Biochemical MRI predicts hip osteoarthritis in an experimental ovine femoroacetabular impingement model

Current and Future Advanced Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) can be idiopathic or develop secondary to structural joint abnormalities of the hip joint (alteration of normal anatomy) and/or due to a systemic condition with joint involvement. Early osteoarthritic changes to the hip can be completely asymptomatic or may cause the development hip symptomatology without evidence of OA on radiographs. Delaying the progression of hip OA is critical due to the significant impact of this condition on the patient’s quality of life. Pre-OA of the hip is a newly established term that is often described as the development of signs and symptoms of degenerative hip disease but no radiographic evidence of OA. Advanced imaging methods can help to diagnose pre-OA of the hip in patients with hip pain and normal radiographs or aid in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients with an underlying hip diagnosis that is known to increase the risk of early OA of the hip. These methods include the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC), quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI- T1rho, T2, and T2* relaxation time mapping), 7-Tesla MRI, computed tomography (CT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). dGEMRIC proved to be a reliable and accurate modality though it is limited by the significant time necessary for contrast washout between scans. This disadvantage is potentially overcome by T2 weighted MRIs, which do not require contrast. 7-Tesla MRI is a promising development for enhanced imaging resolution compared to 1.5 and 3T MRIs. This technique does require additional optimization and development prior to widespread clinical use. The purpose of this review was to summarize the results of translational and clinical studies investigating the utilization of the above-mentioned imaging modalities to diagnose hip pre-OA, with special focus on recent research evaluating their implementation into clinical practice.

Proof of concept: hip joint damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in an experimental FAI sheep model

OBJECTIVE

In ovine hips chondrolabral damage as seen in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be induced via an intertrochanteric varus osteotomy. However, it is yet to proven whether the observed cartilage damage is caused by a dynamic cam type impingement. Thus we asked, (1) whether actual cartilage damage observed after FAI induction in ovine hips occurs at the predicted, computed zone of FAI; (2) whether the extent of cartilage damage increases with ambulation time in this animal model?

DESIGN

In this experimental, controlled, comparative study 20 sheep underwent unilateral FAI induction through an intertrochanteric varus osteotomy. Preoperatively sheep underwent computed tomography to generate three-dimensional models of the osseous pelvis and femur. The models were used to predict impingement zones before and after simulated varus osteotomy using range of motion (ROM) analysis. Sheep were sacrificed after 14-40 weeks of ambulation. At sacrifice cartilage was inspected and (1) location of actual damage and computed impingement zones were compared; (2) Cartilage damage was compared between short- and long ambulation groups.

RESULTS

(1) The average location and the extent of peripheral and central cartilage lesions did not differ with the computed impingement zones (all P > 0.05). (2) Grades of central, posterior cartilage damage were more severe in the long-compared to the short ambulation group (2.2 ± 1.8 vs 0.4 ± 0.5; P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental ovine FAI model the surgical induction of an osseous impingement conflict between the femur and acetabulum causes cartilage damage at the zone of simulated FAI.

Do dGEMRIC and T2 Imaging Correlate With Histologic Cartilage Degeneration in an Experimental Ovine FAI Model?

BACKGROUND

Biochemical MRI of hip cartilage such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping is increasingly used to judge cartilage quality in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The current evidence is sparse about which of these techniques yields a stronger correlation with histologic cartilage degeneration because of the difficulty in validating biochemical MRI techniques against histology in the clinical setting. Recently, an experimental ovine FAI model was established that induces chondrolabral damage and offers a validated platform to address these limitations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a sheep model, we asked: (1) Do dGEMRIC and/or T2 values of acetabular and femoral cartilage correlate with histologic cartilage degeneration as assessed with the Mankin score? (2) Do simultaneously measured dGEMRIC and T2 values correlate in an experimental ovine FAI model?

