Physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the normal adult anal canal: evaluation by PET/CT

Quantifying 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Perianal Fistulas on PET/CT: A Retrospective Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in assessing inflammatory diseases has shown significant promise. Uptake patterns in perianal fistulas, which may be an incidental finding on PET/CT, have not been purposefully studied. Our aim was to compare FDG uptake of perianal fistulas to that of the liver and anal canal in patients who underwent PET/CT for hematologic/oncologic diagnosis or staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging between January 2011 and May 2023, where the report described a perianal fistula or abscess. PET/CTs of patients included in the study were retrospectively analyzed to record the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the fistula, abscess, anal canal, rectum, and liver. Fistula-to-liver and Fistula-to-anus SUVmax ratios were calculated. We statistically compared FDG activity among the fistula, liver, and anal canal. We also assessed FDG activity in patients with vs. without anorectal cancer, as well as across different St. James fistula grades.

RESULTS

The study included 24 patients with identifiable fistulas. Fistula SUVmax (mean=10.8 ± 5.28) was significantly higher than both the liver (mean=3.09 ± 0.584, p < 0.0001) and the anal canal (mean=5.98 ± 2.63, p = 0.0005). Abscess fistula SUVmax was 15.8 ± 4.91. St. James grade 1 fistulas had significantly lower SUVmax compared to grades 2 and 4 (p = 0.0224 and p = 0.0295, respectively). No significant differences existed in SUVmax ratios between anorectal and non-anorectal cancer groups.

CONCLUSION

Perianal fistulas have increased FDG avidity with fistula SUVmax values that are significantly higher than the anal canal.

Four-dimensional quantitative analysis using FDG-PET in clinical oncology

Positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been commonly used in many oncological areas. High-resolution PET permits a three-dimensional analysis of FDG distributions on various lesions in vivo, which can be applied for tissue characterization, risk analysis, and treatment monitoring after chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy. Metabolic changes can be assessed using the tumor absolute FDG uptake as standardized uptake value (SUV) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV). In addition, tumor heterogeneity assessment can potentially estimate tumor aggressiveness and resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Attempts have been made to quantify intratumoral heterogeneity using radiomics. Recent reports have indicated the clinical feasibility of a dynamic FDG PET-computed tomography (CT) in pilot cohort studies of oncological cases. Dynamic imaging permits the assessment of temporal changes in FDG uptake after administration, which is particularly useful for differentiating pathological from physiological uptakes with high diagnostic accuracy. In addition, several new parameters have been introduced for the in vivo quantitative analysis of FDG metabolic processes. Thus, a four-dimensional FDG PET-CT is available for precise tissue characterization of various lesions. This review introduces various new techniques for the quantitative analysis of FDG distribution and glucose metabolism using a four-dimensional FDG analysis with PET-CT. This elegant study reveals the important role of tissue characterization and treatment strategies in oncology.

The Relationship among Bowel [18]F-FDG PET Uptake, Pathological Complete Response, and Eating Habits in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Recently, the impact of patients’ eating habits on both breast cancer (BC) management and inflammation have been proven. Here, we investigated whether inflammatory habits could correlate with baseline bowel [18]F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and the latter, in turn, with pathological Complete Response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We included stage I−III BC undergoing standard NAC at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy. Patients fulfilled a survey concerning eating/lifestyle behaviors and performed a staging [18]F-FDG positrone emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). In the absence of data on the effects of individual foods, we aggregated drink and food intake for their known inflammatory properties. Data were recorded for 82 women (median age, 48). We found positive correlations between colon mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and pro-inflammatory drinks (alcohol and spirits; r = +0.33, p < 0.01) and foods (red and cured meats; r = +0.25, p = 0.04), and a significant negative correlation between rectum SUVmean and anti-inflammatory foods (fruits and vegetables; r = −0.23, p = 0.04). Furthermore, colon SUVmean was significantly lower in patients with pCR compared to non pCR (p = 0.02). Our study showed, for the first time, that patients’ eating habits affected bowel [18]F-FDG uptake and that colon SUVmean correlated with pCR, suggesting that PET scan could be an instrument for identifying patients presenting unhealthy behaviors.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: III. Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate the characterization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The third report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In the third of these review articles, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The focus is on the use of ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), rather than on research radiopharmaceuticals under development. Many different types of gastrointestinal tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET-CT for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common adult gastrointestinal malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. The information provided here will provide information outlining the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides interpretive guidance related to PET-CT for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Dynamic whole-body FDG-PET imaging for oncology studies

Introduction

Recent PET/CT systems have improved sensitivity and spatial resolution by smaller PET detectors and improved reconstruction software. In addition, continuous-bed-motion mode is now available in some PET systems for whole-body PET imaging. In this review, we describe the advantages of dynamic whole-body FDG-PET in oncology studies.

