Cochrane in CORR®: surgery for rotator cuff disease (review)

What are People That Seek Care for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Experiencing in Their Daily Life?

This qualitative study sought to answer three questions: What is it like to live with rotator cuff tendinopathy? What are the barriers and facilitators of a healthy lifestyle with an aging shoulder? And, what are the outcomes that matter most to people seeking care for rotator cuff tendinopathy? Patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tendinopathy participated in group discussions using semi-structured guides that focus on diagnosis, daily experiences living with rotator cuff tendinopathy, goals, concerns, and clinical care experiences. A hybrid of initial inductive coding of themes and subsequent deductive consideration of these themes within the capability, comfort, and calm framework was utilized. Themes associated with rotator cuff tendinopathy were less restful sleep, difficulty with work and life transitions, loss of baseline abilities, and limitation in social roles in the capability realm; physical pain, despair, and loneliness in the comfort realm; and lack of direction or progress and feeling uncared for in the calm realm. Barriers identified included: the sense that rotator cuff tendinopathy is something correctable rather than age-associated and the sense that painful activities will make the tendinopathy worse (common misconceptions); tenuous relationships and limited trust with clinicians; loss of hope; and a sense that care is directionless. What matters most to a person seeking specialty care for shoulder pain are feeling that they are getting effective care and not being dismissed; maintaining meaningful activity and life roles; and replacing despair and frustration with hope and progress. Anticipating these needs may facilitate the design of more effective care models.

Level of Evidence: N/A.

Significant improvement in patient self-assessed comfort and function at six weeks after the smooth and move procedure for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation

BACKGROUND

It has been documented that the smooth and move procedure-smoothing the proximal humeral surface while maintaining the coracoacromial arch-can provide clinically significant long-term improvement in function for patients having irreparable rotator cuff tears with retained active elevation. This study sought to demonstrate that clinically significant gains in comfort, function, and active motion can be realized as early as 6 weeks after this procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of the 6-week clinical outcomes for 48 patients enrolled prior to a smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Prior rotator cuff repair had been attempted in 28 (70%).

RESULTS

In 40 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements, the Simple Shoulder Test scores improved from an average of 3.4 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 5.7 ± 3.5 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), an improvement that exceeded the published values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The clinical outcomes were not worse for the 18 shoulders with irreparable tears of both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In 30 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative objective measurements of active motion, the average abduction improved from 93(± 43) to 123(± 47)° (p = 0.005) and the average flexion improved from 102(± 46) to 126(± 44)° (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to its previously documented long-term effectiveness for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation, this study demonstrates that the smooth and move procedure provides clinically significant improvement as early as 6 weeks after surgery.

Patient self-assessed shoulder comfort and function and active motion are not closely related to surgically documented rotator cuff tear integrity

BACKGROUND

The rationale for rotator cuff repair surgery is that better integrity of the cuff should be associated with better comfort and function. However, in patients with cuff disease, there is not good evidence that the degree of rotator cuff integrity is closely associated with the shoulder's comfort, function, or active motion. The goal of this study was to explore these relationships in shoulders with surgically documented cuff disease.

METHODS

In 55 shoulders having surgery for cuff-related symptoms, we correlated the preoperative Simple Shoulder Test score with the objectively measured preoperative active shoulder motion and with the integrity of the cuff observed at surgery.

RESULTS

The 16 shoulders with tendinosis or partial-thickness tears had an average Simple Shoulder Test score of 3.7 ± 3.3, active abduction of 111° ± 38°, and active flexion of 115° ± 36°. The corresponding values were 3.6 ± 2.8, 94° ± 47°, and 94° ± 52° for the 22 full-thickness supraspinatus tears and 3.9 ± 2.7, 89° ± 39°, and 100° ± 39° for the 17 supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears.

CONCLUSION

In this study, surgically observed cuff integrity was not strongly associated with the shoulder's comfort or function. Whereas surgeons often seek to improve the integrity of the rotator cuff, the management of patients with rotator cuff disorders needs to be informed by a better understanding of the factors other than cuff integrity that influence the comfort and functioning of shoulders with cuff disease.