AMPA Receptor Expression Requirement During Long-Term Memory Retrieval and Its Association with mTORC1 Signaling

DREADD-mediated inhibition of anterior retrosplenial cortex: Effects on novelty recognition of objects, locations, and object-in-place associations in male and female Long Evans rats

Previous research suggests ionotropic glutamate receptors in anterior retrosplenial cortex (aRSC) are important for short-term (1-hour) object-in-place (OiP) novelty recognition, indicated by enhanced interaction with novel object-location pairs during OiP test phases. Here, male and female rats were repeatedly tested in three 1-hour delay novelty recognition tests: object recognition (OR), object location (OL), and OiP. Prior to behavioral testing, control (AAV5-CaMKIIα-mCherry) or active (AAV5-CaMKIIα-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry) viral vectors were bilaterally infused into the aRSC of male (8 control, 13 active) and female (8 control, 13 active) Long Evans rats, enabling selective inhibition of aRSC neurons with the hM4D agonist Compound 21 (C-21). Following recovery from surgery, rats were repeatedly tested in recognition tests following injection of either saline or C-21 (1.0 mg/kg; i.p.) ∼45-min prior to test phases (6 tests/rat). Analyses of exploration times indicated that total object interaction times did not differ between phase, sex, or treatment. Further analyses revealed that C-21 treatment of rats infused with the active vector reduced novelty recognition in the OR test yet had no influence in the OL test, regardless of sex. Interestingly, C-21 also reduced novelty recognition in OiP recognition test phases, an effect only observed in male rats infused with the active vector. Findings highlight a nuanced influence of aRSC neurons in supporting novelty recognition which varies by sex and type of stimuli assayed.

Time-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics of Contextual Fear Memory Retrieval Reveals the Function of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 9 in Reconsolidation

Numerous studies on the formation and consolidation of memory have shown that memory processes are characterized by phase-dependent and dynamic regulation. Memory retrieval, as the only representation of memory content and an active form of memory processing that induces memory reconsolidation, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although the molecular mechanisms specific to memory retrieval-induced reconsolidation have been gradually revealed, an understanding of the time-dependent regulatory mechanisms of this process is still lacking. In this study, we applied a transcriptome analysis of memory retrieval at different time points in the recent memory stage. Differential expression analysis and Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) depicting temporal gene expression patterns indicated that most differential gene expression occurred at 48 h, and the STEM cluster showing the greatest transcriptional upregulation at 48 h demonstrated the most significant difference. We then screened the differentially-expressed genes associated with that met the expression patterns of those cluster-identified genes that have been reported to be involved in learning and memory processes in addition to dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9). Further quantitative polymerase chain reaction verification and pharmacological intervention suggested that DPP9 is involved in 48-h fear memory retrieval and viral vector-mediated overexpression of DPP9 countered the 48-h retrieval-induced attenuation of fear memory. Taken together, our findings suggest that temporal gene expression patterns are induced by recent memory retrieval and provide hitherto undocumented evidence of the role of DPP9 in the retrieval-induced reconsolidation of fear memory.

Arc and BDNF mediated effects of hippocampal astrocytic glutamate uptake blockade on spatial memory stages

Glutamate is involved in fundamental functions, including neuronal plasticity and memory. Astrocytes are integral elements involved in synaptic function, and the GLT-1 transporter possesses a critical role in glutamate uptake. Here, we study the role of GLT-1, specifically located in astrocytes, in the consolidation, expression, reconsolidation and persistence of spatial object recognition memory in rats. Administration of dihydrokainic acid (DHK), a selective GLT-1 inhibitor, into the dorsal hippocampus around a weak training which only induces short-term memory, promotes long-term memory formation. This promotion is prevented by hippocampal administration of protein-synthesis translation inhibitor, blockade of Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc) translation or Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) action, which are plasticity related proteins necessary for memory consolidation. However, DHK around a strong training, which induces long-term memory, does not affect memory consolidation. Administration of DHK before the test session impairs the expression of long-term memory, and this effect is dependent of Arc translation. Furthermore, DHK impairs reconsolidation if applied before a reactivation session, and this effect is independent of Arc translation. These findings reveal specific consequences on spatial memory stages developed under hippocampal GLT-1 blockade, shedding light on the intricate molecular mechanisms, governed in part for the action of glia.

