Adjuvant radiation therapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer: a propensity-matched SEER analysis

Differences in risk factors for mortality between T2N1M0 and T3N0M0 lobular breast cancer patients: a comparative study

Objective

This study aimed to explore the differences in risk factors for mortality between T2N1M0 and T3N0M0 lobular breast cancer, and investigate the factors associated with non-lobular breast cancer mortality.

Methods

Data from 2,693 T2N1M0 and 1,384 T3N0M0 lobular breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2008-2018) were analyzed. The lobular breast cancer-specific and non-lobular breast cancer mortality were compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with non-lobular breast cancer mortality.

Results

The total survival time showed a significant difference between the T2N1M0 and T3N0M0 groups (p = 0.0011). Statistically significant difference were found in lung-related disease mortality (p = 0.0023), with the survival rate of T2N1M0 higher than that of T3N0M0. Age, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were independent factors associated with mortality in lung-related disease patients with both subtypes, and compared with T2N1M0, radiotherapy in T3N0M0 increased the risk of lung-related disease mortality (HR = 2.076, 95% CI: 1.4318-3.011).

Conclusion

The T3N0M0 group had a higher mortality rate from lung-related diseases compared to the T2N1M0 group, and radiotherapy may increase the risk of lung-related disease death in T3N0M0 patients. These findings provide valuable information for treatment strategies for T2N1M0 and T3N0M0 subtypes of patients and assist physicians and patients make better treatment choices.

Unveiling Epigenetic Vulnerabilities in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer through 3D Organoid Drug Screening

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a therapeutic challenge due to its aggressive nature and lack of targeted therapies. Epigenetic modifications contribute to TNBC tumorigenesis and drug resistance, offering potential therapeutic targets. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) organoid cultures, enabling precise drug screening, hold immense promise for identifying novel compounds targeting TNBC. In this study, we established two patient-derived TNBC organoids and implemented a high-throughput drug screening system using these organoids and two TNBC cell lines. Screening a library of 169 epigenetic compounds, we found that organoid-based systems offer remarkable precision in drug response assessment compared to cell-based models. The top 30 compounds showing the highest drug sensitivity in the initial screening were further assessed in a secondary screen. Four compounds, panobinostat, pacritinib, TAK-901, and JIB-04, targeting histone deacetylase, JAK/STAT, histone demethylases, and aurora kinase pathways, respectively, exhibited potent anti-tumor activity in TNBC organoids, surpassing the effect of paclitaxel. Our study highlights the potential of these novel epigenetic drugs as effective therapeutic agents for TNBC and demonstrates the valuable role of patient-derived organoids in advancing drug discovery.

Outcomes with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer: An institutional experience

AIM

The objective of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in treating patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer within the context of modern therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from January 2005 to December 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The study involved a total of 222 participants, with 112 individuals undergoing PMRT and 110 individuals not receiving it. The median follow-up duration was 77 months (range: 6-171 months). The entire cohort demonstrated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 85.1% and 91.0%, respectively, along with a locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate as low as 7.2%. The PMRT group showed significantly better 5-year DFS (90.2% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02) and OS (95.5% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.012) rates, as well as a lower LRR rate (4.5% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.122), compared to the group without PMRT. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic significance of PMRT for both DFS (p = 0.040) and OS (p = 0.047). Following propensity score matching (PSM), the analysis included 100 matched patients, revealing an improved prognosis for those who received PMRT (DFS: p = 0.067; OS: p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals favorable prognoses for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer patients treated within contemporary therapeutic approaches. The pivotal role of PMRT in this context is evident. However, due to the retrospective design of our study and the relatively limited sample size, further investigation is imperative to validate and enhance these initial findings.