Association between HRAS rs12628 and rs112587690 polymorphisms with the risk of melanoma in the North American population

A Case Study on PPM1D and 9 Other Shared Germline Alterations in a Family

BACKGROUND

The use of high-throughput genotyping techniques has enabled us to identify the rare germline genetic variants with different pathogenicity and penetrance, and understand their role in cancer predisposition. We report here a familial cancer case, a study from Western Indian.

METHODS

NGS-WES was carried out in a lung cancer patient who has a family history of multiple cancers across generations, including tongue, lung, brain, cervical, urothelial, and esophageal cancer. The results were validated by data mining from available data bases. I-TASSER, RasMol and PyMol were used for protein structure modelling.

RESULTS

The sequencing by NGS-WES revealed PPM1D c.1654C>T (p.Arg552Ter) mutation in hotspot region exon 6 leading to sudden protein truncation and loss of the C-terminal, due to the substitution of C>T. This mutation was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), due to limited data on lung cancer, The three unaffected siblings of proband did not show any pathogenic variants and comparative analysis of the four siblings indicate 9 shared genetic variants, classified as benign as per ClinVar.

CONCLUSION

PPM1D constitutional genetic alterations are rare and uncommon in different ethnic populations. This gene encodes a phosphatase playing role in regulating the P53 tumor suppressor pathway and DNA damage response. Genetic alterations in the PPM1D gene maybe linked to history of gliomas, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer onset in the proband's family.
.

Synonymous Variants: Necessary Nuance in our Understanding of Cancer Drivers and Treatment Outcomes

Once called "silent mutations" and assumed to have no effect on protein structure and function, synonymous variants are now recognized to be drivers for some cancers. There have been significant advances in our understanding of the numerous mechanisms by which synonymous single nucleotide variants (sSNVs) can affect protein structure and function by affecting pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA expression, stability, folding, miRNA binding, translation kinetics, and co-translational folding. This review highlights the need for considering sSNVs in cancer biology to gain a better understanding of the genetic determinants of human cancers and to improve their diagnosis and treatment. We surveyed the literature for reports of sSNVs in cancer and found numerous studies on the consequences of sSNVs on gene function with supporting in vitro evidence. We also found reports of sSNVs that have statistically significant associations with specific cancer types but for which in vitro studies are lacking to support the reported associations. Additionally, we found reports of germline and somatic sSNVs that were observed in numerous clinical studies and for which in silico analysis predicts possible effects on gene function. We provide a review of these investigations and discuss necessary future studies to elucidate the mechanisms by which sSNVs disrupt protein function and are play a role in tumorigeneses, cancer progression, and treatment efficacy. As splicing dysregulation is one of the most well recognized mechanisms by which sSNVs impact protein function, we also include our own in silico analysis for predicting which sSNVs may disrupt pre-mRNA splicing.

Variations in MAP kinase gladiators and risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma

Thyroid carcinoma (TC) accounts for ~2.1% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. Mutations in KRAS, HRAS, NRAS and BRAF are primary participants in the development and progression of various types of malignancy, including differentiated TC (DTC). Therefore, the present prospective cohort study aimed to screen patients with DTC for variations in RAS gene family and BRAF gene. Exon 1 and 2 of KRAS, HRAS, NRAS and exon 15 of BRAF gene were screened for hotspot mutations in 72 thyroid tumor and adjacent normal tissue samples using di-deoxy Sanger sequencing. HRAS T81C mutation was found in 21% (15 of 72) of DTC tissue samples, therefore this mutation was investigated in blood samples from patients with DTC and controls as a genetic polymorphism. In addition, HRAS T81C genotypes were determined in 180 patients with DTC and 220 healthy controls by performing restriction fragment length polymorphism. BRAF^V600E mutation was confined to classical variant of papillary thyoid cancer (CPTC; 44.4%) and was significantly associated with multifocality and lymph node (LN) metastasis. No mutation was found in exons 1 and 2 of KRAS and NRAS and exon 2 of HRAS genes, however, mutation was detected in exon 1 of HRAS gene (codon 27) at nucleotide position 81 in 21% (15 of 72) of DTC tumor tissue samples. Furthermore, HRAS T81C single nucleotide polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of DTC with variant genotypes more frequently detected in cases compared with controls (P≤0.05). Moreover, frequency of variant genotypes (TC+CC) was significantly higher among DTC cases with no history of smoking, males, greater age, multifocality and LN metatasis compared with healthy controls (P<0.05). BRAF^V600E mutation was primarily present in CPTC and associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype but mutations in RAS gene family were not present in patients with DTC. HRAS T81C polymorphism may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of DTC in a Pakistani cohort. Furthermore, testing for the BRAF^V600E mutation may be useful for selecting initial therapy and follow-up monitoring.