Methods

PET–CT imaging was obtained at 60 min after FDG administration. Dynamic whole-body imaging with continuous bed motion in 3 min each with flow motion was obtained over 400 oncology cases. For routine image analysis, these dynamic phases (usually four phases) were summed as early FDG imaging. The image quality of each serial dynamic imaging was visually evaluated. In addition, changes in FDG uptake were analyzed in consecutive dynamic imaging and also in early delayed (90 min after FDG administration) time point imaging (dual-time-point imaging; DTPI). Image interpretation was performed by consensus of two nuclear medicine physicians.

Result

All consecutive dynamic whole-body PET images of 3 min duration had acceptable image quality. Many of the areas with physiologically high FDG uptake had altered uptake on serial images. On the other hand, most of the benign and malignant lesions did not show visual changes on serial images. In the study of 60 patients with suspected colorectal cancer, unchanged uptake was noted in almost all regions with pathologically proved FDG uptake, indicating high sensitivity with high negative predictive value on both serial dynamic imaging and on DTPI. We proposed another application of serial dynamic imaging for minimizing motion artifacts for patients who may be likely to move during PET studies.

Discussion

Dynamic whole-body imaging has several advantages over the static imaging. Serial assessment of changes in FDG uptake over a short period of time is useful for distinguishing pathological from physiological uptake, especially in the abdominal regions. These dynamic PET studies may minimize the need for DPTI. In addition, continuous dynamic imaging has the potential to reduce motion artifacts in patients who are likely to move during PET imaging. Furthermore, kinetic analysis of the FDG distribution in tumor areas has a potential for precise tissue characterization.

Conclusion

Dynamic whole-body FDG-PET imaging permits assessment of serial FDG uptake change which is particularly useful for differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake with high diagnostic accuracy. This imaging can be applied for minimizing motion artifacts. Wide clinical applications of such serial, dynamic whole-body PET imaging is expected in oncological studies in the near future.

Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers

In the past two decades, PET/CT has become an essential modality in oncology increasingly used in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Most PET/CT tracers used in clinical practice show some degree of GI uptake. This uptake is quite variable and knowledge of common patterns of biodistribution of various radiotracers is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radiotracer and has quite a variable uptake within the bowel. 68Ga-Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) shows intense uptake within the proximal small bowel loops. 11C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) shows high accumulation within the bowels, which makes it difficult to assess bowel or pelvic diseases. One must also be aware of technical artifacts causing difficulties in interpretations, such as high attenuation oral contrast material within the bowel lumen or misregistration artifact due to patient movements. It is imperative to know the common variants and benign diseases that can mimic malignant pathologies. Intense FDG uptake within the esophagus and stomach may be a normal variant or may be associated with benign conditions such as esophagitis, reflux disease, or gastritis. Metformin can cause diffuse intense uptake throughout the bowel loops. Intense physiologic uptake can also be seen within the anal canal. Segmental bowel uptake can be seen in inflammatory bowel disease, radiation, or medication induced enteritis/colitis or infection. Diagnosis of appendicitis or diverticular disease requires CT correlation, as normal appendix or diverticulum can show intense uptake. Certain malignant pathologies are known to have only low FDG uptake, such as early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, mucinous tumors, indolent lymphomas, and multicystic mesotheliomas. Response assessment, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, can be limited by post-treatment inflammatory changes. Post-operative complications such as abscess or fistula formation can also show intense uptake and may obscure underlying malignant pathology. In the absence of clinical suspicion or rising tumor marker, the role of FDG PET/CT in routine surveillance of patients with GI malignancy is not clear.