and 2018, we treated 40 patients with distal radius tumors at our institution, 30 of whom had a distal radius enbloc resection. Twenty-eight patients had an ipsilateral ulna translocation and wrist arthrodesis in which the radius and translocated ulna were aligned with either the second (n = 15) or the third (n = 13) metacarpals. Two patients in the second metacarpal group and three patients in the third metacarpal group were lost to follow-up before 24 months after surgery and were excluded. A retrospective analysis of 23 patients (20 with giant cell tumors and three with malignant bone tumors) included a review of radiographs and institutional tumor database for surgical and follow-up records to study oncologic (local disease recurrence), reconstruction (union of osteotomy junctions, implant breakage or graft fracture, and wrist circumference), and functional outcomes (MSTS and Mayo wrist scores and objective grip strength assessment compared with the contralateral side). The results were compared for each study group (second metacarpal versus third metacarpal). There was no difference in the incidence of local recurrence or the time to union between the two groups. There were no implant breakages or graft fractures noted in either group.

RESULTS

Patients in the second metacarpal group lost less grip strength compared with the unoperated side in the third metacarpal group (median 12% [range -30% to 35%] versus median 28% [15% to 42%], difference of medians 16%; p = 0.006). There were no between-group differences in terms of MSTS (median 30 [24 to 30] versus median 26.5 [22 to 30], difference of medians 3.5; p = 0.21) or Mayo wrist scores (median 83 [65 to 100] versus median 72 [50 to 90], difference of medians 11; p = 0.10). The second metacarpal group also had less wrist narrowing as seen from the median difference in circumference between the operated and unoperated wrists (median narrowing 10 mm [3 to 35 mm] in the second metacarpal group versus median 30 mm [15 to 35 mm] in the third metacarpal group, difference of medians 20 mm; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Wrist arthrodesis after ulna translocation with alignment of the translocated ulna and the second metacarpal provides a functional position with ulnar deviation that offers some improvement in grip strength but no improvement in the MSTS or Mayo scores. Radialization/lateralization of the translocated ulna achieved from the alignment with the second metacarpal decreases the reduction in the wrist circumference and therefore reduces wrist narrowing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Wrist Reconstruction after En bloc Resection of Bone Tumors of the Distal Radius

Wrist reconstruction after en bloc resection of bone tumors of the distal radius has been a great challenge. Although many techniques have been used for the reconstruction of long bone defects following en bloc resection of the distal radius, the optimal reconstruction method remains controversial. This is the first review to systematically describe various reconstruction techniques. We not only discuss the indications, functional outcomes, and complications of these reconstruction techniques but also review the technical refinement strategies for improving the stability of the wrist joint.

En bloc resection should be performed for Campanacci grade III giant cell tumors (GCT) as well as malignant tumors of the distal radius. However, wrist reconstruction after en bloc resection of the distal radius represents a great challenge. Although several surgical techniques, either achieving a stable wrist by arthrodesis or reconstructing a flexible wrist by arthroplasty, have been reported, the optimal reconstruction procedure remains controversial. The purpose of this review was to investigate which reconstruction methods might be the best option by analyzing the indications, techniques, limitations, and problems of different reconstruction methods. With the advancement of imaging, surgical techniques and materials, some reconstruction techniques have been further refined. Each of the techniques discussed in this review has its advantages and disadvantages. Wrist arthrodesis seems to be preferred over wrist arthroplasty in terms of grip strength and long‐term complications, while wrist arthroplasty seems to be superior to wrist arthrodesis in terms of wrist motion. All things considered, wrist arthroplasty with a vascularized fibular head autograft might be a good option because of better wrist function, acceptable grip strength, and a relatively lower complication rate. Moreover, wrist arthrodesis is still an option if the fibular head autograft reconstruction fails. Orthopaedic oncologists should familiarize themselves with the characteristics of each technique to select the most appropriate reconstruction method depending on each patient's situation.

Therapy-Related Imaging Findings in Patients with Sarcoma

Knowledge of imaging findings related to therapy administered to patients with sarcoma is pivotal in selecting appropriate care for these patients. Imaging studies are performed as surveillance in asymptomatic patients or because symptoms, including anxiety, develop. In addition to detection of recurrent disease and assessment of response to therapy, diagnosis of conditions related to therapy that may or may not need treatment has a marked positive impact on quality of life. The purpose of this review is to assist radiologists, nuclear physicians, and others clinicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients in recognizing imaging findings related to therapy and not to activity of the previously treated sarcoma. Imaging findings are time dependent and often specific in relation to therapy given.

The indications and donor-site morbidity of tibial cortical strut autografts in the management of defects in long bones

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to determine the morbidity of a tibial strut autograft and characterize the rate of bony union following its use.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively assessed a series of 104 patients from a single centre who were treated with a tibial strut autograft of > 5 cm in length. A total of 30 had a segmental reconstruction with continuity of bone, 27 had a segmental reconstruction without continuity of bone, 29 had an arthrodesis and 18 had a nonunion. Donor-site morbidity was defined as any event that required a modification of the postoperative management. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically at a median of 36 months (IQR, 14 to 74).

