Patient Positioning for Proximal Femur Fracture Fixation: a Review of Best Practices

Does Hip Abduction during Intramedullary Nail Fixation Help Correct Residual Varus Alignment in Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Varus malalignment is a risk factor for nonunion and mechanical complications in subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs). Although various reduction techniques have been reported to avoid varus malalignment in SFFs, achieving anatomic reduction remains challenging, often resulting in residual varus alignment (RVA) after reduction. This study aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a novel method resolving RVA by abducting the ipsilateral hip after cephalomedullary fixation with an intramedullary nail and subsequently inserting distal interlocking screws.

Methods

This retrospective study, conducted between March 2016 and March 2022, included patients who underwent hip abduction during intramedullary nailing due to RVA. Demographics and fracture patterns (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA]) and types (typical or atypical) were analyzed. Radiographic outcomes included Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria (BRQC), tip-apex distance (TAD), neck-shaft angle (NSA), lateral cortex residual gap, union, and time to union. Clinical outcomes included ambulatory level using the Palmer-Parker Mobility Score (PPM), complications, and reoperation.

Results

This study included 45 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; mean follow-up period, 18.4 months). The most common fracture pattern was 32A2 in 15 patients and 29 were typical and 16 were atypical fractures. The BRQC was good in 36 patients, and TAD was < 25 mm in 43 patients. Pre-abduction NSA (126.0° ± 3.8°) was significantly smaller than post-abduction NSA (129.9° ± 3.4°, p < 0.001). Post-abduction NSA was comparable to contralateral NSA of 128.9° ± 2.8° (p = 0.155). Residual gap was significantly reduced from 6.1 ± 2.9 mm pre-abduction to 1.7 ± 1.0 mm post-abduction (p < 0.001). Union was achieved in 44 patients (97.8%; mean duration, 5.9 months). PPM decreased from 7.8 ± 2.0 pre-injury to 7.0 ± 2.1 1-year postoperatively. One nonunion case required reoperation. Radiographic outcomes did not significantly differ by fracture pattern (p = 0.470 for NSA and p = 0.334 for residual gap).

Conclusions

Hip abduction during intramedullary nailing corrects alignment and reduces the gap in SFFs with residual varus alignment. This method can be applied to various fracture patterns in a straightforward manner and considered valuable for managing SFFs.

Proximal femoral nailing for unstable trochanteric fractures: lateral decubitus position or traction table? A case-control study of 96 patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with short proximal femoral nailing in elderly patients in the lateral decubitus position versus the supine position on traction tables.

METHODS

From June 2020 to January 2022, a prospective case-control study was performed on 96 patients who presented with unstable trochanteric fractures treated by internal fixation via short proximal femoral nail (PFN). Patients were divided into two groups: Group A, which included patients who underwent surgery in the lateral position; and Group B, which included those in the supine position. Both groups were subjected to follow-up for 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean setup time, surgery time, and blood loss were significantly greater in Group B than in Group A, while the hospital stay and fluoroscopy duration were similar in both groups. Regarding reduction quality and fixation (TAD (tip-apex distance), CDA (collodiaphyseal angle), and Reduction CRQC (change reduction quality criterion)), there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups; moreover, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in either group or the Harris hip score (67.65 ± 17.06 in Group A vs. 67.15 ± 17.05 in Group B).

CONCLUSION

The lateral decubitus and supine positions on a traction table are suitable for proximal femoral nailing with comparable outcomes, and surgeons can use either position according to their preferences and resources.

Principles of Minimally Invasive Reduction and Nail Fixation for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Subtrochanteric femur fractures have a reputation as difficult orthopaedic injuries to treat. Strong deforming forces, including the hip musculature and high physiologic forces, must be counteracted to obtain and maintain reduction. Adding to the complexity is a wide variety of fracture morphologies that must be recognized to execute an appropriate surgical plan. The challenging nature of this injury is demonstrated by nonunion rates of 4% to 5%, but some series have reports of up to 15% and malunion rates of 10% to 15%. Improved outcomes have been shown to be dependent on appropriate reduction and stable fixation, which can be achieved with less surgical insult. The treating surgeon must have a thorough understanding of the injury characteristics and reduction techniques to appropriately execute minimally invasive techniques for these difficult fractures.

The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients

Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. Materials and Methods: A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Conclusions: Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.

Comparison of patient positions without traction table for proximal femoral nailing: Supine, semilithotomy and lateral decubitus positions

BACKGROUND

Femur intertrochanteric fractures are performed commonly in a supine position with a traction table. There is a challenge in obtaining traction tables, especially in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is still a debate on which position should be preferred if the traction table cannot be obtained.

METHODS

A total of 123 patients who were treated for femur intertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA A1 or A2) using cephalomedullary nail (CN) were retrospectively analyzed. All three positions without traction table (supine:25 patients, semilithotomy:36 patients and lateral decubitus:62 patients) were compared according to preparation time, surgical time, Tip-Apex distance (TAD), zones of lag screw placement, collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), CDA difference (∆ CDA), postoperative posterior sag, medial cortical support and Baumgardner reduction quality criteria.

RESULTS

The preparation time was longer in the semilithotomy group, and surgery time was longer in the supine position group. There was no difference according to total time, surgical time, TAD, CDA difference (∆ CDA), postoperative posterior sag, medial cortical support and Baumgardner reduction quality criteria. Target lag screw placement is superior in supine and semilithotomy group than lateral decubitus.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that there was a difference in preparation time, surgery time and optimal lag screw placement in the lateral plane between groups. The surgeon may prefer all three methods according to patient benefit and surgeon familiarity.

Operative Traction Technique for an Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in a Patient with Transfemoral Amputation: A Case Report

CASE

A 53-year-old woman with a history of transfemoral amputation presented to the emergency department with an ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture. Standard fracture tables that use a boot to pull traction are not helpful in these cases, which makes achieving adequate traction for reduction difficult.

CONCLUSION

We describe a unique technique to manipulate an amputated extremity using 2 Schanz pins attached to a weight through a traction rope. This practical technique provided adequate skeletal traction for reduction and internal fixation in our case and can be performed on a standard radiolucent table without the need for special table attachments.