Is It Really Gone? Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

Short-term outcomes from the 'Watch and Wait' (WoW) study: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite absence of level 1 evidence on the long-term oncological safety of non-operative management for rectal cancer (watch and wait), increased implementation has occurred globally over the past decades. In Sweden, a pan-national prospective non-randomized study was initiated in 2017 to assess its implementation.

METHOD

Patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy according to national guidelines in whom a clinical complete response was detected at reassessment were eligible for inclusion following informed consent. Only patients with an opportunistic watch-and-wait approach were included. Inclusion and follow-up, according to the study protocol, was managed at the participating study centres. The primary outcome measure of the study is 3-year disease-free survival. Here, the secondary short-term outcomes local regrowth rate, distant metastasis rate and outcomes after surgery for regrowth, at 6 months follow-up, are reported.

RESULTS

Between January 2017 and February 2023, 211 patients with a clinical complete response were included in the study. Thirty-three (16%) patients developed suspicious regrowth within 6 months of inclusion. Thirty-two of 33 patients had abdominal resectional surgery for regrowth. The curative intention rate was 94% for patients with regrowth. Three patients (1.4%) developed distant metastases within 6 months of inclusion.

CONCLUSION

This Swedish national study on watch and wait reports regrowth rates after 6 months are in line with previous reports in the literature. Nearly all patients with early regrowth could be treated with salvage surgery and curative intent.

Rectal adenocarcinoma: Ex vivo 9.4T MRI-correlation with histopathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the imaging details and diagnostic information of the treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) of rectal adenocarcinoma at 9.4T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by ex vivo.

METHODS

Fifteen cases with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) followed by radical surgery after nCRT between September 2022 and February 2023 were recruited. Resected specimens were fixed in a perfluoropolyether-filled test tube and scanned with a 3.0T and 9.4T MRI system ex vivo. The residual tumor depth and MRI-based tumor regression grade (TRG) were subjectively assessed and then compared with the pathological findings.

RESULTS

The ex vivo 9.4T T2WI without fat suppression clearly differentiated tumor tissue, fibrosis and normal rectal wall, which clearly corresponded to the pathologic tissues of the rectal specimens. The TRG could be accurately assessed on ex vivo 9.4T images in 13/15 specimens (86.7%), while in 11/15 specimens (73.3%) on ex vivo 3.0T images.

CONCLUSION

Ex vivo 9.4T MR imaging clearly displayed the components of rectal wall and proved excellent diagnostic performance for evaluating the treatment response to nCRT, which allow radiologists to understand and then assess more accurately the TRG of LARC after nCRT.

Compare clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer. Our study will systematically collect and integrate studies to evaluate the ability of these two treatments to improve tumor shrinkage rates, surgical resection rates, tumor-free survival, and severe adverse events.

AIM

To provide clinicians and patients with more reliable treatment options to optimize treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatment options.

METHODS

A full search of all clinical studies on the effectiveness and safety of TNT and nCRT for treating locally advanced rectal cancer identified in Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database) and English (PubMed, Embase) databases was performed. Two system assessors independently screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature. We used RevMan 5.3 software to perform a meta-analysis of the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, T stage degradation rate, resection 0 (R0) rate, anal grade 3/4 acute toxicity rate, perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in the TNT and nCRT groups.

RESULTS

Finally, 14 studies were included, six of which were randomized controlled studies. A total of 3797 patients were included, including 1865 in the TNT group and 1932 in the nCRT group. The two sets of baseline data were comparable. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pCR rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.90, P < 0.00001], T stage degradation rate (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.63-2.57, P < 0.00001), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009) were significantly greater in the nCRT group than in the nCRT group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 acute toxicity or perioperative complications between the two groups. The 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.69-1.02, P = 0.08] and DFS (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.03-1.39, P = 0.74) of the TNT group were similar to those of the nCRT group.

CONCLUSION

TNT has greater clinical efficacy and safety than nCRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Responsiveness to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotheapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients from Endomicroscopy

The protocol for treating locally advanced rectal cancer consists of the application of chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) followed by surgical intervention. One issue for clinical oncologists is predicting the efficacy of neoCRT in order to adjust the dosage and avoid treatment toxicity in cases when surgery should be conducted promptly. Biomarkers may be used for this purpose along with in vivo cell-level images of the colorectal mucosa obtained by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) during colonoscopy. The aim of this article is to report our experience with Motiro, a computational framework that we developed for machine learning (ML) based analysis of pCLE videos for predicting neoCRT response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. pCLE videos were collected from 47 patients who were diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4, or N+). The patients received neoCRT. Response to treatment by all patients was assessed by endoscopy along with biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-seven patients were classified as non-responsive to neoCRT because they presented a visible macroscopic neoplastic lesion, as confirmed by pCLE examination. Ten remaining patients were considered responsive to neoCRT because they presented lesions as a scar or small ulcer with negative biopsy, at post-treatment follow-up. Motiro was used for batch mode analysis of pCLE videos. It automatically characterized the tumoral region and its surroundings. That enabled classifying a patient as responsive or non-responsive to neoCRT based on pre-neoCRT pCLE videos. Motiro classified patients as responsive or non-responsive to neoCRT with an accuracy of ~ 0.62 when using images of the tumor. When using images of regions surrounding the tumor, it reached an accuracy of ~ 0.70. Feature analysis showed that spatial heterogeneity in fluorescence distribution within regions surrounding the tumor was the main contributor to predicting response to neoCRT. We developed a computational framework to predict response to neoCRT by locally advanced rectal cancer patients based on pCLE images acquired pre-neoCRT. We demonstrate that the analysis of the mucosa of the region surrounding the tumor provides stronger predictive power.

Sense and non-sense of imaging in the era of organ preservation for rectal cancer

This review summarizes the current applications and benefits of imaging modalities for organ preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer. The concept of organ preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer has revolutionized the way rectal cancer is managed. Initially, organ preservation was limited to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who needed neoadjuvant therapy to reduce tumor size before surgery and achieved complete response. However, neoadjuvant therapy is now increasingly utilized for smaller and less aggressive tumors to achieve primary organ preservation. Additionally, more intensive neoadjuvant strategies are employed to improve complete response rates and increase the chances of successful organ preservation. The selection of patients for organ preservation is a critical component of treatment, and imaging techniques such as digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and MRI are commonly used for this purpose. In this review, we provide an overview of what imaging modalities should be chosen and how they can aid in the selection and follow-up of patients undergoing organ-preserving strategies.