METHODS

We performed an experimental pilot study on five female Swiss Alpine sheep (10 hips) that underwent postmortem MRI, including biochemical cartilage sequences, after a staged FAI correction had been performed on one side. No surgery was performed on the contralateral side, which served as a healthy control. In these sheep, an extraarticular intertrochanteric varus osteotomy was performed to rotate the naturally aspherical ovine femoral head into the acetabulum to induce cam-type FAI and chondrolabral damage comparable to human beings. After a 70-day ambulation period, femoral osteochondroplasty was performed and all sheep were euthanized after a total observation period of 210 days. Before they were euthanized, the sheep received a contrast agent and roamed and walked for at least 45 minutes. Hips were prepared to fit in a knee coil and MRI was performed at 3 T including a three-dimensional (3-D) dGEMRIC sequence, a two-dimensional (2-D) radial T2 mapping sequence, and a 2-D radial proton density-weighted sequence for morphologic cartilage assessment. Using specifically developed software, the 3-D dGEMRIC images and T2 maps were coregistered on the 2-D morphologic radial images. This enabled us to simultaneously measure dGEMRIC and T2 values using the identical regions of interest. dGEMRIC and T2 values of the acetabular and femoral cartilage were measured circumferentially using anatomic landmarks. After MRI, bone-cartilage samples were taken from the acetabulum and the femur and stained with toluidine blue for assessment of the histologic cartilage degeneration using the Mankin score, which was assessed in consensus by two observers. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to (1) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values with the histologic Mankin score of femoroacetabular cartilage; and to (2) correlate dGEMRIC values and T2 values of femoroacetabular cartilage.

RESULTS

A moderate to fair correlation between overall dGEMRIC values of the acetabular cartilage (R = -0.430; p = 0.003) and the femoral cartilage (R = -0.334; p = 0.003) versus the histologic Mankin score was found. A moderate correlation (R = -0.515; p = 0.010) was found among peripheral dGEMRIC values of the acetabulum, the superior femoral cartilage (R = -0.500; p = 0.034), and the histologic Mankin score, respectively. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular T2 values and the histologic Mankin scores was found. No correlation between overall and regional femoroacetabular dGEMRIC values and T2 values was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this recently established sheep model, we found dGEMRIC values correlated well with histologic evidence of cartilage degeneration in the hip. This combination of a robust animal model and an accurate imaging technique appears to offer a noninvasive means to study the natural course of FAI and to compare the effectiveness of potential surgical options to treat it.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This translational study supports the continuing use of dGEMRIC as a biomarker for prearthritic cartilage degeneration with the ultimate goal to identify patients who will benefit most from corrective FAI surgery. The value of T2 imaging of hip cartilage warrants further investigation.

Cam FAI and Smaller Neck Angles Increase Subchondral Bone Stresses During Squatting: A Finite Element Analysis

BACKGROUND

Individuals with a cam deformity and a decreased (varus) femoral neck-shaft angle may be predisposed to symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, it is unclear what combined effects the cam deformity and neck angle have on acetabular cartilage and subchondral bone stresses during an impinging squat motion. We therefore used finite element analysis to examine the combined effects of cam morphology and femoral neck-shaft angle on acetabular cartilage and subchondral bone stresses during squatting, examining the differences in stress characteristics between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with cam deformities and individuals without cam deformities and no hip pain.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using finite element analysis in this population, we asked: (1) What are the differences in acetabular cartilage stresses? (2) What are the differences in subchondral bone stresses? (3) What are the effects of high and low femoral neck-shaft angles on these stresses?

METHODS

Six male participants were included to represent three groups (symptomatic cam, asymptomatic cam, control without cam deformity) with two participants per group, one with the highest femoral neck-shaft angle and one with the lowest (that is, most valgus and most varus neck angles, respectively). Each participant's finite element hip models were reconstructed from imaging data and assigned subject-specific bone material properties. Hip contact forces during squatting were determined and applied to the finite element models to examine maximum shear stresses in the acetabular cartilage and subchondral bone.

