Short-Term Adverse Drug Reactions to Antiretroviral Therapy in Children with HIV: A Cohort Study

A Comparison of Active Pharmacovigilance Strategies Used to Monitor Adverse Events to Antiviral Agents: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The safety of antiviral agents in real-world clinical settings is crucial, as pre-marketing studies often do not capture all adverse events (AE). Active pharmacovigilance strategies are essential for detecting and characterising these AE comprehensively.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify and characterise active pharmacovigilance strategies used in real-world clinical settings for patients under systemic antiviral agents, focusing on the frequency of AE and the clinical data sources used.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review by searching three electronic bibliographic databases targeting observational prospective active pharmacovigilance studies, phase IV clinical trials for post-marketing safety surveillance, and interventional studies assessing active pharmacovigilance strategies, focusing on individuals exposed to systemic antiviral agents.

RESULTS

We included 36 primary studies, predominantly using Drug Event Monitoring (DEM), with a minority employing sentinel sites and registries. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was the most common condition, with the majority using DEM. Within the DEM, there was a wide range of incidences of patients experiencing at least one AE, and most of these studies used one or two data sources. Sentinel site studies were less common, with two on hepatitis C virus (HCV) and one on HIV, each relying on one or two data sources. The single study using a registry focusing on HIV therapy reported using just one data source. Patient interviews were the most common data source, followed by medical records and laboratory tests. The quality of the studies was considered 'good' in 18/36, 'fair' in 1/36, and 'poor' in 17/36 studies.

CONCLUSION

DEM was the predominant pharmacovigilance strategy, employing multiple data sources, and appears to increase the likelihood of detecting higher AE incidence. Establishing such a framework would facilitate a more detailed and consistent approach across different studies and settings.

Global, regional, and national prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite significant reductions in mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission risks due to the advancements and scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), the global burden of HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced children and adolescents remains poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of HIVDR in these populations globally, regionally, and at the country level.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies reporting HIVDR in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced children and adolescents from inception to June 28, 2024. Eligible studies reported at least ten successfully genotyped cases. We excluded studies where drug resistance was not reported separately for children and adults or for treatment-naive and treatment-experienced populations. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed, and random-effect models were used for meta-analysis to determine the pooled overall and regimen-specific prevalence of one or more HIVDR mutations in these populations globally, regionally, or at the country level. This study is registered with PROSPERO under the number CRD42023424483.

Findings

Of 2282 records identified, 136 studies (28,539 HIV-1-infected children from 52 countries) were included for analysis. The overall prevalence of HIVDR is 26.31% (95% CI, 20.76-32.25) among treatment-naive children and 74.16% (95% CI, 67.74-80.13) among treatment-experienced children (p < 0.0001). HIVDR varied widely across subregion with the highest prevalence in Southern Africa (37.80% [95% CI, 26.24-50.08]) and lowest in South America (11.79% [95% CI, 4.91-20.84]) for treatment-naive children while highest in Asia (80.85% [95% CI, 63.76-93.55]) and lowest in Europe (54.39% [95% CI, 28.61-79.03]) for treatment-experienced children. The proportion of viral failure (VF) presented positive correlation with DR prevalence for treatment-experienced children, which increased from 61.23% (95% CI, 47.98-73.72) in proportion of VF <50%-81.17% (95% CI, 71.57-89.28) in proportion of 100%. Meta-regression analysis for both groups showed that only age (naive: p = 0.0005; treated: p < 0.0001) was the sources of heterogeneity. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistances were the most seen mutations among the treatment-naive group, with the HIVDR prevalence more than 10% in Southern Africa, Western and Central Africa, Eastern Africa, Asia, and North America. Both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and NNRTI resistances were commonly seen among the treatment-experienced group, varying from 36.33% (95% CI, 11.96-64.93) in North America to 77.54% (95% CI, 62.70-89.58) in South America for NRTI and from 39.98% (95% CI, 13.47-69.97) in Europe to 68.86 (95% CI, 43.91-89.17) in Asia for NNRTI, respectively.

Interpretation

This study underscores the significant burden of HIVDR among children and adolescents worldwide, particularly pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa and low-income countries. It emphasizes the critical importance of surveillance in all HIV-1-infected children and advocates for the adoption of dolutegravir (DTG) or other optimal formulations as first-line ART in settings where NNRTI resistance exceeds the WHO's 10% threshold. DTG's high resistance barrier, potent antiviral efficacy, and favorable safety profile makes it a superior choice for managing drug-resistant HIV-1, surpassing traditional antiretroviral therapies.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (No. JCYJ20220531102202005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2024A1515012118).