Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: cons

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

CONCLUSION

In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Medical treatment of functional pituitary adenomas, trials and tribulations

CONTEXT

Functioning pituitary adenomas (FPAs) include most frequently prolactinomas, somatotroph or corticotroph adenomas, while thyrotroph and gonadotroph adenomas are very rare. Despite their benign histological nature (aggressive tumors are rare and malignant ones exceptional), FPAs could cause significant morbidity and increased mortality due to complications associated with hormonal excess syndromes and/or mass effect leading to compression of adjacent structures. This mini review will focus on the increasing role of medical therapy in the multimodal treatment, which also includes transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) and radiotherapy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Most patients with prolactinomas are treated only with medications, but surgery could be considered for some patients in a specialized pituitary center, if higher chances of cure. Dopamine agonists, especially cabergoline, are efficient in reducing tumor size and normalizing prolactin. TSS is the first-line treatment for all other FPAs, but most patients require complex adjuvant treatment, including a combination of therapeutic approaches. Medical therapy is the cornerstone of treatment in all patients after unsuccessful surgery or when surgery cannot be offered and includes somatostatin receptor ligands and dopamine agonists (almost all FPAs), growth hormone receptor antagonists (acromegaly), adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers (Cushing's disease). Novel medical treatments, especially for acromegaly and Cushing's disease are under research.

CONCLUSIONS

An enlarged panel of effective drugs available with increased knowledge of predictive factors for response and/or adverse effects will enhance the possibility to offer a more individualized treatment. This would not only improve disease control and prognosis, but also quality of life.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant).

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

Dissecting the in vitro efficacy of octreotide and cabergoline in GH- and GH/PRL-secreting pituitary tumors

CONTEXT

Cabergoline (CAB) is an off-label medical therapy for acromegaly, overshadowed by first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, e.g. octreotide (OCT).

OBJECTIVE

Head-to-head comparison between OCT and CAB in inhibiting growth hormone (GH) secretion in primary cultures of GH- and GH/PRL-secreting tumors. To investigate the role of somatostatin (SST) and dopamine type 2 (D2R) receptor expression.

DESIGN

To evaluate the antisecretory effect of OCT and CAB, together with receptor mRNA expression, in 23 tumor cultures.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Acromegaly patients referred to the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands).

INTERVENTIONS

72-hour OCT and CAB treatment (10 nM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GH concentrations in cell culture media.

RESULTS

OCT showed a slightly higher efficacy compared with CAB (GH decrease -39.5% vs. -32.5%, p = 0.079). The effect of the two drugs was superimposable in GH/PRL co-secreting tumors (-42.1% vs. -44.8%), where SST1 and D2R had a higher expression compared to the pure GH-secreting ones (p = 0.020 and p = 0.026). OCT was more effective than CAB in 8/23 cultures, while CAB was more effective than OCT in 3/23 (CAB + group). In CAB + tumors, SST1 expression was higher compared to the other groups (p = 0.034). At ROC curve analysis, SST1 and D2R discriminated between GH and GH/PRL co-secretion (AUC 0.856, p = 0.013; AUC 0.822, p = 0.024). SST1 was the best predictor of CAB response (≥50% GH reduction, AUC 0.913, p = 0.006; 80% sensitivity, 94% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT is 5-10% more effective than CAB in vitro. SST1 mRNA expression can represent a reliable marker of GH/PRL co-secreting tumors showing a preferential response to CAB treatment.

The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly

Currently, the first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel, are the mainstays of acromegaly treatment and achieve biochemical control in approximately 40% of patients and tumor shrinkage in over 60% of patients. Pasireotide, a second-generation SRL, shows higher efficacy with respect to both biochemical control and tumor shrinkage but has a worse safety profile. In this review, we discuss the future perspectives of currently available SRLs, focusing on the use of biomarkers of response and precision medicine, new formulations of these SRLs and new drugs, which are under development. Precision medicine, which is based on biomarkers of response to treatment, will help guide the decision-making process by allowing physicians to choose the appropriate drug for each patient and improving response rates. New formulations of available SRLs, such as oral, subcutaneous depot, and nasal octreotide, may improve patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life since there will be more options available that better suit each patient. Finally, new drugs, such as paltusotine, somatropin, ONO-5788, and ONO-ST-468, may improve treatment adherence and present higher efficacy than currently available drugs.

