Post Parotidectomy Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Parotid Neoplasm: A Prospective Study

Readability and quality of online patient health information on parotidectomy

OBJECTIVE

Complications of parotidectomy can have a massive impact on patients' quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the readability and quality of online health information on parotidectomy.

METHOD

The search terms 'parotidectomy', 'parotid surgery', 'parotidectomy patient information' and 'parotid surgery patient information' were parsed through three popular search engines.

RESULTS

The websites were analysed using readability scores of the Flesch Reading Ease test and the Gunning Fog Index. The DISCERN instrument was used to assess quality and reliability. The average Flesch Reading Ease score was 50.2 ± 9.0, indicating that the materials were fairly difficult to read, the Gunning Fog Index score showed that the patient health information was suitable for an individual above 12th grade level, and the DISCERN score indicated that the online patient health information had fair quality. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in Flesch Reading Ease and DISCERN tool scores according to website category (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Current online patient health information on parotidectomy is too difficult for the public to understand, and it exceeds the reading levels recommended by Health Education England and the American Medical Association.

Impact of great auricular nerve sacrifice on sensory disturbance after parotidectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between great auricular nerve (GAN) sacrifice during parotidectomy and postoperative sensory disturbance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent parotidectomy between November 2016 and May 2020 at a single academic institution were included in this retrospective chart review. Operative notes were reviewed to determine incidence of GAN sacrifice. Prevalence of patient-reported sensory complaints in the GAN distribution and time to spontaneous resolution of symptoms were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 305 parotidectomy patients, 111 (36.4%) endorsed complaints of postoperative sensory disturbances in the GAN distribution typically characterized by numbness or shooting pains. GAN sacrifice was present in 9 (8.1%) of 111 patients who experienced sensory disturbances compared to 9 (4.6%) who reported no sensory disturbances (p > 0.05). Twenty-five patients (32.5%) experienced spontaneous resolution of symptoms at their most recent follow-up at a mean of 6.2 months after onset of symptoms. Of those that experienced a sensory disturbance, GAN preservation was not significantly associated with likelihood of spontaneous recovery (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the largest series to date of post-operative sensory disturbance in parotidectomy patients as it relates to intraoperative GAN sacrifice. Although the relationship between GAN sacrifice and the incidence of postoperative sensory disturbance and its subsequent resolution were not significant, we continue to advocate for GAN preservation to reduce incidence of postoperative sensory disturbances.

A prospective study of patient-reported xerostomia-related outcomes after parotidectomy

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of data on patient-reported outcome measures regarding xerostomia after parotidectomy surgery. Although salivary flow rates after parotidectomy have been previously studied, they do not correlate with subjective xerostomia. This study was designed to evaluate if unilateral parotidectomy increases patient-reported xerostomia.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients undergoing unilateral partial, superficial, or total parotidectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pathology without postoperative radiation at a tertiary care academic center was studied. We analyzed patient-reported outcome measures of xerostomia using the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) preoperatively and postoperatively. We compared pre- and postoperative cumulative and individual XQ scores using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. We stratified patients by the weight in grams (g) of the parotid tissue excised, pathology, smoking status, and xerostomia-related medication use.

RESULTS

Twenty-two adults with benign or low grade malignant unilateral parotid tumors were included. Postoperative questionnaires were completed at a median of 10.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.6-11.9) after unilateral parotidectomy. Mean preoperative and postoperative cumulative XQ scores, on a 100-point scale, with higher scores representing worse symptoms, were 10.33 (95% CI: 4.46-16.20) and 10.54 (95% CI: 5.10-15.98), respectively, with a mean change of +0.21 (p = 0.472). There were no statistically significant changes in individual XQ symptom scores. Neither type of parotidectomy, resection specimens weighing over 10 g, smoking habits, xerostomia-related medication use, nor malignant pathology were associated with worse symptom scores.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, unilateral parotidectomy does not appear to definitely, or at least consistently, increase xerostomia per patient reporting. More extensive parotid resections are not associated with worse symptom scores. These data can help guide preoperative counseling and postoperative expectations for parotidectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b.

Real impact of surgical robotic system for precision surgery of parotidectomy: retroauricular parotidectomy using da Vinci surgical system

Background

We performed robotic parotidectomy with or without robotic neck dissection via a retroauricular approach in patients with parotid benign and malignant tumors and analyzed treatment outcomes of the patients to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic parotidectomy.

Methods

Between January 2017 and July 2018, 53 patients received robotic parotidectomy with/without robotic neck dissection through a remote access retroauricular incision without a preauricular incision.

Results

All operations were successfully performed in all patients without significant perioperative complications or tumor spillage. Tumors were located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland in 40 patients, and the remaining 13 tumors were located in the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Postoperative pathologic examination revealed benign tumor in 32 patients and malignant tumors in 18 patients. The mean operation time was 226 minutes in patients who underwent only parotidectomy and 375 minutes in patients who underwent parotidectomy with robotic neck dissection. The average amount of bleeding was 23 mL, and the amount of drainage after operation averaged 171 mL. The average length of hospital stay was 6 days. Postoperative complications were limited to transient facial paralysis in three patients, all of which resolved within 1 month. All patients were satisfied with their cosmetic results at 6 months after operation.

Conclusions

Robotic parotidectomy with/without robotic neck dissection through a retroauricular approach was a feasible and safe technique in patients with parotid benign and malignant tumor. Specifically, we found it to be helpful in young patients with malignant parotid tumors who should receive cervical lymphadenectomy and parotidectomy, because it does not leave a visible scar on the face or neck. In the future, long-term follow-up will be necessary to validate its oncologic safety and functional outcomes.