Reduced-intensity unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Superior Survival After Unrelated Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Low-Dose ATG Compared to Low-Dose TBI in Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan-Based Regimen for MDS on Behalf of the Adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT

The fludarabine/intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/kg (FB4) regimen is an effective conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); however, limited data is available on the prognostic impact of FB4 with low-dose anti-thymoglobulin (ATG ≤ 5 mg/kg) or low-dose total body irradiation (TBI ≤ 4 Gy). Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes in 280 adults with de novo MDS who underwent their first transplantation from an unrelated donor between 2009 and 2018. Median age was 61 years (range, 16 to 70 years). In the FB4 alone (FB4), FB4 plus ATG (FB4-ATG), and FB4 plus TBI (FB4-TBI) groups, 3-years overall survival (OS) rates were 39.9%, 64.8%, and 43.7%; 3-years nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 32.1%, 22.1%, and 27.1%; and 3-years relapse incidences were 34.7%, 21.2%, and 28.9%, respectively. The multivariate analyses showed that FB4-ATG group significantly correlated with better OS (hazard Ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.95; P = .032) than FB4 group. FB4-ATG group tended to correlate with lower NRM (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.06; P = .063) than FB4 group. In comparison with FB4-TBI group, FB4-ATG group showed better OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99, P = .049) and NRM (HR 0.034, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.92, P = .034). No significant differences were observed in OS and NRM between the FB4-TBI and FB4 groups. The present study demonstrated that the FB4 plus low-dose ATG regimen improved OS and NRM, but FB4 plus low-dose TBI regimen had no clear benefit over FB4 alone, in MDS patients who used unrelated donors.

Impact of Different Fludarabine Doses in the Fludarabine-Based Conditioning Regimen for Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation

The purine analog fludarabine (Flu) plays a central role in reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens because of limited nonhematologic toxicities. Few reports assess the impact of different dose of Flu on the clinical outcomes and the Flu doses vary across reports. To compare the effect of Flu dose, the clinical outcomes of patients who received Flu and busulfan (FB; n = 1647) or melphalan (Flu with melphalan (FM); n = 1162) conditioning for unrelated bone marrow transplantation were retrospectively analyzed using Japanese nationwide registry data. In the FB group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFB) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFB) were given to 1334 and 313 patients, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in the HFB group than in the LFB group (49.5% versus 39.2%, P < .001). In the HFB and LFB groups, the cumulative incidences were 30.4% and 36.6% (P = .058) for 3-year relapse and 25.1% and 28.1% (P = .24) for 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for OS and relapse, Flu dose was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 0.83, P = .03; hazard ratio: 0.80, P = .043). In the FM group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFM) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFM) were given to 118 and 1044 patients, respectively. The OS, relapse, and NRM after 3 years did not differ significantly between the HFM and LFM groups (48.3% versus 48.8%, P = .92; 23.7% versus 27.2%, P = .55; 31.9% versus 30.8%, P = .67). These findings suggest that high-dose Flu was associated with favorable outcomes in the FB group but not in the FM group.

Reduced-intensity vs myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients aged over 45 years with ALL in remission: a study from the Adult ALL Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT)

In this study, outcomes for 575 adult ALL patients aged ≥45 years who underwent first allo-SCT in CR were analyzed according to the type of conditioning regimen (myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for 369 patients vs reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for 206 patients). Patients in the RIC group were older (median age, 58 vs 51 years, P<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year OS, disease-free survival (DFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM): 51% vs 53%, 47% vs 39% and 38% vs 36%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that CR2 and HLA mismatching were associated with poor OS (P=0.002 and P=0.019, respectively). HLA mismatching was associated with lower rate of relapse (P=0.016), but was associated with higher rate of NRM (P=0.001). RIC was associated with good OS and DFS in patients who received HLA-mismatch transplantation and were aged ≥55 years compared with MAC by multivariate analysis for each event with interaction (hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval 0.35 and 0.15-0.81, P=0.014 for OS and 0.36 and 0.16-0.81, P=0.013 for DFS). Therefore, patients ≥55 years of age with HLA-mismatch transplantation should be candidates for RIC rather than MAC.

Quantitation of hematogones at the time of engraftment is a useful prognostic indicator in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Quantitation of hematogones at engraftment is useful to predict prognosis of patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Reduced intensity conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission is effective in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and an intermediate-risk karyotype

To evaluate the efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 93 consecutive patients transplanted at our institution either following RIC (n = 37) or standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (n = 56) between 1999 and 2007. Projected overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients at 1, 2, and 5 years was 78 or 70%, 65 or 57%, and 61 or 53% in the RIC group versus 73 or 70%, 68 or 62%, and 56 or 54% in the standard MAC group. In the subgroup of patients with an intermediate-risk karyotype projected OS at 1, 2, and 5 years was 86, 68, and 68% following RIC (n = 21) or 75, 69, and 66% following standard MAC (n = 36). Relapse or treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 15 or 17% (RIC group) and 26 or 14% (standard MAC group). Taken together, these data suggest that RIC-alloSCT may induce stable remissions in patients with AML transplanted in CR1. In particular, patients with an intermediate-risk karyotype ineligible to transplantation following standard MAC may benefit from RIC-alloSCT in CR1 at a low TRM.