Leakage decrease detected by dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI predicts survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab

Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy

Tumor vascular physiology is an important determinant of disease progression as well as the therapeutic outcome of cancer treatment. Angiogenesis or the lack of it provides crucial information about the tumor's blood supply and therefore can be used as an index for cancer growth and progression. While standalone anti-angiogenic therapy demonstrated limited therapeutic benefits, its combination with chemotherapeutic agents improved the overall survival of cancer patients. This could be attributed to the effect of vascular normalization, a dynamic process that temporarily reverts abnormal vasculature to the normal phenotype maximizing the delivery and intratumor distribution of chemotherapeutic agents. Longitudinal monitoring of vascular changes following antiangiogenic therapy can indicate an optimal window for drug administration and estimate the potential outcome of treatment. This review primarily focuses on the status of various imaging modalities used for the longitudinal characterization of vascular changes before and after anti-angiogenic therapies and their clinical prospects.

Diagnostic Approaches to Adult-Type Diffuse Glial Tumors: Comparative Literature and Clinical Practice Study

Gliomas are the most frequent intrinsic central nervous system tumors. The new 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors brought significant changes into the classification of gliomas, that underline the role of molecular diagnostics, with the adult-type diffuse glial tumors now identified primarily by their biomarkers rather than histology. The status of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 describes tumors at their molecular level and together with the presence or absence of 1p/19q codeletion are the most important biomarkers used for the classification of adult-type diffuse glial tumors. In recent years terminology has also changed. IDH-mutant, as previously known, is diagnostically used as astrocytoma and IDH-wildtype is used as glioblastoma. A comprehensive understanding of these tumors not only gives patients a more proper treatment and better prognosis but also highlights new difficulties. MR imaging is of the utmost importance for diagnosing and supervising the response to treatment. By monitoring the tumor on followup exams better results can be achieved. Correlations are seen between tumor diagnostic and clinical manifestation and surgical administration, followup care, oncologic treatment, and outcomes. Minimal resection site use of functional imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) have become indispensable tools in invasive treatment. Perfusion imaging provides insightful information about the vascularity of the tumor, spectroscopy shows metabolic activity, and nuclear medicine imaging displays tumor metabolism. To accommodate better treatment the differentiation of pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, or radiation necrosis is needed. In this report, we present a literature review of diagnostics of gliomas, the differences in their imaging features, and our radiology's departments accumulated experience concerning gliomas.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with glioblastoma who have been previously treated with first-line radiation or chemoradiotherapy and who are suspected of experiencing tumor progression.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, is standard contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion weighted imaging useful for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes?

LEVEL II

Magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement including diffusion weighted imaging is recommended as the imaging surveillance method to detect the progression of previously diagnosed glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance spectroscopy add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL II

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is recommended as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance perfusion add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

Magnetic resonance perfusion is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does the addition of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide additional useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

The routine use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to identify progression of glioblastoma is not recommended.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does positron emission tomography with amino acid agents add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

It is suggested that amino acid positron emission tomography be considered to assist in the differentiation of progressive glioblastoma from treatment related changes.

Imaging acute effects of bevacizumab on tumor vascular kinetics in a preclinical orthotopic model of U251 glioma

The effect of a human vascular endothelial growth factor antibody on the vasculature of human tumor grown in rat brain was studied. Using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, the effects of intravenous bevacizumab (Avastin; 10 mg/kg) were examined before and at postadministration times of 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h (N = 26; 4-5 per time point) in a rat model of orthotopic, U251 glioblastoma (GBM). The commonly estimated vascular parameters for an MR contrast agent were: (i) plasma distribution volume (v_p ), (ii) forward volumetric transfer constant (K^trans ) and (iii) reverse transfer constant (k_ep ). In addition, extracellular distribution volume (V_D ) was estimated in the tumor (V_D-tumor ), tumor edge (V_D-edge ) and the mostly normal tumor periphery (V_D-peri ), along with tumor blood flow (TBF), peri-tumoral hydraulic conductivity (K) and interstitial flow (Flux) and tumor interstitial fluid pressure (TIFP). Studied as % changes from baseline, the 2-h post-treatment time point began showing significant decreases in v_p , V_D-tumor, V_D-edge and V_D-peri , as well as K, with these changes persisting at 4 and 8 h in v_p , K, V_{D-tumor, -edge} and _-peri (t-tests; p < 0.05-0.01). Decreases in K^trans were observed at the 2- and 4-h time points (p < 0.05), while interstitial volume fraction (v_e ; = K^trans /k_ep ) showed a significant decrease only at the 2-h time point (p < 0.05). Sustained decreases in Flux were observed from 2 to 24 h (p < 0.01) while TBF and TIFP showed delayed responses, increases in the former at 12 and 24 h and a decrease in the latter only at 12 h. These imaging biomarkers of tumor vascular kinetics describe the short-term temporal changes in physical spaces and fluid flows in a model of GBM after Avastin administration.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Advanced magnetic resonance imaging to support clinical drug development for malignant glioma

