1
|
Ni YC, Lin ZK, Cheng CH, Pai MC, Chiu PY, Chang CC, Chang YT, Hung GU, Lin KJ, Hsiao IT, Lin CY, Yang HC. Classification Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia Using Physiological Data and ECD SPECT Images. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:365. [PMID: 38396404 PMCID: PMC10888136 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are the two most common forms of dementia. However, their neuropsychological and pathological features often overlap, making it difficult to distinguish between AD and VaD. In addition to clinical consultation and laboratory examinations, clinical dementia diagnosis in Taiwan will also include Tc-99m-ECD SPECT imaging examination. Through machine learning and deep learning technology, we explored the feasibility of using the above clinical practice data to distinguish AD and VaD. We used the physiological data (33 features) and Tc-99m-ECD SPECT images of 112 AD patients and 85 VaD patients in the Taiwanese Nuclear Medicine Brain Image Database to train the classification model. The results, after filtering by the number of SVM RFE 5-fold features, show that the average accuracy of physiological data in distinguishing AD/VaD is 81.22% and the AUC is 0.836; the average accuracy of training images using the Inception V3 model is 85% and the AUC is 0.95. Finally, Grad-CAM heatmap was used to visualize the areas of concern of the model and compared with the SPM analysis method to further understand the differences. This research method can quickly use machine learning and deep learning models to automatically extract image features based on a small amount of general clinical data to objectively distinguish AD and VaD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ching Ni
- Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325, Taiwan
| | - Zhi-Kun Lin
- Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Han Cheng
- Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chyi Pai
- Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
- Institute of Gerontology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
- Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan 704, Taiwan
| | - Pai-Yi Chiu
- Department of Neurology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
| | - Chiung-Chih Chang
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Ting Chang
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
| | - Guang-Uei Hung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 505, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ju Lin
- Healthy Aging Research Center and Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Molecular Imaging Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Gung University and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Ing-Tsung Hsiao
- Healthy Aging Research Center and Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Molecular Imaging Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Gung University and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sedlakova Z, Nachtigalova I, Rusina R, Matej R, Buncova M, Kukal J. Alzheimer ’s disease identification from 3D SPECT brain scans by variational analysis. Biomed Signal Process Control 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
3
|
Ardalan Z, Subbian V. Transfer Learning Approaches for Neuroimaging Analysis: A Scoping Review. Front Artif Intell 2022; 5:780405. [PMID: 35265830 PMCID: PMC8899512 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.780405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep learning algorithms have been moderately successful in diagnoses of diseases by analyzing medical images especially through neuroimaging that is rich in annotated data. Transfer learning methods have demonstrated strong performance in tackling annotated data. It utilizes and transfers knowledge learned from a source domain to target domain even when the dataset is small. There are multiple approaches to transfer learning that result in a range of performance estimates in diagnosis, detection, and classification of clinical problems. Therefore, in this paper, we reviewed transfer learning approaches, their design attributes, and their applications to neuroimaging problems. We reviewed two main literature databases and included the most relevant studies using predefined inclusion criteria. Among 50 reviewed studies, more than half of them are on transfer learning for Alzheimer's disease. Brain mapping and brain tumor detection were second and third most discussed research problems, respectively. The most common source dataset for transfer learning was ImageNet, which is not a neuroimaging dataset. This suggests that the majority of studies preferred pre-trained models instead of training their own model on a neuroimaging dataset. Although, about one third of studies designed their own architecture, most studies used existing Convolutional Neural Network architectures. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was the most common imaging modality. In almost all studies, transfer learning contributed to better performance in diagnosis, classification, segmentation of different neuroimaging diseases and problems, than methods without transfer learning. Among different transfer learning approaches, fine-tuning all convolutional and fully-connected layers approach and freezing convolutional layers and fine-tuning fully-connected layers approach demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy. These recent transfer learning approaches not only show great performance but also require less computational resources and time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaniar Ardalan
- Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- *Correspondence: Zaniar Ardalan
| | - Vignesh Subbian
- Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Feasibility of Differentiating Lewy Body Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease by Deep Learning Using ECD SPECT Images. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112091. [PMID: 34829438 PMCID: PMC8624770 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The correct differential diagnosis of dementia has an important impact on patient treatment and follow-up care strategies. Tc-99m-ECD SPECT imaging, which is low cost and accessible in general clinics, is used to identify the two common types of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD). Two-stage transfer learning technology and reducing model complexity based on the ResNet-50 model were performed using the ImageNet data set and ADNI database. To improve training accuracy, the three-dimensional image was reorganized into three sets of two-dimensional images for data augmentation and ensemble learning, then the performance of various deep learning models for Tc-99m-ECD SPECT images to distinguish AD/normal cognition (NC), LBD/NC, and AD/LBD were investigated. In the AD/NC, LBD/NC, and AD/LBD tasks, the AUC values were around 0.94, 0.95, and 0.74, regardless of training models, with an accuracy of 90%, 87%, and 71%, and F1 scores of 89%, 86%, and 76% in the best cases. The use of transfer learning and a modified model resulted in better prediction results, increasing the accuracy by 32% for AD/NC. The proposed method is practical and could rapidly utilize a deep learning model to automatically extract image features based on a small number of SPECT brain perfusion images in general clinics to objectively distinguish AD and LBD.
Collapse
|