Mutation profiling of anaplastic ependymoma grade III by Ion Proton next generation DNA sequencing

Background: Ependymomas are glial tumors derived from differentiated ependymal cells. In contrast to other types of brain tumors, histological grading is not a good prognostic marker for these tumors. In order to determine genomic changes in an anaplastic ependymoma, we analyzed its mutation patterns by next generation sequencing (NGS). Methods:  Tumor DNA was sequenced using an Ion PI v3 chip on Ion Proton instrument and the data were analyzed by Ion Reporter 5.6. Results: NGS analysis identified 19 variants, of which four were previously reported missense variants; c.395G>A in IDH1, c.1173A>G in PIK3CA, c.1416A>T in KDR and c.215C>G in TP53. The frequencies of the three missense mutations ( PIK3CA c.1173A>G, KDR c.1416A>T, TP53, c.215C>G) were high, suggesting that these are germline variants, whereas the IDH1 variant frequency was low (4.81%). However, based on its FATHMM score of 0.94, only the IDH1 variant is pathogenic; other variants TP53, PIK3CA and KDR had FATHMM scores of 0.22, 0.56 and 0.07, respectively. Eight synonymous mutations were found in FGFR3, PDGFRA, EGFR, RET, HRAS, FLT3, APC and SMAD4 genes. The mutation in FLT3 p.(Val592Val) was the only novel variant found. Additionally, two known intronic variants in KDR were found and intronic variants were also found in ERBB4 and PIK3CA. A known splice site mutation at an acceptor site in FLT3, a 3'-UTR variant in the CSF1R gene and a 5'_UTR variant in the SMARCB1 gene were also identified. The p-values were below 0.00001 for all variants and the average coverage for all variants was around 2000x. Conclusions: In this grade III ependymoma, one novel synonymous mutation and one deleterious missense mutation is reported. Many of the variants reported here have not been detected in ependymal tumors by NGS analysis previously and we therefore report these variants in brain tissue for the first time.

Mutation profiling of anaplastic ependymoma grade III by Ion Proton next generation DNA sequencing

Background: Ependymomas are glial tumors derived from differentiated ependymal cells. In contrast to other types of brain tumors, histological grading is not a good prognostic marker for these tumors. In order to determine genomic changes in an anaplastic ependymoma, we analyzed its mutation patterns by next generation sequencing (NGS). Methods:  Tumor DNA was sequenced using an Ion PI v3 chip on Ion Proton instrument and the data were analyzed by Ion Reporter 5.6. Results: NGS analysis identified 19 variants, of which four were previously reported missense variants; c.395G>A in IDH1, c.1173A>G in PIK3CA, c.1416A>T in KDR and c.215C>G in TP53. The frequencies of the three missense mutations ( PIK3CA c.1173A>G, KDR c.1416A>T, TP53, c.215C>G) were high, suggesting that these are germline variants, whereas the IDH1 variant frequency was low (4.81%). However, based on its FATHMM score of 0.94, only the IDH1 variant is pathogenic; other variants TP53, PIK3CA and KDR had FATHMM scores of 0.22, 0.56 and 0.07, respectively. Eight synonymous mutations were found in FGFR3, PDGFRA, EGFR, RET, HRAS, FLT3, APC and SMAD4 genes. The mutation in FLT3 p.(Val592Val) was the only novel variant found. Additionally, two known intronic variants in KDR were found and intronic variants were also found in ERBB4 and PIK3CA. A known splice site mutation at an acceptor site in FLT3, a 3'-UTR variant in the CSF1R gene and a 5'_UTR variant in the SMARCB1 gene were also identified. The p-values were below 0.00001 for all variants and the average coverage for all variants was around 2000x. Conclusions: In this grade III ependymoma, one novel synonymous mutation and one deleterious missense mutation is reported. Many of the variants reported here have not been detected in ependymal tumors by NGS analysis previously and we therefore report these variants in brain tissue for the first time.

Association of KRAS and NRAS gene polymorphisms with Wilms tumor risk: a four-center case-control study

Wilms tumor is a type of pediatric solid tumor that arises partly due to somatic and germline mutations. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the RAS gene reportedly modify the risk for several types of human malignancies. We conducted a multicenter study to investigate whether RAS gene variants predispose individuals to Wilms tumor. Four SNPs in RAS were genotyped in 355 Wilms tumor cases and 1070 controls. The SNPs included rs12587 G>T, rs7973450 A>G and rs7312175 G>A in KRAS, and rs2273267 A>T in NRAS. Individuals harboring the rs12587 GT genotype were more likely to develop Wilms tumor than those carrying the GG genotype (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.004-1.68, P=0.046). However, the other three SNPs seemed not to influence the risk for Wilms tumor. Compared to individuals without a risk genotype, those harboring one to three KRAS risk genotypes had an adjusted OR of 1.28 for developing Wilms tumor (95% CI=1.002-1.64, P=0.048). Stratification analysis revealed that rs12587 GT/TT was associated with Wilms tumor risk in children >18 months old (adjusted OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.02-1.89, P=0.037). Our findings indicate that the rs12587 G>T polymorphism in KRAS is associated with increased Wilms tumor susceptibility.

Putative role of HIF transcriptional activity in melanocytes and melanoma biology

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is a highly oxygen sensitive bHLH protein that is part of the heterodimeric HIF-1 transcription factor. Under hypoxic stress, HIF-1 activity is induced to control expression of multiple downstream target genes, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The normal epidermis exists in a constant mild hypoxic microenvironment and constitutively expresses HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Expression of HIF-1α and/or HIF-2α has been suggested to correlate with the increased malignant potential of melanocytes, therefore, failures of melanoma therapies may be partially linked to high HIF activity. Notably, melanomas that have the V600E BRAF mutation exhibit increased HIF-1α expression. We have utilized a bioinformatics approach to identify putative hypoxia response elements (HREs) in a set of genes known to participate in the process of melanogenesis (includingTRPM1, SLC45A2, HRAS, C-KIT, PMEL and CRH). While some of the mechanistic links between these genes and the HIF pathway have been previously explored, others await further investigation. Although agents targeting HIF activity have been proposed as novel treatment modalities for melanoma, there are currently no clinical trials in progress to test their efficacy in melanoma.