Even though the treatment options and survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common type of malignant glioma, have improved over the past decade, there is still a high unmet medical need to develop novel therapies. Complexity in pathology and therapy require biomarkers to characterize tumors, to define malignant and active areas, to assess disease prognosis, and to quantify and monitor therapy response. While conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have improved these assessments, limitations remain. In this review, we evaluate the role of various non-invasive biomarkers based on advanced structural and functional MRI techniques in the context of GBM drug development over the past 5 years.

Cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient - Valuable predictors of non-response to bevacizumab treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The core of standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM was established in 2005 and includes maximum feasible surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide, with subsequent temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Unfortunately, nearly all patients experience a recurrence. Bevacizumab (BV) is a commonly used second-line agent for such recurrences, but it has not been shown to impact overall survival, and short-term response is variable.

METHODS

We collected MRI perfusion and diffusion images from 54 subjects with recurrent GBM treated only with radiation and temozolomide. They were subsequently treated with BV. Using machine learning, we created a model to predict short term response (6 months) and overall survival. We set time thresholds to maximize the separation of responders/survivors versus non-responders/short survivors.

RESULTS

We were able to segregate 21 (68%) of 31 subjects into unlikely to respond categories based on Progression Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) criteria. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects could similarly be identified as unlikely to survive long using the machine learning algorithm.

CONCLUSION

With the use of machine learning techniques to evaluate imaging features derived from pre- and post-treatment multimodal MRI, it is possible to identify an important fraction of patients who are either highly unlikely to respond, or highly likely to respond. This can be helpful is selecting patients that either should or should not be treated with BV.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

Some phase 2 trials had reported encouraging progression-free survival with Bevacizumab in monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in glioblastoma. However, phase 3 trials showed a significant improvement in progression free survival without a benefit in overall survival. To date, there are no predictive biomarker of response for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma.

METHODS

We used Immunochemical analysis on tumor samples and pretreatment and post-treatment perfusion-MRI to try to identify possible predictive angiogenesis-related biomarkers of response and survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in the first recurrence. We analyzed histological parameters: vascular proliferation, mitotic number and Ki-67 index; molecular factors: MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR amplification and EGFR variant III; immunohistochemical: MET, Midkine, HIF1, VEGFA, VEGF-R2, CD44, Olig2, microvascular area and microvascular density; and radiological: rCBV.

RESULTS

In the statistical analysis, no significant correlation of any histological, molecular, microvascular or radiological parameters could be demonstrated with the response rate, PFS or OS with bevacizumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Unfortunately, in this histopathological, molecular, immunohistochemical and neuroradiological study we did not find any predictive biomarker of response or survival benefit for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma.

Evaluation of tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent gliomas using contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is of vital importance to find radiologic biomarkers that can accurately predict treatment response. Usually, the initiation of antiangiogenic therapy causes a rapid decrease in the contrast enhancing tumor. However, the treatment response is observed only in a fraction of patients due to the partial radiological response secondary to stabilization of abnormal vessels which does not essentially indicate a true antitumor effect. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (PW-MRI) techniques have shown implicitness as a strong imaging biomarker for gliomas since they give hemodynamic information of blood vessels. Hence, there is a rapid expansion of PW-MRI related studies and clinical applications.

AIM

To determine the diagnostic performance of PW-MRI techniques including: (A) dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI); and (B) dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) for evaluating response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent gliomas.

METHODS

Databases such as PubMed (MEDLINE included), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant original articles. The included studies were assessed for methodological quality with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Medical imaging follow-up or histopathological analysis was used as the reference standard. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), and heterogeneity were calculated using Meta-Disc 1.4 software.