RESULTS

Both groups with cam deformities experienced higher subchondral bone stresses than cartilage stresses. Both groups with cam deformities also had higher subchondral bone stresses (symptomatic with high and low femoral neck-shaft angle = 14.1 and 15.8 MPa, respectively; asymptomatic with high and low femoral neck-shaft angle = 10.9 and 13.0 MPa, respectively) compared with the control subjects (high and low femoral neck-shaft angle = 6.4 and 6.5 MPa, respectively). The symptomatic and asymptomatic participants with low femoral neck-shaft angles had the highest cartilage and subchondral bone stresses in their respective subgroups. The asymptomatic participant with low femoral neck-shaft angle (123°) demonstrated anterolateral subchondral bone stresses (13.0 MPa), similar to the symptomatic group. The control group also showed no differences between cartilage and subchondral bone stresses.

CONCLUSIONS

The resultant subchondral bone stresses modeled here coincide with findings that acetabular subchondral bone is denser in hips with cam lesions. Future laboratory studies will expand the parametric finite element analyses, varying these anatomic and subchondral bone stiffness parameters to better understand the contributions to the pathomechanism of FAI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Individuals with a cam deformity and more varus neck orientation may experience elevated subchondral bone stresses, which may increase the risks of early clinical signs and degenerative processes associated with FAI, whereas individuals with cam morphology and normal-to-higher femoral neck-shaft angles may be at lesser risk of disease progression that would potentially require surgical intervention.

Vascular supply of the femoral head in sheep-Implications for the ovine femoroacetabular impingement model

Sheep hips have a natural non-spherical head similar to a cam-type deformity in human beings. By performing an intertrochanteric varus osteotomy, cam-type femoroacetabular impingement can be induced experimentally. In sheep, the aspherical portion is located superiorly-exactly matching the region where the superior retinacular vessels enter the femoral head-neck junction in human beings. In order to fully exploit the potential of this experimental FAI model, a safe osteochondroplasty of the superior asphericity would need to be done without the risk of avascular necrosis. The aim of this study was to describe the vascular anatomy of the femoral head in sheep from the aorta to the retinacular vessels in order to perform safe femoral osteochondroplasty of the superior femoral asphericity in sheep. Sixty-two ovine hips were analyzed using CT angiography (30 hips), post mortem intravascular latex injection (6 hips), vascular corrosion casting (6 hips), and analysis of the distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head-neck junction in macerated ovine femora (20 hips). The ovine femoral head receives its blood supply from anterior retinacular arteries from the lateral femoral circumflex artery, and from posterior retinacular arteries from the medial femoral circumflex artery. The superior aspherical portion is free of vessels. Detailed knowledge about vascular anatomy of sheep hips is of clinical significance since it allows to perform osteochondroplasty of the superior aspherical portion in the experimental ovine FAI model safely without the risk of osteonecrosis. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2340-2348, 2018.

Anatomic Predictors of Sagittal Hip and Pelvic Motions in Patients With a Cam Deformity

BACKGROUND

As there is a high prevalence of patients with cam deformities and no ongoing hip dysfunction, understanding the biomechanical factors predicting the onset of symptoms and degenerative changes is critical. One such variable is how the spinopelvic parameters may influence hip and pelvic sagittal mobility. Hypothesis/Purpose: Pelvic incidence may predict sagittal hip and pelvic motions during walking and squatting. The purpose was to determine which anatomic characteristics were associated with symptoms and how they influenced functional hip and pelvic ranges of motion (ROMs) during walking and squatting.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifty-seven participants underwent computed tomography and were designated either symptomatic (n = 19, cam deformity with pain), asymptomatic (n = 19, cam deformity with no pain), or control (n = 19, no cam deformity or pain). Multiple femoral (cam deformity, neck angle, torsion), acetabular (version, coverage), and spinopelvic (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence) parameters were measured from each participant's imaging data, and sagittal hip and pelvic ROMs during walking and squatting were recorded using a motion capture system.

