Interventionelle Therapie von AV-Klappenerkrankungen – Kriterien für die Zertifizierung von Mitralklappenzentren

[Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in Germany : Treatment reality, potential needs, possible quality indicators and open questions]

In 2020 in Germany, 21,753 patients were hospitalized with the main diagnosis of mitral valve regurgitation (MR), whereby 6050 isolated mitral valve (MV) operations, 4977 combined MV operations and 6011 transcatheter MV interventions were performed. In the last 10 years there was a nearly linear increase of MR-related hospitalizations and transcatheter MV interventions, whereas the numbers of isolated MV operations remained stable and the number of combined MV operations decreased. Due to demographic change and age distribution of MR patients, an increased need for minimally invasive transcatheter MV procedures can be expected in the future. In 2020 the 6011 transcatheter MV interventions were performed at approximately 180 centers in Germany. According to a retrospective analysis of diagnosis-related groups (DRG) hospital data up to 2017, two thirds of all 158 centers which provided transcatheter MV repair in Germany at that time carried out no more than 25 procedures per year. A significant correlation between hospital intervention volume and intrahospital mortality has not yet been found for transcatheter MV repair; however, registry data from Germany, Italy and the USA consistently confirm that centers with a high intervention volume achieve a better reduction of mitral regurgitation, which could directly translate into long-term survival. Thresholds of 20 or 50 procedures per year were suggested as predictive for a better procedural result in terms of MR reduction. Such analyses should be implemented in considerations regarding the appropriate number of transcatheter MV centers for Germany.

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease and, when left untreated, results in reduced quality of life, heart failure, and increased mortality. Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has matured considerably as a non-surgical treatment option since its commercial introduction in Europe in 2008. As a result of major device and interventional improvements, as well as the accumulation of experience by the interventional cardiologists, M-TEER has emerged as an important therapeutic strategy for patients with severe and symptomatic MR in the current European and American guidelines. Herein, we provide a comprehensive up-do-date overview of M-TEER. We define preprocedural patient evaluation and highlight key aspects for decision-making. We describe the currently available M-TEER systems and summarise the evidence for M-TEER in both primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). In addition, we provide recommendations for device selection, intraprocedural imaging and guiding, M-TEER optimisation and management of recurrent MR. Finally, we provide information on major unsolved questions and "grey areas" in M-TEER.

[Mitral valve: When conservative, when surgical, when interventional therapy?]

The management of severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation is in contrast to the aortic-valve-intervention more challenging due to the complex mitral-valve anatomy. In primary mitral regurgitation surgical therapy is recommended, whereas there are various therapeutic options in secondary mitral regurgitation. Besides the established mitral-valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge-Repair (M-TEER) and the interventional annuloplasty - devices dynamic developments have recently been made in the field of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement-therapy (TMVR). This article surveys the current recommendations and available therapeutic options in mitral regurgitation.

Current devices and interventions in mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular disease. With a rising incidence in older age, the prevalence of relevant comorbidities inevitably increases. Considering the constantly aging population with high surgical risk, transcatheter therapy of MR is gaining increasing importance. Interventional therapy of either primary or secondary MR represents an alternative to pure drug or surgical therapy. With mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, a well-established treatment has evolved in the past two decades. In addition, direct or indirect annuloplasty and ultimately transcatheter mitral valve implantation further expand the armamentarium. The current broad spectrum of interventional therapy options allows for patient-oriented therapy individually targeting different MR pathologies. This review discusses the current landscape of transcatheter therapies for relevant MR.

Centre procedural volume and adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous transvenous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair using MitraClip® in Germany

AIMS

The number of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) procedures has increased substantially during the last years. A better understanding of the relationship between hospital volume of transcatheter transvenous mitral valve repairs using MitraClip® and patient outcomes may provide information for future policy decisions to improve patient management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for all TMVr procedures using MitraClip® performed in Germany from 2011 to 2017. Hospitals were stratified according to centre volumes and patients were compared for baseline characteristics and adverse in-hospital events. Overall, 24 709 inpatients were treated during the observational period. Patients treated in centres with a volume of ≤10 procedures annually developed more often pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.13; P = 0.012) compared to those treated in centres with a volume of >10 procedures annually, whereas no association of centre volume (≤10 or >10) was found with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.728). Although patients treated in centres with an annual volume >25 TMVr procedures had higher numbers of comorbidities compared to those treated in centres with an annual volume of ≤25 TMVr procedures, in-hospital mortality did not differ (3.6% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.485). Similarly, when centre volumes were stratified for ≤50 vs. >50 procedural volumes, no association with in-hospital mortality was recorded (P = 0.792). A lower rate of mitral valve surgery after MitraClip® was observed over time, particularly in high-volume centres.

CONCLUSION

Annual numbers of MitraClip® implantations increased from 2011 to 2017 in Germany, whereas in-hospital mortality remained stable. Although patients treated in high-volume centres had a more unfavourable risk profile, in-hospital mortality was comparable to that of low-volume centres.