What are the current outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: who are the long-term survivors treated initially with imatinib?

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: in the era of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown great efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), significantly prolonging the survival of patients. In the era of imatinib, a few studies reported some prognostic factors for patients with advanced GISTs, such as age, sex, performance status, diameter of the largest lesions, KIT exon mutations, and some hematological examination results. However, with the advent of more TKIs, the prognostic factors for patients with advanced GISTs have not been fully understood in the era of multiple TKIs. In this study, we aimed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with the survival of patients diagnosed with advanced GISTs.

Methods

Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival were retrospectively collected for patients with primary unresectable or recurrent GISTs treated from January 2010 to July 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors of survival.

Results

A total of 194 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up duration was 59.9 months (range, 2.7-141.7 months). The median overall survival (mOS) in this cohort was 76.5 months (95% confidence interval, 63.4 to 89.6 months). All patients received TKI therapy during the follow-up period, and 56.2% received two or more types of TKIs. In multivariable Cox analysis, younger age, a single lesion at enrollment, no previous use of TKIs, smaller tumor burden, good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS ≤1), and lesions limited to the liver were independent prognostic factors for better survival.

Conclusions

We found that a single lesion at enrollment, no previous use of TKIs, a smaller tumor burden, and lesions limited to the liver were associated with better survival. Drug resistance is a severe challenge for advanced GISTs, and several factors mentioned above may be correlated with the development of drug resistance, leading to the poor survival of patients.

Update of epidemiology, survival and initial treatment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the USA: a retrospective study based on SEER database

OBJECTIVES

An updated epidemiological analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), the change of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and patterns of initial treatment are of interest.

DESIGN

A retrospective study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 5625 patients with GIST diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were identified.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) and annual prevalence rate were calculated. SEER combined stage, period CSS rate and initial treatment were summarised. All the data were calculated by SEER*Stat software.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2019, the ASIR of GIST increased from 0.79 to 1.02 per 100 000 person-years, with an increase of 2.4% annually. The increase was across age and sex subgroups. The prevalence trend was similar with the ASIR trend in each subgroup. The stage distributions were similar between different age groups, but varied among different primary tumour sites. More importantly, a stage shift from regional stage to localized stage at diagnosis was found, which may result in the improvement of CSS over years. Overall, the 5-year CSS rate of GIST was approximately 81.3%. Even for metastatic GIST, the rate exceeded 50%. Surgery was the most common treatment regimen for GIST, followed by surgery and systemic treatment. Whereas approximately 7.0% patients were undertreated, which was more pronounced among patients with distant and unknown stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest an improving early detection of GIST and an improving ability of accurate staging. Though most patients are effectively treated and perform good survivals, approximate 7.0% patients may be undertreated.

What are the late effects of older gastric cancer survivors? A scoping review

Objective

Older gastric cancer survivors account for a high proportion of cancer survivors. To improve their quality of life, a cancer survivorship care plan with a consideration of the late effects is required. This study aimed to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the late effects in older gastric cancer survivors.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review based on the JBI scoping review framework. We explored articles in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Research InformationSharing Service (RISS), Korean Medical dataBASE(KMBase), and National Digital Science Library (NDSL) databases published from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. The keywords used for search are "gastric cancer", "aged", "survivors", and "late effect or long-term effect or late symptom or time factors". While 439 records were initially identified, 14 articles were eventually selected based on the inclusion criteria.

Results

Most studies were conducted in 2019 (4 studies, 28.6%), and more than half (8 studies, 57.1%) were conducted in Asia. In total, six definitions of cancer survivors were found in the studies. The most common age range in the studies was 60-64 years (7 studies, 50.0%). The second primary cancer risk was the most common late effects (5 studies, 20.8%). Among 14 studies, there was only one study of intervention study (7.1%).

Conclusions

It is time to shift the focus from survival to care that improve the quality of life after treatment. We suggest future studies to define cancer survivors, set the age criteria and characterize the late effects in older gastric cancer survivors.

Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Focus on Younger Patients

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originate from Cajal's cells and are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs in young adults, i.e., patients before the age of 40, are rare and differ from those in older patients and GISTs in children in terms of the molecular and clinical features, including the location and type of mutations. They often harbor other molecular abnormalities than KIT and PDGFRA mutations (wild-type GISTs). The general principles of therapeutic management in young patients are the same as in the elderly. Considering some differences in molecular abnormalities, molecular testing should be the standard procedure to allow appropriate systemic therapy if needed. The optimal treatment strategy should be established by a multidisciplinary team experienced in sarcoma treatment. The impact of treatment on the quality of life and daily activities, including the impact on work, pregnancy, and fertility, in this patient population should be especially taken into consideration.

Spectroscopic studies of simultaneous binding of cyclophosphamide and imatinib mesylate to human holo-transferrin

The interactions of proteins with drugs are very important from a pharmacological point of view. Holo-transferrin is a blood-plasma glycoprotein whose main function is iron-binding and the transport of other ligands. Additionally, the protein is only transferrin-form recognized by TfR1 and TfR2 receptors at the surface of rapidly proliferating malignant cells. Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor mainly used in the treatment of blood cancers, frequently in multidrug therapy with cyclophosphamide. In this study the effect of cyclophosphamide on the interaction of imatinib mesylate with human holo-transferrin has been investigated. Using spectroscopic techniques such as fluorescence, circular dichroism, ultraviolet-visible and electrophoretic light scattering additive parameters, system stability and the effect of the ligands on the protein conformation at varying pH values have been defined. Calculated quenching constants are in the order of 2 × 10⁴ M^-1 and the type of interaction depends on the reaction medium. Under physiological conditions binding constant is 1.329 × 10⁶ M^-1 whereas in an environment similar to that of cancer cells the constant is significantly lower, K_a = 6.060 × 10⁴ M^-1. N values are approximate to 1 in all cases. Moreover, some changes are observed in the α-helical structure of the protein after interaction with the drugs and the presence of cyclophosphamide slightly stabilizes the protein secondary structure. All collected data proves the effect of cyclophosphamide on the interaction between imatinib mesylate and human holo-transferrin. It is of great clinical interest due to anticancer, multidrug therapies including both imatinib mesylate and cyclophosphamide.

Treatment of Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): A Focus on Older Patients

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) originating in the Cajal cells are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. The median age of patients with this diagnosis is 65 years, and over 20% of cases affect people over the age of 70 years. The effectiveness and tolerability of systemic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in older patients with GIST seem to be similar to that in younger patients, but some studies have shown that treatment of older patients is suboptimal. Disability, frailty, comorbidities, and concomitant medications may influence treatment decisions, and toxicities also more often lead to treatment discontinuation. The known safety profile and oral administration route of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in GIST may allow maximization of treatment and the best efficacy, especially in older patients. This review summarizes the efficacy data for the systemic treatment of GIST, including data for older patients and from real-world experiences, if available and significant. The reported safety data and general rules for toxicity management, including appropriate patient selection and the need for careful monitoring during treatment, are also discussed.

Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) Recommendations on Prioritization in Sarcoma Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

The COVID‐19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID‐19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care.

Material and Methods

A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft‐tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2–3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as “strongly recommended” (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, “recommended” (R) if 75%–90% of experts agreed and “no consensus” (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European‐Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology‐Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic‐treatment recommendations to support prioritization.

Results

There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher‐priority recommendations (85%, 12%, and 3% for SR, R, and NC, respectively) than in the 50 lower‐priority recommendations (32%, 52%, and 16% for SR, R, and NC, respectively).

Conclusion

The consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high‐level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a tool for sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID‐19 outbreak.

Implications for Practice

The Sarcoma European‐Latin American Network (SELNET) consensus on sarcoma prioritization care during the COVID‐19 era issued 125 pragmatical recommendations distributed as higher or lower priority to protect critical decisions on sarcoma care during the COVID‐19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary team from 11 countries reached consensus on 115 recommendations. The consensus was lower among lower‐priority recommendations, which shows reticence to postpone actions even in indolent tumors. The European Society for Medical Oncology‐Magnitude of Clinical Benefit scale was applied as support for prioritizing systemic treatment. Consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a practice tool for guidance in the decisions of sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID‐19 outbreak.

The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused deferral, modification, or cessation of treatment for patients with cancer. This article presents a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care.

Is nonanatomic rectal resection a valid therapeutic option for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors? A proposed decision algorithm

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The best surgical approach to rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still debated, and both nonanatomic rectal resection (NARR) and anatomic rectal resection (ARR) are applied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of NARR and ARR for rectal GISTs (R-GISTs).