Results

Donor-site morbidity occurred in four patients (4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 10). One patient had a stress fracture of the tibia, which healed with a varus deformity, requiring an osteotomy. Two patients required evacuation of a haematoma and one developed anterior compartment syndrome which required fasciotomies. The cumulative probability of union was 90% (95% CI 80 to 96) at five years. The type of reconstruction (p = 0.018), continuity of bone (p = 0.006) and length of tibial graft (p = 0.037) were associated with the time to union.

Conclusion

The tibial strut autograft has a low risk of morbidity and provides adequate bone stock for treating various defects of long bones. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:667-74.

Does Wrist Arthrodesis With Structural Iliac Crest Bone Graft After Wide Resection of Distal Radius Giant Cell Tumor Result in Satisfactory Function and Local Control?

BACKGROUND

Many techniques have been described for reconstruction after distal radius resection for giant cell tumor with none being clearly superior. The favored technique at our institution is total wrist fusion with autogenous nonvascularized structural iliac crest bone graft because it is structurally robust, avoids the complications associated with obtaining autologous fibula graft, and is useful in areas where bone banks are not available. However, the success of arthrodesis and the functional outcomes with this approach, to our knowledge, have only been limitedly reported.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the success of union of these grafts and how long does it take? (2) How effective is the technique in achieving tumor control? (3) What complications occur with this type of arthrodesis? (4) What are the functional results of wrist arthrodesis by this technique for treating giant cell tumor of the distal radius?

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2013, 48 patients were treated for biopsy-confirmed Campanacci Grade III giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Of those, 39 (81% [39 of 48]) were treated with wrist arthrodesis using autogenous nonvascularized iliac crest bone graft. Of those, 27 (69% [27 of 39]) were available for followup at a minimum of 24 months (mean, 45 months; range, 24-103 months). During that period, the general indications for this approach were Campanacci Grade III and estimated resection length of 8 cm or less. Followup included clinical and radiographic assessment and functional assessment using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, grip strength, and range of motion at every followup by the treating surgeon and his team. All functional results were from the latest followup of each patient.

RESULTS

Union of the distal junction occurred at a mean of 4 months (± 2 months) and union of the proximal junction occurred at a mean of 9 months (± 5 months). Accounting for competing events, at 12 months, the rate of proximal junction union was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35%-72%), whereas it was 67% (95% CI, 45%-82%) at 18 months. In total, 11 of the 27 patients (41%) underwent repeat surgery on the distal radius, including eight patients (30%) who had complications and three (11%) who had local recurrence. The mean DASH score was 9 (± 7) (value range, 0-100, with lower scores representing better function), and the mean MSTS 1987 score was 29 (± 1) (value range, 0-30, with higher scores representing better function) as well as 96% (± 4%) of mean MSTS 1993 score (value range, 0%-100%, with higher scores representing better function). The mean grip strength was 51% (± 23%) of the uninvolved side, whereas the mean arc of forearm rotation was 113° (± 49°).

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of defects after resection of giant cell tumor of the distal radius with autogenous structural iliac crest bone graft is a facile technique that can be used to achieve favorable functional results with complications and recurrences comparable to those of other reported techniques. We cannot show that this technique is superior to other options, but it seems to be a reasonable option to consider when other reconstruction options such as allografts are not available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Sleep bruxism: challenges and restorative solutions

Bruxism is a parafunctional activity related to clenching or grinding the teeth and tooth wear can be a consequence of sleep bruxism (SB). Management of severe tooth wear due to SB is a challenging situation because of the common reduced amount of remaining dental structure and loss of vertical dimension of occlusion. Rationale for the planning of oral rehabilitation of patients with SB presenting severe tooth wear should rely on evidence-based approaches; however, few studies have discussed properties of dental materials for SB rehabilitation and how to cosmetically manage severe tooth wear. This review aimed to provide an overview into bruxism cosmetic rehabilitation and how this can be implemented with good outcomes for the patient.

A modified ulnar translocation reconstruction technique for Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors of the distal radius using a clover leaf plate

BACKGROUND

Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors of the distal radius are locally aggressive and in close proximity to the median nerve, articular cartilage, flexor and extensor tendons, and the radial artery. Although several reconstructive techniques have been described, it is unclear to what degree these procedures restore function.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

We present a modified ipsilateral ulna translocation technique using a clover leaf plate, for reconstruction of en bloc resected distal radius. This has the theoretical advantage of ensuring a solid, pain-free wrist arthrodesis, while preserving the forearm rotational axis and minimizing functional loss, without the associated donor site morbidity or allograft rejection issues of other reconstructive techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2013, 3 patients underwent this procedure for Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors. All patients were right hand-dominant females, aged 24, 35, and 46 years, respectively. Two cases involved the right radius. Patients were reviewed retrospectively with clinical examination, functional assessment [the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for upper limb], and radiographs. The review period was 30, 51, and 41 months, respectively.

RESULTS

The length of distal radius resected was 70, 50, and 35 mm, respectively. All achieved clear margins. There were no complications and there have been no recurrences. All ulnocarpal translocations achieved radiographic fusion. Patient's averaged 80-degree pronation, 70-degree supination, and clinical TESS scores of 86 at most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique achieved a painless and functional wrist arthrodesis with partially restored wrist motion, without complications. This technique has the advantage of negating remote donor site morbidity and/or allograft rejection issues of other techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.