The anterior retrosplenial cortex is required for short-term object in place recognition memory retrieval: Role of ionotropic glutamate receptors in male and female Long-Evans rats

The anterior retrosplenial cortex (aRSC) integrates multimodal sensory information into cohesive associative recognition memories. Little is known about how information is integrated during different learning phases (i.e., encoding and retrieval). Additionally, sex differences are observed in performance of some visuospatial memory tasks; however, inconsistent findings warrant more research. We conducted three experiments using the 1-h delay object-in-place (1-h OiP) test to assess recognition memory retrieval in male and female Long-Evans rats. (i) We found both sexes performed equally in three repeated 1-h OiP test sessions. (ii) We showed infusions of a mixture of muscimol/baclofen (GABAA/B receptor agonists) into the aRSC ~15-min prior to the test phase disrupted 1-h OiP in both sexes. (iii) We assessed the role of aRSC ionotropic glutamate receptors in 1-h OiP retrieval using another squad of cannulated rats and confirmed that infusions of either the competitive AMPA/Kainate receptor antagonist CNQX (3 mM) or competitive NMDA receptor antagonist AP-5 (30 mM) (volumes = 0.50 uL/side) significantly impaired 1-h OiP retrieval in both sexes compared to controls. Taken together, findings challenge reported sex differences and clearly establish a role for aRSC ionotropic glutamate receptors in short-term visuospatial recognition memory retrieval. Thus, modulating neural activity in the aRSC may alleviate some memory processing impairments in related disorders.

α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in memory processing

Information storage in the brain involves different memory types and stages that are processed by several brain regions. Cholinergic pathways through acetylcholine receptors actively participate on memory modulation, and their disfunction is associated with cognitive decline in several neurological disorders. During the last decade, the role of α7 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in different memory stages has been studied. However, the information about their role in memory processing is still scarce. In this review, we attempt to identify brain areas where α7 nicotinic receptors have an essential role in different memory types and stages. In addition, we discuss recent work implicating-or not-α7 nicotinic receptors as promising pharmacological targets for memory impairment associated with neurological disorders.

Persistence of spatial memory induced by spaced training involves a behavioral-tagging process

Spaced training, which involves long inter-trial intervals, has positive effects on memories. One of the main attributes of long-term memories (LTM) is persistence. Here, to identify the process that promotes LTM persistence by spaced learning, we used the spatial object recognition (SOR) task. The protocol consisted of a first strong training session that induced LTM formation (tested 1 day after training), but not LTM persistence (tested 7 or 14 days after training); and a second weak training session that promoted memory persistence when applied 1 day, but not 7 days, after the first training. We propose that the promotion of memory persistence is based on the Behavioral Tagging (BT) mechanism operating when the memory trace is retrieved. BT involves the setting of a tag induced by learning which gives rise to input selectivity, and the use of plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) to establish the mnemonic trace. We postulate that retraining will mainly retag the sites initially activated by the original learning, where the PRPs needed for memory expression and/or induced by retrieval would be used to maintain a persistent mnemonic trace. Our results suggest that the mechanism of memory expression, but not those of memory reinforcement or reconsolidation, is necessary to promote memory persistence after retraining. The molecular mechanisms involve ERKs1/2 activity to set the SOR learning tag, and the availability of GluA2-containing AMPA receptor. In conclusion, both the synthesis of PRPs and the setting of a learning tag are key processes triggered by retraining that allow SOR memory persistence.

The role of hippocampus in memory reactivation: an implication for a therapeutic target against opioid use disorder

Purpose of the review

The abuse of opioids induces many terrible problems in human health and social stability. For opioid-dependent individuals, withdrawal memory can be reactivated by context, which is then associated with extremely unpleasant physical and emotional feelings during opioid withdrawal. The reactivation of withdrawal memory is considered one of the most important reasons for opioid relapse, and it also allows for memory modulation based on the reconsolidation phenomenon. However, studies exploring withdrawal memory modulation during the reconsolidation window are lacking. By summarizing the previous findings about the reactivation of negative emotional memories, we are going to suggest potential neural regions and systems for modulating opioid withdrawal memory.

Recent findings

Here, we first present the role of memory reactivation in its modification, discuss how the hippocampus participates in memory reactivation, and discuss the importance of noradrenergic signaling in the hippocampus for memory reactivation. Then, we review the engagement of other limbic regions receiving noradrenergic signaling in memory reactivation. We suggest that noradrenergic signaling targeting hippocampus neurons might play a potential role in strengthening the disruptive effect of withdrawal memory extinction by facilitating the degree of memory reactivation.

Summary

This review will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying reactivation-dependent memory malleability and will provide new therapeutic avenues for treating opioid use disorders.

AMPA Receptors: A Key Piece in the Puzzle of Memory Retrieval

Retrieval constitutes a highly regulated and dynamic phase in memory processing. Its rapid temporal scales require a coordinated molecular chain of events at the synaptic level that support transient memory trace reactivation. AMPA receptors (AMPAR) drive the majority of excitatory transmission in the brain and its dynamic features match the singular fast timescales of memory retrieval. Here we provide a review on AMPAR contribution to memory retrieval regarding its dynamic movements along the synaptic compartments, its changes in receptor number and subunit composition that take place in activity dependent processes associated with retrieval. We highlight on the differential regulations exerted by AMPAR subunits in plasticity processes and its impact on memory recall.