Favorable survival in lung transplant recipients on preoperative low-dose, as compared to high-dose corticosteroids, after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Management of pharmacotherapy in lung transplant candidates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation is a common treatment for end-stage lung disease (ESLD). Patients present to lung transplantation evaluation on various medications that could impact their candidacy and posttransplant course. In this review, we will discuss pretransplant optimization of pharmacotherapy to minimize complications while waiting for transplant and increase posttransplant success. We will also discuss important considerations for posttransplant immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and complex drug interactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prior to lung transplantation, several medications should be optimized to promote posttransplant success including minimization of corticosteroids, opioids, and benzodiazepines. Lung transplantation candidates should be up to date on vaccinations. Most medications for ESLD are well tolerated to continue up until the point of transplant including antifibrotics, CFTR modulators, and pulmonary vasodilators. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and other immunosuppressants may need to be stopped or minimized before lung transplantation to minimize posttransplant infection and would healing complications. Medications that increase risk of posttransplant bleeding, thrombosis, or aspiration should be stopped prior to listing.

SUMMARY

In this article, we discuss management of pharmacotherapy for lung transplantation candidates to minimize posttransplant complications. Changes in medications for ESLD should be done cautiously to prevent worsening of native disease while waiting for lung transplantation.

Impact of perioperative airway pathogens on living-donor lobar lung transplantation outcomes

PURPOSE

To elucidate the clinical impact of pathogenic organism (PO) positivity early after transplantation, we evaluated the impact of perioperative airway POs on outcomes after living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), where the graft airway is supposed to be sterile from a healthy donor.

METHOD

A retrospective review of 67 adult LDLLT procedures involving 132 living donors was performed. Presence of POs in the recipients' airways was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively in intensive-care units.

RESULTS

POs were detected preoperatively in 13 (19.4%) recipients. No POs were isolated from the donor airways at transplantation. POs were detected in 39 (58.2%) recipients postoperatively; most were different from the POs isolated preoperatively. Postoperative PO isolation was not associated with short-term outcomes other than prolonged postoperative ventilation. The 5-year overall survival was significantly better in the PO-negative group than in the PO-positive group (89.1% vs. 63.7%, P = 0.014). In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.041 per 1-year increase, P = 0.033) and posttransplant PO positivity in the airway (HR: 3.684, P = 0.019) significantly affected the survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The airways of the living-donor grafts were microbiologically sterile. PO positivity in the airway early after transplantation negatively impacted long-term outcomes.

A Case Report of Lung Transplantation After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Literature Review

Pulmonary complications may occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Lung transplantation is the only treatment option for end-stage lung failure. We presented a case of acute myeloid leukemia who received a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and underwent bilateral lung transplantation with end-stage usual interstitial pneumonia and chronic obstructive lung disease. This case showed that lung transplantation could be successfully applied in properly selected hematologic malignancy patients with long disease-free survival, like lung transplantations performed for other indications.

Outpatient Pharmacologic Management of Lung Transplant Candidates on the Waiting List

The medical care of patients awaiting lung transplantation is complex and requires the treatment of active medical conditions, including lung disease, while at the same time maintaining candidacy for transplantation. Some medications that would otherwise be considered routine may create undesirable challenges or complications in the perioperative setting. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of the risks and benefits of these medications must take into account both their potential utility in managing a patient's current disease state, as well as the risks of compromising postlung transplant outcomes. In this review, we summarize the available data regarding several medications that are commonly used to treat patients with a variety of lung diseases, but that may impact a patient's course on the waiting list or in the posttransplant period.