METHODS

Through a large French multicentre retrospective study, 35 patients were treated for R-GIST between 2001 and 2013. Patients who underwent NARR and ARR were compared.

RESULTS

There were 23 (65.7%) patients in group ARR and 12 (34.3%) in group NARR. Significantly more patients in the group with ARR had a neoadjuvant treatment (86%) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (imatinib) compared to those with NARR (25%) (p < .01). The median preoperative tumor size was significantly different between the groups without and with neoadjuvant TKI: 30 ± 23 mm versus 64 ± 44.4 mm, respectively (p < .001). Overall postoperative morbidity was 20% (n = 7) (26% for ARR vs. 8% for NARR; p = .4). After a median follow-up of 60.2 (3.2-164.3) months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 79.5% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 54-100) for the NARR group and 68% (CI 95%: 46.4-89.7) for the ARR group (p = .697), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of NARR for small R-GIST's does not seem to impair the oncological prognosis.

Long-term survival outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and surgical intervention in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A 14-year, single-center experience

The long‐term effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including imatinib, and surgical intervention on advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were evaluated. All 379 patients had metastatic or recurrent GIST and started 400 mg/d imatinib at the Asan Medical Center in periods 1 and 2 [2001‐2007 (33.2%) and 2008‐2014 (66.8%), respectively]. Men constituted 60.4%; median patient age and tumor size at the initiation of imatinib were 58.6 (14.6‐85.5) years and 51 (0‐324) mm, respectively, without differences between periods except for older age and less preimatinib surgery in period 2. Response and disease control rates with imatinib in measurable GIST were 63.1% and 94.3%, respectively, without differences between periods. More patients in period 2 underwent surgical resection for TKI‐responsive diseases within the first 2 years (24.9%, P = 0.006). With a median follow‐up of 6.1 years (2.5‐16.0) in survivors, median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5.4 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0‐6.9]. Subsequent sunitinib (P = 0.066) and regorafenib (P = 0.003) were more commonly administered in period 2. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 years (95% CI, 7.8‐9.7). PFS with imatinib (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.019) were significantly longer in period 2. Young age, smaller tumor size at the initiation of imatinib, KIT exon 11 mutation, surgical intervention, and period 2 were favorable factors for PFS and OS. Patients with advanced GIST showed better prognosis with the optimal use of imatinib, along with active surgical intervention and more common use of subsequent TKIs in period 2.

Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib

INTRODUCTION

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was shown to be prognostic in several solid malignancies. There are limited data about predictive/prognostic value of NLR during targeted therapy of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The aim of this study was to asses a clinical value of this ratio in patients with advanced GIST.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2016, 385 patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST treated initially with imatinib were included in the analysis. In all patients, the NLR was assessed at the baseline, after 3 months of treatment, and upon disease progression (or last observation). The cutoff values for NLR were set at 2.7 and 5.4. Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimation with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) on imatinib treatment was 44.8 months, 5-year rate 43%; median overall survival (OS) 87.2 months, 10-year rate 36.3%. NLR >2.7 at baseline was significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS: median OS was 89.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.2-115) for NLR ratio ≤2.7 vs 59.4 months (95% CI 48.6-82) for NLR >2.7 (p < .001); median PFS was 59.4 vs 32.7 (p < .001), respectively. In multivariate model adjusted for mitotic index and driver mutation in the tumor (KIT exon 11 mutation versus other), NLR ratio was proven to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = .030). Among patients with disease progression, NLR >2.7 assessed at the third month of treatment was linked with significantly shorter median time to progression (7.5 vs 19 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the usefulness of NLR as a prognostic and predictive marker as well as a marker for treatment monitoring in patients with advanced GIST treated with imatinib.

Treatment outcomes in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the treatment results of advanced GIST in the largest, homogenous series of older patients.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2016, 686 patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST were treated initially with imatinib and 656 were included in the analysis. Subsequently 232 patients were treated with sunitinib after imatinib failure. We have analyzed the outcomes of patients who have been treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor at the age ≥ 70 years and compared to control group of patients younger than 70 years old.