RESULTS

This study analyzed a total of six articles. The overall sensitivity for DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.82], and the specificity was 0.99 (95%CI: 0.93-1) by a random effects model (DerSimonianee-Laird model). The likelihood ratio (LR) +, LR-, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 12.84 (4.54-36.28), 0.35 (0.22-0.53), and 24.44 (7.19-83.06), respectively. The AUC (± SE) was 0.9921 (± 0.0120), and the Q* index (± SE) was 0.9640 (± 0.0323). For DSC-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.73, the specificity was 0.98, the LR+ was 7.82, the LR- was 0.32, the DOR was 31.65, the AUC (± SE) was 0.9925 (± 0.0132), and the Q* index was 0.9649 (± 0.0363). For DCE-MRI, the sensitivity was 0.41, the specificity was 0.97, the LR+ was 5.34, the LR- was 0.71, the DOR was 8.76, the AUC (± SE) was 0.9922 (± 0.2218), and the Q* index was 0.8935 (± 0.3037).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a beneficial value of PW-MRI (DSC-MRI and DCE-MRI) in monitoring the response of recurrent gliomas to antiangiogenic therapy, with reasonable sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and -LR.

Imaging biomarkers guided anti-angiogenic therapy for malignant gliomas

Antiangiogenic therapy is a universal approach to the treatment of malignant gliomas but fails to prolong the overall survival of newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma patients. Imaging biomarkers are quantitative imaging parameters capable of objectively describing biological processes, pathological changes and treatment responses in some situations and have been utilized for outcome predictions of malignant gliomas in anti-angiogenic therapy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques (including perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging), positron emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy are imaging techniques that can be used to acquire imaging biomarkers, including the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), K^trans, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Imaging indicators for a better prognosis when treating malignant gliomas with antiangiogenic therapy include the following: a lower pre- or post-treatment rCBV, less change in rCBV during treatment, a lower pre-treatment K^trans, a higher vascular normalization index during treatment, less change in arterio-venous overlap during treatment, lower pre-treatment ADC values for the lower peak, smaller ADC volume changes during treatment, and metabolic changes in glucose and phenylalanine. The investigation and utilization of these imaging markers may confront challenges, but may also promote further development of anti-angiogenic therapy. Despite considerable evidence, future prospective studies are critically needed to consolidate the current data and identify novel biomarkers.

•

Anti-angiogenic therapy only benefits specific populations of glioma patients.

•

Advanced imaging techniques can produce quantitative imaging biomarkers.

•

Physiological and metabolic parameter can predict outcome for anti-angiogenic therapy.

•

Larger prospective studies are needed to provide further evidence.

Early Changes in Tumor Perfusion from T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI following Neural Stem Cell-Mediated Therapy of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Correlate with Overall Survival

Background

The aim of this study was to correlate T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI- (DCE-MRI-) derived perfusion parameters with overall survival of recurrent high-grade glioma patients who received neural stem cell- (NSC-) mediated enzyme/prodrug gene therapy.

Methods

A total of 12 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients were enrolled in a first-in-human study (NCT01172964) of NSC-mediated therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma. DCE-MRI data from all patients were collected and analyzed at three time points: MRI#1—day 1 postsurgery/treatment, MRI#2— day 7 ± 3 posttreatment, and MRI#3—one-month follow-up. Plasma volume (V_p), permeability (K^tr), and leakage (λ^tr) perfusion parameters were calculated by fitting a pharmacokinetic model to the DCE-MRI data. The contrast-enhancing (CE) volume was measured from the last dynamic phase acquired in the DCE sequence. Perfusion parameters and CE at each MRI time point were recorded along with their relative change between MRI#2 and MRI#3 (Δ₃₂). Cox regression was used to analyze patient survival.

Results

At MRI#1 and at MRI#3, none of the parameters showed a significant correlation with overall survival (OS). However, at MRI#2, CE and λ^tr were significantly associated with OS (p < 0.05). The relative λ^tr and V_p from timepoint 2 to timepoint 3 (Δ₃₂λ^tr and Δ₃₂V_p) were each associated with a higher hazard ratio (p < 0.05). All parameters were highly correlated, resulting in a multivariate model for OS including only CE at MRI#2 and Δ₃₂V_p, with an R² of 0.89.

Conclusion

The change in perfusion parameter values from 1 week to 1 month following NSC-mediated therapy combined with contrast-enhancing volume may be a useful biomarker to predict overall survival in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Brain Tumor Imaging

Modern imaging techniques, particularly functional imaging techniques that interrogate some specific aspect of underlying tumor biology, have enormous potential in neuro-oncology for disease detection, grading, and tumor delineation to guide biopsy and resection; monitoring treatment response; and targeting radiotherapy. This brief review considers the role of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography in these areas and discusses the factors that limit translation of new techniques to the clinic, in particular, the cost and difficulties associated with validation in multicenter clinical trials.