Review: immunosuppression for the lung transplant patient

Lung transplantation (LTx) has evolved significantly since its inception and the improvement in LTx outcomes over the last three decades has predominantly been driven by advances in immunosuppression management. Despite the lack of new classes of immunosuppression medications, immunosuppressive strategies have evolved significantly from a universal method to a more targeted approach, reflecting a greater understanding of the need for individualized therapy and careful consideration of all factors that are influenced by immunosuppression choice. This has become increasingly important as the demographics of lung transplant recipients have changed over time, with older and more medically complex candidates being accepted and undergoing LTx. Furthermore, improved survival post lung transplant has translated into more immunosuppression related comorbidities long-term, predominantly chronic kidney disease (CKD) and malignancy, which has required further nuanced management approaches. This review provides an update on current traditional lung transplant immunosuppression strategies, with modifications based on pre-existing recipient factors and comorbidities, peri-operative challenges and long term complications, balanced against the perpetual challenge of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). As we continue to explore and understand the complexity of LTx immunology and the interplay of different factors, immunosuppression strategies will require ongoing critical evaluation and personalization in order to continue to improve lung transplant outcomes.

Meticulous closure of collateral vessels in the perihilar mediastinal pleura to control intraoperative bleeding during lung transplantation for pulmonary hypertension

Background

Massive blood transfusion compensating hemorrhage during lung transplantation (LT) results in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and worse outcomes after LT. Collateral vessels in the perihilar mediastinal pleura could be the source of hemorrhage during LT in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of closure with hemoclips of the vessels in the perihilar mediastinal pleura on the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage and outcomes after LT in patients with PH.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients who underwent LT, including 13 patients with primary PH, 29 patients with secondary PH, and 38 patients with non-PH.

Results

The median number of hemoclips was significantly higher in the primary PH group than in the non-PH group (P=0.0045) or secondary PH group (P=0.0060). The intraoperative blood loss, transfusion volume, maximum PGD grade, and the 30-day and 90-day mortality rates in the primary PH group were equivalent to those in the other two groups.

Conclusions

Meticulous closure of collateral vessels in the perihilar mediastinal pleura during LT in patients with primary PH allowed intraoperative hemorrhage to be controlled and might be associated with acceptable mortality rate in these patients similar to that of LT in patients with other diseases.

Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.

Effect of preoperative long-term use of corticosteroids on the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after lung transplantation: a single-center experience in Japan

PURPOSE

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a major complication of lung transplantation (LTx). However, few studies on PTLD in Asian populations have been reported. We explored the characteristics of Japanese PTLD cases after LTx.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 195 cases of LTx at our institute. We summarized the clinical experiences of 7 PTLD cases and analyzed the patient characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with (n = 7) and without (n = 188) PTLD.

RESULTS

All PTLD patients were taking corticosteroids preoperatively (p = 0.0030), and the duration of preoperative corticosteroid therapy was significantly longer in the PTLD group (p = 0.0064) than in the non-PTLD group. The overall survival after LTx was significantly worse in the PTLD group (p = 0.027) than in the non-PLTD group. Among the three patients who died within 1 year after the PTLD onset, two died of opportunistic infections without residual PTLD lesions. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) or bronchiolitis obliterans at an autopsy were diagnosed after PTLD treatment in four cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term preoperative corticosteroid therapy may be a risk factor for PTLD after LTx. Opportunistic infections are lethal complications of PTLD, regardless of the effectiveness of PTLD treatment. CLAD occurs at a high rate after PTLD treatment, and close monitoring is required.

Characterization of localized macrophages in bronchiolitis obliterans after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) remains one of the most devastating manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Recent findings of BOS after lung transplantation indicate that donor (lung)-derived lung-resident macrophages contribute to BOS, suggesting that differences in the origin of immune cells and localized antigen-presenting cells cause the onset of BOS.

METHODS

We identified the phenotype and origin of infiltrating macrophages using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in eight sex-mismatched HCT recipients who underwent lung transplantation for BOS after HCT.

RESULTS

Most of the infiltrating macrophages appeared to be derived from donor (hematopoietic) cells in patients who developed BOS following HCT. Macrophages observed in the early-stage region of BOS were positive for cluster of differentiation (CD)68 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and negative for CD163 and CD206, suggesting an M1 phenotype. In the late-stage region, macrophages were negative for CD68 and iNOS in all patients, but also positive for CD163 and CD206 in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived M1-macrophages may be involved in the pathogenesis of the early-stage region of BOS. In addition, some macrophages in the late-stage region showed M2 polarization that might be involved in fibrosis.