Anastrozole as add-on therapy for cabergoline-resistant prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: real-life experience in male patients

INTRODUCTION

Prolactin-secreting adenoma (PRLoma) can present as large and invasive neoplasm, with increased markers of cellular proliferation. First-line approach is Dopamine Agonists (DAs) treatment; however, DA-resistance has been reported, especially in male patients. Estrogens induce lactotroph cell replication and PRL secretion: the use of anti-estrogen treatment in patients with PRLoma have been described in few cases. We reported our experience regarding treatment with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (ANA) as add-on therapy for male patients with DA resistant PRLoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe four male patients (26, 38, 29 and 19 years old at diagnosis), with PRLoma (median diameter 26 mm, PRL 7730 μg/L). They were resistant to cabergoline (CAB, > 2 mg/week) in terms of PRL secretion and tumor size reduction. ANA 1 mg/day was added to the maximum tolerated dose of CAB for at least 1 year. Magnetic Resonance was performed at baseline, after 6 months of CAB + ANA combination and every 12 months afterward.

RESULTS

PRL levels decreased in all patients after CAB + ANA (mean - 70%, range - 44/- 97%), achieving a normalization of PRL levels in one case. Tumor size decreased in all cases (mean - 47%, range - 24.5/- 68%). No severe adverse effects have been reported, a moderate weight gain has been observed in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of an aromatase inhibitor (ANA) to the dopamine agonist therapy improved the control of prolactin levels and induced tumour regression.

Prolactinomas

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

An update on clinical care for pregnant women with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

As pregnancy is rare in women with acromegaly, only case reports and few series have been published.

AREAS COVERED

All case reports and publications dealing with pregnancy in patients with acromegaly were collated. Information concerning the effects of acromegaly on pregnancy outcomes, the impact of pregnancy on GH/IGF-I measurements, acromegaly comorbidity and pituitary adenoma size, the effects of treatment of acromegaly on fetus outcomes were retrieved and analyzed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Based on the small number of reported cases, pregnancy is generally uneventful, except for a potential increased incidence of gestational hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Medical therapy of acromegaly (dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, growth hormone-receptor antagonists) is generally interrupted before or at diagnosis of pregnancy. In very rare patients with a pituitary adenoma, particularly a macroadenoma that has not been surgically treated before pregnancy, or if a surgical remnant persists, or when acromegaly is revealed during pregnancy, tumor volume may increase and cause symptoms through a mass effect. Close monitoring of clinical manifestations and imaging are necessary during pregnancy in these cases. In the rare cases of symptomatic tumor enlargement during pregnancy, medical treatment with dopamine agonists or eventually somatostatin analogs may be attempted before resorting to transsphenoidal surgery.

Systemic Complications of Acromegaly and the Impact of the Current Treatment Landscape: An Update

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disease with many complications and is associated with increased mortality when not adequately treated. Substantial advances in acromegaly treatment, as well as in the treatment of many of its complications, mainly diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and arterial hypertension, were achieved in the last decades. These developments allowed change in both prevalence and severity of some acromegaly complications and furthermore resulted in a reduction of mortality. Currently, mortality seems to be similar to the general population in adequately treated patients with acromegaly. In this review, we update the knowledge in complications of acromegaly and detail the effects of different acromegaly treatment options on these complications. Incidence of mortality, its correlation with GH (cumulative exposure vs last value), and IGF-I levels and the shift in the main cause of mortality in patients with acromegaly are also addressed.

Bringing Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Acromegaly to an Update. How Should We Diagnose and Manage Them?

