Expression of gremlin1 in gastric cancer and its clinical significance

Gremlin1: a BMP antagonist with therapeutic potential in Oncology

Gremlins, originating from early 20th-century Western folklore, are mythical creatures known for causing mechanical malfunctions and electronic failures, aptly dubbed "little devils". Analogously, GREM1 acts like a horde of these mischievous entities by antagonizing the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP signaling) pathway or through other non-BMP dependent mechanisms (such as binding to Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) contributing to the malignant progression of various cancers. The overexpression of GREM1 promotes tumor cell growth and survival, enhances angiogenesis within the tumor microenvironment, and creates favorable conditions for tumor development and dissemination. Consequently, inhibiting the activity of GREM1 or blocking its interaction with BMP presents a promising strategy for suppressing tumor growth and metastasis. However, the role of GREM1 in cancer remains a subject of debate, with evidence suggesting both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions. Currently, several pharmaceutical companies are researching the GREM1 target, with some advancing to Phase I/II clinical trials. This article will provide a detailed overview of the GREM1 target and explore its potential role in cancer therapy.

Quantification of Gremlin 1 throughout the tumor stroma using whole slide imaging and its clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer

Gremlin 1 (GREM1) is an antagonist of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). GREM1 is expressed in the stromal cells of various carcinomas and promotes tumor progression by suppressing BMP signaling. We designed this study to establish an evaluation strategy for GREM1 expression, focusing on the tumor stroma, and to examine its clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer (GC) progression. We employed RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) to evaluate the prognostic value of GREM1 expression in a cohort of 104 surgically resected GC cases and assessed ISH scores according to previous reports. GREM1 expression was observed in tumor stromal cells, including fibroblasts. We defined GREM1-positive cells as those expressing ISH score ≥ 3 and quantified the number of GREM1-positive cells using image analysis software. We examined the relationship between the number of GREM1-positive cells in the tumor stroma and clinicopathological features. The number of GREM1-positive cells per tumor stroma ranged from 0 to 714.7 cells/mm2 (median, 1.65 cells/mm2). We divided the 104 GC cases into GREM1-High and GREM1-Low expression groups based on the abovementioned median value. GREM1-High expression group was significantly associated with a more advanced pT grade, pN grade, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly poorer survival in the GREM1-High expression group than in the GREM1-Low expression group. These results indicated that GREM1 expression in GC is localized in tumor stromal cells, and that high GREM1 expression in the tumor stroma could be a poor prognostic factor.

Resveratrol induces the growth inhibition of CDX-deficient gastric cancer cells using CDX2 and RUNX3 via the β-catenin/TCF4 signaling pathway

This study aimed to determine the expression levels of runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) and caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) in patients with chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and gastric cancer (GC). To analyze the overexpression of CDX2 and the effects of resveratrol (Res) on MKN7 and TMK1 cells, immunohistochemical staining was performed to determine the protein expression levels in tissue samples. The biological activity of MKN7 and TMK1 cells was determined. Relative mRNA and protein expression levels were also determined. RUNX3 expression was positively correlated with CDX2 expression and negatively correlated with β-catenin and transcription factor 4 (TCF-4) levels in GC tissues. Interestingly, RUNX3 expression was negatively correlated with CDX2 expression in other tissues. CDX2 overexpression or Res treatment inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while inducing cell apoptosis. Furthermore, RUNX3 and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)-associated X protein (Bax) expression levels were increased, while those of of β-catenin, TCF-4, and Bcl-2 were decreased in the CDX2 group. Upon treatment with lithium chloride (LiCl), the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CDX2-overexpressing MKN7 and TMK1 cells were enhanced. Our results indicate that Res inhibits the growth of MKN7 and TMK1 cells by increasing RUNX3 and CDX2 expression levels, with the potential involvement of the β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling pathway.

Gremlin-1 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Metastasis by Activating ATF6 and Inhibiting ATF4 Pathways

Cancer cell survival, function and fate strongly depend on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proteostasis. Although previous studies have implicated the ER stress signaling network in all stages of cancer development, its role in cancer metastasis remains to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of Gremlin-1 (GREM1), a secreted protein, in the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells in vitro and in vivo. Firstly, public datasets showed a positive correlation between high expression of GREM1 and a poor prognosis for CRC. Secondly, GREM1 enhanced motility and invasion of CRC cells by epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Thirdly, GREM1 upregulated expression of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and downregulated that of ATF4, and modulation of the two key players of the unfolded protein response (UPR) was possibly through activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and antagonization of BMP2 signaling pathways, respectively. Taken together, our results demonstrate that GREM1 is an invasion-promoting factor via regulation of ATF6 and ATF4 expression in CRC cells, suggesting GREM1 may be a potential pharmacological target for colorectal cancer treatment.

