Exclusive 3D-brachytherapy as a good option for stage-I inoperable endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis in the gynaecological cancer GEC-ESTRO Working Group

Safety and Efficacy of Brachytherapy in Inoperable Endometrial Cancer

Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy represents the only treatment option for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy (BT) in this selected patient population. Methods: Between 1990 and 2019, 18 patients with inoperable EC in stage FIGO I-IV were treated with intracavitary brachytherapy using the "Heyman Packing technique". BT was performed either as sole PDR- or HDR-brachytherapy with a median cumulative dose up to 60.0 Gy (67.9 Gy EQD2 α/β = 3Gy) and 34.0 Gy (75.6 Gy EQD2 α/β = 3Gy), respectively. Results: The median follow-up was 46 months (6-219). The mean age was 71 years. The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate (CLRR) for the whole cohort was 27.3%. The 5-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 51%, 79%, and 69%. The 5-year DFS for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk EC was 89%, 50%, and 44% (p = 0.51). No significant difference in DFS was observed in patients over 70 (p = 0.526). No late side effects of grade > 1 were documented. Conclusions: Brachytherapy for inoperable EC is a safe and effective treatment option, offering good local control and OS with minimal toxicity. Moreover, brachytherapy effectively controls hemoglobin-relevant bleeding. Therefore, BT should be considered a viable alternative to non-curative treatment strategies in gynecological multidisciplinary conferences.

Clinical outcomes analysis of image-guided brachytherapy as definitive treatment for inoperable endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided brachytherapy combined with or without external beam radiotherapy (IGBT ± EBRT) as definitive treatment for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer (IOEC), in addition to establishing a risk classification to predict prognosis.

METHODS

Fifty-one IOEC patients who underwent IGBT ± EBRT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 42 patients (82.4%) were treated with IGBT + EBRT and 9 patients (17.6%) with IGBT alone. Establishing risk classification based on FIGO 2009 staging and biopsy pathology, stage III/IV, non-endometrioid, or Grade 3 endometrioid cancer were included in the high-risk group (n = 25), and stage I/II with Grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer was included in the low-risk group (n = 26).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 58.0 months (IQR, 37.0-69.0). Clinical complete remission (CR) was achieved in 92.2% of patients after radiotherapy (n = 47). The cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant failure were 19.6% (n = 10) and 7.8% (n = 4), respectively. A total of 20 patients died (39.2%), including 10 cancer-related deaths (19.6%) and 10 comorbidity-related deaths (19.6%). The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 76.9%, 71.2%, 59.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. No Grade 3 or above acute or late toxicities were reported. In univariate analysis, LRC, TTP, and CSS were significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for age, number of comorbidities, radiotherapy modality, and chemotherapy, the low-risk group was still significantly better than the high-risk group in terms of LRC (HR = 6.10, 95% CI: 1.18-31.45, P = 0.031), TTP (HR = 8.07, 95% CI: 1.64-39.68, P = 0.010) and CSS (HR = 6.29, 95% CI: 1.19-33.10, P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

IGBT ± EBRT is safe and effective as definitive treatment for IOEC patients, achieving satisfactory locoregional control, favorable survival outcomes, and low toxicity. Risk classification based on FIGO 2009 staging and biopsy pathology is an independent prognostic factor for LRC, TTP, and CSS.

Effect of 3D laparoscopy versus traditional laparotomy on serum tumor markers and coagulation function in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of Three-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy compared to traditional laparotomy on serum tumor markers and coagulation function in patients diagnosed with early-stage Endometrial Cancer (EC).

METHOD

The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 75 patients diagnosed with early-stage EC and categorized them into two groups based on the surgical techniques employed. The 3D group consisted of 36 patients who underwent 3D laparoscopic surgery, while the Laparotomy group comprised 39 patients who underwent traditional laparotomy. The authors then compared the alterations in serum tumor markers and coagulation function between the two groups.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, serum levels of CA125, CA199, and HE4 were notably reduced in both groups on the third day, with the levels being more diminished in the 3D group than in the Laparotomy Group (p < 0.05). Conversely, FIB levels escalated significantly in both groups on the third-day post-surgery, with a more pronounced increase in the 3D group. Additionally, PT and APTT durations were reduced and were more so in the 3D group than in the laparotomy group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When juxtaposed with traditional laparotomy, 3D laparoscopic surgery for early-stage EC appears to be more efficacious, characterized by reduced complications, and expedited recovery. It can effectively mitigate serum tumor marker levels, attenuate the inflammatory response and damage to immune function, foster urinary function recovery, and enhance the quality of life. However, it exerts a more significant influence on the patient's coagulation parameters, necessitating meticulous prevention and treatment strategies for thromboembolic events in clinical settings.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy as the method of choice in medically inoperable early-stage endometrial cancer patients

