Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin for high-risk infections in patients with hematological malignancies

Evaluation of once-daily dosing and target concentrations in therapeutic drug monitoring for arbekacin: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Arbekacin is the first aminoglycoside antibacterial agent approved for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Japan. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended during arbekacin treatment, little evidence for the target exposure and once-daily dosing has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the target peak/trough concentrations and the effectiveness of once-daily dosing of arbekacin against nephrotoxicity or treatment failure via meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web.

RESULTS

Nine observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 μg/mL did not exhibit a statistically significant lower risk of treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30-1.24). A trough arbekacin concentration of <2 μg/mL resulted in a significantly lower risk of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.15-0.61). Once-daily dosing significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.97) but not nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.16-1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily dosing can improve the therapeutic efficacy of arbekacin, and a trough arbekacin concentration of <2 μg/mL can reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 μg/mL did not exhibit the significant lower risk of treatment failure. Additional clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Increased Arbekacin Clearance in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Arbekacin (ABK) is used to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and is used widely for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). As ABK has a narrow therapeutic concentration window, the dosage must be adjusted via therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the influence of the physiology of patients with FN on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of ABK remains unclear. Therefore, we examined this influence on ABK PK parameters.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from patients with a hematologic malignancy who were ≥18 years and had been administered ABK. We excluded patients who did not receive therapeutic drug monitoring and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL/min, because clinically sufficient data would not be available.

RESULT

Of the 99 enrolled patients, 25 did not have FN and 74 had FN. Arbekacin clearance (CLabk) was shown to correlate with eGFR in patients with FN (r = 0.32, P = 0.0062) and without FN (r = 0.50, P = 0.01). CLabk was higher in patients with FN than in those without FN. In addition, in the eGFR of <100 mL/min group (normal renal function), CLabk and CLabk/eGFR were also higher in patients with FN than in those without FN.

CONCLUSIONS

CLabk was increased in patients with FN and normal renal function; therefore, we propose an increased ABK dose for patients with FN and normal renal function.

Clinical Usefulness of Arbekacin

Arbekacin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Arbekacin has antibacterial activities against high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococci, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii et al. Here, we reviewed in vitro data on arbekacin in Staphylococci and Gram-negative microorganisms. We also reviewed clinical studies for clinical efficacy and microbiologic efficacy data in patients with identified MRSA and suspected MRSA infections. The overall clinical efficacy ranged from 66.7% to 89.7%. The microbiologic efficacy rate ranged from 46.2% to 83%. In comparative studies between arbekacin and glycopeptides, arbekacin was similar to other glycopeptides with respect to clinical and microbiological efficacy rates. Combination trials with other antibiotics suggest that arbekacin will be a promising strategy to control Enterococcus spp. multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa. The major adverse reaction was nephrotoxicity/hepatotoxicity, but patients recovered from most adverse reactions without any severe complications. Based on these results, arbekacin could be a good alternative to vancomycin/teicoplanin in MRSA treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to maximize clinical efficacy and decrease nephrotoxicity.