RESULTS

In the group of patients treated with imatinib, 139 (21%) started therapy at the age of at least 70 years (median age of the entire cohort: 60). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st line imatinib did not differ between patients ≥70 yo (years old) and < 70yo (38.5 vs 44.9 months), but median overall survival (OS) was significantly better for younger patients (81 months vs. 50; p = 0.0001; although disease-specific survival - DSS was similar). Distribution of primary tumor mutational status was generally similar in older and younger patients. Permanent dose reduction (300-100 mg/day) was required for 23 patients (16.9%) in the older group and was significantly more frequent as compared to younger patients (5%). Drug-related adverse events were mainly of grades 1/2, but grade 3/4 toxicity occurred more frequently in older (14.7%) than in younger patients (3.8%). Similarly in group of patients treated with second-line sunitinib median PFS and DSS were comparable in groups of patients ≥70 yo (n = 55) and < 70yo (9.7 months vs 10.3 months; p = 0.7, and 21.5 vs 22.9 months). >40% of patients in both groups required dose adjustments to 37.5-25 mg daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that current therapy of advanced GIST with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (both in 1st and 2nd line) in older patients enable to achieve the similar disease control rate and final outcomes as in younger patients, but it demands close cooperation of experienced oncologist with patients for dose modifications and side effects management. Limitation of our study is that the patients did not undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment, what might be helpful for personalized management of patients. Nevertheless, we confirm that older patients with GIST should not receive less treatment irrespective of comorbidities.

The analysis of the long-term outcomes of sorafenib therapy in routine practice in imatinib and sunitinib resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Aim of the study

was to analyze the outcome of treatment and factors predicting results of sorafenib therapy in inoperable/metastatic CD117-positive GIST patients after failure on imatinib and sunitinib.

Material and methods

We identified 60 consecutive patients (40 men, 20 women) with advanced inoperable/metastatic GIST after failure on at least imatinib and sunitinib treated in one sarcoma center with sorafenib at initial dose 2 × 400 mg daily in 2007-2015 (in 56 cases it was 3^rd line therapy). Median follow-up time was 39 months.

Results

One year progression-free survival (PFS; calculated from the date of the start of sorafenib to disease progression) rate was 23% and median PFS = 7.7 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months calculated from sorafenib start (1-year OS rate = 57%) and 7 years from imatinib start. Three patients (5%) had objective partial responses to therapy, 31 patients (52%) had stabilization of disease > 4 months. Primary tumor mutational status was known in 43 cases (73%), but we have not identified the differences in PFS between tumors carrying different KIT/PDGFRA mutations. The most common adverse events were: diarrhoea, hand and foot syndrome, fatigue, loss of weight and skin reactions; grade 3-5 toxicity occurred in 35% of patients. 23 patients required sorafenib dose reductions due to AEs.

Conclusions

We confirmed that many advanced GIST patients benefit from sorafenib therapy after imatinib/sunitinib failure with OS > 1 year.

Prediction of long-term survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: analysis of a large, single-institution cohort

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with metastatic GIST become long-term survivors, and a more precise prediction of outcome could improve clinical decision-making.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One-hundred and thirty-three patients diagnosed with metastatic GIST from 1995 to 2013 were identified from the sarcoma database at Oslo University Hospital. Clinical data prospectively registered in the database were supplemented with retrospective review of medical records. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifteen patients with metastatic GIST were included in the final study cohort. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 years (95% CI 5.6-8.3). Factors associated with long-term survival in univariate analysis were good baseline performance status (ECOG ≤1; p < .001), young age (p = .022), oligometastatic disease (OMD) (≤3 metastases; p < .001), maximum tumor diameter <5 cm (p < .001), surgery for metastatic disease (p = .005), surgery of the primary tumor (p < .001), normal baseline hemoglobin level (p = .05), normal baseline albumin level (p = .001) and normal baseline neutrophil count (p = .03). On multivariate analysis, good performance status, small tumor diameter and, OMD were the factors associated with long-term survival. Five and 10-year OS for patients with OMD were 89% and 71%, respectively, compared to 38% and 20% for patients with polymetastatic disease (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution cohort of patients, OMD was as a strong prognostic factor in patients with metastatic GIST. Patients with OMD had an outcome similar to patients with high-risk localized disease, and should be regarded as a separate category among patients with metastatic GIST.

