Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Elderly Patients With Space-Occupying Infarction (DECAP): A Prospective Observational Study

Surgical timing and indications for decompressive craniectomy in malignant stroke: results from a single-center retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Acute ischemic stroke induces rapid neuronal death and time is a key factor in its treatment. Despite timely recanalization, malignant cerebral infarction can ensue, requiring decompressive surgery (DC). The ideal timing of surgery is still a matter of debate; in this study, we attempt to establish the ideal time to perform surgery in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing DC for stroke at our department. The indication for DC was based on drop in level of consciousness and standard imaging parameters. Patients were stratified according to the timing of DC in four groups: (a) "ultra-early" ≤12 h, (b) "early" >12≤24 h, (c) "timely" >24≤48 h, and (d) "late" >48 h. The primary endpoint of this study was in-house mortality, as a dependent variable from surgical timing. Secondary endpoint was modified Rankin scale at discharge.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 110 patients, the timing of surgery did not influence mortality or functional outcome (p=0.060). Patients undergoing late DC were however significantly older (p=0.008), and those undergoing ultra-early DC showed a trend towards a lower GCS at admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results add to the evidence supporting an extension of the time window for DC in stroke beyond 48 h. Further criteria beyond clinical and imaging signs of herniation should be considered when selecting patients for DC after stroke to identify patients who would benefit from the procedure.

Prediction of midline shift after media ischemia using computed tomography perfusion

Background

Decision-making about the indication for decompressive hemicraniectomy in cases with malignant infarction in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is still a matter of debate. Some scores have been introduced and tested, most of them are midline-shift dependent. We introduce the Kinematics of malignant MCA infarction (KM) index, which can be calculated based on an initial computed tomography perfusion scan and the chosen therapy (lysis/thrombectomy/conservative) in order to estimate the maximum midline-shift in the subsequent 6 days.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with middle cerebral artery infarction who had a non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, CT angiography and a CT perfusion scan in the acute setting and who presented in our emergency room between 2015 and 2019. 186 patients were included. Midline shift was measured on follow-up imaging between days 0 and 6 after stroke. We evaluated Pearson’s correlation between the KM index and the amount of midline shift.

Results

The mean KM index of all patients was 1.01 ± 0.09 (decompressive hemicraniectomy subgroup 1.13 ± 0.13; midline shift subgroup 1.18 ± 0.13). The correlation coefficient between the KM index and substantial midline-shift was 0.61, p < 0.01 and between KM index and decompressive hemicraniectomy or death 0.47; p < 0.05. KM index > 1.02 shows a sensitivity of 92% (22/24) and a specificity of 78% (126/162) for detecting midline shifts. The area under curve of the receiver operator characteristics was 91% for midline shifts and 86% for the occurrence of decompressive hemicraniectomy or death.

Conclusion

In this retrospective study, KM index shows a strong correlation with significant midline-shift. The KM index can be used for risk classification regarding herniation and the need of decompressive hemicraniectomy.

Hemicraniectomy for Dominant vs Nondominant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Decompressive hemicraniectomy decreases mortality and severe disability from space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction in selected patients. However, attitudes towards hemicraniectomy for dominant-hemispheric stroke have been hesitant. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of stroke laterality with outcome after hemicraniectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search up to 6th February 2020 to retrieve original articles about hemicraniectomy for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction that reported outcome in relation to laterality. The primary outcome was severe disability (modified Rankin Scale 4‒6 or 5‒6 or Glasgow Outcome Scale 1‒3) or death. A two-stage combined individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis evaluated the association between dominant-lateralized stroke and (a) short-term (≤ 3 months) and (b) long-term (> 3 months) outcome. We performed sensitivity analyses excluding studies with sheer mortality outcome, second-look strokectomy, low quality, or small sample size, and comparing populations from North America/Europe vs Asia/South America.

RESULTS

The analysis included 51 studies (46 observational studies, one nonrandomized trial, and four randomized controlled trials) comprising 2361 patients. We found no association between dominant laterality and unfavorable short-term (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69‒1.45) or long-term (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76‒1.33) outcome. The results were unchanged in all sensitivity analyses. The grade of evidence was very low for short-term and low for long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that patients with dominant-hemispheric stroke have equal outcome after hemicraniectomy compared to patients with nondominant stroke. Despite the shortcomings of the available evidence, our results do not support withholding hemicraniectomy based on stroke laterality.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy in ischemic stroke

Malignant hemispheric stroke (MHS) is a life-threatening event, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHS) is the treatment of choice to relieve the emerging space-occupying brain edema. This review details the pathophysiological and scientific background, considerations for clinical decision making, surgical treatment and impact on the patients' outcome. Although surgery reduces mortality significantly, the probability for unfavorable outcome is still high in selected cases. While former randomized controlled studies aimed for the prevention of the primary cause, the current research focuses on the treatment and prevention of secondary neurological injury.