The prognostic nutritional index is correlated negatively with the lung allocation score and predicts survival after both cadaveric and living-donor lobar lung transplantation

PURPOSE

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated based on the serum albumin levels and the total lymphocyte count, has been identified as a predictor of clinical outcomes in various fields of surgery. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the PNI and the lung allocation score (LAS) as well as the impact of the PNI on the outcomes of both cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT) and living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT).

METHODS

We reviewed retrospective data for 127 recipients of lung transplantation (LT), including 71 recipients of CLT and 56 recipients of LDLLT.

RESULTS

The PNI was correlated significantly and negatively with the LAS (r = - 0.40, P = 0.0000037). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (P = 0.00093), BMI (P = 0.00087), and PNI (P = 0.0046) were independent prognostic factors of a worse outcome after LT. In a subgroup analysis, survival after both CLT (P = 0.015) and LDLLT (P = 0.041) was significantly worse in the low PNI group than in the high PNI group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative nutritional evaluations using the PNI can assist with the assessment of disease severity in LT recipients and may predict survival after both CLT and LDLLT.

Favorable Outcome of Lung Transplantation for Severe Pulmonary Graft Versus Host Disease: An Australian Multicenter Case Series

BACKGROUND

Severe pulmonary chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Few treatments influence outcome, with 5-year overall survival as low as 13%. Lung transplantation (LTx) has been reported in small numbers of patients worldwide.

METHODS

We investigated the outcomes of LTx performed for this indication at 2 large Australian LTx centers.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (aged 10-64 y; median, 29.6 y) received bilateral deceased lung transplants for pulmonary chronic GVHD between 2002 and 2017. LTx was performed at a median of 8.6 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (range, 2-23 y) with a median interval of 16 months from the time of transplant unit review to LTx. There were 2 early infective deaths and 3 further deaths from pulmonary infection and lung allograft rejection. There were no primary disease relapses. At a median follow-up of 5 years, the 5-year overall survival post-LTx is 80% and comparable to the Australia and New Zealand registry data of 64% for LTx performed for all indications.

CONCLUSIONS

From one of the largest series of deceased LTx for this indication, we conclude that it is a feasible option for selected patients with severe pulmonary GVHD. The outcomes appear superior to that of non-LTx-based therapies and similar to the survival of the general LTx population. Establishing guidance on referral triggers, patient eligibility, organ selection, prophylaxis of allograft rejection, and supportive care would assist hematopoietic and lung transplant units in optimizing resource allocation and patient outcomes.

Short-term efficacy and safety of prednisone in herpes zoster and the effects on IL-6 and IL-10

Short-term efficacy and safety of prednisone in herpes zoster and the effect on IL-6 and IL-10 were investigated. A total of 125 patients (aged 40–70 years) with acute infective herpes zoster who were admitted to Daqing Oilfield General Hospital were selected and divided into 3 groups according to different treatment methods: low-dose (n=44), middle-dose (n=42) and high-dose (n=39) groups. The therapeutic effect, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, pain relieving and disappearing time, herpes stopping and disappearing time, incrustation and decrustation time, and incidence of adverse reactions in the three groups were recorded. The changes of IL-6 and IL-10 levels in the peripheral blood of patients before and after treatment were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in order to analyze their relationship with pain degree and the time of symptom remission and subsidence. There were no significant differences in cure rate, significant effective rate, effective rate, ineffective rate and total effective rate among the three groups (P>0.05). The pain relieving and disappearing time in the middle-dose group were shorter than those in the low- and high-dose groups (P<0.05). The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 showed no statistical differences in the 3 groups before treatment (P>0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that IL-6 was positively correlated with VAS pain score, pain relieving and disappearing time, herpes stopping and disappearing time, incrustation and decrustation time (P<0.05), while IL-10 was negatively correlated with the above indicators (P<0.05). In conclusion, middle-dose prednisone has similar short-term efficacy to high-dose prednisone in the treatment of herpes zoster, but with lower complication and higher safety. IL-6 and IL-10 are closely related to the pain degree and the time of symptom remission and subsidence, which may provide a reference for clinical evaluation of the therapeutic effect of patients with herpes zoster.