Measurement of coagulation factor antibody levels is useful for diagnosis and determining therapeutic efficacy in hemorrhagic patients with autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII and factor V: results from a single center in Japan

Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Acquired Coagulation Factor Deficiencies: An Evidence-Based Review of Japanese Practice

Among the acquired coagulation factor deficiencies, autoimmune coagulation factor deficiencies (AiCFD) are rare and result from autoantibody production against coagulation factors. In Japan, a nationwide survey on AiCFD has been conducted since 2009. Autoimmune factor XIII, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, factor V, and factor X deficiencies (AiF13D, AiF8D, AiVWFD, AiF5D, and AiF10D, respectively) have been enacted as "designated intractable disease-282." The incidence of AiF8D, AiF13D, and AiF5D was 1.83, 0.044, and 0.038 per million people/year, respectively, whereas that of AiVWFD and AiF10D was not calculable owing to the small number of patients. AiF13D and AiF8D were often idiopathic, whereas AiVWFD was often associated with plasma cell neoplasms. Epistaxis was a characteristic symptom of AiVWFD, intramuscular bleeding was frequent in AiF13D and AiF8D, and subcutaneous bleeding (purpura) was frequent in AiF13D and AiF10D, although none were specific to any one disease. Differential diagnosis cannot be made based on bleeding symptoms alone; therefore, rapid and accurate testing is mandatory. Definitive diagnosis of AiCFD necessitates identifying the presence of coagulation factor "inhibitors" and/or "autoantibodies." Therefore, these tests should be performed upon unexplained severe acquired coagulation factor deficiencies. The mainstay of treatment for AiCFD was hemostatic therapy and autoantibody eradication therapy, which included the replacement of coagulation factors or "bypass" agents and administration of immunosuppressants. The rate of hemorrhagic death was high in AiF13D (13%), followed by AiF5D (7%) and Ai10D (5%); therefore, early diagnosis and optimal treatment are essential for AiCFDs. Given the unknown long-term prognosis, "intractable disease platform registries" have begun to accumulate in Japan.

Comprehensive comparison of global coagulation assays to differentiate lupus anticoagulant from acquired hemophilia A in patients with prolonged APTT

There is no established method for differentiating acquired hemophilia A (AHA) from lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity because both present with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. We compared various parameters of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), thrombin generation assay (TGA), and clot waveform analysis (CWA) in patients with AHA (n = 10) and LA (n = 44). Compared with AHA, possible (n = 12) and definite (n = 32) LA showed significantly shorter clotting time (CT) in NATEM mode of ROTEM (> 3600 vs. 501/533). In TGA, peak height was significantly lower in AHA (16 vs. 242/174 nM). In CWA, CT was significantly longer (81 vs. 36/41 s) and Ad|min1| was lower (2.1 vs. 8.7/6.7) in AHA. Notably, CT by NATEM and peak height in TGA completely discriminated between AHA and LA, whereas Ad|min1| did not discriminate between them in 4 cases of AHA and 1 of LA. Comparison of 3 patients with both AHA and LA against a patient with only LA and markedly low FVIII activity (3.5%) showed that both CT by NATEM and peak height of TGA precisely classified the former 3 cases as AHA and the latter 1 case as LA, whereas Ad|min1| classified all 4 cases as AHA. ROTEM and TGA can comparably distinguish between AHA and LA.