Okishev DN, Cherebylo SA, Konovalov AN, Chelushkin DM, Shekhtman OD, Konovalov NA, Okisheva EA, Kravchuk AD, Eliava SS. [Features of modeling a polymer implant for closing a defect after decompressive craniotomy].
ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2022;
86:17-27. [PMID:
35170273 DOI:
10.17116/neiro20228601117]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Individual polymer implants are widespread for bone reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy. Despite the availability of customized titanium products, various specialists and hospitals prefer polymer implants.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the methods of modeling and manufacturing the polymethylmethacrylate implants and identify the features affecting the quality of reconstruction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We analyzed 14 patients with extensive skull defects after installation of polymethyl methacrylate implants. Software used for modeling of individual implants by different specialists was compared.
RESULTS
Satisfactory reconstruction result was obtained in all cases. There were no infectious complications. The authors outlined certain important aspects for modeling of individual polymer products: local use of anatomical thickness of the implant, leaving safe spaces, prevention of temporal retraction, template-based resection before reconstruction.
CONCLUSION
To date, skull defect closure with polymeric materials remains relevant, and even has certain advantages over customized titanium products.
Collapse