Patients with acromegaly frequently develop cardiovascular comorbidities, which significantly affect their morbidity and contribute to an increased all-cause mortality. In this regard, the most frequent complications that these patients may encounter include hypertension, cardiomyopathy, heart valve disease, arrhythmias, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. The specific underlying mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of these comorbidities are not always fully understood, but uncontrolled GH/IGF-I excess, age, prolonged disease duration, and coexistence of other cardio-vascular risk factors have been identified as significant influencing predisposing factors. It is important that clinicians bear in mind the potential development of cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegalic patients, in order to promptly tackle them, and avoid the progression of cardiac abnormalities. In many cases, this approach may be performed using straightforward screening tools, which will guide us for further diagnosis and management of cardiovascular complications. This article focuses on those cardiovascular comorbidities that are most frequently encountered in acromegalic patients, describes their pathophysiology, and suggests some recommendations for an early and optimal diagnosis, management and treatment.

Treatment escape reduces the effectiveness of cabergoline during long-term treatment of acromegaly in monotherapy or in association with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands

BACKGROUND

Few studies evaluated the use of cabergoline (CAB) for acromegaly treatment in monotherapy or in combination with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy, predictors of response and safety of CAB treatment in acromegaly both in monotherapy and in combination with SRLs.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected demographic, biochemical, tumour and treatment data. Short-term disease control was defined as random GH level < 1.0 μg/L and normal age-matched IGF-I level after 3-6 months of treatment with the higher dose used. Long-term disease control was defined as maintenance of normal GH and IGF-I levels at the last visit (at least 9 months of treatment).

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were studied. The median total time of treatment in monotherapy or in combination with SRLs was 14 months (3-124) and 34 months (3-88), respectively. Short-term disease control was observed in 6 (21%) patients in the monotherapy group and in 20 (32%) in the combination group. Treatment escape was observed in 1 patient after 16 months of CAB monotherapy and in 6 (30%) patients with combination therapy (after a median of 38 months), resulting in long-term disease control of 18% and 23%, respectively. Hyperprolactinemia was a predictor of response to monotherapy and pretreatment GH level to combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

We presented the results of the largest single-centre study with CAB in monotherapy and in combination with SRL. The efficacy of CAB in acromegaly seems to be lower than that of other drugs, and treatment escape may occur after a long-term follow-up.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is associated with high morbidity and elevated mortality when not adequately treated. Surgery is the first-line treatment for most patients as it is the only one that can lead to immediate cure. In patients who are not cured by surgery, treatment is currently based on a trial-and-error approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are initiated for most patients, although approximately 25% of patients present resistance to this drug class. Some biomarkers of treatment outcome are described in the literature, with the aim of categorizing patients into different groups to individualize their treatments using a personalized approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status of precision medicine for the treatment of acromegaly and future perspectives on the use of personalized medicine for this purpose.

The efficacy of medical treatment in patients with acromegaly in clinical practice

Although somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are recommended as the first-line medical therapy for acromegaly, dopamine agonists (DAs) are also a therapeutic option for treatment. We aimed to assess and compare the efficacies of DAs and SSAs in treating acromegaly in clinical practice. We included 89 patients with acromegaly who took DAs (bromocriptine [BCT], n = 63; cabergoline [CAB], n = 11) or SSAs (n = 15) as a primary medical therapy for more than 3 months in the Seoul National University Hospital. The CAB (45.5%) and SSA (33.3%) groups achieved random GH levels of <2.5 ng/mL and the normal IGF-1 levels were significantly higher than in the BCT group (11.1%) (p = 0.009). We further included all the patients with acromegaly (n = 132) who had taken CAB, BCT, and SSAs as first- or second-line medical therapy. The CAB group showed similar efficacy as the SSA group in terms of the GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (57.6% for random GH level <2.5 ng/mL, 42.4% for normal IGF-1 levels, 36.4% for both). Logistic regression analysis revealed that medications, age, GH level, or IGF-1 level before medication, hyperprolactinemia, and prior gamma-knife surgery or radiation therapy, did not affect the therapeutic response. High pretreatment GH levels predicted poor treatment outcomes (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.95 [0.90-0.99]). CAB was effective in treating acromegaly at a relatively lower cost in patients with low pretreatment GH levels.