RESULTS

Symptomatic participants had large cam deformities, smaller femoral neck-shaft angles, and larger pelvic incidence angles compared with the asymptomatic and control participants. Discriminant function analyses confirmed that radial 1:30 alpha angle (λ₁ = 0.386), femoral neck-shaft angle (λ₂ = 0.262), and pelvic incidence (λ₃ = 0.213) ( P < .001) were the best anatomic parameters to classify participants with their groups. Entering these 3 parameters into a hierarchical linear regression, significant regressions were achieved for hip ROM only when pelvic incidence was included for walking ( R² = 0.20, P = .01) and squatting ( R² = 0.14, P = .04). A higher pelvic incidence decreased walking hip ROM ( r = -0.402, P = .004). Although symptomatic participants indicated a trend of reduced squatting hip and pelvic ROMs, there were no significant regressions with the anatomic parameters.

CONCLUSION

A cam deformity alone may not indicate early clinical signs or decreased ROM. Not only was pelvic incidence a significant parameter to classify the participants, but it was also an important parameter to predict functional ROM. Symptomatic patients with a higher pelvic incidence may experience limited sagittal hip mobility.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement showed a higher pelvic incidence and, combined with a cam deformity and varus neck, can perhaps alter the musculature of their iliopsoas, contributing to a reduced sagittal ROM. With an early and accurate clinical diagnosis, athletes could benefit from a muscle training strategy to protect their hips.

Femoral osteochondroplasty can be performed effectively without the risk of avascular necrosis or femoral neck fractures in an experimental ovine FAI model

OBJECTIVE

The experimental induction of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in sheep is established. To tap the full potential of this ovine model, one should be able to perform a femoral osteochondroplasty safely. This study was based on previous cadaver experiments on the blood supply to the ovine femoral head and on the biomechanical strength of the proximal femur following offset creation. We hypothesized that offset creation in this ovine FAI model does not lead to (1) avascular necrosis (AVN) of the ovine femoral head or (2) iatrogenic femoral neck fractures and (3) can be performed effectively.

DESIGN

In this experimental, controlled, prospective study nine sheep underwent unilateral FAI induction through an intertrochanteric, varus osteotomy. Seventy days following FAI induction, femoral osteochondroplasty was performed. Sheep were sacrificed after another 140 days. Radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans and MRI were acquired. Histologic samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. (1) The multimodal Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification was used for assessment of AVN. (2) Femoral neck fractures were assessed with the multimodal imaging approach. (3) Pre- and postoperative (=after sacrifice) alpha angles and femoral neck diameters were compared.

RESULTS

(1) No signs for AVN according to the ARCO classification or (2) for femoral neck fractures were detected. (3) Mean alpha angles and femoral neck diameters decreased significantly (p < 0.001) superiorly by at least 30° respectively 4 mm after the offset creation.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral osteochondroplasty can be performed effectively and without the risk of AVN or femoral neck fractures in this ovine FAI model.

Imaging of impingement syndromes around the hip joint

Impingement syndromes are increasingly recognised as significant causes of hip pain and dysfunction. A broad spectrum of intraarticular and extraarticular conditions has been implicated in their pathophysiology. Physical examination is often inconclusive as clinical findings may be unclear or misleading, often simulating other disorders. With current improvements in imaging techniques and better understanding of hip impingement related pathomechanisms, these entities can be accurately diagnosed. In addition, preoperative imaging has allowed for targeted treatment planning. This article provides an overview of the various types of hip impingement, including femoroacetabular impingement, ischiofemoral impingement, snapping hip syndrome, greater trochanteric-pelvic and subspine impingement. Current literature data regarding their pathogenesis, clinical manifestation and imaging work-up are discussed.

Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear why many individuals with a cam morphology of the hip do not experience pain. It was recently reported that a decreased femoral neck-shaft angle may also be associated with hip symptoms. However, the effects that different femoral neck-shaft angles have on hip stresses in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with cam morphology remain unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We examined the effects of the cam morphology and femoral neck-shaft angle on hip stresses during walking by asking: (1) Are there differences in hip stress characteristics among symptomatic patients with cam morphology, asymptomatic individuals with cam morphology, and individuals without cam morphology? (2) What are the effects of high and low femoral neck-shaft angles on hip stresses?

