A comparison of microdebrider assisted endoscopic sinus surgery and conventional endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polypi

Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study

Objective

The microdebrider is a powered surgical instrument that is widely used in the field of otolaryngology. We aim to identify the type and frequency of device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to the use of microdebriders.

Study Design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2011 to 2021 Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Methods

The MAUDE database was queried for reports of "microdebrider," with adverse events selected that pertained to usage in head and neck surgeries from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021.

Results

There were 282 adverse events in 267 individual medical device reports (MDR). Although the majority of the reports did not specify the specific operation, endoscopic sinus surgery was the most common reported procedure (89, 33.3%). The most common cause of device malfunction was due to a broken piece (120, 48.2%) followed by overheating of the microdebrider motor (78, 31.3%). Of the reports which specified patient injury, the most commonly reported was "unintentional tissue damage," (10, 32.3%).

Conclusion

The microdebrider has demonstrated utility within the field of otolaryngology, but is not without risk of malfunction that can cause patient injury. By understanding possible risks of microdebrider usage, including tissue damage, burns, and bleeds caused by device malfunction or operator error, physicians can be better prepared to address complications and educate patients.

Surgical and Nonsurgical Lines of Treatment of Reinke's Edema: A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of different surgical and nonsurgical lines of treatment of Reinke's edema to identify the effectiveness and the guidelines described to use each of them.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Coherence for randomized controlled trials and case reports studies did on adult humans aged from 18 to 80 years, from January 1997 to December 2018. We included studies that treated patients with Reinke's edema by one and/or combinations of the following interventions: cold steel microlaryngeal phonosurgery, microdebrider, CO₂ laser, photoangiolytic laser, voice therapy, Steroid and Hyaluronidase injection. We selected studies that assessed patients pre- and post-treatment by at least one of the following measures: subjective assessment of the patient's voice by the voice handicap index, perceptual analysis of the voice by GRBAS scale, video laryngeoscopic examination of the VFs and the lesion, aerodynamic measures, and acoustic analysis of the voice by the computerized speech lab. We assessed quality of the included studies with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment Tool.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, research yielded 262 studies. Of 217 abstracts and titles, 36 full-text articles were read, and one study was added through hand search, resulting in 10 included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of literature analyzed were deficient to address the effectiveness of any of the six lines included in this study. This is mainly due to the small number of the included articles and the small sample size in most of these studies. We found only 10 articles that reported the effectiveness based on comparing the results of before and after treatment. In addition, the variability of outcome measures used and the lack of the comprehensive assessment of the patient's voice, vocal image in most of the included studies made it hard to us to compare the results of any of the included studies. More researches with larger sample size and accurate randomization are needed for further accurate assessment of the effectiveness of the surgical and nonsurgical lines of treatment of Reinke's edema. The future researches should take in their consideration the use of an agreed comprehensive assessment protocol for assessing and comparing the outcome measures before and after treatment.

Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis

Therapeutic decisions in otorhinolaryngology are based on clinical experience, surgical skills, and scientific evidence. Recently, evidence-based therapies have gained increased attention and importance due to their potential to improve the individual patient's treatment and their potential at the same time to reduce treatment costs. In clinical practice, it is almost impossible to stay ahead of the increasing mass of literature and on the other hand critically assess the presented data. A solid scientific and statistical knowledge as well as a significant amount of spare time are required to detect systematic bias and other errors in study designs, also with respect to assessing whether or not a study should be part of an individual therapeutic decision. Meta-analyses, reviews, and clinical guidelines are, therefore, of increasing importance for evidence-based therapy in clinical practice. This review is an update of the availability of external evidence for the treatment of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis. It becomes evident that both groups of diseases differ significantly in the availability of external evidence. Furthermore, it becomes obvious that surgical treatment options are normally based on evidence of significantly lower quality than medical treatment options.

Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.