Insights into the Role of Gremlin-1, a Bone Morphogenic Protein Antagonist, in Cancer Initiation and Progression

The bone morphogenic protein (BMP) antagonist Gremlin-1 is a biologically significant regulator known for its crucial role in tissue differentiation and embryonic development. Nevertheless, it has been reported that Gremlin-1 can exhibit its function through BMP dependent and independent pathways. Gremlin-1 has also been reported to be involved in organ fibrosis, which has been correlated to the development of other diseases, such as renal inflammation and diabetic nephropathy. Based on growing evidence, Gremlin-1 has recently been implicated in the initiation and progression of different types of cancers. Further, it contributes to the stemness state of cancer cells. Herein, we explore the recent findings on the role of Gremlin-1 in various cancer types, including breast, cervical, colorectal, and gastric cancers, as well as glioblastomas. Additionally, we highlighted the impact of Gremlin-1 on cellular processes and signaling pathways involved in carcinogenesis. Therefore, it was suggested that Gremlin-1 might be a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in cancers.

Proteomic Signatures of Diffuse and Intestinal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of death from cancer globally. Gastric cancer is classified into intestinal, diffuse and indeterminate subtypes based on histology according to the Laurén classification. The intestinal and diffuse subtypes, although different in histology, demographics and outcomes, are still treated in the same fashion. This study was designed to discover proteomic signatures of diffuse and intestinal subtypes. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using tandem mass tags (TMT)-based multiplexed analysis was used to identify proteins in tumor tissues from patients with diffuse or intestinal gastric cancer with adjacent normal tissue control. A total of 7448 or 4846 proteins were identified from intestinal or diffuse subtype, respectively. This quantitative mass spectrometric analysis defined a proteomic signature of differential expression across the two subtypes, which included gremlin1 (GREM1), bcl-2-associated athanogene 2 (BAG2), olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4), thyroid hormone receptor interacting protein 6 (TRIP6) and melanoma-associated antigen 9 (MAGE-A9) proteins. Although GREM1, BAG2, OLFM4, TRIP6 and MAGE-A9 have all been previously implicated in tumor progression and metastasis, they have not been linked to intestinal or diffuse subtypes of gastric cancer. Using immunohistochemical labelling of a tissue microarray comprising of 124 cases of gastric cancer, we validated the proteomic signature obtained by mass spectrometry in the discovery cohort. Our findings should help investigate the pathogenesis of these gastric cancer subtypes and potentially lead to strategies for early diagnosis and treatment.

Expression of the Serrated Markers Annexin A10 or Gremlin1 in Colonic Adenocarcinomas: Morphology and Prognostic Values

Describe clinical, histological and molecular charatcteristics and prognosis values of the serrated candidate markers AnnexinA10 and Gremlin1 in colon adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemical expression of AnnexinA10 and Gremlin1 was evaluated on 346 colonic adenocarcinomas. Clinicopathological, molecular features and prognostic characteristics were then evaluated. A total of 40 colonic adenocarcinomas expressed AnnexinA10 (11.6%) and, 115 expressed Gremlin1 (40.4%). AnnexinA10 expression was significantly associated, on univariate analyses, with female gender (p = 0.03), right tumor location (p < 0.001), differentiation grade 3 (p < 0.001), serrated adenocarcinoma subtype (p < 0.001), serrated (p < 0.001), medullary (p = 0.005), and mucinous component (p = 0.004), cytoplasmic eosinophilia (p < 0.001), discernible nuclei (p = 0.001), preserved polarity (p < 0.001), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.01), BRAFV600E mutation (p < 0.001), MSI-H status (p < 0.001) and CIMP-H status (p = 0.019). Multivariate analyses revealed that mucinous component (p = 0.002), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.02) and BRAFV600E mutation (p < 0.001) were independently associated with AnnexinA10 expression. In addition, AnnexinA10 was an indicator of poorer overall survival (OS) in UICC stage IV adenocarcinomas (p = 0.01) only. Gremlin1 expression was neither associated with serrated adenocarcinoma subtype (p = 0.51) nor with AnnexinA10 expression (p = 0,31), but was significantly associated, in univariate analysis with male gender (p = 0.002), younger age (p = 0.002), left tumor location (p = 0.04), and MSS status (p = 0.03). Gremlin1 expression was associated with better OS only in UICC stage III colon adenocarcinomas (p = 0.006). Colon adenocarcinomas expressing AnnexinA10 have distinct clinico-pathological and molecular features. AnnexinA10 expression is an indicator of poorer OS in UICC stage IV patients. Gremlin1 expression is not associated with serrated adenocarcinomas subtype. Its expression was associated with better OS in UICC Stage III patients.