Cabergoline in acromegaly

Acromegaly, a rare disease due to growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion by a pituitary adenoma, is associated with severe comorbidity and premature death if not adequately treated. The usual first-line treatment is surgery. Various drugs, including somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and GH receptor antagonists, are now available for use if surgery fails to suppress GH/IGF-I hypersecretion. Cabergoline, now the preferred dopamine agonist for treating hyperprolactinemia, is also used off-label for treating acromegaly. Cabergoline monotherapy is reported to normalize IGF-I levels in more than one-third of patients with acromegaly. When a somatostatin receptor ligand proves ineffective, cabergoline add-on therapy normalizes the IGF-I level in 40-50% of patients. Finally, when combined with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with mild uncontrolled disease, cabergoline helps to achieve normal IGF-I levels while avoiding the need for high-dose pegvisomant. Cabergoline is also inexpensive and well tolerated; in particular, it does not appear to promote heart valve disease.

Cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegaly: an update on their diagnosis and management

Comorbidities related to the cardiovascular system are one of the most prevalent in patients with acromegaly, and contribute to an increased risk of morbidity and all-cause mortality. Specifically, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, heart valve disease, arrhythmias, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, and cardiac dysfunction may be frequent findings. Although the underlying physiopathology for each comorbidity may not be fully elucidated, uncontrolled growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor 1 excess, age, prolonged disease duration, and coexistence of other cardio-vascular risk factors are significant influencing variables. A simple diagnostic approach to screen for the presence of these comorbidities may allow prompt treatment and arrest the progression of cardiac abnormalities. In this article, we revise the most prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities and their pathophysiology in acromegalic patients, and we address some recommendations for their prompt diagnosis, management and treatment. Strengths and pitfalls of different diagnostic techniques that are currently being used and how different treatments can affect these complications will be further discussed.

Somatostatin and dopamine receptor regulation of pituitary somatotroph adenomas

Somatostatin and dopamine receptors are expressed in normal and tumoral somatotroph cells. Upon receptor stimulation, somatostatin and the somatostatin receptor ligands octreotide, lanreotide, and pasireotide, and to a lesser extent, dopamine and the dopamine analogs bromocriptine and cabergoline, suppress growth hormone (GH) secretion from a GH-secreting pituitary somatotroph adenoma. Somatostatin and dopamine receptors are G_αi-protein coupled that inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and cAMP production and reduce intracellular calcium concentration and calcium flux oscillations. Although their main action on somatotroph cells is acute inhibition of GH secretion, they also may inhibit GH production and possibly somatotroph proliferation. These receptors have been reported to create complexes that exhibit functions distinct from that of receptor monomers. Somatostatin suppression of GH is mediated mainly by somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and to a lesser extent by SST5. Human somatostatin receptor subtype 5 has also been shown to harbor mutations associated with GH levels, somatotroph tumor behavior, and somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) responsiveness. Reviewing current knowledge of somatostatin and dopamine receptor expression and signaling in normal and tumoral somatotroph cells offers insights into mechanisms underlying SRL and dopamine agonist effectiveness in patients with acromegaly.

Somatostatin analogs, cabergoline and pegvisomant: comparing the efficacy of medical treatment for acromegaly

