Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Residual or Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Pooled Analysis of 12 Individual Studies

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging is a non-invasive technique used for the evaluation of tissue vascularity features through imaging series acquisition after contrast medium administration. Over the years, the study technique and protocols have evolved, seeing a growing application of this method across different imaging modalities for the study of almost all body districts. The main and most consolidated current applications concern MRI imaging for the study of tumors, but an increasing number of studies are evaluating the use of this technique also for inflammatory pathologies and functional studies. Furthermore, the recent advent of artificial intelligence techniques is opening up a vast scenario for the analysis of quantitative information deriving from DCE. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive update on the techniques, protocols, and clinical applications - both established and emerging - of DCE in whole-body imaging.

Roundtable: arguments in support of using multi-parametric prostate MRI protocol

There is increasing evidence to suggest the value of bi-parametric prostate MRI to replace multi-parametric MRI, which includes the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence. In this review, we discuss the value of DCE in select scenarios, specifically in resolving equivocal cases, improving the diagnostic accuracy in the inexperienced reader, rescuing exams in the settings of failed T2W and DWI, detecting biochemical recurrence, while imposing minimal to no risk to the patient with respect to IV gadolinium use, specifically group II agents.

Minimal Residual Disease in Prostate Cancer

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in prostate cancer over several decades has greatly informed our understanding of dissemination and recurrence, but has not yet been routinely used in clinical care. Investigators have detected MRD by identification of prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow; termed disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and blood; termed circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Various techniques including PSA-RT PCR, PSA immunocytochemistry, cytokeratin immunocytochemistry, and immune-magnetic depletion of hematopoietic cells followed by EPCAM based positive selection, have been used. Importantly, detection of DTCs correlates with recurrence. Research into prostate cancer CTCs has intensified recently, but their use in MRD evaluation has been more limited. Investigators are using semi-automated platforms to detect and begin to study prostate cancer CTCs in patients with no evidence of disease. PSA immunocytochemistry also detects CTCs and correlates with recurrence. Emerging technologies have the potential to greatly aid research in this exciting field.

Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein Test for Neonatal Septicemia: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) test in detecting neonatal septicemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Springer, MBASE, Elsevier Science Direct, and Medline databases up to March 2017. To collect relevant data on CRP testing in patients with neonatal septicemia, we performed a meta-analysis of positive likelihood ratio (LR), sensitivity, negative LR, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) of CRP testing, using Stata 12.0 and Meta-DiSc 1.4 data analysis software. RESULTS Ten studies including 1819 participants were considered in this study. We found that positive LR, sensitivity, negative LR, specificity, and dOR of the CRP test for neonatal septicemia were 5.63 (95% CI=2.86 to 11.09), 0.70 (95% CI=0.66 to 0.75), 0.36 (95% CI=0.21 to 0.60), 0.89 (95% CI=0.87 to 0.91), and 17.99 (95% CI=6.50 to 49.83), respectively. The AUC and Q* index of this meta-analysis were 0.90 and 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The area under the curve (AUC), negative LR, positive LR, Q* index, specificity, and dOR of the CRP test suggest that it is appropriate for detecting neonatal septicemia.

Diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in cough-variant asthma: an updated meta-analysis

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in cough-variant asthma (CVA) detection. Methods: Relevant studies on the FeNO test in patients with CVA were retrieved from electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, up to August 2018. Meta-analysis for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the FeNO test were conducted after extracting related data from the included studies. Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software were applied to perform the meta-analysis. Results: In total, 12 studies involving 1968 participants were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled results of the FeNO test for CVA diagnosis showed that the sensitivity was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 0.77), specificity was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.80 to 0.84), PLR was 4.15 (95% CI = 3.04 to 5.65), NLR was 0.30 (95% CI = 0.22 to 0.41), and DOR was 15.33 (95% CI = 8.43 to 27.86). The area under the curve and Q* index were 0.87 and 0.80, respectively. Moreover, no significant publication bias was observed using Egger's linear regression test (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The FeNO test might be an appropriate diagnostic tool for CVA detection.

Innovations in imaging modalities for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The last decade has witnessed tremendous changes in the management of advanced and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. In the current systematic review, we analyze novel imaging techniques in the setting of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), exploring available data and highlighting future exams which could enter clinical practice in the upcoming years.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The National Library of Medicine Database was searched for relevant articles published between January 2012 and August 2017. A wide search was performed including the combination of following words: "Prostate" AND "Cancer" AND ("Metastatic" OR "Recurrent") AND "imaging" AND ("MRI" OR "PET"). The selection procedure followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) principles and is presented using a PRISMA flow chart.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Novel imaging techniques, as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whole-body MRI and Choline and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging techniques are currently revolutioning the treatment planning in patients with advanced and metastatic PCa, allowing a better characterization of the disease. Multiparametric MRI performs well in the detection of local recurrences, with sensitivity rates of 67-98% and overall diagnostic accuracy of 83-93%, depending on the type of magnetic field strength (1.5 vs. 3T). Whole body MRI instead shows a high specificity (>95%) for bone metastases. PET imaging, and in particular PSMA PET/CT, showed promising results in the detection of both local and distant recurrences, even for low PSA values (<0.5 ng/mL). Sensitivity varies from 77-98% depending on PSA value and PSA velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole body-MRI, NaF PET, Choline-PET/CT and PSMA PET/CT are flourishing techniques which find great application in the field of recurrent and metastatic PCa, in the effort to reduce treatment of "PSA only" and rather focus our therapies on clinical tumor entities. Standardization is urgently needed to allow adequate comparison of results and diffusion on a large scale.

Improving postoperative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer has one of the highest incidences in the world, with good curative treatment options like radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. Unfortunately, about 30% of the patients initially treated with curative intent will develop a recurrence and need adjuvant treatment. Five randomized trials covered the role of postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy, but there is still a lot of debate about which patients should receive postoperative radiotherapy. Areas covered: This review will give an overview on the available literature concerning post-operative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy with an emphasis on the five randomized trials. Also, new imaging techniques like prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and the development of biomarkers like genomic classifiers will be discussed in the search for an improved selection of patients who will benefit from postoperative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. With new treatment techniques like Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, toxicity profiles will be kept low. Expert commentary: Patients with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy with an early rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) will benefit most from postoperative radiotherapy. In this way, patients with only high risk pathological features can avoid unnecessary treatment and toxicity, and early intervention in progressing patients would not compromise the outcome.