Increased Expression of Gremlin1 Promotes Proliferation and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Gastric Cancer Cells and Correlates With Poor Prognosis of Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Gremlin1 (GREM1) plays an important role in certain malignancies by antagonising bone morphogenetic proteins and regulating angiogenesis directly/indirectly. The present study aimed to investigate the role of Gremlin1 in the development and progression of gastric cancer (GC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Expression of GREM1 in GCs was examined using quantitative real time PCR and The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) data. Influence on cellular functions was determined in both Gremlin1 knockdown and overexpression cell line models.

RESULTS

GREM1 expression was up-regulated in GCs, which was correlated with poorer survival. Increased GREM1 expression was significantly correlated with tumour growth/invasion and lymphatic metastasis. Gremlin1 promoted proliferation and tumourigenic capacity of GC cells in vitro. GREM1 expression was associated with epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in GC.

CONCLUSION

Increased GREM1 expression in GCs is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis in which EMT, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are likely involved.

GREM2 maintains stem cell-like phenotypes in gastric cancer cells by regulating the JNK signaling pathway

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the major malignancies worldwide. This study was conducted to explore the mechanism by which GREM2 maintains biological properties of GC stem cells (GCSCs), and proved that GREM2 could potentially regulate the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, migration and tumorigenic ability of GCSCs through the regulation of the JNK signaling pathway. In silico analysis was utilized to retrieve expression microarray related to GC, and differential analysis was conducted. The cell line with the highest GREM2 expression was overexpressed with GREM2 mimic, silencing GREM2 by siRNA, or treated with activator or inhibitor of the JNK signaling pathway. Subsequently, expression of GREM2, JNK signaling pathway-, apoptosis- or migration and invasion-associated factors were determined. Proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis of GCSCs in vitro and tumorigenic ability and lymph node metastasis of GCSCs in vivo were determined. Based on the in silico analysis of GSE49051, GREM2 was determined to be overexpressed in GC and its expression was the highest in the MKN-45 cell line, which was selected for the subsequent experiments. Silencing of GREM2 or inhibition of the JNK signaling pathway suppressed the proliferation, migration and invasion, while promoting apoptosis of GCSCs in vitro as well as inhibiting tumorigenesis and lymph node metastasis in vivo. In conclusion, the aforementioned findings suggest that the silencing of GREM2 suppresses the activation of the JNK signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting tumor progression. Therefore, GREM2-mediated JNK signaling pathway was expected to be a new therapeutic strategy for GC.

Hernia and Cancer: The Points Where the Roads Intersect

Introduction: This review aimed to present common points, intersections, and potential interactions or mutual effects for hernia and cancer. Besides direct relationships, indirect connections, and possible involvements were searched. Materials and Methods: A literature search of PubMed database was performed in July 2018 as well as a search of relevant journals and reference lists. The total number of screened articles was 1,422. Some articles were found in multiple different searches. A last PubMed search was performed during manuscript writing in December 2018 to update the knowledge. Eventually 427 articles with full text were evaluated, and 264 included, in this review. Results: There is no real evidence for a possible common etiology for abdominal wall hernias and any cancer type. The two different diseases had been found to have some common points in the studies on genes, integrins, and biomarkers, however, to date no meaningful relationship has been identified between these points. There is also some, albeit rather conflicting, evidence for inguinal hernia being a possible risk factor for testicular cancer. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapeutic modalities like chemotherapy and radiotherapy may cause postoperative herniation with their adverse effects on tissue repair. Certain specific substances like bevacizumab may cause more serious complications and interfere with hernia repair. There are only two articles in PubMed directly related to the topic of "hernia and cancer." In one of these the authors claimed that there was no association between cancer development and hernia repair with mesh. The other article reported two cases of squamous-cell carcinoma developed secondary to longstanding mesh infections. Conclusion: As expected, the relationship between abdominal wall hernias and cancer is weak. Hernia repair with mesh does not cause cancer, there is only one case report on cancer development following a longstanding prosthetic material infections. However, there are some intersection points between these two disease groups which are worthy of research in the future.