METHODS

Six participants were selected, from a larger cohort, and their cam morphology and femoral neck-shaft angle parameters were measured from CT data. Two participants were included in one of three groups: (1) symptomatic with cam morphology; (2) asymptomatic with a cam morphology; and (3) asymptomatic control with no cam morphology with one participant having the highest femoral neck-shaft angle and the other participant having the lowest in each subgroup. Subject-specific finite element models were reconstructed and simulated during the stance phase, near pushoff, to examine maximum shear stresses on the acetabular cartilage and labrum.

RESULTS

The symptomatic group with cam morphology indicated high peak stresses (6.3-9.5 MPa) compared with the asymptomatic (5.9-7.0 MPa) and control groups (3.8-4.0 MPa). Differences in femoral neck-shaft angle influenced both symptomatic and asymptomatic groups; participants with the lowest femoral neck-shaft angles had higher peak stresses in their respective subgroups. There were no differences among control models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the hips of individuals with a cam morphology and varus femoral neck angle may be subjected to higher mechanical stresses than those with a normal femoral neck angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Individuals with a cam morphology and decreased femoral neck-shaft angle are likely to experience severe hip stresses. Although asymptomatic participants with cam morphology had elevated stresses, a higher femoral neck-shaft angle was associated with lower stresses. Future research should examine larger amplitudes of motion to assess adverse subchondral bone stresses.

Both 3-T dGEMRIC and Acetabular-Femoral T2 Difference May Detect Cartilage Damage at the Chondrolabral Junction

BACKGROUND

In addition to case reports of gadolinium-related toxicities, there are increasing theoretical concerns about the use of gadolinium for MR imaging. As a result, there is increasing interest in noncontrast imaging techniques for biochemical cartilage assessment. Among them, T2 mapping holds promise because of its simplicity, but its biophysical interpretation has been controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine whether (1) 3-T delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping are both capable of detecting cartilage damage at the chondrolabral junction in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); and (2) whether there is a correlation between these two techniques for acetabular and femoral head cartilage assessment.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with hip-related symptoms resulting from FAI underwent a preoperative 3-T MRI of their hip that included dGEMRIC and T2 mapping (symptomatic group, 16 women, 15 men; mean age, 27 ± 8 years). Ten volunteers with no symptoms according to the WOMAC served as a control (asymptomatic group, seven women, three men; mean age, 28 ± 3 years). After morphologic cartilage assessment, acetabular and femoral head cartilages were graded according to the modified Outerbridge grading criteria. In the midsagittal plane, single-observer analyses of precontrast T1 values (volunteers), the dGEMRIC index (T1_Gd, patients), and T2 mapping values (everyone) were compared in acetabular and corresponding femoral head cartilage at the chondrolabral junction of each hip by region-of-interest analysis.

RESULTS

In the symptomatic group, T1_Gd and T2 values were lower in the acetabular cartilage compared with corresponding femoral head cartilage (T1_Gd: 515 ± 165 ms versus 650 ± 191 ms, p < 0.001; T2: 39 ± 8 ms versus 46 ± 10 ms, p < 0.001). In contrast, the asymptomatic group demonstrated no differences in T1 and T2 values for the acetabular and femoral cartilages with the numbers available (T1: 861 ± 130 ms versus 860 ± 182 ms, p = 0.98; T2: 43 ± 7 ms versus 42 ± 6 ms, p = 0.73). No correlation with the numbers available was noted between the modified Outerbridge grade and T1, T1_Gd, or T2 as well as between T2 and either T1 or T1_Gd.

CONCLUSIONS

Without the need for contrast media application, T2 mapping may be a viable alternative to dGEMRIC when assessing hip cartilage at the chondrolabral junction. However, acquisition-related phenomena as well as regional variations in the microstructure of hip cartilage necessitate an internal femoral head cartilage control when interpreting these results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study.

