Comparison of hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen in predicting liver histology in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

Quantitative HBcrAg and HBcAb versus HBsAg and HBV DNA in predicting liver fibrosis levels of chronic hepatitis B patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the quantitative markers of hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and anti-hepatitis B core antigen antibodies HbcAb versus hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) in predicting liver fibrosis levels in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 245 HBeAg-negative patients were enrolled. With reference to the Scheuer standard, stage 2 or higher and stage 4 liver disease were defined as significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the HBV markers investigated.

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of HBcrAg in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients (0.577 and 0.700) were both close to those of HBsAg (0.617 and 0.762) (both P> 0.05). In HBeAg-negative patients (0.797 and 0.837), they were both significantly greater than those of HBV DNA (0.723 and 0.738) (P=0.0090 and P=0.0079). The AUCs of HBcAb in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients (0.640 and 0.665) were both close to those of HBsAg. In HBeAg-negative patients (0.570 and 0.621), they were both significantly less than those of HBcrAg (P <0.0001 and P=0.0001). Specificity in predicting significant fibrosis and sensitivity in predicting cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients, using a single cut-off of HBsAg ≤5,000 IU/ml, were 76.5% and 72.7%, respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, using a single cut-off of HBcrAg>80kU/ml, they were 85.9% and 81.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg has good performance in predicting liver fibrosis levels in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, and HBcrAg has very good performance in predicting liver fibrosis levels in HBeAg-negative patients.

Role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen levels in predicting liver biopsy time in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients

Aim of the study

The quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) level indicates the amount of transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and integrated DNA in hepatocytes which plays a role in development of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and may help decide whether the treatment is necessary or not. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between serum qHBsAg levels and viral replication and stage of liver fibrosis in treatment-naive CHB patients and to determine the role of qHBsAg levels in predicting when liver biopsy is necessary.

Material and methods

967 patients were included in the study. Because of refusal of liver biopsy the study was conducted on 123 patients. The association between qHBsAg levels with HBV DNA, a-fetoprotein, fibrosis stage and histology activity index was evaluated.

Results

Of the patients, mean age was 48 ±11.2 years and 56.1% were male. We found that patients with HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/ml had a higher qHBsAg titer in comparison with HBV DNA < 2000 IU/ml. However, there was no relationship between qHBsAg titer and liver necroinflammation or fibrosis stage.

Conclusions

Monitoring of qHBsAg together with HBV DNA may be helpful in CHB management. However, qHBsAg level does not provide knowledge about the timing of biopsy or the decision of CHB treatment.

A Noninvasive Score to Predict Liver Fibrosis in HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B Patients with Normal or Minimally Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

Noninvasive fibrosis tests are highly needed but have not been well studied in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or minimally elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. This study is aimed at developing a noninvasive score system to predict liver fibrosis in these patients. HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with ALT levels of <80 IU/l and liver histology (n = 290) were assigned to training (n = 203) or validation (n = 87) groups. Training group patients were divided into nonsignificant (F0-1) and significant fibrosis (F2-4) according to METAVIR stages. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors for liver fibrosis and develop a score system. The capacity of the score to identify the severity of fibrosis was displayed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under ROC (AUROC) values. Multivariate logistic regression showed that HBeAg (ratios of the sample to the cutoff values (S/CO)) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM; kilopascals (kPa)) were independent factors of liver fibrosis. A score system composed of HBeAg and LSM by assigning a point of 1, 2, or 3 to different HBeAg and LSM levels, respectively, was developed. The scores 2-3, 4, and 5-6 of the sum of HBeAg and LSM points indicated nonsignificant, indeterminate, and significant fibrosis, respectively. The score system had an AUROC of 0.880 and showed similar performance in validation group patients. The accuracy for identifying significant and nonsignificant fibrosis was 77.14% in validation group patients and 71.26% in the entire group of patients. It is suggested that this noninvasive score system can accurately predict hepatic fibrosis and may reduce the need for liver biopsy in HBeAg-positive patients with normal or minimally elevated ALT levels.

Development and validation of a model for staging hepatic fibrosis for chronic hepatitis B patients with E antigen-positive

BACKGROUND

Interest is growing in the use of non-invasive techniques for complementing liver biopsy for liver fibrosis assessment. We aimed to prospectively evaluate liver histology in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with e-antigen positivity, and develop and validate a novel scoring system-e-antigen-positive CHB liver fibrosis (EPLF) score-for noninvasively predicting the fibrosis stages.

METHODS

We identified the baseline variables associated with fibrosis stage (MATAVIR score, F0-F4) in 212 CHB patients with e-antigen positivity. These significant variables were used to develop the EPLF scoring system. The EPLF score equation was developed based on the prediction of fibrosis stages via multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic powers of the EPLF score and several non-invasive markers were assessed through an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses. This EPLF score model was validated in another set of 208 similar patients.

RESULTS

The natural logarithms of serum albumin, HBeAg, and HBsAg levels were selected as significant independent variables for the EPLF score equation. The EPLF score had good diagnostic power (AUROC, 0.72-0.90, p<0.001) and good diagnostic accuracy (72-85%), with a high positive predictive value (80.8-92.8%) for each fibrosis stage in the test group. Similar results were observed in the validation group (AUROC, 0.73-0.89, p<0.001). The EPLF score exhibited a strong correlation with fibrosis stage (r=0.67, p<0.001), and was the preferable non-invasive marker for staging liver fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

In e-antigen-positive patients with CHB, the EPLF score could serve as a potential non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis stage.

Rates and determinants of hepatitis B 'e' antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during long-term follow-up of patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus

OBJECTIVE

This study determines rates and risk factors associated with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B 'e' antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance, two important prognostic indicators during infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), in a large contemporary cohort of patients coinfected with HIV-HBV.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of predominately antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced, coinfected patients.

METHODS

Participants enrolled in the French HIV-HBV Cohort had complete HBV serological battery conducted at inclusion and every yearly visit. Piecewise-exponential survival models were used to determine risk factors associated with seroclearance.

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients, of whom 151 (52.1%) were HBeAg positive, had been followed for a median 7.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.1-8.0). Tenofovir (TDF) containing ART became increasingly more frequent, as rates of undetectable HBV-DNA increased accordingly (at baseline = 39.3%, end of follow-up = 91.0%). In HBeAg-positive patients, 60 of 151 had HBeAg seroclearance (cumulative 46.4% at end of follow-up) after a median 3.0 years (IQR = 2.0-4.9). Overall, 17 of 290 patients had HBsAg seroclearance (cumulative 7.4% at end of follow-up) after a median 4.6 years (IQR = 2.1-7.2). Lower levels of time-averaged cumulative HBV-DNA were significantly associated with both HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). In post hoc analysis among patients initiating TDF, incidence rates of HBeAg seroclearance peaked at year 4 of TDF treatment (13.1/100 person-years), whereas a steep drop in HBsAg seroclearance incidence rates occurred after year 3 (at year 3 = 1.2/100 person-years versus thereafter = 0.6/100 person-years).

CONCLUSION

HBsAg seroclearance and, to a lesser extent, HBeAg seroclearance remain difficult endpoints for patients coinfected with HIV-HBV to achieve. HBV-DNA suppression, associated with effective treatment, is strongly linked to seroclearance, but this mostly occurs within the first years of ART-containing highly potent anti-HBV activity.