PURPOSE

About 3-9% of patients with endometrial cancer are unable to undergo surgery due to medical comorbidities, including morbid obesity, or age-related frailty syndrome. An alternative curative option is irradiation. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) treatment in such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with FIGO stage I-II endometrial cancer disqualified from surgery were treated with HDR-ICBT with 45-52,5 Gy prescribed to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) in 5-9 fractions given once a week. All fractions were planned using computed tomography (CT) scans.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 67 months. Median age was 79 years (range: 42-93 years). Median body mass index (BMI) was 39,1 kg/m2 (range: 24,2-68 kg/m2). We observed no statistically significant impact of BMI ≥ 40 on overall survival (OS) or prgression free survival (PFS). The 3- and 5-year OS for the whole population were 69% and 55%, respectively. The impact of high risk features (FIGO II, grade 3 or type 2 cancer) on OS was significant (p = 0,049). The 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure, distant metastases and non-cancer death were 12,9% [95% CI: 5,4%-20,5%], 6,4% [95% CI: 0,9%-11,9%], 33,1% [95% CI: 22,3%-43,9%], respectively. The 5-year risk of cancer and non-cancer death were 9% (95% CI: 3%-16%) and 36% (95% CI: 25%-47%), respectively. We observed G1 vaginal apex stenosis only.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided HDR-ICBT is a feasible and safe management of FIGO stage I endometrial cancer in obese and elderly patients. The survival outcome of the treated group is influenced more by associated comorbidities than by the progression of endometrial cancer.

Interventional Radiotherapy in Gynecological Cancer

This special issue of "Cancers" explores unusual and very particular aspects of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in gynecological cancer [...].

Stages I-III Inoperable Endometrial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis by the Gynaecological Cancer GEC-ESTRO Working Group of Patients Treated with External Beam Irradiation and 3D-Image Guided Brachytherapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Analyse the outcomes of stages I-III inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with external-beam-irradiation (EBRT) and 3D-image-guided-brachytherapy (IGBT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of IEC patients receiving EBRT + IGBT in eight European and one Canadian centres (2004-2019) were examined, including: pelvic ± para-aortic EBRT and lymph node boost; anaesthetic procedure, applicators, BT-planning imaging, clinical target volume (CTV), brachytherapy schedule, and EQD2 to the CTV(α/β=4.5Gy) and D2 cm3(α/β=3Gy) for organs at risk. Complications are evaluated using CTCAEv4 scores. The 2- and 5-year survival probability according to stages was estimated (cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)).

STATISTICS

descriptive analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

103 patients (stages: I-44, II-14, III-44) were included. Median follow-up: 28 months (7-170). All patients received pelvic ± para-aortic EBRT. Median D90-EQD2(α/β=4.5) to the CTV:73.3 Gy (44.6-132.7), 69.9 Gy (44.7-87.9 and 75.2 Gy (55.1-97) in stages I, II, and III, respectively. Thirty patients presented relapse (stages: 10-I, 3-II, 17-III): 24 uterine (stages: 7-I, 3-II, 14-III), 15 nodal (stages: 4-I, 1-II, 10-III), and 23 distant (stages: 6-I, 2-II, 15-III). Five year CSS was 71.2% (stages: 82%-I-II and 56%-III) and DFS, LRFS, LRRFS, and DMFS were 55.5%, 59%, 72%, and 67.2%, respectively. Late G3-G4 complications (crude): 1.3% small bowel, 2.5% rectum, and 5% bladder.

CONCLUSION

In stages I-III of the IEC, EBRT + IGBT offer good 2- and 5-year CSS of 88.7% and 71.2%, respectively, with the best outcomes in stages I-II. Prospective studies are needed to determine how better outcomes can be achieved.

Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022–2023 : prise en charge du cancer de l'endomètre localisé

Recommendations for clinical practice, Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023: Management of localized endometrial cancer Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological cancers in industrialized countries and its incidence increases. The newmolecularclassification allows determination of the risk of recurrence and helps orienting therapeutic management. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Minimally invasive approach must be preferred for stages I and II. Surgery includes hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy even in high risk diseases and omentectomy for non-endometrioid tumors (except in case of clear cells tumors). Fertility preservation can be proposed in low grade, stage I tumors without myometrial involvement. In stage III/IV disease, lymph node debulking without totallymphadenectomy is indicated. In case of peritoneal carcinomatosis, first-line cytoreductive surgery is recommended if complete resection can be achieved. Adjuvant therapy is not recommended in low risk tumors. In intermediate risk tumors, curietherapy is indicated. In tumors with high-intermediate risk, curietherapy and external radiotherapy are indicated according to prognostic factors (stage II, lymphovascular invasion); adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In high risk tumors, chemotherapy and external radiotherapy are recommended using a concomitant or sequential approach.