Therapies for acromegaly aim at normalizing hormonal excess and controlling tumor growth . Therapeutic approaches are surgery, pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy. Area covered: This review focuses on the role of medical therapy of acromegaly, comparing the efficacy of somatostatin analogues (SSA), dopamine-agonists (DA) and pegvisomant (PEG), the three available drug classes for treating acromegaly. To clarify the difference in response rates reported in the literature for these therapies, we performed a search for original articles published in PubMed. SSA represent the first-line approach to medical treatment. This therapy is effective in controlling acromegaly in about 40% of patients, however there are great differences in the reported hormonal efficacy of SSA in the different series. In patients partially resistant to SSA, cabergoline can be added when hormonal levels are close to normalization, resulting effective in control IGF-I levels in 43% of patients. In patients with higher hormonal levels PEG is indicated, normalizing IGF-I levels in 79.8% and 80.6% of cases when used in monotherapy or in combination with SSA. Pasireotide, the newly developed SSA multi-ligand receptor, represents a new option in SSA resistant patients. Expert commentary: Medical therapy represents an important therapeutic option resulting safe and effective in controlling acromegaly in a high percentage of patients. The best treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account sex, age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and hormonal levels.

Experience with pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly in a single Brazilian tertiary reference center: efficacy, safety and predictors of response

Objective

To describe the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant therapy and the predictors of treatment response in acromegaly patients at a single tertiary reference center in Brazil.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegaly patients treated with pegvisomant in our center. We also evaluated the presence of the d3 isoform of the growth hormone receptor (d3GHR).

Results

Twenty-seven patients were included (17 women). Pegvisomant was used in combination with octreotide LAR in 20 patients (74%), in combination with cabergoline in one (4%) and as monotherapy in six (22%). IGF-I normalization was achieved in 23 patients (85%). Mild and transitory elevation of liver enzymes was observed in two patients (7.4%), tumor growth in one (3.4%) and lipodystrophy in two (7.4%). One patient stopped the drug due to headaches. The GHR isoforms were evaluated in 14 patients, and the presence of at least one d3GHR allele was observed in 43% of them, but it was not a predictor of treatment response. Only pre-treatment IGF-I level was a predictor of treatment response.

Conclusion

Pegvisomant treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Brazilian patients. A better chance of disease control can be expected in those with lower pre-pegvisomant IGF-I levels.

New medical therapies of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Treatment of acromegaly aims at controlling growth hormone hypersecretion, improving patients' symptoms and comorbidities and normalizing mortality. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatment options, approximately one-half of patients are not adequately controlled. Progress in molecular research has made possible to develop new therapeutic strategies to improve control of acromegaly. This article will review the new medical approaches to acromegaly which consist in evolution of traditional therapeutic protocols and development of new molecules with different profiles of activity.

Current and Emerging Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus in Acromegaly

Diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication of acromegaly, a disease characterized by chronic hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) by a pituitary adenoma. Diabetes occurs commonly but not only as a consequence of an insulin-resistant state induced by GH excess. The development of diabetes in patients with acromegaly is clinically relevant, since such a complication is thought to increase the already elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk of the disease. Emerging data suggest that a specific cardiomyopathy can be identified in acromegaly patients with diabetes. Moreover, the presence of diabetes may also influence therapeutic decision making in acromegaly, since traditional and newly developed drugs used in this clinical setting may impact glucose metabolism regardless of control of GH hypersecretion.

Current and future medical treatments for patients with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a relatively rare condition of growth hormone (GH) excess associated with significant morbidity and, when left untreated, high mortality. Therapy for acromegaly is targeted at decreasing GH and insulin-like growth hormone 1 levels, ameliorating patients' symptoms and decreasing any local compressive effects of the pituitary adenoma. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies (such as dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor ligands and the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant) and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatments option, approximately 50% of patients are not adequately controlled.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, the authors discuss: 1) efficacy and safety of current medical therapy 2) the efficacy and safety of the new multireceptor-targeted somatostatin ligand pasireotide 3) medical treatments currently under clinical investigation (oral octreotide, ITF2984, ATL1103), and 4) preliminary data on the use of new injectable and transdermal/transmucosal formulations of octreotide.

EXPERT OPINION

This expert opinion supports the need for new therapeutic agents and modalities for patients with acromegaly.

LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT APPROACHES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACROMEGALY

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), typically from a benign pituitary somatotroph adenoma, that leads to subsequent hypersecretion of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Patients with acromegaly have an increased risk of mortality and progressive worsening of comorbidities. Surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy are currently available treatment approaches for patients with acromegaly, with overall therapeutic goals of lowering GH levels and achieving normal IGF-1 levels, reducing tumor size, improving comorbidities, and minimizing mortality risk. Although surgery can lead to biochemical remission in some patients with acromegaly, many patients will continue to have uncontrolled disease and require additional treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed recently published reports and present a summary of the safety and efficacy of current treatment modalities for patients with acromegaly.

RESULTS

A substantial proportion of patients who receive medical therapy or radiotherapy will have persistently elevated GH and/or IGF-1. Because of the serious health consequences of continued elevation of GH and IGF-1, there is a need to improve therapeutic approaches to optimize biochemical control, particularly in high-need patient populations for whom current treatment options provide limited benefit.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses current treatment options for patients with acromegaly, limitations associated with each treatment approach, and areas within the current treatment algorithm, as well as patient populations for which improved therapeutic options are needed. Novel agents in development were also highlighted, which have the potential to improve management of patients with uncontrolled or persistent acromegaly.

Growth hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical and medical therapy

Growth hormone (GH) pituitary tumors are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current treatments, including surgery and medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSA), dopamine agonists and/or a GH receptor antagonist, result in disease remission in approximately half of patients. Predictors of GH tumor response to different therapies have been incompletely defined based on histologic subtype, particularly densely (DG) versus sparsely (SG) granulated adenomas. The aim of this study was to examine our own institutional experience with GH adenomas and correlate how subtype related to clinical parameters as well as response to surgery and medical therapies. A retrospective chart review of 101 acromegalic patients operated by a single neurosurgeon was performed. Clinical data were correlated with histologic subtype and disease control, as defined by IGF-1 levels, and random growth hormone levels in response to surgery and/or medical therapies. SG tumors, compared to DG, occurred in younger patients (p = 0.0010), were 3-fold larger (p = 0.0030) but showed no differences in tumor-invasion characteristics (p = 0.12). DG tumors had a higher rate of remission in response to surgery compared to SG, 65.7 vs. 14.3 % (p < 0.0001), as well as to medical therapy with SSAs (68.8 % for DG vs. 28.6 % for SG tumors; p = 0.028). SG tumors not controlled with SSAs consistently responded to a switch to, or addition of, a GH receptor antagonist. Histological GH tumor subtyping implicates a different clinical phenotype and biologic behavior, and provides prognostic significance for surgical success and response to medical therapies.

Growth hormone deficiency in treated acromegaly

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) of the adult is characterized by reduced quality of life (QoL) and physical fitness, skeletal fragility, and increased weight and cardiovascular risk. Hypopituitarism may develop in patients after definitive treatment of acromegaly, but an exact prevalence of GHD in this population is still uncertain owing to limited awareness and the scarce and conflicting data available on this topic. Because acromegaly and GHD may yield adverse consequences on similar target systems, the final outcomes of some complications of acromegaly may be further affected by the occurrence of GHD. However, it is still largely unknown whether patients with post-acromegaly GHD may benefit from GH replacement. We review the diagnostic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of GHD in adult patients treated for acromegaly.

Surgical treatment of microprolactinomas: pros

Medical therapy with dopaminergic agonists (DAs) has been used for several decades for the treatment of both micro- and macroprolactinomas, without much differentiation between the two conditions. While most cases respond well to DAs in terms of prolactin normalization and control of tumor growth, DAs are often needed for many years, or even for lifetime. Concerns have been raised recently about the possible side effects of long-term use of these medications on the anatomy and function of the heart valves. While macroprolactinomas are rarely surgically curable, pituitary surgery in expert hands is a safe and effective method to permanently cure microprolactinomas, with long-term cure rates around 70 %. In this article, I will review the data on safety of DAs an on the effectiveness and safety of surgery, and I will make an argument that surgery should be offered as a possible therapy to microprolactinoma patients, provided that an experienced pituitary neurosurgeon is available.