Combined Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Radical surgery is the mainstay of therapy for primary resectable, localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nevertheless, approximately 40% to 50% of patients with potentially curative resections develop recurrent or metastatic disease. The introduction of imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the therapy of advanced (inoperable and/or metastatic) GIST and has become the standard of care in treatment of patients with advanced GIST. This article discusses the proper selection of candidates for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced GIST, exploring the available evidence behind the combination of preoperative imatinib and surgery.

The safety of regorafenib for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

The management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) evolved due to effective molecularly targeted therapy with imatinib and sunitinib which are used first- and second-line, respectively. However, due to the development of resistance to those drugs in the majority of patients, the need for third-line therapy arose.

AREAS COVERED

Regorafenib, an oral multitargeted inhibitor with activity against multiple kinases including KIT, RET, RAF1, BRAF, angiogenesis (VEGFR, TIE-2) and those involved in tumor microenvironment (PDGFR and FGFR) was introduced after the successful Phase III GRID (GIST - Regorafenib In progressive Disease) clinical trial. This study showed significant improvement in progression-free survival for patients receiving regorafenib compared to placebo (4.8 months vs 0.9 months). The treatment was reasonably well tolerated, with arterial hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea being the most common grade ≥3 adverse events, which could be managed by dose reduction and supportive treatment. The aim of this paper is to describe, assess and advise on the safety of regorafenib as third-line therapy in GIST.

EXPERT OPINION

Regorafenib has demonstrated clinical benefit in GIST patients after progression on prior treatment with at least imatinib/sunitinib and currently it is the approved standard third-line option in therapy of advanced GIST. The safety profile is similar to other multikinase inhibitors with anti-VEGFR activity and is manageable.

The GOLD ReGISTry: a Global, Prospective, Observational Registry Collecting Longitudinal Data on Patients with Advanced and Localised Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal sarcomas. This global, prospective registry followed patients with advanced or localised GIST (2007-2011).

METHODS

Current and evolving diagnostics, treatments and outcome measures in patients with GIST were assessed. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced or localised GIST within 15months of registry entry. No treatment plan was prescribed, and no visit schedule was mandated. Treating physicians recorded patient information, including tumour response, diagnostic methods, medications, surgeries performed, mutation status and adverse events leading to dose/medication changes. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Other data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The registry included 1663 patients (advanced GIST, n=1095; localised GIST, n=537). Medications (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitor use and dosing), disease progression or recurrence and physician assessment of response to treatment in registry patients were consistent with controlled trials and prevailing clinical recommendations. In advanced GIST, estimated 30-month progression-free survival (PFS) (59.8%) and overall survival (OS) (82.7%) were higher than results from previously reported trials (≈40% and ≈70%, respectively). Consistent with treatment guidelines, the most common initial treatments were imatinib for advanced GIST, and complete surgical resection for localised GIST. Computed tomography scans were the most common imaging technique used at diagnosis and follow-up. Mutation analysis was performed at diagnosis in only 15.3% and 14.5% of patients with advanced and localised GIST, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world GIST registry, patients with advanced GIST were treated with imatinib and patients with localised GIST received surgical resection, in accordance with prevailing clinical recommendations.

Expression of CD117, DOG-1, and IGF-1R in gastrointestinal stromal tumours - an analysis of 70 cases from 2004 to 2010

Introduction

Determination of the type of mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) plays a major role in assessing the risk of progression of the disease, and also allows determination of the clinical management and treatment. More accurate GIST diagnosis is possible by using simultaneously various types of antibodies to immunohistochemistry methods in routine procedures.

Aim

To evaluate the expression of CD117, DOG-1, and IGF-1R in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours, and analysis of the impact of the examined protein expression on patient survival with emphasis on specific recognition and prognostication of these tumours.

Material and methods

The protein expression was analyzed in 70 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, using the immunohistochemical method.

Results

Positive expression of CD117, DOG-1, and IGF1R included 95.71%, 88.57% and 11.43% of study GISTs, respectively. Statistical analysis showed positive significant correlation between DOG-1 expression and histological type of tumour (p = 0.024). Analysis of overall survival curves of 70 GIST patients according to expression of CD117, DOG-1, and IGF1R did not show a tendency towards longer survival of patients with positive expression (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Predictive factors determining the survival time of patients are strongly associated with morphological features of tumours. A thorough analysis of each case plays a key role in predicting survival time of patients and may be a clue in targeting the therapeutic procedure.