1
|
Keifer J. Synaptic Mechanisms of Delay Eyeblink Classical Conditioning: AMPAR Trafficking and Gene Regulation in an In Vitro Model. Mol Neurobiol 2023; 60:7088-7103. [PMID: 37531025 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-023-03528-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
An in vitro model of delay eyeblink classical conditioning was developed to investigate synaptic plasticity mechanisms underlying acquisition of associative learning. This was achieved by replacing real stimuli, such as an airpuff and tone, with patterned stimulation of the cranial nerves using an isolated brainstem preparation from turtle. Here, our primary findings regarding cellular and molecular mechanisms for learning acquisition using this unique approach are reviewed. The neural correlate of the in vitro eyeblink response is a replica of the actual behavior, and features of conditioned responses (CRs) resemble those observed in behavioral studies. Importantly, it was shown that acquisition of CRs did not require the intact cerebellum, but the appropriate timing did. Studies of synaptic mechanisms indicate that conditioning involves two stages of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking. Initially, GluA1-containing AMPARs are targeted to synapses followed later by replacement by GluA4 subunits that support CR expression. This two-stage process is regulated by specific signal transduction cascades involving PKA and PKC and is guided by distinct protein chaperones. The expression of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein is central to AMPAR trafficking and conditioning. BDNF gene expression is regulated by coordinated epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA methylation/demethylation and chromatin modifications that control access of promoters to transcription factors. Finally, a hypothesis is proposed that learning genes like BDNF are poised by dual chromatin features that allow rapid activation or repression in response to environmental stimuli. These in vitro studies have advanced our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie associative learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Keifer
- Neuroscience Group, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kadota S, Ou J, Shi Y, Lee JT, Sun J, Yildirim E. Nucleoporin 153 links nuclear pore complex to chromatin architecture by mediating CTCF and cohesin binding. Nat Commun 2020; 11:2606. [PMID: 32451376 PMCID: PMC7248104 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16394-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Nucleoporin proteins (Nups) have been proposed to mediate spatial and temporal chromatin organization during gene regulation. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms in mammalian cells are not well understood. Here, we report that Nucleoporin 153 (NUP153) interacts with the chromatin architectural proteins, CTCF and cohesin, and mediates their binding across cis-regulatory elements and TAD boundaries in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. NUP153 depletion results in altered CTCF and cohesin binding and differential gene expression - specifically at the bivalent developmental genes. To investigate the molecular mechanism, we utilize epidermal growth factor (EGF)-inducible immediate early genes (IEGs). We find that NUP153 controls CTCF and cohesin binding at the cis-regulatory elements and POL II pausing during the basal state. Furthermore, efficient IEG transcription relies on NUP153. We propose that NUP153 links the nuclear pore complex (NPC) to chromatin architecture allowing genes that are poised to respond rapidly to developmental cues to be properly modulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Kadota
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jianhong Ou
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Yuming Shi
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jeannie T Lee
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Genetics, The Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Jiayu Sun
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Eda Yildirim
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|