Mechanism of action of everolimus in renal cell carcinoma

Effectiveness of targeted therapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the most frequent cause of death in women. Targeted therapies offer a possibility of effective and individualized therapy based on the molecular profile of the tumor. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted agents added to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) depending on their human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and hormone receptor (HR) status (positive or negative). The systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thirteen trials were included. The addition of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, bevacizumab, or lapatinib to chemotherapy significantly (P < .05) improved objective response rate (ORR), time to failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2-positive (HER2(+)) disease. Trastuzumab or lapatinib combined with endocrine therapy significantly (P < .05) improved ORR, time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2(+) and HR(+) disease. In patients with HER2-negative (HER2(-)) cancer, bevacizumab or lapatinib added to chemotherapy significantly (P < .05), improved ORR but did not prolong PFS and OS (P > .05). In patients with HER2(-) and HR(-) disease, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy did not significantly improve (P > .05) ORR or PFS. Targeted therapies also increased the overall risk of adverse events. So far, there is a lack of published results for everolimus and trastuzumab emtansine trials in patients with previously untreated MBC. The addition of targeted therapy to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy using HER2 and HR status significantly improved ORR, PFS, and OS in patients with previously untreated MBC.

Clinical prognostic factors associated with outcome in patients with renal cell cancer with prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy treated with everolimus

BACKGROUND

The mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, prognostic models are needed to determine the patients who would most benefit from this therapy. We have developed a model based on clinical parameters and patient stratification into risk groups to predict patients with RCC who will derive the most benefit from treatment with everolimus.

METHODS

We assessed retrospective data on 57 patients with RCC who received everolimus after previous treatment with immunotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors to identify prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In the original phase II study, patients received 10mg of everolimus daily without interruption and were assessed every other week for the first 8 weeks on therapy and every 4 weeks thereafter. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate OS and PFS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were constructed using the Cox proportional hazards model and a stepwise procedure to validate the data.

RESULTS

We grouped patients according to risk: 0 prognostic factors indicated favorable risk, 1 to 2 factors intermediate risk, and≥3 factors poor risk. We found notable differences in median OS (29.6 mo for favorable risk, 14.3 mo for intermediate risk, and 7.2 mo for poor risk). Three risk factors (prior radiation treatment, no lung metastasis present at the start of treatment, and lymphocytes<25cells/µl) in the multivariate analysis were found to be associated with PFS, and 4 risk factors were found to be associated with OS (bone metastasis at start of treatment, LDH>1.5×upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase>120U/l, and lymphocytes<25cells/µl).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prognostic model includes 3 readily available clinical parameters for PFS and 4 readily available clinical parameters for OS to help stratify patients into poor, intermediate, and favorable prognosis groups for the treatment of everolimus in clear cell RCC. These intriguing results warrant further study in a larger patient population to validate the findings.