Hepatitis B virus X gene mutants emerge during antiviral therapy and increase cccDNA levels to compensate for replication suppression

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection

The updated EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection provide comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for its management. Spanning ten thematic sections, the guidelines address diagnostics, treatment goals, treatment indications, therapeutic options, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, management of special populations, HBV reactivation prophylaxis, post-transplant care, HBV prevention strategies, and finally address open questions and future research directions. Chronic HBV remains a global health challenge, with over 250 million individuals affected and significant mortality due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These guidelines emphasise the importance of early diagnosis, risk stratification based on viral and host factors, and tailored antiviral therapy. Attention is given to simplified algorithms, vaccination, and screening to support global HBV elimination targets. The guidelines also discuss emerging biomarkers and evolving definitions of functional and partial cure. Developed through literature review, expert consensus, and a Delphi process, the guidelines aim to equip healthcare providers across disciplines with practical tools to optimise HBV care and outcomes worldwide.

HBV-Induced Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms, Correlation With Viral Suppression, and Implications for Treatment

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common but underdiagnosed and undertreated health condition and is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. HBV (rated a Grade 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer) drives the transformation of hepatocytes in multiple ways by inducing viral DNA integrations, genetic dysregulation, chromosomal translocations, chronic inflammation, and oncogenic pathways facilitated by some HBV proteins. Importantly, these mechanisms are active throughout all phases of HBV infection. Nevertheless, most clinical guidelines for antiviral therapy recommend treatment based on a complex combination of HBV DNA levels, transaminasemia, liver histology, and demographic factors, rather than prompt treatment for all people with infection.

AIMS

To determine if current frameworks for antiviral treatment address the impacts of chronic HBV infection particularly preventing cancer development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the recent data demonstrating pro-oncogenic factors acting throughout a chronic HBV infection can be inhibited by antiviral therapy.

RESULTS

We extensively reviewed Hepatitis B virology data and correlating clinical outcome data. From thi, we suggest that new findings support simplifying and expanding treatment initiation to reduce the incidence ofnew infections, progressive liver disease, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. We also consider lessons learned from other blood-borne pathogens, including the benefits of antiviral treatment in preventing transmission, reducing stigma, and reframing treatment as cancer prevention.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating these practice changes into treatment is likely to reduce the overall burden of chronic HBV infections and HCC. Through this, we may better achieve the World Health Organization's goal of eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat and minimise its impact on people's lives.

Evolution of hepatitis B virus polymerase and surface genes in patients receiving finite antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation could develop after withdrawal following a finite course of nucleoside analog (NA) therapy, leading to virological and clinical relapses. The genetic heterogeneity in the HBV surface and polymerase genes during finite NA therapy has not been carefully studied.

METHODS

Seven chronic HBV-infected patients experiencing relapses following entecavir (ETV; n = 5; Patients 1 to 5) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; n = 2; Patients 6 and 7) withdrawal were included. Sera obtained before treatment and at relapses were retrieved and submitted for DNA extraction and amplicon-specific deep sequencing.

RESULTS

ETV-treated patients had a longer time-to-relapse than that of TDF-treated patients (P = 0.0357). No drug-resistance related polymerase mutation was detected during relapses, except for a low percentage (1.4%) of rtM204I mutation in Patient 1. Two surface truncation mutations (sW216*; 40.9% and sW182*; 4.7%) detected before treatment in two TDF-treated patients (Patients 6 and 7, respectively) were overtaken by the wild types during subsequent drug-withdrawal-related relapses. The simultaneous presence of sG44E (T-cell epitope) and sE164G (B-cell epitope) mutations was associated with failure of HBV e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance in ETV-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, HBV genome continues to evolve during the courses of finite antiviral therapies. Pre-existing surface truncation mutations can be overtaken by the wild types after relapses. The sG44E/sE164G mutations are associated with failure of HBeAg seroclearance.

Aldolase B-driven lactagenesis and CEACAM6 activation promote cell renewal and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer through the Warburg effect

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy worldwide and is associated with a high mortality rate. Changes in bioenergy metabolism, such as the Warburg effect, are often observed in CRC. Aldolase B (ALDOB) has been identified as a potential regulator of these changes, but its exact role in CRC cell behavior and bioenergetic homeostasis is not fully understood. To investigate this, two cohorts of CRC patients were analyzed independently. The results showed that higher ALDOB expression was linked to unfavorable prognosis, increased circulating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and altered bioenergetics in CRC. Further analysis using cell-based assays demonstrated that ALDOB promoted cell proliferation, chemoresistance, and increased expression of CEA in CRC cells. The activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1 (PDK1) by ALDOB-induced lactagenesis and secretion, which in turn mediated the effects on CEA expression. Secreted lactate was found to enhance lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB) expression in adjacent cells and to be a crucial modulator of ALDOB-mediated phenotypes. Additionally, the effect of ALDOB on CEA expression was downstream of the bioenergetic changes mediated by secreted lactate. The study also identified CEA cell adhesion molecule-6 (CEACAM6) as a downstream effector of ALDOB that controlled CRC cell proliferation and chemoresistance. Notably, CEACAM6 activation was shown to enhance protein stability through lysine lactylation, downstream of ALDOB-mediated lactagenesis. The ALDOB/PDK1/lactate/CEACAM6 axis plays an essential role in CRC cell behavior and bioenergetic homeostasis, providing new insights into the involvement of CEACAM6 in CRC and the Warburg effect. These findings may lead to the development of new treatment strategies for CRC patients.

Rs9679162 genotype predicts prognosis of real-world advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by sorafenib

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors widely used in the targeted therapy to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). The GALNT14-rs9679162 genotype is a predictor of therapeutic outcome in multiple gastrointestinal cancers.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive role of the GALNT14-rs9679162 genotype in aHCC treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib.

METHODS

Totally 350 real-world patients with aHCC received sorafenib or lenvatinib were enrolled for GALNT14-rs9679162 genotyping and outcome analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were conducted to evaluate therapeutic outcomes. Cell-based assays were performed to determine the underlying mechanism.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis showed that the "GG" genotype was not associated with overall survival (OS) when all patients were included. However, it was associated with shorter OS in specific clinical subgroups, including anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive (n= 108; P= 0.005) and hepatitis B surface antigen-negative (n= 117; P= 0.002) patients. Intriguingly, hepatitis B virus X protein trans-suppressed the GALNT14 promoter, thereby reducing the elevated expression of GALN14 in hepatoma cells, which partially contributed to the inability of the GALNT14-rs9679162 genotypes to predict the outcome of hepatitis B-related HCC. Finally, by analyzing the outcomes of 52 patients with aHCC treated with lenvatinib, patients with the "GG" genotype were associated with a favorable/shorter time-to-response (P= 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The GALNT14-rs9679162 "GG" genotype predicted shorter OS in patients with HBsAg-negative aHCC treated with sorafenib, but predicted a favorable response in all patients with aHCC treated with lenvatinib.