Morphologic and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage for the assessment of post-traumatic osteoarthritis

Orthopedic trauma, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption, is a common source of osteoarthritis in the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive multi-planar imaging modality commonly used to evaluate hard and soft tissues of diarthrodial joints following traumatic injury. The contrast provided by generated images enables the evaluation of bone marrow lesions as well as delamination and degeneration of articular cartilage. We will provide background information about MRI signal generation and decay (T₁ and T₂ values), the utility of morphologic MRI, and the quantitative MRI techniques of T_1ρ , T₂ , and T₂ * mapping, to evaluate subjects with traumatic knee injuries, such as ACL rupture. Additionally, we will provide information regarding the dGEMRIC, sodium, and gagCEST imaging techniques. Finally, the description and utility of newer post hoc analysis techniques, such as texture analysis, will be given. Continued development and refinement of these advanced MRI techniques will facilitate their clinical translation. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:412-423, 2017.

Head-Neck Osteoplasty has Minor Effect on the Strength of an Ovine Cam-FAI Model: In Vitro and Finite Element Analyses

BACKGROUND

Osteochondroplasty of the head-neck region is performed on patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) without fully understanding its repercussion on the integrity of the femur. Cam-type FAI can be surgically and reproducibly induced in the ovine femur, which makes it suitable for studying corrective surgery in a consistent way. Finite element models built on quantitative CT (QCT) are computer tools that can be used to predict femoral strength and evaluate the mechanical effect of surgical correction.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) What is the effect of a resection of the superolateral aspect of the ovine femoral head-neck junction on failure load? (2) How does the failure load after osteochondroplasty compare with reported forces from activities of daily living in sheep? (3) How do failure loads and failure locations from the computer simulations compare with the experiments?

METHODS

Osteochondroplasties (3, 6, 9 mm) were performed on one side of 18 ovine femoral pairs with the contralateral intact side as a control. The 36 femurs were scanned via QCT from which specimen-specific computer models were built. Destructive compression tests then were conducted experimentally using a servohydraulic testing system and numerically via the computer models. Safety factors were calculated as the ratio of the maximal force measured in vivo by telemeterized hip implants during the sheep's walking and running activities to the failure load. The simulated failure loads and failure locations from the computer models were compared with the experimental results.

RESULTS

Failure loads were reduced by 5% (95% CI, 2%-8%) for the 3-mm group (p = 0.0089), 10% (95% CI, 6%-14%) for the 6-mm group (p = 0.0015), and 19% (95% CI, 13%-26%) for the 9-mm group (p = 0.0097) compared with the controls. Yet, the weakest specimen still supported more than 2.4 times the peak load during running. Strong correspondence was found between the simulated and experimental failure loads (R² = 0.83; p < 0.001) and failure locations.

CONCLUSIONS

The resistance of ovine femurs to fracture decreased with deeper resections. However, under in vitro testing conditions, the effect on femoral strength remains small even after 9 mm correction, suggesting that femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty could be done safely on the ovine femur. QCT-based finite element models were able to predict weakening of the femur resulting from the osteochondroplasty.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ovine femur provides a seemingly safe platform for scientific evaluation of FAI. It also appears that computer models based on preoperative CT scans may have the potential to provide patient-specific guidelines for preventing overcorrection of cam FAI.

T2* mapping of subtalar cartilage: Precision and association between anatomical variants and cartilage composition

Hindfoot arthritis is an important contributor to foot pain and physical disability. While the subtalar joint (STJ) is most frequently affected, anatomical variants such as facet configuration were suggested to further STJ cartilage deterioration. T2* mapping enables detection of ultra-structural cartilage change, particularly in thin cartilage layers, but its feasibility in the STJ has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate segmentation consistency and inter-scan short-term precision error of T2* mapping of talocalcaneal cartilage and to investigate the relationship between facet configuration and STJ T2* values. Using 3Tesla morphological magnetic resonance imaging, STJ configuration was categorized according to the degree of fusion between anterior, medial, or posterior facets. Subsequently, two repeats of multi-echo gradient recalled echo sequences were performed to obtain T2* maps with repositioning. Segmentation consistency of T2* values attained an ICC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.69-0.99). Precision errors comprised a coefficient of variation (CV) ranging 0.01-0.05, corresponding to a root mean square CV of 0.03-0.04. A 2-joint configuration type (i.e., fused anterior-medial facets) was significantly associated with a decrease in posterior facet T2* values (β = -0.6, p = 0.046). STJ T2* mapping is a reliable method requiring at least a 4% difference within people to enable detection of significant change. Anatomical variants in STJ configuration were associated with T2* values with the more stable 3-joint types exhibiting more favorable cartilage outcomes. Longer-term larger-scaled studies focusing on arthritis pathology are needed to further support the use of T2* mapping in hindfoot disease monitoring. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1969-1976, 2016.

Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts

Following the recognition of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a clinical entity, diagnostic tools have continuously evolved. While the diagnosis of FAI is primarily made based on the patients' history and clinical examination, imaging of FAI is indispensable. Routine diagnostic work-up consists of a set of plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR-arthrography. Recent advances in MRI technology include biochemically sensitive sequences bearing the potential to detect degenerative changes of the hip joint at an early stage prior to their appearance on conventional imaging modalities. Computed tomography may serve as an adjunct. Advantages of CT include superior bone to soft tissue contrast, making CT applicable for image-guiding software tools that allow evaluation of the underlying dynamic mechanisms causing FAI. This article provides a summary of current concepts of imaging in FAI and a review of the literature on recent advances, and their application to clinical practice.

In vivo deformation of thin cartilage layers: Feasibility and applicability of T2* mapping

The objectives of this study were as follows: (i) to assess segmentation consistency and scan precision of T2* mapping of human tibio-talar cartilage, and (ii) to monitor changes in T2* relaxation times of ankle cartilage immediately following a clinically relevant in vivo exercise and during recovery. Using multi-echo gradient recalled echo sequences, averaged T2* values were calculated for tibio-talar cartilage layers in 10 healthy volunteers. Segmentation consistency and scan precision were determined from two repeated segmentations and two repeated acquisitions with repositioning, respectively. Subsequently, acute in vivo cartilage loading responses were monitored by calculating averaged tibio-talar T2* values at rest, immediately after (i.e., deformation) and at 15 min (i.e., recovery) following a 30-repetition knee bending exercise. Precision errors attained 4-6% with excellent segmentation consistency point estimates (i.e., intra-rater ICC of 0.95) and acceptable limits of confidence. At deformation, T2* values were increased in both layers [+16.1 (10.7)%, p = 0.004 and +17.3 (15.3)%, p = 0.023, for the talus and tibia, respectively] whereas during recovery no significant changes could be established when comparing to baseline [talar cartilage: +5.2 (8.2)%, p = 0.26 and tibial cartilage: +6.6 (10.4)%, p = 0.23]. T2* mapping is a viable method to monitor deformational behavior in thin cartilage layers such as ankle cartilage. Longitudinal changes in T2* can be reliably appraised and require at least 4-6% differences to ascertain statistical significance. The ability to detect considerable change even after non-strenuous loading events, endorses T2* mapping as an innovative method to evaluate the effects of therapeutic exercise on thin cartilage layers. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:771-778, 2016.

Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects

Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is now a known precursor of early osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. In terms of clinical intervention, the decision between joint preservation and joint replacement hinges on the severity of articular cartilage degeneration. The exact threshold during the course of disease progression when the cartilage damage is irreparable remains elusive. The intention behind radiographic imaging is to accurately identify the morphology of osseous structural abnormalities and to accurately characterize the chondrolabral damage as much as possible. However, both plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) are insensitive for articular cartilage anatomy and pathology. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques include magnetic resonance arthrography and biochemically sensitive techniques of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1rho (T1ρ), T2/T2* mapping, and several others. The diagnostic performance of these techniques to evaluate cartilage degeneration could improve the ability to predict an individual patient-specific outcome with non-surgical and surgical care. This review discusses the facts and current applications of biochemical MRI for hip joint cartilage assessment covering the roles of dGEMRIC, T2/T2*, and T1ρ mapping. The basics of each technique and their specific role in FAI assessment are outlined. Current limitations and potential pitfalls as well as future directions of biochemical imaging are also outlined.